1 . When the parcel arrives, the remote-controlled car inside is broken. That could easily result in an unhappy child — but not this time.
The package has come from a British start-up that hopes to equip the nation’s youngsters with an endangered skill: the ability to fix gadgets when they fail. The aim is to encourage 10 to 14-year-olds to try fixing electronic devices and learn how they work, by sending them faulty toys that they have to take apart and repair themselves. The company, Team Repair, has been founded by five engineering graduates from Imperial College London. Having begun as a university project, its ultimate goal is to steer children into careers in science and to nurture (培养) a new generation of engineers and inventors.
“Every month, we’ll send children an electronic gadget with a carefully planned fault,” said Patrick McGuckian, 22, the chief operating officer. “The idea is that they learn key repair skills, and that they also learn the science and technology behind how the components inside it work.”
It is estimated that two million tonnes of electrical and electronic items are thrown away in the UK each year. “Meanwhile, the UK has a Stem [science, technology, engineering and maths] skills shortage costing£1.5 billion a year,” McGuckian said. “We wanted to help solve those two problems.”
The service — currently in a testing phase — will cost £28 a month, with each kit designed to keep a child occupied for several hours. Once a gadget has been mended, you post it back so it can be broken again for somebody else to fix. There is also an app to provide instructions on how to perform the repair, and also mini science lessons. “As a society we’ve been tuned to replace rather than repair,” McGuckian said. “We want to encourage a different mindset in the next generation — and on top of that, we want them to be creative, to be engineers, to be inventors that solve the biggest problems.”
1. Why does the author mention the remote-controlled car in the first paragraph?A.To introduce the topic. | B.To present a fact. |
C.To make a comparison. | D.To explain a point. |
A.To provide children with faulty toys. | B.To reduce the use of electronic items. |
C.To help children learn Stem skills for free. | D.To equip children with the ability to repair. |
A.The gadget after being repaired. | B.Face-to-face guidance to mend. |
C.Some mini science lessons online. | D.A faulty electronic gadget weekly. |
A.Broken Toys Have a Good Place to Go | B.Team Repair for Young People was Set Up |
C.The Ability to Fix Gadgets is to be Improved | D.Broken Toys Offer Neat Fix for Skills Shortage |
With the
In the 1950s, in order to control the flooding and to get electricity from the flow of the Nile River, the Egyptian government made a proposal
Later, an international committee
The project was considered a greatly successful example by UNESCO to prevent world heritage from
3 . That old saying “An apple a day keeps the doctor away” may hold some truth. In fact, one study found that in 2012, almost half of the deaths in America caused by heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes were linked to poor diet.
But knowing you should eat healthfully and actually doing it are two different things, and making the right choice isn’t any easier when a pound of grapes costs more than twice as much as a pound of spaghetti. The Fresh Food Pharmacy aims to change that. A program was created by Geisinger Health System, a hospital network in Pennsylvania. This pharmacy is similar to a grocery store stocked with fresh produce, lean meats and more. Even better, it’s all free.
Under the program, patients with type 2 diabetes are prescribed a week’s worth of food for their entire household. After the first year, all 180 participants improved in key health measurements, in particular their hemoglobin Ale levels( HbAlc), the gold standard for tracking blood sugar control.
In 2012, the costs associated with diabetes in the United States were $ 245 billion. Geisinger will spend only about $ 1,000 annually on each patient. David Feinberg, Geisinger’s CEO, calculates that “a decrease HbAlc of one point saves us about $ 8,000.’’ With many patients dropping three points, the program could save $24, 000 a year-as well as reduce the risk of blindness and other complications.
Geisinger isn’t the only organization experimenting with produce prescriptions. Nonprofits, hospitals, and even doctors’ offices around the country have programs that bring “food is medicine” concept to life. Boston Medical Center’s Preventive Food Pantry was the first such program in the country when it opened. Today it serves approximately 7,000 patients in a month.
1. The author uses the old saying at the beginning of the passage to ______________.A.show his love for apples | B.describe the background |
C.stress the importance of apples | D.introduce a topic |
A.people’s blood sugar | B.the hospital network |
C.high price of healthy food | D.people’s awareness of dieting |
A.All participants in Geisinger Health System’s program improved in all health measurements |
B.Geisinger’s program can decline the possibility of blindness and other related diseases. |
C.now about 7,000 patients have benefited from Geisinger Health System’s program |
D.to carry out its program, Geisinger Health System learned from Boston Medical Center’s Preventive Food Pantry. |
The China International Search and Rescue Team (CISAR) was formed in 2001 and is now made up
After long and
Since then, the CISAR has completed many missions. The list of people to whom help has been given is long. The team treated more than 3,000 people
Rescue workers are trained to be strong in both body and mind. It takes a lot of love and courage
5 . The signs appeared practically overnight. They’d been planted everywhere—in front of homes, along sidewalks, around the local high school. Each featured just a few uplifting words in simple black type: “Don’t Give Up,” “You Are Worthy of Love,” “Your Mistakes Do Not Define You.” The high school in Newberg, Oregon, had lost four students and three former graduates to kill themselves that year, so the town of 25, 000 instantly understood the messages.
Amy Wolff had done so, in part, because she’d lost her own teenage brother in an accident about 20 years earlier. It was compassion (同情) for compassion’s sake.
Yet as Wolff saw the deep emotion her sign inspired in her neighbors, she decided to step forward to share her message publicly. Instantly, her inbox was flooded with requests for more signs. Since then, the Don’t Give Up Movement has spread from Newberg to the hearts and yards of people in every state. Wolff charges only the cost of materials and shipping. “It’s a terrible business decision if we wanted to function like a business,” she says.
Chrisanne Moger commented on one of the movement’s posts about the need for one particular sign, “We’re All in This Together.” She thought it would really speak to a world huddling together under the cloud of COVID-19. Wolff agreed, and she received 750 orders within a week of its creation. A mother in Colorado, unable to travel during the quarantine (隔离), contacted the organization after her stepson’s sudden death. “I saw one of your signs recently and it was a touching message from above to hang on.” she wrote.
Aware of the added emotional challenges isolation brings, the Don’t Give Up Movement has since offered to send handwritten letters of support to anyone in quarantine who needs it.
1. Why did the signs suddenly appear everywhere in Newberg?A.They featured some inspiring words. |
B.The high school had lost several students. |
C.They conveyed simple messages. |
D.The outbreak of COVID-19 scared people. |
A.It is a non-profit organization. |
B.It met all requests of neighbors. |
C.It gradually won the hearts of people. |
D.It was started in honor of Amy’s brother. |
A.They bring emotional challenges. |
B.They offer great encouragement. |
C.They provide information for COVID-19. |
D.They improve interpersonal relationships. |
A.She’s active and open-minded. | B.She’s talkative and sociable. |
C.She’s decisive and ambitious. | D.She’s selfless and devoted. |
6 . When a corporation is formed, it issues stock (股票), which is sold or given to individuals. Ownership of stock entitles you to vote in the election of a corporation’s directors, so in theory holders of stock control the company. In practice, however, in most large corporations, ownership is separated from control of the firm. Most stockholders have little input into the decisions a corporation makes. Instead, corporations are often controlled by their managers, who often run them for their own benefit as well as for the owners. The reason is that the owners’ control of management is limited.
A large percent of most corporations’ stock is not even controlled by the owners; instead, is controlled by financial institutions such as mutual funds (financial institutions that invest individuals’ money for them) and by pension funds (financial institutions that hold people’s money for them until it is to be paid out to them upon their retirement). Thus, ownership of I Corporations is another step removed from individuals. Studies have shown that 80 percent of the largest 200 corporations in the US are essentially controlled by managers and have little effective stockholder control.
Why is the question of who controls a firm important? Because economic theory assumes the goal of business owners is to maximize profits , which would be true of corporations if stockholders made the decisions. Managers don’t have the same motivation to maximize profits that owners do. There’s pressure on managers to maximize profits, but that pressure can often be weak or ineffective. An example of how firms deal with this problem involves stock options. Many companies give their managers stock options-rights to buy stock at a low price - to encourage them to worry about the price of their company’s stock. But these stock options dilute (稀释)the value of company ownership and decrease profits per share and can give managers an incentive (激励, 刺激)to overstate profits through accounting tricks, as happened at Enron, Xerox, and a number of other firms.
1. Why can’t the stockholders control the company?A.Because they are separated from the managers. |
B.Because they have a little input in making decisions. |
C.Because they are limited in the control of management. |
D.Because they are restricted to the ownership of the company. |
A.Ownership is controlled by managers. |
B.Ownership is separated from control of the company. |
C.Ownership is removed from the stockholders. |
D.Ownership is controlled by financial institutions. |
A.Stock option. | B.The right to own stock. |
C.Controlling power. | D.Effective stockholder control. |
A.Who Controls Corporation? | B.When should the Stock be Issued? |
C.Importance of Financial Institutions | D.Stockholders and Managers |