组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 新型冠状病毒
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 25 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇新闻报道。短文报道了荷兰科学家训练蜜蜂通过嗅觉识别新冠肺炎的研究。

1 . Scientists in the Netherlands have trained bees to identify COVID-19 through their sense of smell, according to a press release from Wageningen University. The research was conducted on more than 150 bees in Wageningen University’s research lab.

The scientists trained the bees by giving them a treat — a sugar-water solution — every time they were exposed (暴露于) to the smell of samples (样本) infected with COVID-19. Each time the bees were exposed to a non-infected sample, they wouldn’t get a reward. Eventually, the bees could identify an infected sample within a few seconds — and would then stick out their tongues like clockwork to collect the sugar water.

Bees aren’t the first animals to detect COVID-19 by smell. Researchers have also trained dogs to tell the difference between positive and negative COVID-19 samples from human saliva (唾液) or sweat with fairly high levels of accuracy. A German study found that dogs could identify positive COVID-19 samples 94% of the time. That’s because the coronavirus (冠状病毒) makes an infected person’s body smell slightly different from those of a non-infected person. But researchers still aren’t sure whether animals are the best bet for smelling out COVID-19 cases outside the lab.

“No one is saying they can replace a PCR machine, but they could be very promising,” Holger Volk, a neurologist, told Nature. PCR machines are what lab technicians use to process standard COVID-19 tests. At the very least, certain animals could be useful for identifying COVID-19 in places or countries in which high-tech lab equipment is not enough or inaccessible.

Wageningen scientists are working on a machine that can train bees at once. Then bees can use their skills to test for coronavirus aerosols (气溶胶) in the surrounding environment.

1. How did the researchers teach the bees to identify COVID-19?
A.By offering bees some rewards.B.By infecting bees with the virus.
C.By raising bees with sugar water.D.By exposing bees to infected humans.
2. Why are dogs able to find out positive COVID-19 samples?
A.They can watch for the hidden virus.
B.They have a sharp sense of smell.
C.They can feel samples’ inner changes.
D.They react more quickly than bees.
3. What is the follow-up task of Wageningen scientists?
A.To keep track of more bees.B.To detect coronavirus aerosols.
C.To help underdeveloped countries.D.To develop a new type of machine.
4. What is a suitable title for the text?
A.Dogs: Well-trained PCR machines
B.Bees: Promising COVID-19 detectors
C.Holger Volk: A fighter against COVID-19
D.Wageningen University: A leader in keeping bees
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校

2 . Photos of a gentleman reading calmly in bed in the newly-built makeshift hospital in Wuhan, epicenter (中心) of the coronavirus outbreak, went viral on China’s social media platforms, with many calling him the “Invincible Wuhan Man”.

The man, dubbed “The Reader in Fang Cang” (mobile cabin hospital) has even garnered (获得) attention from the author of the book featured in the photo, The Origins of Political Order by Francis Fukuyama, on Twitter. Surnamed Fu, the 39-year old “invincible” reader is currently a teaching postdoc at Florida State University after obtaining his doctorate degree in Wuhan University. His hometown is in Xiaogan, a city neighbouring Wuhan, but his parents currently live in Wuhan. Fu was infected with novel coronavirus when he visited his parents, and he was among the first group of patients transferred to the cabin hospital at Wuhan International Conference and Exhibition Center on Feb. 5, according to Hubei Daily. He bought the book in Wuhan, and he likes reading, Fu told Hubei Daily. He was just reading the book out of interest and never anticipated that the photo would go viral.

As Fu gains more popularity, Fukuyama’s book has also become a hit. The Origins of Political Order quickly topped the recommended book list on China’s review site Douban on Feb 7. Netizens were charmed by Fu’s positive and calm attitude. “This picture of him reading in bed gives me strength and hope, I wonder if he is still available,” said one Weibo user.

“When you feel depressed, reading is one of the solutions to heal your inner pains. Sometimes doing exercises helps too,” said another netizen.

Authorities in Hubei province, especially its capital Wuhan, are resolute in the measures taken to make sure all people needing medical assistance are admitted to medical facilities for the novel coronavirus pneumonia.

1. What made Fu go viral?
A.Living in the newly-built makeshift hospital in Wuhan.
B.Posting a picture on China’s social media platforms.
C.Publishing a book called The Origins of Political Order.
D.Reading calmly in the hospital during an outbreak.
2. Why did Fu went to Wuhan?
A.To return to his hometown.B.To visit his parents.
C.To buy the book.D.To help people in Wuhan.
3. Which of the following best describes the man, dubbed “The Reader in Fang Cang”?
A.Humorous.B.Ambitious.
C.Caring.D.Positive and calm.
4. We can infer that the main purpose of passage is to ______.
A.introduce the book The Origins of Political Order
B.encourage readers to keep positive and calm during the coronavirus outbreak
C.tell readers how to be an “Invincible Wuhan Man”
D.analyse why the coronavirus broke out in Wuhan
2023-09-08更新 | 29次组卷 | 1卷引用:山西省朔州市怀仁市怀仁一中、大地学校2023-2024学年高二上学期开学英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。新冠发生以来,生活的方方面面都受到防疫措施的影响,造成很多心理问题。最新的科学研究发现,连我们的性格都被改变了。

3 . COVID-19 changed a lot—how we socialized, where we went, and even what work looked like. A new study shows the pandemic (流行病) may have changed our personalities as well.

Psychologists have long believed that a person’s characters stayed pretty much the same, even in the wake of stressful events. But by looking at pre-pandemic levels of neuroticism (神经质), extraversion (外向), openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness (勤奋而细心) and comparing that to data collected in 2021 and 2022, researchers found clear personality changes among the United States population.

“The pandemic was an opportunity to see how a collective stressful event may impact personality,” said lead study author Angelina Sutin, a professor of medicine at Florida State University.

Extraversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness all declined in the US population in the years following the start of the pandemic, particularly in young adults, according to the study, published Wednesday in the journal PLOS One.

Why were younger adults more impacted? We don’t know for sure, Sutin said, but there are theories. “Personality is less stable in young adults. Then at the same time, the pandemic disturbed what young adults are supposed to be doing. They’re supposed to be in school or starting their careers. Then, everything was changed. However, the results didn’t hold true for each person.”

Researchers examined the data through the five-factor model, which hypothesizes (提出假说) that the various personality characters can come down to five important qualities: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness.

Over the entire population they examined, researchers found a declining trend in neuroticism in 2020, but the changes were small. Once they took 2021 and 2022 data into account, researchers saw a more significant decrease in extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness. Neuroticism also increased over this time. That is especially significant considering how important those characters are, Sutin said. For example, conscientiousness is important for academic and work outcomes, as well as relationship and physical health, she added.

1. How do researchers get their study results?
A.By comparing data collected in different periods.
B.By collecting data from different people.
C.By making experiments in a university.
D.By building a five-factor model.
2. Which of the following would Sutin probably agree with?
A.Personality is more stable in old adults.
B.The study results hold true for every person.
C.Younger adults are less impacted during the pandemic.
D.American people are more likely to be influenced.
3. Which one of the qualities is important for relationship and physical health?
A.Neuroticism.B.Extraversion.
C.Openness.D.Conscientiousness.
4. What’s the best title for the text?
A.Pandemic Has a Great Impact on People’s Life
B.Young Adults Adapted Quickly During the Pandemic
C.Different Personality Characters Influence Social Relationships
D.People Experienced Personality Changes During the Pandemic
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 较难(0.4) |
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。主要介绍了冠状病毒大流行病期间,不去实体工作场所、在家里远程工作成为许多人的工作方式。

4 . The coronavirus pandemic (大流行病) has changed many aspects of daily life around the world. One of the main changes for many people has been that they are now working 100% from home. While it is impossible for all jobs to be done from home, companies whose work can be carried out remotely have been working to set up systems for employees to do so. There have been some challenges to work out in the early stages but many workers are finding that they are able to do their jobs in almost exactly the same way as if they were in an office.

With the high-speed Internet, working from home has technically been possible. However, the vast majority of businesses have been averse to having employees not attend a physical workplace. Many business owners believe that their staff will not work as efficiently if they are working from home. There is a strong belief that workers won’t focus on work and will do other things if they are not being watched like they are in a physical workplace.

Businesses in multiple countries have been forced to close as countries lockdown and practice social distancing because of the coronavirus. As such, companies have been trying to find creative solutions to continue their regular work. Meetings are being held over apps like Zoom and Skype. In March, Zoom has been one of the most downloaded apps in the world.

The sudden shift to working from home has led many to question whether they can continue working from home after the Covid-19 situation is settled. Working from home has many benefits for workers who don’t have to commute (通勤) and can work how they like. Not all workers wish to continue working from home. For many people the social aspect of meeting coworkers in a workplace is important and some people struggle to work as efficiently in their own home. The question now is whether the working culture of the world has permanently changed. In the future, we could see a lot more people choosing to work either full or part-time from their own homes.

1. What can we know from paragraph 1?
A.Working in office has already been phased out.
B.Working remotely is encouraged in the pandemic.
C.Companies urgently need to purchase the systems.
D.Remote work is exactly the same as the office work.
2. Which word can replace the underlined word “averse” in paragraph 2?
A.Unclear.B.Unwilling.
C.Uninterested.D.Unbelievable.
3. What does paragraph 3 mainly focus on?
A.The popularity of Zoom.B.The reason for social distancing.
C.Measures to continue normal work.D.Functions of some apps in regular work.
4. What can we learn from the last paragraph?
A.Working place has been shifted home.
B.Working from home is more productive.
C.Working time will become more flexible.
D.Working culture has changed completely.
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了新冠病毒大流行的背景下,嗅觉训练疗法的需求不断增加的情况。

5 . As the coronavirus pandemic spread out, the demand for smell training therapy stepped up, as potentially millions of those who had COVID-19 experienced losing their sense of smell.

Unlike some other viruses that can cause the loss of smell by directly infecting cells involved in detecting smell, the virus that causes COVID-19 spares them. Instead, the coronavirus infects surrounding support cells. To defend the body against the virus, immune cells rush to this site of infection and generate antiviral proteins, which then lead to the loss.

Approximately 80% of COVID-19 patients who had lost their sense of smell regained it without any treatment within one to four weeks. But as three months went by, patient Chris Rogers’ situation barely improved, so he started to seek out smell training therapy.

Twice a day for 10 weeks, Rogers sniffed four kinds of essential oils — rose, lemon, eucalyptus, and clove — to potentially strengthen the survival of newly formed smell-detecting cells or speed up their production and rebuild the connection between his nose and brain. To assess whether this smell therapy was effective, the doctor asked Rogers to distinguish between a number of additional smells before and after the smell training. Rogers did the therapy for 10 weeks and started noticing improvements at week six. At least five months since the smell training ended, the improvements can be more like 75%.

While scientists have recorded improvements in some individuals’ ability to smell, it has been difficult to show how much of that improvement comes from the therapy itself or natural recovery occurring over time, said Eric Holbrook, a doctor at Massachusetts Eye and Ear Hospital. “But I continue to recommend the therapy because such training could speed up the healing process. Also, it’s one of very few and often the only therapeutic options that’s available to millions of COVID-19 patients who haven’t been able to regain their sense of smell for months,” Eric Holbrook added.

Although the benefits of smell training can vary considerably among patients, depending on their starting point, “it is generally not considered harmful,” says Bradley Goldstein, a specialist studying at Duke University. “But we still need to find specific, more effective drug therapies. It’s really an unmet need.”

1. Why did the doctor ask Rogers to identify additional smells before and after the treatment?
A.To estimate the effectiveness of smell training.
B.To improve the sensitivity of Rogers’ sense of smell.
C.To make Rogers remember the smell of common oil.
D.To rebuild the connection between Rogers’ nose and brain.
2. Which word best describes Eric Holbrook’s attitude to smell training therapy?
A.Favorable.B.Indifferent.
C.Ambiguous.D.Disapproving.
3. What does Bradley Goldstein suggest?
A.Encouraging patients to recover naturally.
B.Developing better drug therapies for patients.
C.Conducting the smell training on a large scale.
D.Providing long-term health guidance for patients
4. What would be the best title for the passage?
A.The ways of restoring the sense of smell.
B.The significance of smell training therapy.
C.Main symptoms of coronavirus infection.
D.Smell training therapy for COVID-19.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了人们的研究证明,用狗来对人进行新冠检测,检测的结果高效、准确,但是狗需要培训才能从事这种检测任务,这就使原本很紧张的警犬资源更加短缺。

6 . In a study involving sweat samples from 335 people, trained dogs sniffed out 97 percent of the coronavirus cases that had been identified by PCR tests and all 31 COVID-19 cases among 192 people who didn’t have symptoms, researchers reported.

These findings are evidence that dogs could be effective for mass screening efforts at places such as airports or concerts and may provide friendly alternatives for testing people who fear the tests, says Dominique Grandjean in France.

Dogs’ noses also identified more COVID-19 cases than did antigen (抗原) tests, but sometimes mistook another virus for the coronavirus, Grandjean and colleagues found. What’s more, evidence suggests the dogs can pick up cases 48 hours before people test positive by PCR.

In the study, dogs were trained in coronavirus detection by rewarding them with toys—usually tennis balls. “It’s playtime for them,” Grandjean says. It takes about three to six weeks, depending on the dog’s experience with odor detection, to train a dog to pick out COVID-19 cases from sweat samples. For detection, the dogs sniffed used face masks or housing sweat samples collected from human volunteers’ underarms. Results showed that dogs perform as well as or even better than PCR tests for detecting the virus that causes COVID-19, Furton says. He and colleagues have used dogs at schools, a music festival and in a small trial screening airline employees for coronavirus infections.

One of the biggest advantages dogs have over other tests is their speed, Furton says. “Even with what we call a rapid test, you’re still going to have to wait tens of minutes or even hours, where the dog in a matter of seconds can make a response.” However, dogs take time to train and there currently aren’t even enough dogs trained to detect explosives, let alone diseases, Otto says.

Another drawback is that people don’t think of them as high-tech, though they’re one of the highest-tech devices we have.

1. What can we learn about the study from the first paragraph?
A.Dogs were trained to test COVID-19.
B.Sweat samples are perfect to test COVID-19.
C.Dogs can identify most COVID-19 cases.
D.PCR tests failed to meet public expectation.
2. What’s the disadvantage of using dogs for COVID-19 tests?
A.Dogs may be unfriendly to people when doing tests.
B.Dogs lack experience dealing with large screens.
C.Dogs may need a long time to identify the disease.
D.Dogs may recognize other diseases as coronavirus.
3. What can we infer about trained dogs according to Furton?
A.They perform well at detecting COVID-19 virus.
B.They do better at detecting explosives than viruses.
C.They are widely used in public places like schools.
D.They like to be rewarded with toys after training.
4. How does Otto view getting dogs to do COVID-19 tests?
A.Supportive.B.Disapproving.C.Fearful.D.Confident.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇记叙文。文章讲述了在COVID-19疫情期间,Kirby White医生因一次性罩衣不足而开发了一款可重复使用的罩衣并推广的故事。

7 . During the first COVID-19 outbreak, Dr. Kirby White struggled to get enough disposable gowns (一次性罩衣), so she and her colleague Dr. Nicole Lowe decided to act. In March2020, they developed a gown that could be laundered and reused, allowing them to keep seeing patients at their Bendigo’s clinic.

“The second COVID-19 wave made it impossible for anyone to purchase disposable gowns, says Kirby, who explains one reusable gown lasts as long as 130 single-use gowns. “It was important to have a reusable gown. We didn’t know how long the pandemic would last so we needed a sustainable solution.”

Two weeks later, Gowns for Doctors was created. Taking to social media, Kirby, 36, shared the initiative (新方案) in a local Facebook group. Overnight, hundreds of volunteers put up their hands to sew (缝), donate fabric and distribute the gowns. She was blown away by the unbelievable response. “We had400 emails overnight! “Kirby says. “It’s the spirit that allowed us to send out so many gowns to people in need. Months later, Gowns for Doctors still has a lot of gowns if medical staff are in need of them. We are continuing to help those who need them.”

The success of the initiative has now gone global, after a company contacted Kirby to create a Barbie doll (芭比娃娃) in her image, celebrating all the healthcare heroes globally. “Seeing my one-of-a-kind Barbie doll for the first time was a heart-skip moment. There were tears of joy. She looks just like me! ”

After hand-packing every order, Dr. White loves seeing happy healthcare workers wearing their donated gowns. “We’ve been sent photos of medical staff wearing their gowns with big smiles,” she says. “Everyone has been so appreciative; we are inundated with thank-you cards. It’s so nice to see them.”

1. Why did Kirby start to make reusable gowns?
A.There was a lack of gowns’ materials.
B.The number of the patients was large.
C.There weren’t enough disposable gowns.
D.The quality of the disposable gowns was poor.
2. What did the volunteers do for the initiative?
A.They wrote a lot of emails.B.They helped make the gowns.
C.They bought many new gowns.D.They called some medical staff.
3. How did Kirby feel when she saw the Barbie doll for the first time?
A.Annoyed.B.Curious.C.Upset.D.Touched.
4. What does the underlined word “inundated” in the last paragraph mean?
A.Flooded.B.Competed.C.Compared.D.Equipped.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约280词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。介绍了发展中国家只有15%的人接种COVID-19的疫苗,这种不公平情况,揭露了发展中国家在这种类似于救命的科学技术上被迫依赖的现象一直存在,此外也说明了只有基于发展中国家的世界合作,让更多的发展中国家拥有疫苗中心才能真正取得对抗COVID-19的胜利。

8 . Scientists developed vaccines (疫苗)against a new disease in less than 12 months. And yet,18 months after the first of these vaccines, against COVID-19, were put on the market, just 15% of people in developing countries have been fully vaccinated. Such unfairness costs lives and uncovers a long-standing problem that some countries have been forced to depend on others for life-saving science and technology. It is unacceptable, for example, that in Africa, a continent of 54 independent countries and 1.2 billion people, 99% of vaccines are from other countries.

The World Health Organization (WHO)is searching for a way to get vaccines to more people more easily.Last year, the WHO started a program called the mRNA vaccine technology center. The goal of the program is to develop and produce mRNA vaccines and treatments(for COVID-19 and other diseases) in developing countries from the technology used in developed countries highly successful COVID-19 vaccines.

More importantly,the cooperation (合作)between universities and companies based in developing countries is needed to realize the goal. On July 8th,the USA National Institutes of Health, where much of the research on mRNA vaccines was carried out, joined this program to help build vaccine technology centers in developing countries.

Besides the necessity of fairness, outbreaks would end sooner if every country could depend on its own defence. As Larry Brilliant,a scientist of the US National Institutes of Health who helps wipe out smallpox(天花),told Nature,“Fairness is often thought of as a burden(负担),but it is a strategic need in the battle against COVID-19.”

1. Why does the author mention Africa in paragraph 1?
A.To lead in the topic.
B.To show the unfairness in vaccines.
C.To stress the importance of vaccines.
D.To say thanks to the help from developed countries.
2. Why did the WHO start the program?
A.To make more people in developing countries get vaccines.
B.To build up a center to attract experts in developing vaccines
C.To get the technology used in successful COVID-19 vaccines,
D.To strengthen the cooperation between universities and companies.
3. What can we conclude from the last paragraph?
A.Fairness is a burden, so it is not necessary.
B.We’ll win the battle sooner if every country has its defence.
C.Fairness is necessary because it can stop COVID-19 from breaking out.
D.Wiping out smallpox is a strategic need in the battle against COVID-19.
4. What is the most suitable title for the text?
A.Why fairness is necessary?
B.How did WHO start the program?
C.How did scientists develop vaccines?
D.Why is a vaccine center for developing countries a must?
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。文章通过列举Alexia Cambon和Lovich对于“远程工作”的看法,阐述了远程工作将继续存在。

9 . It’s uncertain when many offices may reopen, but it’s clear the virtual work revolution that began with the pandemic isn’t going away.

Alexia Cambon,research director at Gartner, says finding the right combination of in-person and virtual work will take creativity and experimentation. Managing director Deborah Lovich stresses that companies should consider that flexibility is not only about location, but also about the hours employees work.

Alexia also points out the importance of finding solutions for a whole team. “What COVID-19 taught us is that flex work cannot be for an individual. It has to be for the team,” she says. “When the whole team is together online versus a whole team together in person,it works.”

Progressive organizations are also reconsidering their workplace culture. “They’re thinking about changing culture and leadership to be much more trust-based, impact-based, instead of input-based,like,I see you,so I think you’re productive,’ compared to, ‘Wow, I see what you’ve accomplished,and I know you’ve been productive,””Lovich says.

Lovich sees remote work as a “win-win” for cmployees who get more flexibility and employers who can hire people from anywhere in the country or even the world. She views it as creating equality in terms of allowing small towns to attract talent and offering more opportunity for women to climb the corporate ladder without having to relocate their families, something that she says often takes a back seat in a dual-career houschold.

Companies that require a return to a fully on-site model could lose one in three employees.Lovich agrees that employers need to be careful. “It’s an employee’s market right now. The world is short of workers,and because of that we should really think about what we need and feel confident and courageous to speak up. And a lot of companies are getting that, and so it’s a real opportunity to either shape the place you work to be the place it needs to be or go someplace else that does,”Lovich says.“For decades,we’ve been contorting(扭曲)our lives to fit around work, and COVID-19 forced work to fit around lives.”

1. What does Alexia emphasize according to the text?
A.How to make virtual work go away soon.
B.How to create virtual work cooperatively.
C.How to combine virtual work with science.
D.How to find the best location for virtual work
2. Why do progressive organizations change their workplace culture?
A.To take control of the development of virtual work.
B.To compare company culture with firm leadership.
C.To make employees feel trusted and develop positively.
D.To persuade more companies to choose virtual work soon.
3. What does Lovich think of virtual work?
A.It is attractive to all employees.B.It is just beneficial to employers.
C.It is popular among small firms.D.It benefits both bosses and workers.
4. What does the author mainly want to tell us?
A.Virtual work is here to stay.B.Advantages of virtual work.
C.Be far away from flexibility.D.A“win-win“ change for business.
阅读理解-七选五(约270词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇应用文,文章介绍了几个防止戴口罩眼镜起雾的方法。

10 . How to stop glasses fogging up with a face mask

Wearing a mask keeps you safe during the pandemic, but it come with its own set of challenges. And, one of the biggest drawbacks of wearing a mask is how much your glasses fog up and affect your vision. Taking off your glasses to wipe them clean each time it fogs up is not only frustrating, but it can also increase the risk of infection.     1     Here are some tricks to stop it.

Twist your mask strings.

From the side, once you twist it, the strings will look like the figure eight. This is great for stopping fogging because it redirects your breath by putting slight downward pressure on the top part of the mask.     2     This may leave you infected by virus.

    3    

If you wash your glasses with soap, this creates a thin film on your lenses which limits fogging. Use a fragrance-free soap and mix it with warm water. Put your glasses in it and let it air dry. When you wear your glasses next, soap molecules on your lenses should block fogging.

Use tissues.

You can put a tissue under the top part of the mask.     4     To do this DIY trick properly, you should fold a tissue in half and place the straight edge along the bridge of your nose.

Change the position of your masks and glasses.

    5     But if you do this there are a few things to keep in mind. Firstly, you need to make sure that your mask still covers your chin(下巴)after you pull it up. And, if your prescription is stronger, this trick could impact your vision and cause increased blurriness.

A.Put glasses in the water.
B.Wash your glasses with soap.
C.It will help catch air and damp, keeping your glasses free of fog.
D.So the key is to prevent or minimize fogging due to face masks.
E.Cover your chin with masks to prevent need for repositioning when talking.
F.Though, it’s worth noting that it does create a slight gap between the mask and your face.
G.Pull up your mask and draw your glasses down, blocking your breath from rising upwards.
共计 平均难度:一般