A complete skeleton (骨架) of an animal, which was later confirmed to be that of a giant panda, was unearthed at
The skeleton had well-developed teeth, and was placed within a neatly
The researchers thought this giant panda might have originated from the forests on the northern side of the Qinling Mountains, where the climate was possibly
Back in 1975, a buried giant panda
Besides the giant panda, the remains of other rare animals were also found in the tomb,
Come and see the Terracotta Army: more than 8, 000 statues were made in the third century BC to
A Stone Age bird sculpture
Described
4 . A new study provides the earliest known evidence of amputation — the medical term for cutting off a part of a person’s body. Around 31,000 years ago, a young adult had his left foot and part of his left leg removed in what is modern-day Indonesia, the study suggests.
Scientists say the ancient surgery was performed when the person was a child — and that the individual went on to live for years. It suggests that humans were carrying out medical operations much earlier than scientists had thought.
Tim Maloney, the study’s lead researcher, said that researchers were exploring a cave in Borneo, a rainforest area known for ancient rock art, when they came across the person’s burial.
Although much of the skeleton(骨骼)remained, it was missing its left foot and the lower part of its left leg, Maloney explained. After examining the remains, the researchers concluded the foot bones were not missing from the burial or lost in an accident. Instead, the bones had been carefully removed. The remaining leg bone showed a clean cut that healed over, Maloney said. There were no signs of infection, which would be expected if the child had gotten its leg bitten off by a creature like a crocodile. And there were also no signs of a crushing fracture(粉碎性骨折),which would have been expected if the leg had been cut off in an accident.
The child appears to have lived for around six to nine more years after losing the limb, eventually dying from unknown causes as a young adult, researchers said.
The evidence suggests that the ancient people knew enough about medicine to perform the surgery without fatal blood loss or infection. Researchers do not know what kind of tool was used to perform the surgery, or how infection was prevented. But they believe that a sharp stone tool may have made the cut, and some of the plant life in the area could have been used for medical treatment.
“The discovery of this early surgery rewrites the history of human medical knowledge and developments,”Maloney said at a press conference.
1. What can we know about the ancient surgery?A.It was discovered by accident. |
B.It was later than scientists had thought. |
C.Researchers have completely understood it. |
D.The young adult died soon after receiving surgery. |
A.The child’s miserable experience. |
B.The reason for the child’s injury. |
C.The evidence of amputation. |
D.The significance of the discovery. |
A.Living environment. |
B.Family and relatives. |
C.One of the unknown causes. |
D.Left foot and part of his left leg. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Positive. |
C.Puzzled. | D.Critical. |
5 . Discoveries at the famous Sanxingdui ruins in Southwest China show that the region’s ancient Shu Kingdom Civilization shared similarities with the Maya.
The Sanxingdui ruins belonged to the Shu Kingdom that existed at least 4,800 years ago and lasted more than 2,000 years, while the Mayan civilization built its city-states around 200 AD.
The bronze-made remains of tress unearthed at the ruins of the Shu Kingdom resemble the sacred ceiba tree, which symbolized the union of heaven, earth and the underworld in the Mayan civilization. “They are very important similarities,” says Santos, a Mexican archaeologist (考古学家) stressing that “the representations of tress in both cultures provide a symbolism that is very similar”.
The findings at the Sanxingdui ruins, considered one of the greatest archaeological discoveries of the 20th century, also show a new aspect of Bronze Age culture, indicating the ancient civilization already had technologies that were thought to have been developed much later.
While the lime span between the Shu kingdom and the Mayan culture is great, the findings highlight the closeness between the two civilizations. They developed in areas with comparable climates and reflected their worldview through related symbols. “In the end, man is still man, independent of time and space. What we have is that, at this latitude (纬度), both the Shu people and the Mayans looked at the same sky and had the same stars on the horizon,” the expert says.
One notable feature of the recent discoveries at Sanxingdui was the cross-subject work and technology applied by teams of Chinese archaeologists, which allowed the unearthing of artifacts as fragile as silk remains, which other types of less careful digging methods would not have been able to register.
Cooperation between Chinese and Mexican archaeologists could benefit projects in the Mayan world, where the rainy climate and humidity are problematic for the conservation of ruins.
“Every time our cultural knowledge increases, regardless of whether we speak one language or another, what it shows us is that we continue to be sister cultures and, therefore, the exchange of such knowledge is fundamental,” says Santos.
1. What is a similarity between the Shu Kingdom and Maya civilization?A.Their starting time. |
B.Their historical origins. |
C.Their cultural symbols. |
D.Their ceremony traditions. |
A.silk was a common clothing material then |
B.some technologies were developed much earlier |
C.the Bronze Age started earlier than previously assumed |
D.the Shu Kingdom and the Mayan world had close contact |
A.Damp weather. | B.Positioning of ruins. |
C.High latitude. | D.Language barriers. |
A.The future of the China-Mexico cooperation. |
B.The benefits of speaking a different language. |
C.The importance of the exchange of cultural knowledge. |
D.The increasing sisterhood in culture between China and Mexico. |
Come and see the Terracotta Army: more than 8,000 statues were made in the third century BCE