组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 文化交流
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 1 道试题

1 . In New York City, eating on the subway is controversial. No law bans the practice, but a Democratic state senator introduced one last week. The proposed law would ban eating on the subway system and fine first time violators $250, according to the New York Times. Supporters of the bill argue that eating on the subway attracts rates. Other say the broader target should be those who carelessly drop litter in public places, rather than those who carefully sip their coffee and eat their bread on the way to work. They also argue that “street food” is an important part of New York’s culture and history. Banning its consumption in public areas such as the subway would have negative effects.

Street food and eating in public places is along-established cultural practice in cities like New York, Beijing and Paris. But commonly, it has been traditionally thought of as what the lower classes would do. Eating in public was (and in some places, still is) associated with uncivilized, poorer people. In the 19th century, eating in public was seen as a threat to morality and public health. Putnam’s (a popular magazine at the time) stated, “Eating in public may lead to a certain freedom of manner in little ladies and gentlemen. It was something people in the Victorian era did not want to encourage. A recent New York Times article drew a link between this moral panic about street food and concern over the growing populations of Irish German, Italian and Jewish immigrants who ran food carts in the 1800s. “To Victorian society, immigrant street peddlers were called ‘hucksters’, a name that still has a bit of moral judgment to this day.”

In Australia, street food is not something you see every day. Carts selling tasty snacks only come out for festivals or market days. However, eating in public places such as parks is encouraged. Outdoor barbeques at the beach or picnics in the countryside are common. While eating on public transport is discourages, it would unlikely lead to any sort of conflict in Australia. From an Australian perspective, street food is an exciting and tasty new dining opportunity, and not one I would associate with being uncivilized.

China’s street food scene is similar to that of New York City’s: It is a culturally entrenched practice and one that adds a lot of color and flavor to the scene of streets. But whether you love eating street food, or have to eat your breakfast on the run, it’s best to be considerate when enjoying a bite in public.

1. Supporters of “street food” are against the bill, because ________.
A.eating on the subway may attract undesirable pests like mice
B.consuming food on the way to work proves their carefulness
C.banning litter-dropping is more important for the environment
D.enjoying a bite in public areas is a part of the city’s culture
2. According to paragraph 2, what can be inferred?
A.Only the uncivilized, poorer people were allowed to eat in public places.
B.Street food was seen as a threat in the 19th century because they were not heathy.
C.Eating in public was considered impolite for children in the Victorian era.
D.Immigrant street peddlers were encouraged and thus welcomed in the 1800s.
3. According to paragraph 3, what is true in Australia?
A.Eating in public like parks may be seen as ill-mannered.
B.Having food on the subway system may cause serious conflicts.
C.People may feel excited about being allowed to eat in public.
D.Tasting street food may bring much enjoyment whenever possible.
4. The word “entrenched” in paragraph 4 maybe closest in meaning to ________.
A.deep-rootedB.eye-catchingC.well-knownD.far-reaching
共计 平均难度:一般