1 . An Ontario teen is making waves by turning old fishing gear into new treasures. Since last year, Natalie, 15, has been taking lost or thrown — away fishing nets and rope and transforming them into bracelets, rope art, mats, baskets and necklaces.
Last year, Natalie was working on an assignment for her science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) class. As part of the assignment, she learned about “ghost nets”, which are fishing nets that have been left or lost in the ocean by people who fish.
“They have huge effects on our environment. They can kill coral reefs and many animals,” said Natalie. “46 percent of the Pacific garbage is ghost gear.” The Great Pacific Garbage is a huge collection of trash floating in the Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and California.
Natalie told her mom she wanted to do something to help. She got in touch with a handful of charities, including the Sea Protection Society and Coastal Action.
After getting some shipments of ghost nets and rope from those organizations, Natalie, with the help of her family, started turning the discarded gear into new artworks. “We've made bracelets, rope art, mats, baskets, and we've made necklaces, which also use beach glass in them,” she said. Natalie then started selling the artworks online, the crafty buying and selling website.
She donated all her profits-minus a small sum of change to cover supplies — to the charities that donated fishing supplies to her. She's also been donating all the income from her non-profit business, called Nautical Waters, to charity. Natalie said she hoped to continue her passion for ocean life, with plans to study marine biology in university.
1. How did Natalie help with ghost nets?A.By turning them into artworks. | B.By asking support from her mother. |
C.By collecting money from charities. | D.By selling ghost nets at a good price. |
A.To collect supplies for the artworks. | B.To prepare for her study in university. |
C.To protect coral reefs and marine animals. | D.To complete an assignment for her STEM class. |
A.Polluted. | B.Rare. | C.Waste. | D.Discovered. |
A.Ghost Nets Ready for Sale | B.Charities Make a Big Difference |
C.Natalie's Passion for Ocean Treasures | D.Teen Turns Old Fishing Nets into Artworks |
2 . There you are in your favorite clothing store. You don’t really need to buy anything, but everything is so cheap and stylish! Before you know it, you leave the store with bags and bags of new clothes.
On the surface, this doesn’t seem so bad. However, there are a lot of hidden costs behind the cheap price tags (标牌). To put it plainly, the fashion industry is terrible for the planet. Not only does it use up a lot of resources, but it also heavily pollutes the environment with chemicals, microplastics and unwanted waste.
Fashion is one of the least sustainable industries on the planet, commented Michael Stanley-Jones. “We’ve all become our own waste managers, hoarding fashion waste in our houses,” he noted.
It doesn’t just take up space in our cupboards, though. It also ends up in landfills (垃圾场), too. But, thankfully, the fashion trend tides are changing. People are increasingly examining their own consumption and what changes they can make to become sustainable, Jane Fellner, founder and CEO of sustainable fashion seller Loopster, told the Guardian.
In particular, with its typically lower prices and rare fashion finds, shopping secondhand has become an increasingly popular and eco-friendly option. According to online reseller ThredUp, the secondhand market is predicted to reach $80 billion by 2029. And, although fast fashion will continue to grow 20 percent over the next 10 years, secondhand fashion is expected to grow an unbelievable 185 percent in that same amount of time. Fellner continued: “Secondhand has become more socially acceptable. Thrifting (节约) is now massive on TikTok.”
The only true sustainable way to shop is to not shop at all, unless you’re buying clothes that already exist.
1. What does the fashion industry bring about?A.People’s love for fast fashion. | B.Damage to the earth. |
C.Cheap price tags. | D.Sufficient resources. |
A.Sorting. | B.Avoiding. |
C.Storing. | D.Recycling. |
A.It is gaining popularity. |
B.It has defeated fast fashion. |
C.It makes people attractive. |
D.It is huge among young people. |
A.Young Consumers’ Habits |
B.A Stylish Fashion Manager |
C.The Fashion Industry |
D.Sustainable Fashion Trend |
3 . Can you imagine a world where more than half of our common plant species and a third of our known animals disappear from sight? That's the prediction suggested by new research on the impact of climate change.
An international team of researchers looked at the impact of rising temperatures on nearly 50,000 species of plants and animals. They came to the conclusion that these are to decline due to changes in their habitat. They looked at temperature and rainfall records for the habitats in which these species now live, and mapped the areas that would remain suitable for them under different weather conditions.
The scientists projected that if no significant efforts were made to limit greenhouse gas emissionss, by the year 2100 global temperatures would be 4C above pre-industrial levels. In this scenario, some 34% of animal species and 57% of plants would lose more than half of their current habitat ranges. The impact on species will be felt more heavily in some parts of the world such as the Amazon region.
Our society would be affected too, according to Dr. Rachel Warren, from the University of East Anglia in Britain. She says: "There'll be a knock-on effect for humans because these species are important for things like water and air purification, flood control and nutrients cycling, and eco-tourism."
In spite of the conclusions to this paper, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, it is not all doom and gloom. Dr Warren says: "Swift action to reduce CO2 and other greenhouse gases can prevent the biodiversity loss by reducing the amount of global warming to 2C rather than 4 degrees." The researcher believes that this would buy time for plants and animals to adapt to the change.
If nothing is changed and the predictions of this study are confirmed, the world might look very different in a few generations.
1. What made animals and plants decrease?A.Temperature and rainfall. | B.The transition in their living surroundings. |
C.Weather condition | D.The change of nature. |
A.Assumption. | B.Theory . | C.Expectation . | D.Truth . |
A.The temperature will not increase. | B.The biodiversity loss can be totally prevented. |
C.Animals and plants have more time to fit. | D.Current habitat will not be affected. |
A.The impact of climate change. | B.Massive species may die from climate change. |
C.Plant and animals are in danger. | D.Global warming are threatening us. |
When it comes to wildlife
Billions of trees are being cut down every year
Strange things happened in the city of Tangshan. The well walls had deep cracks. A
California burns every year, but 2020 is the worst year yet. In a study, more than 77,600 fires
The reason for the burs is a double hit of climate change and development. Pricy housing has pushed people onto
So
On 8 November 2013, Super Typhoon Haiyan swept through the Philippines. All of a sudden, a whole city lay in
8 . There are many ways to deal with the plastic pollution. Tom Szaky’s way may be one of the bravest. He has gone back to an old way-using reusable containers. The idea was used in the last century. It was introduced to the world by Coca-Cola in the early 1920s, when Coke was sold in expensive glass bottles that needed returning. They asked for two cents, about 40 percent of the full cost of the soft drink,and got about 98 percent of their bottles back, to be reused 40 or 50 times. Bottle deposit programs remain one of the most effective methods.
Ten months ago, Szaky started Loop, an online delivery service that uses strong reusable containers. The biggest part of his risk is that Loop pushes far beyond the common reusable bottles. From food packaging to washing powder packaging, the containers are in different sizes and made from different materials. One of his products is Haagen-Dazs ice cream that is packed inside a special box to keep the ice cream from melting.
17 years ago, Szaky founded TerraCycle, a small waste management company. He thought up a way to deal with plastics, cigarette wastes, and a long list of other wastes. Gradually, he became more interested in thinking of how to recycle different kinds of waste in the best way.
Loop is part of the reappearance of the reusable packaging as a best choice to plastic waste. The food and drink companies are more likely to use reusable bottles. A company said they have started the United States’ first state-wide reusable beer system. More obviously, Szaky’s idea of reusable packaging for products has attracted more and more companies to pay attention to the reusable packaging.
1. What do we know about Tom Szaky from paragraph 1?A.He invented Coke bottles. | B.He recommended using reusable containers. |
C.He invented a new kind of container. | D.He asked people for deposit. |
A.To help keep its temperature. | B.To make it easy to eat. |
C.To make it sweeter. | D.To help it melt quickly. |
A.It will solve plastic waste completely. | B.It will bring about a lot of new waste. |
C.It will attract more and more attention. | D.It will make Loop lose a lot of customers. |
A.Different New Ways to Deal with Plastic Pollution | B.The Story of a Creative Inventor |
C.The World’s Attitude to Plastic Pollution | D.An Old Idea of Fighting against Plastic Pollution |
1. 全球变暖的负面影响;
2. 如何从我做起减缓全球变暖。
注意:1. 词数100左右;
2. 可适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
Dear teachers and fellow students,
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Student Union
10 . The New South Wales government used planes to drop more than 4,000 pounds of carrots and sweet potatoes, to the forests which are damaged by the recent wildfires. The fires are reported to have killed more than a billion wild animals and destroyed a land of more than 84 thousand square kilometers—about twice the size of Maryland. What is worse, most Australians are worrying about when the wildfires will be fully put out.
“The home of several important wallabies (沙袋鼠) was burnt in the recent fires,” New South Wales Environment Minister Matt Kean said on Sunday. Kean said the drops are what wallabies need. The plan is designed to help wallabies and allow them to recover.
Fire seasons often take place in the country, but this year the fires have been quite devastating. The country experienced one of its hottest and driest years, which made it harder to put out the fires. Besides wild animals, the fires have taken the lives of at least 25 people and destroyed more than 2,000 homes.
“I think there’s nothing to compare with the damage that’s going on over such a large area so quickly. It’s a big event in terms of geography and the number of wild animals,” Dickman, an animal protection expert, said in an interview with NPR last week.
“We know that the number of Australian wild animals has been going down over the last several decades, and it’s probably fairly well known that Australia’s got the world’s highest rate of extinction of animals,” he added. “It’s events like this that may increase the speed of extinction of a lot of other animals. So, it’s very sad time. Everyone has to try their best to do something for them.”
1. Why did the Australian government drop potatoes?A.To feed the animals. | B.To trap the animals. |
C.To plant potatoes there. | D.To help the people. |
A.Damaging. | B.Interesting. |
C.Surprising. | D.Tiring. |
A.They have been under control. |
B.The weather is helpful in putting out them. |
C.They have killed a small amount of wildlife. |
D.They have greatly influenced both people and animals. |
A.Australia has a lot of wildlife. |
B.Australians have suffered a lot. |
C.Australians should protect the wildlife. |
D.The government is responsible for the wildfires. |