1 . The world has been troubled by COVID-19 for over a year. Masks (口罩) are really important to everybody during the pandemic (疫情). We all wear masks every day.
In a study, scientists from the US and Denmark said that people around the world are now using 129 billion face masks every month.
According to Elvis Genbo Xu from the University of Southern Denmark, disposable (一次性的) masks are plastic products.
A.They also suggest that we use more reusable cotton masks. |
B.Other plastic products are often recycled. |
C.But we have to throw them away after a short time. |
D.That is to say, we use 2.8 million masks every minute! |
E.These used plastic masks can not only pollute the earth but also oceans. |
In 2004, the junior high school student, now 13, launched the basketball-themed Hoops of Hope,
“I realized these kids weren’t any
Another participant, Li Yeqiao, a 15-year-old student at Beijing Bayi Middle School, told the conference how the group seeks to improve the way electronic waste
British animal behavior expert Jane Goodall introduced the Roots & Shoots concept to China in 2000 to promote environmental and humanitarian education programs to
3 . In October 2015, Shah began picking up rubbish from the beach every Sunday morning. At first, it was just him and a neighbor, and then he began
Shah hasn't stopped since. He's now spent 209 weekends
For Shah, the work has
Today, Shah is also working with coastal communities to
"This world
A.asking | B.ordering | C.warning | D.forcing |
A.challenged | B.encouraged | C.involved | D.required |
A.compared | B.adapted | C.related | D.devoted |
A.workers | B.volunteers | C.journalists | D.clerks |
A.originally | B.finally | C.suddenly | D.theoretically |
A.park | B.bank | C.beach | D.market |
A.occasionally | B.hardly | C.already | D.always |
A.global | B.local | C.national | D.coastal |
A.described | B.honored | C.opposed | D.elected |
A.simplified | B.changed | C.accepted | D.finished |
A.make | B.discuss | C.throw | D.handle |
A.trees | B.materials | C.rubbish | D.tools |
A.ocean | B.factory | C.mountain | D.forest |
A.protect | B.control | C.scold | D.educate |
A.talks | B.complains | C.thinks | D.argues |
A.earlier | B.faster | C.more | D.better |
A.sea | B.planet | C.water | D.sands |
A.pity | B.need | C.pain | D.effect |
A.come on | B.get on | C.look on | D.go on |
A.great | B.complex | C.complete | D.difficult |
4 . A new study has found that ride-sharing services result in much more pollution than other kinds of private and public transportation. Ride-sharing trips also draw passengers away from more environment friendly methods of travel, like public transportation, walking or biking, the study found.
Several studies in recent years have suggested that ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft can worsen traffic problems in cities. The new study represents an attempt to center on how ride-sharing services affect pollution.
Overall, the researchers reported that ride-sharing trips now "result in a 69 percent more climate pollution on average than the trips they replace." The study notes that the same passengers could have chosen to travel by bus, train, bike or on foot.
One of the big reasons they give for this result is that ride-sharing vehicles are often driven with no passengers in the car. This happens when drivers are either waiting for rider requests, are on the way to pick up passengers. This situation, known as "deadheading," takes up about 42 percent of all ride-sharing driving activity, the study found. The researchers said that deadheading results in about 50 percent more carbon dioxide than one person driving in a private vehicle.
Both Uber and Lyft have said in the past that most studies on the subject overstate (夸大)the effects of their services on pollution. Uber told Reuters news agency in a statement it had no comment on the latest report and that the study made misleading claims about ride-sharing. Meanwhile, the company said it would work directly with cities to address climate changes, promoting sharing trips and other means of transportation.
1. Which of the following is the best title of the passage?A.Ride-sharing becomes a new trend that can’t be avoided. |
B.Ride-sharing industry is met with criticism. |
C.Ride-sharing services increase pollution. |
D.Ride-sharing services need improvement. |
A.a driving process where the driver is not carrying passengers |
B.a potential risk that the driver may lose control of the vehicle |
C.a period of driving hours when vehicles produce more carbon dioxide |
D.a situation in which a driver has too many passengers to pick up |
A.barking up the wrong tree | B.not seeking the truth from facts |
C.killing two birds with one stone | D.beating around the bush |
A.Ride-sharing attracts exactly the same number of people as traditional means of transport. |
B.the study was conducted to prove the influence of ride-sharing services on modern cities |
C.ride-sharing service is not an environmentally friendly way to travel |
D.the new report has forced Uber to make big changes to achieve its goal |
5 . Clothing rental is a hot new industry and retailers (零售商) are demanding to get on board in hopes of attracting green shopper.
But is renting fashion actually more environmentally-friendly than buying it, and if so, how much more? Journalist and author Elizabeth Cline investigated (调查) this question and concluded that it's not as sustainable as it seems.
Take shipping, for example, which has to go two ways if an item is rented — receiving and returning. Cline writes that consumer transportation has the second largest carbon footprint of our collective fashion habit after manufacturing.
She writes, ''An item ordered online and then returned can send out 20 kilograms of carbon each way, and increases up to 50 kilograms for rush shipping. By comparison, the carbon impact of a pair of jeans purchased from a physical store and washed and worn at home is 33.4 kilograms, according to a 2015 study by Levi's.''
Then there's the burden of washing, which has to happen for every item when it's returned, regardless of whether or not it was worn. For most rental services, this usually means dry cleaning, a high impact and polluting process. All the rental services that Cline looked into have replaced perchloroethylene (氯乙烯), a carcinogenic (致癌的) air pollutant, still used by 70 percent of US dry cleaners, with alternatives, although these aren't great either.
Lastly, Cline fears that rental services will increase our appetite for fast fashion, simply because it's so easily accessible. There's something called ''share washing'' that makes people waste more precisely because a product or service is shared and thus is regarded as more eco-friendly. Uber is one example of this, advertised as ''a way to share rides and limit ear ownership.'' and yet ''it has been proven to discourage walking,bicycling, and public transportation use.''
Renting clothes is still preferable to buying them cheap and throwing them in the dustbin after a few wears, but we shouldn't let the availability of these services make us too satisfied. There's an even better step — that's wearing what is already in the closet.
1. What is Elizabeth Cline's attitude toward clothing rental?A.Approving. | B.Unfavorable. |
C.Objective. | D.Enthusiastic. |
A.rental services are on the rise |
B.clothing rental will be as successful as Uber |
C.renting clothes might waste more than expected |
D.renting clothes might make people lose interest in fast fashion |
A.give up renting any clothing |
B.purchase inexpensive clothes |
C.rent clothes rather than buy them |
D.make full use of clothes we've possessed |
A.Clothing rental is a new fashion. |
B.Clothing rental is retailers' preference. |
C.Renting clothes is not that eco-friendly. |
D.Renting-clothes business is in a dilemma. |