组卷网 > 知识点选题 > distribution
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 3 道试题
1 . 选词填空
A. sustainable B. renovation C. epic D. substitute E. distribution
F. canopy G. equivalent H. downsize I. emit J. suspend
1. The trees formed such a dense __________ that all beneath was a deep carpet of pine needles.
2. Government should encourage business to invest more on __________ energies.
3. The helmets are designed to withstand impacts __________ to a fall from a bicycle.
4. They undertook a multimillion-dollar __________ that included a go-kart track, a bar and a climbing wall.
5. The company chose to __________ and more fully utilize the remaining worker.
6. Some of the victims are complaining loudly about the uneven __________ of emergency aid.
7. They are hoping to retrace the __________ voyage of Christopher Columbus.
8. We should minimize the use of private cars, which __________ a large amount of greenhouse gases.
9. If we want students to become effective in multicultural settings, one thing is clear: there is no __________ for practice.
10. If you exceed your credit limit, we have the right to __________ your account.
2023-04-27更新 | 56次组卷 | 1卷引用:上海市复兴高级中学2022-2023学年高一下学期期中英语试卷
22-23高二上·全国·假期作业
2 . 英译汉
1 manuka honey    1    
2 bungee jumping    2    
3 a flock of    3    
4 geothermal park    4    
5 distribution    5    
6 pouch    6    
7 temporary    7    
8 phase    8    
9 trunk    9    
10 licensed    10    
2022-01-07更新 | 24次组卷 | 2卷引用:冀教版2019Unit 4 Literature for IdentitySection 1 Reading for Meaning 课前预习
3 . Directions: Fill in each blank with a proper word chosen from the box. Each word can be used only once. Note that there is one word more than you need.
A. consisted  B. composing  C. measures  D. account  E. patterns  F. limitations
G. moderately  H. progressed  I. distribution  J. significantly  K. complement

AI can distinguish between bots and humans based on Twitter activity

Artificial intelligence is being used to spot the difference between human users and fake accounts on Twitter.

Emilio Ferrara at the University of Southern California in the US, and his colleagues have trained an AI to detect bots on Twitter based on differences in     1     of activity between real and fake accounts.

The team analysed two separate datasets of Twitter users, which had been classified either manually or by a pre-existing algorithm as either bot or human.

The manually verified dataset     2     of 8.4 million tweets from 3500 human accounts, and 3.4 million tweets from 5000 bots.

The researchers found that human users replied four to five times more often to other tweets than bots did. Real users gradually become more interactive, with the fraction of replies increasing over the course of an hour-long session of Twitter use.

The length of tweets by human users also decreased as sessions     3    . “The amount of information that is exchanged diminishes,” says Ferrara. He believes that the change may result from a cognitive depletion over time, in which people become less likely to expend mental effort    4     original content.

Bots, on the other hand, show no changes in their interactivity or the length of information they tweet over time.

The team also analysed the amount of time between any two consecutive (连读的) tweets from a single user. When this     5     is plotted, bots showed spikes for certain time gaps, such as tweeting at 30-minute or 60-minute intervals.

The team then combined these     6     to train an existing bot-detection algorithm, called Botometer, on the difference in activity patterns. The AI was     7     more likely to accurately detect to fake accounts than when it was not taking into     8     the timing of posts.

The algorithm could be used to     9     other bot-detection tools that analyse the language within posts, says Ferrara.

One of the study’s     10     is that the Twitter data the team analysed is from three years ago. In that time, it’s possible that bots have become more human-like in their activity patterns.

共计 平均难度:一般