组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 交通方式
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 4 道试题
听力选择题-长对话 | 适中(0.65) |
名校
1 . 听下面一段较长对话,回答以下小题。
1. Why does Alice dislike flying?
A.The luggage can get lost.
B.The long wait is unbearable.
C.The seats are uncomfortable.
2. Which means of transportation does Alice like best now?
A.A bike.B.A bus.C.A train.
3. What is the relationship between Jeff and Alice?
A.Husband and wife.B.Brother and sister.C.Father and daughter
4. What is the disadvantage of cycling in Jack’s opinion?
A.It is extremely tiring.
B.It requires physical fitness.
C.It is greatly affected by weather.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约280词) | 较易(0.85) |
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了在哥本哈根的自行车旅行。

2 . Copenhagen has GREAT public transport. It is reliable, safe, and easily accessible. Of course, like everything in Copenhagen, it is not cheap. The system can be a little confusing, even for locals, but we’re here to help simplify it all for you! And today our focus is Travelling with a Bike.

BIKES ON THE TRAIN

Bicycles can be taken on s-tog lines for free but you can’t take bikes through Nørreport station during peak hours. To take your bike on a train, you need to put it on the first or last carriage, clearly marked with large signs of bicycles on the outside.

To take a bike on a regional train, which takes you to parts of Denmark outside Copenhagen, you must buy an extra ticket. The price depends on the distance and varies from 16 kr to 28 kr.

BIKES ON THE METRO

Bicycles can be taken on the metro for an extra 13 kr. You need to pay for the bike with its own ticket. You can’t take your bike on the metro during peak hours.

BIKES ON THE BUS

You can bring a bike on a bus but each bus is limited to two bikes, even if there is much space. Generally, people do not travel with their bikes on buses in Copenhagen.

BIKES ON THE FERRY(渡轮)

Charges for bicycles depend on the company and the destination. You will need to check with the ferry companies. When you book the ticket, you must state that you have a cycle, even if it’s free of charge.

1. Who is this text probably intended for?
A.Tourist guides.
B.Bike travelers.
C.Local citizens.
D.Ticket inspectors.
2. On which public transport can you take a bike for free?
A.A peak time s-tog train.
B.A weekday regional train.
C.An off-peak metro train.
D.A weekend ferry.
3. What is the disadvantage of bringing a bike on a bus?
A.Buses are too crowded.
B.It’s against the local custom.
C.Availability is not guaranteed.
D.It’s not welcomed by other passengers.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约470词) | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇议论文。作者提出了为缓解交通对环境造成的破坏,需要减少汽车使用,把汽车出行变得不方便。这一观点并不为大众所接受。他通过指出减少通勤时间的好处和现行的一些缓解措施的不足分析支持自己的观点。

3 . Building good transportation is a good idea. To have environmental value, new transportation has to sufficiently replace or eliminate driving to cut energy consumption overall. That means that a new traffic system has to be supported by reduction in car use. Traffic lanes should be eliminated or converted into bike or bus lanes. Ideally, these should be combined with higher fuel taxes, and parking fees. Needless to say, I have to struggle to make myself extensively understood. But they’re necessary, because you can’t make people drive less, in the long run, by taking steps that make driving more pleasant, economical, and productive.

Lengthy commuting (通勤) time is a forceful factor which can slow the growth of suburbs. The farther people live away from cities, the longer commuting time they need, which means more pollution their cars produce. If, in a misguided effort to do something of environmental value, governments take steps that make long-distance car commuting faster or more convenient—by adding lanes, building bypass, employing traffic-control measures that make it possible for existing roads to accommodate more cars with fewer delays—we are actually encouraging people to live still farther from their jobs, stores, and schools. As a result, governments are forced to further extend road networks, water lines, and other facilities. If you cut commuting time by 10 percent, people who now drive fifty miles each way to work can find reason to move five miles farther out, because their travel time won’t change.

Traffic congestion (拥堵) isn’t an environmental problem; traffic is. Relieving congestion without doing anything to reduce the total volume of cars can only make the real problem worse. Highway engineers have known for a long time that building new car lanes only temporarily reduces congestion, because the new lanes add additional driving. Widening roads makes traffic move faster in the short term, but the improved conditions eventually attract additional drivers, and congestion reappears. With more car on the roads, people think about widening roads again. Moving drivers out of cars and into other forms of transportation can have the same effect, if existing traffic lanes are kept in service: road space stimulates road use.

One of the arguments that cities inevitably make in promoting transportation plans is that the new system, by relieving automobile congestion, will improve the lives of those who continue to drive. No one ever promotes a transportation system by arguing that it would make travelling less convenient—even though, from an environmental perspective, inconvenient travel is a worthy goal.

1. In the first paragraph, the author gives us the hint that his recommendations are ______.
A.not widely supportedB.costly to carry out
C.generally recognizedD.temporarily beneficial
2. According to the passage, what will happen if commuting time for drivers is reduced?
A.Drivers will become more productive employees.
B.Mass transportation will be extended farther into suburban areas.
C.Drivers will be more willing to live farther from their working place.
D.Mass transportation will carry fewer passengers and receive less government funding.
3. Which of the following can be inferred about the author’s attitude towards the measures to improve traffic?
A.They are environmentally beneficial and should be carried out immediately.
B.They are well intentioned but ultimately lead to environmental harm.
C.They will definitely arouse people’s awareness of environmental protection.
D.They will only work if they can make driving more economical and productive.
4. The author wrote this massage mainly to ______.
A.support the claim that efforts to reduce traffic actually increase traffic.
B.oppose the belief that improving mass transportation systems is good for the environment.
C.provide a balance between suburban expansion and traffic congestion.
D.indicate that making driving less agreeable is a way to reduce negative effects of traffic.
书信写作-建议信 | 适中(0.65) |
名校
4 . 假定你是李华,你的南非朋友Stephan今年暑假来中国旅游,最近中国开通了一条从上海到新疆的高铁专线。你向他推荐这趟专列。内容如下:
1. 选择高铁的优势;
2. 沿途的经历(领略自然风光等)
3. 你的祝愿
注意:1. 词数80左右;
2. 可以适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
参考词汇:高铁high-speed rail line
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
共计 平均难度:一般