1 . Five meteorologists (气象学家) who were trapped for two weeks after polar bears surrounded their weather station are now able to leave after the creatures were chased away. Their supervisor told NBC News early Wednesday.
Russian officials had feared the siege could last for another month, the time it would take to reach the islands in the Kara Sea, high in the Arctic Circle. But on Tuesday night a research ship took a detour (绕道) to assist those weathermen, station supervisor Vasily Shevchenko told NBC News. The ship run by Russia’s state-run oil firm Rosneft frightened away the bears using its helicopter, before resupplying the weather station with more food and puppies (幼犬). The puppies are not yet big enough to deter the bears, but the station is planning to draft in a replacement adult guard dog as soon as possible.
Some of the bears had taken to sleeping directly outside the windows of remote outpost. There was no risk of the researchers starving because they had a year’s worth of food, but they were forced to take dangerous trips to a nearby building, holding a gun for protection, according to Shevchenko.
Polar bears are an endangered species. In Russia, it’s a crime to shoot them unless in self-defense. The bears usually leave the islands in the summer, but this time they were trapped by the melting ice, an apparent sign of climate change, according to Shevchenko. “They’ve stayed on the island because there is nowhere for them to go,” he said.
The animals suffer from global warming because it shrinks the floating ice that forms their main hunting ground. According to the environmental group the World Wide Fund for Nature, known as the WWF, this has got some polar bears to go near human habitats in search of food.
1. What did the research ship do to help the five meteorologists?A.Drive them home. |
B.Shoot all the bears. |
C.Use its helicopter to scare the bears away. |
D.Supply the weather station with more money. |
A.stop | B.respect |
C.protect | D.raise |
A.Sea Pollution. | B.Climate change. |
C.Humans’ hunting. | D.Animals’ hunting |
A.People in Russia can hunt bear for money. |
B.The melting ice will kill all the polar bears. |
C.The five meteorologists hated the bears very much. |
D.WWF made some contributions to protecting polar bears. |
2 . It’s always been a rule in my family, spoken or unspoken, that you don’t waste food. With six children herself and having grown up in an even larger family through the Great Depression, my mother would never tolerate throwing out the amounts of food we see routinely these days in the dumpster. We were told simply to clean our plates, no matter whether we liked the taste or if we were not hungry or not. So this subject is deep in my genes and upbringing.
Estimates are that nearly one third of all food produced is wasted. USDA estimates 31% of food available at retail (零售)level is wasted. 12% of landfill material is food. 28% of agricultural land produces food which is wasted, says the FAO. 18% of vegetables, and 12% of the apple crop are lost at the farm level in the United States., say experts.
Luckily, there’s an “ugly food” movement picking up steam. “Ugly” foods are those that sellers and buyers often reject because of their appearance, like misshapen vegetables and bruised(擦伤的) fruits. Farmers dump them. Supermarkets and restaurants reject them. Now supermarkets and restaurants reject them. Consumers historically have avoided them. Now supermarkets feature the ugly. It’s fashionable. More artful terms are favored. A French supermarket chain is selling “inglorious” foods. The British chain ASDA uses “wonky(歪斜的)” (which to American ears might sound as bad as “ugly.”) Canada’s Loblaws uses “naturally imperfect.” Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver, who has cast himself as a promoter of the “good food movement,” has signed on with some British chains to support their efforts.
With the effort of Kretschmann Farm CSA’s we’ve taken the line that rather than throw away things which would be classified by others as ugly, inglorious, or imperfect, we would just give them to you and you could decide. Either we throw them away, or you can. Oftentimes this adds to the volume of the box, or makes it a little more urgent to consume (because sometimes those rejected foods are just very ripe!).
1. When the author was a kid, he .A.often suffered from hunger |
B.was not allowed to waste food |
C.had to wash plates after a meal |
D.didn’t like the taste of his food |
A.Coming to an end. |
B.Facing a challenge. |
C.Making a selection. |
D.Becoming more popular. |
A.provides perfect food for customers |
B.sells food mot of which is very ripe |
C.tries to bring ugly food to customers |
D.encourage the consumption of food |
3 . Coffee drink is widespread. When people argue about whether coffee is good for health, they’re usually thinking of the health of the coffee drinker. Is it good for your heart? Does it increase blood pressure? Does it help you concentrate? However, coffee affects the health of the human population in other ways, too.
Traditionally, coffee bushes were planted under the shade of taller trees. However, more and more farmers in Latin America are deforesting the land to grow full sun coffees. At first, this increases production because more coffee bushes can be planted if there aren’t any trees. With increased production come increased profits.
Unfortunately, deforesting for coffee production immediately decreases the local wildlife habitat, because native birds nest and hide from predators(捕食者)in the tall trees and migrating birds rest there.
Furthermore, in the long term, the full-sun method also damages the ecosystem because more chemical fertilizers and pesticides(杀虫剂)are needed to grow the coffee. The fertilizers and pesticides kill insects that eat coffee plant, and then the birds eat the poisoned insects and also die. The chemicals kill or sicken other animals as well, and can even enter the water that people will eventually drink.
Fortunately, farmers in Central and South America are beginning to grow more coffee bushes in the shade. We can support these farmers by buying coffee with such labels as "shade-grown" and "bird-friendly".
Sure, these varieties might cost a little more. But we're paying for the health of the birds, the land, ourselves, and the planet. I think it’s worth it.
1. Which opinion does the author agree with?A.People should buy full-sun coffee. |
B.Shade-grown coffee should be supported. |
C.Farmers should change the places to grow coffee. |
D.Pesticides should be forbidden in coffee planting. |
A.It can protect the ecosystem. |
B.It can promote people's health. |
C.It can provide mare nests for birds. |
D.It can increase the production of coffee. |
A.They cut down trees. |
B.They move to other countries. |
C.They turn grassland into farmland. |
D.They buy more land from other farmers. |
A.It is quite worthwhile to buy shade-grown coffee at any cost. |
B.Farmers all have realized the importance of protecting the environment now. |
C.South American farmers are taking action to plant coffee in the traditional way. |
D.The full-sun method does good to the health of human beings in the long run. |
4 . What do people do with their old, out of date but still useful computers? Most people don’t know
Finally, some companies are thinking of ways
In some countries, laws have been passed, too. Computer companies have to pay for collecting and recycling their
Yet while many people are throwing away good computers, others cannot afford
5 . The Ocean Awareness Student Contest(International)
We invite middle and high school students from around the world to attend the 2017 Ocean Awareness Student Contest! The theme is Making Meaning out of Ocean Pollution, and it challenges you to research, explore, explore interpret, and say something meaningful about the connections between human activities and the health of our oceans.
This year, we challenge you to concentrate on one type of ocean pollution and “make meaning” of it through art, poetry or film. We encourage you to connect it with your own life, your own local community, or something else that is personally meaningful to you, but what’s most important is to pick a topic that inspires you.
To take part:
(1)Research
Do research on your own. Ask tough and complex questions, and think about the way science and society help you explain the topic
(2)Create
To explain your topic, create your own work of art, writing, poetry or film.
(3) Submit(提交)
The closing date for entries is on June 13, 2017, at 11:59pm.
Submit as an individual: This means that you are the only creator of your submission .
Submit as a group: Groups can be of unlimited size, but you must provide the names of each group member. There will be one group leader who will be the contact(联系)person for the group and prizes will be awarded to the group as a whole.
Prizes:
The winners will receive scholarships (up to $ 1,500), and each year we give out over 140 prizes(totaling up to $80,000) as well as chances to the winners to work with us and to get their works exhibited and published.
1. The purpose of the contest is to______.A.encourage more people to explore the ocean |
B.direct students to receive more scholarships |
C.draw students’ attention to the health of the oceans |
D.help students complete their works in various styles |
A.college students | B.teenagers |
C.art students | D.people of all ages |
A.submit their works in groups |
B.experience the life in a local community |
C.exhibit or publish their works in advance |
D.do research and explain their topics |
A.Scholarships will be offered to the winners |
B.The organizers will let the winners work with them |
C.The winners will be admitted to famous universities |
D.Chances are that the winners can get their works published |
好处:减少二氧化碳的排放,有利于缓解全球变暖;
具体建议:随手关掉不用的电器,如电灯、电视和电脑;
步行或骑自行车出行;如果路程远,乘坐公交车
购物时尽量使用环保布袋,不用一次性塑料袋。
大家都行动起来,我们就能与环境和谐共处。
注意: 词数不少于100;可适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
参考词汇:二氧化碳排放 carbon dioxide emissions;一次性塑料袋disposable plastic bags
Nowadays,it is becoming common to lead a low-carbon lifestyle._______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Each year
About 40,000 tourists visit Antarctica each year. More than five million travel to the Arctic and sub-Arctic. Transporting tourists to the regions
Others say that access