Growing numbers of travelers are deciding not
With a population of 602 ,000 , Luxembourg is one of the richest and smallest
Taking up 2, 586 square kilometers, Luxembourg is roughly the size of Rhode Island. From the capital of Luxembourg City , Belgium, France and Germany can all
But that could be about to change.
3 . Water keeps us alive. When it runs out, we have a problem.
About one out of four people on the planet are facing a shortage of water. Seventeen countries around the world are dealing with high-water stress. This means they are using almost all the water they have access to. Many are dry countries. Some waste much of their water. Some may currently use too much of their groundwater that they should be saving. Several big cities face acute shortages. These include Sao Paulo, Brazil; Chennai, India; and Cape Town, South Africa. A year ago, Cape Town faced nay Zero-the day when all its dams would he dry.
Climate change adds to the risk of water shortages. Rainfall is less steady. The water supply becomes less reliable. The days grow hotter. More water evaporates(蒸发)from lakes and rivers even as demand for water increases. By 2030, the number of cities in the high-stress category may have risen to 45 and include almost 470 million people.
All over the world, farmers compete with city residents for water. Rich urban places, such as Los Angeles, use too much water for pools and golf courses. But the worst problem is the growth of cities. Bangalore, India, for example, had a few years with little rain. It built over its many lakes or filled them with city waste. The lakes are no longer the rain water storage tanks they once were. Bangalore now imports water. A lot of the imported water, however, gets lost on the way to Bangalore.
To address this issue, what can be done? First, cities can plug leaks in their water distribution system. Wastewater can be recycled. Rain can be harvested and saved for hard times. Lakes and wetlands can be cleaned up and old wells can be restored. And farmers can switch from water-intensive crops like rice to less-thirsty crops like millet(小米).
Experts are looking at ways to reduce the number of people on the planet. They are looking at ways to reduce the size of cities. They are looking for ways to encourage people, factories and farmers to use less water.
1. What can we know from Paragraph 2?A.A quarter of the world's population is living with water shortages. |
B.Nearly all countries are facing acute water shortages now. |
C.Underground water should he used to meet the water demand. |
D.Measures have been taken to deal with the water shortage in India. |
A.Rainfall is not as steady as before. | B.Climate change may lead to water shortages. |
C.The water supply relies more on rainfall. | D.Hotter weather changes the water demand. |
A.Plug leaks in the water distribution system. | B.Clean up lakes and wetlands and restore wells. |
C.Reduce the number of people in the cities. | D.Grow less-water consumption crops instead. |
A.How to prevent from climate change. | B.How to inspire people to save water. |
C.How to recycle wastewater in cities. | D.How to make people get access to clean water. |
的宣传后所采取的行动。请根据图片的先后顺序,为校刊“英语园地”写一篇短文。
5 . London Fashion Week will not feature any animal fur clothes or accessories(配饰) on the runway this year, making it the first fur-free major fashion week.
In a statement, the BFC said: "The BFC survey results reflect a cultural change not only based on ideals and choices made by designer businesses, international brands as well as consumer feeling but also encouraged by the attitude of multi-brand stores who are moving away from selling fur.”
There is increasing pressure from anti-fur protesters(抗议者) to ban fur or boycott designers that use the material. During last year's London Fashion Week, there were 250 anti-fur protesters, The Guardian reported, and a show in February saw an activist storm the stage at a Mary Katrantzou show. Following the incident, Mary Katrantzou's team made a statement insisting that the collection was animal fur-free and “only man-made fur was used.”
Ahead of this year's fashion week, set to take place from September 14 to 18, an open letter written by singer Paloma Faith and published by Peta also called for a ban of animal fur.
The letter read: “The BFC shouldn't be approving a material whose production is considered so cruel that it is outlawed in the UK. With the vast number of cutting- edge, eco-friendly man-made furs available on the market today, I'm sure you'll agree that there's no longer any excuse for killing animals for their fur.”
London Fashion Week's fur-free runway follows a similar policy recently adopted by Burberry Design to end the use of fur including rabbit, fox, mink, racoon, and angora wool, as is confirmed by Burberry CEO Marco Gobbetti in an interview with Business of Fashion.
The BFC's news has been met with support from people on social media, who have applauded the designers choosing to give up the use of animal fur.
“I am so excited that fur has been banned from London Fashion Week! Progress!” Faith wrote on Twitter.
Another said: “London Fashion Week is ditching fur and leading the way towards a fur-free future in fashion.”
1. Why are examples of last year's London Fashion show and Mary Katrantzou show in February are given in paragraph 3?A.To compare the two fashion shows. |
B.To prove Mary Katrantzou was wronged. |
C.To show pressure from anti-fur protesters. |
D.To indicate the popularity of London Fashion Show. |
A.It is expensive to kill animals for fur. |
B.BFC has banned the use of animal fur. |
C.Production of animal fur is illegal in the world. |
D.Good Man-made furs are available on the market. |
A.Critical. | B.Ambiguous. |
C.Favorable. | D.Indifferent. |
A.The BFC reports a cultural change in fashion. |
B.London Fashion Week will be fur free this year. |
C.Famous singer writes open letter to ban animal fur. |
D.Animal fur is sure to be replaced by man-made fur. |
1.创建绿色校园的意义
2.一些校园浪费的现象
3.建绿色校园的建议并发出倡议
注意:1.词数120左右;
2.可适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
7 . “What kind of rubbish are you?” This question might normally cause anger, but in Shanghai it has brought about weary groans over the past week. On July 1st, the city introduced strict trash-sorting regulations that are expected to be used as a model for our country. Residents must divide their waste into four separate categories and toss it into specific public bins. They must do so at scheduled times, when monitors are present to ensure compliance(服从)and to inquire into the nature of one’s rubbish.
Violators face the prospect of fines and worse. They could be hit with fines of up to 200 yuan ($29). For repeat violators, the city can add black marks to their credit records, making it harder for them to obtain bank loans or even buy train tickets.
Shanghai authorities are responding to an obvious environmental problem. It generates 9 million tons of garbage a year, more than London’s annual output and rising quickly. But like other cities in China, it lacks a recycling system. Instead, it has relied on trash pickers to sift through the waste, plucking out whatever can be reused. This has limits. As people get wealthier, fewer of them want to do such dirty work. The waste, meanwhile, just keeps piling up. China churns out 80 billion pairs of disposable chopsticks a year.
Many residents appear to support the idea of recycling in general but are frustrated by the details. Rubbish must be divided according to whether it is food, recyclable, dry or hazardous(有害的), the distinctions among which can be confusing, though there are apps to help work it out. Some have complained about the rules surrounding food waste. They must put it straight in the required public bin, forcing them to tear open plastic bags and toss it by hand. Most vexing(令人烦恼的)are the short windows for dumping trash, typically a couple of hours, morning and evening. Along with the monitors at the bins, this means that people go at around the same time and can keep an eye on what is being thrown out; no one wants to look bad.
1. What’s the purpose of the first paragraph?A.To introduce the trash-sorting regulations. |
B.To explain the four categories of the waste. |
C.To present residents’ complaints about trash dividing. |
D.To show the goal of trash-sorting regulations. |
A.People who don’t sort the waste. |
B.People who argue with the monitors. |
C.People who don’t throw the trash on time. |
D.People who are against the regulations. |
A.The massive traffic. |
B.The increasing garbage. |
C.Lack of a recycling system. |
D.Lack of trash pickers. |
A.Complex distinction among the four categories of trash. |
B.Short scheduled time for tossing the trash. |
C.Being observed by monitors when throwing the garbage. |
D.Being fined when blamed due to improper behavior. |
A.A Restart of Trash-sorting |
B.A Great Change in Tackling Litter |
C.A New Era of Garbage Classification |
D.A Craze for Learning Waste Sorting |
8 . As most people know, in the last few years, sandstorms have swept across many cities and areas of North China, polluting the air and disturbing daily lives of human beings. People look dirty and suffer many kinds of illnesses, such as breath difficulty. The sandstorm is such a serious problem that it has not only weakened the industrial and agricultural development of our country but also caused a lot of trouble to the living conditions of the Chinese people.
Therefore, effective measures should be taken as soon as possible to stop its happening. So how should we deal with the frightening sandstorms?
Some experts offer practical advice as follows: For one thing, more money ought to be put into tree planting and forest protection in order to keep more water on the Earth. For another, government of all countries should make laws on environment protection. For example, banning the use of throw-away chopsticks and punishing illegal tree cutting. Scientists should also study and find ways to lower the grade of its destruction and to improve the environment. As for some schools, education about sandstorms should be spread properly and timely to make more and more people attach great importance to this problem.
How people look forward to sunny days with soft wind touching their faces now and forever! The golden days can come back so long as we try our best to protect the natural environment from today on. And the fact is that what I expect is not just a dream. There are some sweet fruits from the early efforts.
1. What’s the first paragraph mainly about?A.Bad influences sandstorms bring. |
B.Ways to protect the environment. |
C.The biggest cause of sandstorms. |
D.The fast development of China. |
A.Two. | B.Three. | C.Four. | D.Five. |
A.The damage sandstorms cause can never be avoided. |
B.The author has confidence in fighting against sandstorms. |
C.The author is unsure about the future of the environment. |
D.The improvement of the environment is especially relaxing. |
A.Why people should always carry on with dreams. |
B.A bright world with no sandstorms anymore. |
C.How to realize our dream to live a happy life. |
D.Successful examples of stopping sandstorms. |
9 . Seattle on Sunday became the first major US city to ban drinking straws(吸管), an environmentally friendly move that leaders hope will spark a nationwide conversation about small, everyday changes that people can make to protect the planet.
A decade ago, the city adopted a law requiring that all one-time-use food-service items be compostable(可分解的) or recyclable. But straws were exempted from that law because there were not many good alternatives. So the straws stayed, along with the environmental problems they cause.
Most plastic straws aren’t heavy enough to make it through industrial recycling sorters, and can ruin an otherwise good load of recycling. Or they end up getting blown out of trash cans and car windows and eventually wind up in the oceans, where they can hurt wildlife.
Strawless Ocean estimates that 71 percent of seabirds and 30 percent of turtles have some kind of plastic in their stomachs. The organization says plastic can increase the death rate of marine life by 50 percent.
Now customers at grocery stores, restaurants, food trucks, even institutional cafeterias have to find another way to get liquid into their mouths. Compostable paper straws are allowed under the ban. People who have a medical need to use a straw are not included.
Failure to obey may result in a US$250 fine, although city leaders said that the purpose of the law is more about raising awareness. In September, 150 businesses participated in Strawless in Seattle, an attempt to reduce the use of plastic straws. In that month alone, Strawless Ocean estimates, 2.3 million plastic straws were removed from the city.
“When you get your iced drink, you’re going to get a straw. When you get your wine, you’re probably going to get a straw,” said Dune Ives, executive director of the Lonely Whale Foundation, which led the campaign. “Imagine a world where we could stop consuming 500 million straws a day, just in America!” the campaign says. “Imagine a world that is less dependent on plastic. That’s change we can start today!”
1. What does the underlined word “exempted” mean in the second paragraph?A.To make something out of the list. | B.To make something better than before. |
C.To include something in a special list. | D.To forgive someone who makes mistakes. |
A.They may make the trash cans dirty. | B.They may destroy American recycling system. |
C.They may cause much ocean wildlife in danger. | D.They may cause many companies get fined. |
A.Many people are in favor of it. | B.Many people pay no attention to it. |
C.Some people are strongly against it. | D.Only the government workers agree with it. |
A.Seattle becomes first major US city to ban straws. |
B.Seattle successfully bans people from using straws. |
C.Seattle has been working hard to protect the environment. |
D.Imagine a world that is less dependent on plastic. |
10 . There’s been a lot of talking about white-and-blue collar workers, and you may have even heard of gold collar workers, but lately a new color of collar is making its way into China’s urban vernacular(土话)—green. Green collars say no when work is life and life is work. They choose to get out of the fast lane(车道), and explore new ways of living “green”.
Living green doesn’t mean someone is working as an environmentalist, biologist or scientist. Instead it is more of a lifestyle choice. A typical green collar is well educated like a white-collar but physically tough like a blue-collar, likely born in the 70s or 80s of the last century and living in one of China’s big cities, with a monthly income well above 5,000 yuan(about US $700).
The life of a green collar may go something like this: Turn off the mobile phone after work, eat only healthy food rich in vitamins, go on hikes every weekend, and like to help the underprivileged.
Green collars even have their own club. In Beijing, the Green Collar Club is for people who share a “be happy, healthy and helpful” spirit. The club often holds charity parties and uses the donations for environmental protection and poverty relief(摆脱贫困) projects in China.
“They are successful in their careers, but do not miss the pleasures in life. They have a lot of money, but do not fall slave to it.” said Zuo Shiguang, one of the founding members of the club.
1. What is the passage mainly about?A.Differences between white-and-blue collars and green collars. |
B.The increasing awareness(意识) of environmental protection. |
C.New trends of life in China’s big cities. |
D.The lifestyle of green collars. |
A.they have a large income to use |
B.they spend a lot of money and time in the open air |
C.they don’t want to live an unhealthy life |
D.they devote themselves to(致力于) environmental protection |
A.prefer to be left alone | B.think nothing about work any more |
C.have fun with old friends | D.do a lot of extra work at home |
A.appreciative. | B.doubtful(怀疑的). |
C.negative(否定的). | D.worried. |