1 . Crazy Laws
It seems that the Greek philosopher, Aristotle, was right when he said, “Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered.”
Did you know, for example, that London taxis (officially called Hackney carriages) are still legally required to carry hay and oats for their horses to eat? And in England, it is illegal to stand within 100 yards (91 metres) of the queen, without wearing socks?
If you live in Scotland, however, it’s important to know that if someone knocks at the door of your house, and needs to use your toilet, you are legally required to let him in.
Lots of the craziest laws seem to involve animals.
Last, children are forbidden from going to school with their breath smelling of wild onions in West Virginia. And in Arkansas, teachers who have a certain hairc ut (a bob) will not be given a pay-rise. In Florida, a woman can be fined for falling asleep under the hair-dryer and unmarried women must not parachute on a Sunday. If they do, they might be arrested, receive a fine or be put in jail.
A.But if you are Scottish you should stay away from the city of York. |
B.Never should a Scotsman leave his own country. |
C.But strange laws don’t just exist in the UK. |
D.England is the place where craziest laws have been in existence for centuries. |
E.Laws in some parts of the world haven’t changed for centuries. |
F.In Hollywood, it is illegal to take more than 2,000 sheep down Hollywood Boulevard at any one time. |
China’s Good Samaritan Law (见义勇为法) Takes Effect
China’s Good Samaritan Law went into effect on October 1 to encourage people who are ready to help others. Under the law, people who voluntarily offer emergency assistance to those who are, or who they believe to be, injured, ill or in danger, will not have civil responsibility in the event of harm to the victims.
The new law aims to ease the reluctance people feel toward helping strangers for fear of legal consequences if they make mistakes in treatment. It is a response to the phenomenon of people hesitating
There has been no shortage of cases
These cases
However, some experts are concerned
3 . When Nelson Mandela opened South Africa’s Constitutional Court in 1995, he said it would determine “the future of our democracy”. The first president of the democratic era argued that the court was as important to the new constitution as the parliament and presidency. Judges should be “creative and independent” in ensuring that,
By and large, the judges have done their job. The Constitutional Court has defended citizens
Critics accuse judges of overstepping their boundaries and usurping (篡夺) legislation. It is true that the judicial branch has become involved in political disputes. But this reflects the
It is,
A.in addition to | B.in contrast to | C.thanks to | D.far from |
A.failed | B.granted | C.resisted | D.convinced |
A.Thus | B.Furthermore | C.Yet | D.Since |
A.scientific | B.constitutional | C.theoretical | D.universal |
A.opposite | B.option | C.distinction | D.mix |
A.range | B.share | C.failure | D.currency |
A.account | B.strike | C.restore | D.complain |
A.says | B.remarks | C.declares | D.puts |
A.therefore | B.though | C.likewise | D.ultimately |
A.violent | B.racial | C.direct | D.personal |
4 . E-cigarettes Ban:Good news for Tobacco?
The proposed ban on flavored e-cigarettes may drive many Americans back to cigarettes,said Christopher Palmeri and Jeff Green in the Los Ange Times.
Responding to an outbreak of hundreds of serious lung illnesses from vapes(电子烟)that killed a seventh person this week, FDA(食物药品监管局)will outlaw everything but tobacco-flavored-cigarettes, as Michigan and New York state recently did. Flavors like buttered popcorn and mango helped create "an explosion" in teen vaping. But hundreds of thousands of teens already addicted to nicotine-and 9 million adults who vape--may simply replace vaping with tobacco products. By banning favored vapes the government may be "closing the shed door after the horse has gotten out."
Nobody vapes "because the flavor is so amazing," said David Marcus in The Federalist com. That's why the ban is so clueless."If kids want to taste bubble gum,they can buy,you know,bubble gum." Vaping giants like Juul need to be honest about the fact that they’re in the nicotine business, and monitor themselves accordingly. They should spend billions ensuring that stores don’t sell to minors instead of touting the "scientific conclusion"that e-cigarettes are safer than smoking. The burning involved in smoking cigarettes creates tar and a bunch of chemicals not present in e-cigarettes' watery vapor. True, but nicotine is also a dangerous and addictive drug and vaping liquid itself contains chemicals that damage blood vessels(血管)."The idea of safe smoking" is"a lie," and the vaping industry's fruit- and candy-flavored pods" are proof of evil intent."
"The massive increase in teen vapers" is a reasonable concern, said Robert Gebelhoff in Washington Post.com.But the evidence suggests that the lung illnesses that led the government to act were caused by black-market products cut with dangerous substance.Banning favored vapes will only drive more nicotine addicts and teens to the black market,which will be happy to provide fruity pods. Instead of banning flavors, the government "should empower the FDA to fully regulate the industry." That would let science,"not panic,guide our policy."
1. What led to the proposed ban on e-cigarettes?A.Popular flavors like mango led to teen nicotine addiction. |
B.The lack of proper legal supervision in the vaping industry. |
C.An increased number of deaths resulting from lung diseases. |
D.The sharp increase in the sale of unhealthy tobacco products. |
A.FDA would regulate the tobacco industry more effectively. |
B.The vaping industry would be more strictly monitored. |
C.The evil intent of the vaping industry would be revealed. |
D.The tobacco industry might regain its previous glory. |
A.Promoting | B.challenging | C.assuming | D.tolerating |
A.Supportive. | B.Disapproving | C.Uninterested | D.Impartial. |
5 . The teenage years of an individual is marked by evaluating one's values,experiencing a shift in outlooks,and a tendency to act rebellious. It can also be a time when someone becomes extremely
The issue of teenage curfews is widely debated in the United States, where this method is still rather
On the other hand, curfews can be seen as a preventive measure that rob young people of their rights,
What is important for a parent to remember when establishing a curfew for their children is that a teenager's misjudged view of certain
A.opposed | B.subjected | C.related | D.restricted |
A.improving | B.restoring | C.ensuring | D.expanding |
A.principle | B.reference | C.approach | D.efficiency |
A.popular | B.absent | C.practical | D.accessible |
A.Typical | B.Evident | C.Critical | D.Specific |
A.in place of | B.in honor of | C.in case of | D.in favor of |
A.results | B.events | C.patterns | D.links |
A.protecting | B.acknowledging | C.limiting | D.liberating |
A.officially | B.logically | C.particularly | D.physically |
A.By contrast | B.In addition | C.In conclusion | D.In general |
A.take charge of | B.contribute to | C.result from | D.deal with |
A.rules | B.charges | C.crimes | D.relations |
A.impolite | B.unrealistic | C.inadequate | D.unfair |
A.adopt | B.allow | C.avoid | D.address |
A.satisfy | B.spare | C.surround | D.settle |
6 . Progressives often support diversity missions as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.
A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender equality" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.
Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government board are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas(配额). If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.
The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which clearly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.
The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest. Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".
But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the percentage of women in the general population, but so what?
The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.
Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.
Writing in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a "golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same elite women occupy multiple seats on a variety of boards.
Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do little to help average women.
1. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will __________.A.help little to reduce gender bias. |
B.pose a threat to the state government. |
C.raise women's position in politics. |
D.greatly broaden career options. |
A.the harm from absolute board decision. |
B.the importance of constitutional guarantees. |
C.the pressure on women in global corporations. |
D.the needlessness of government interventions. |
A.the underestimation of elite women's role |
B.the objection to female participation on boards. |
C.the entry of unqualified candidates into the board. |
D.the growing tension between labor and management. |
A.Women's need in employment should be considered. |
B.Feasibility should be a prime concern in policy making. |
C.Everyone should try hard to promote social justice. |
D.Major social issues should be the focus of the government. |
7 . What happens when the right to know comes up against the right not to know? The ease of genetic testing has brought this question to light. Two
Both cases involve Huntington’s disease (HD). whose
In the British case,
The German case is in some ways the mirror image of the British one. Unlike in Britain, in Germany the right not to know genetic information is protected in law.
Both cases test a legal grey area. If the right to know is
It is the law’s job to
A.remarkable | B.distinct | C.contrasting | D.dominant |
A.consequences | B.symptoms | C.indications | D.diagnoses |
A.influenced | B.affected | C.inherited | D.annoyed |
A.scheduled | B.determined | C.approved | D.implemented |
A.possession | B.status | C.health | D.identity |
A.revealing | B.sharing | C.reminding | D.concealing |
A.convinced | B.suspicious | C.infected | D.positive |
A.Nevertheless | B.Thus | C.Additionally | D.Fundamentally |
A.in advance of | B.in the course of | C.at the close of | D.at the risk of |
A.inevitable | B.inextinguishable | C.incurable | D.intolerable |
A.as a result | B.after all | C.above all | D.in return |
A.financially | B.academically | C.legally | D.culturally |
A.on occasion | B.by comparison | C.in effect | D.for example |
A.reserve | B.balance | C.defend | D.draft |
A.lawmakers | B.victims | C.patients | D.doctors |
8 . France, which prides itself as the global innovator of fashion, has decided its fashion industry has lost an absolute right to define physical beauty for women. Its lawmakers gave approval last week to a law that would make it a crime to employ ultra (过分的)-thin models on runways.
The parliament also agreed to ban websites that “ encourage unreasonable thinness” by promoting extreme dieting.
Such measures ;have a couple of uplifting motives. They suggest beauty should not be defined by looks that end up impinging on health. That’s a start. And the ban on ultrathin models seems to go beyond protecting models from starving themselves to death - as some have done.
The bans, if fully carried out, would suggest to women (and many men) that they should not let others be arbiters (仲裁人) of their beauty. And perhaps faintly, they hint that people should look to qualities like character and intellect rather than dieting their way to size zero.
The French measures, however, rely too much on severe punishment to change a culture that still regards beauty as skin-deep and bone-showing. Under the law, using a fashion model that does not meet a government-defined index of body mass could result in a $85,000 fine and six months in prison.
In contrast to France’s actions, Denmark’s fashion industry agreed last month on rules regarding the age, health, and. other characteristics of models. The newly revised Danish Fashion Ethical Charter clearly states: “We are aware of and take responsibility for the impact the fashion industry has on body ideals, especially on young people.” The charter’s main tool of enforcement (执行) is to deny access for designers and modeling agencies to Copenhagen Fashion Week, which is run by the Danish Fashion Institute.
Relying on moral persuasion rather than law to address the misuse of body ideals may be the best step. Even better would be to help uplift notions (观念) of beauty beyond the material standards of a particular industry.
1. According to the first paragraph, what would happen in France?A.Physical beauty would be redefined. |
B.New runways would be constructed. |
C.Websites about dieting would develop. |
D.The fashion industry would decline. |
A.heightening the value of | B.indicating the state of | C.losing faith in | D.doing harm to |
A.using extravagant material |
B.caring too much about models’ character. |
C.showing little concern for models’ health |
D.pursuing the perfect physical conditions of models |
A.The Great Threats to the Fashion Industry |
B.Beauty Is Skin-deep |
C.A Campaign for Promoting True Beauty in France |
D.A Challenge to the Fashion Industry’s Body Ideals |
It is a common sight on campus or in the streets: a young person rides by on an electric scooter, traveling quickly and proudly. But Beijing’s traffic authorities have said that starting on Sept.5, people who are caught riding electric scooters on public roads or bicycle lanes will be fined 10 yuan. They will also be given a warning not to use the vehicles on public roads again.
The announcement was made after traffic police in Shanghai started a campaign to get electric scooters off public roads, with police officers stopping riders because the scooters could cause traffic problems.
The Beijing Consumer Association said it had tested more than 20 electric scooters of different brands recently and found that most had substandard brakes. It added that 16 of the tested scooters could go faster than the maximum 20 km per hour set for electric bikes. According to the traffic police, people who ride electric scooters at certain speeds can easily bump into the vehicles in the vehicle lane and hurt people who walk in the bicycle lanes.
But seeing the benefits that electric scooters have brought to young people, experts are worried that the ban may take effect slowly.
Electric scooters are a great answer to the ‘last mile problem’ of getting from a public transport station to one’s home. They’re light enough to throw over your shoulder. They’re easy to ride just about anywhere and don’t need a lot of physical effort. The scooter can travel 25 km on one charge. It’s convenient and easy to control.
They are also good for environment. Unlike cars and buses, electric scooters produce no carbon dioxide, need no fuel and make almost no noise.
For many young people, they use them to copy cool celebrities they have seen in videos.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________