组卷网 > 知识点选题 >
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 2 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约480词) | 较难(0.4) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要通过上海海滩上4岁女孩因为父亲疏忽导致死亡的事件作为引入,提出了关于父母对儿童造成伤害是否应被视为犯罪行为进行了讨论。

1 . The recent reports of a 4-year-old girl on a Shanghai beach have gone viral on social media platforms, provoking debate about whether China should criminalize negligence in child supervision.

The father of the little girl claimed that he left her alone on the beach for about 12 minutes to fetch his phone. However, she was nowhere to be found when he was back. Surveillance (监控) videos show that she waited for about 10 minutes before walking toward the water’s edge alone, and then disappeared into the water. Two weeks later, her body was discovered about 100 kilometers away in neighboring Zhejiang Province.

The core issue in this case is the father’s leaving his young daughter unattended on the beach, causing her tragic death. Should such behavior, when it causes harm to a child, be seen as a criminal act? In an online survey, more than 90 percent of respondents insisted that the father be held legally responsible and face criminal punishments.

Nevertheless, according to Liu Chunquan, a lawyer, it may not satisfy the criteria for criminal negligence, since the primary focus of Chinese criminal law is on extreme cases of parental neglect, such as physical abuse and mental torture. Rarely do legal authorities charge parents; instead, they are just likely to face penalties consisting of warnings and fines.

In 2022, a 2-year-old baby drowned in a cesspool while in the company of his father. The court ruled shared responsibility between the father and the cesspool’s owner, with a 7:3 proportion. The owner was ordered to pay 20,000 yuan to the child’s family. Unluckily, similar cases do exist nationwide. Roughly, 100,000 children lose their lives in accidents annually in China, which is largely due to negligence, such as parents leaving their children unattended, either in locked cars or at home. Besides, drowning is now the main cause of death for children aged 1 to 14 years old.

It is no wonder that an increasing number of netizens request that specific laws and regulations be passed to ensure the safety of children and their well-being. Hopefully, criminalizing child supervision negligence in China can serve as a warning and precaution.

However, downsides of introducing such legislation may also emerge. For instance, it’s difficult to distinguish between a regrettable accident and criminal negligence, so that over-criminalization can be triggered, in which well-meaning parents making honest mistakes are charged with a crime.

Therefore, a more balanced approach to addressing the issue of infant safety should involve a combination of new legislation, education and support services. The ultimate objective is to prevent similar catastrophes in the future. We must recognize that children are not only their parents’ offspring, but also the nation’s future.

1. What can we infer from the tragedy of the 4-year-old girl?
A.Her father’s carelessness and negligence should be to blame.
B.The beach in Shanghai should not be open to small children.
C.Her father has been sentenced to severe penalties by the police.
D.She would have survived if she had not waited in the water for a long time.
2. What are the figures in paragraph 5 intended to prove?
A.Irresponsible adults contribute to children’s death.B.People can’t be too concerned about child safety.
C.Kids shouldn’t be allowed to swim alone.D.Parents’ constant monitoring is a must.
3. Updated legislation in child supervision is in demand for the following reasons except _______.
A.the mild penalties in the existing lawsB.parents’ ignorance of potential dangers
C.frequent occurrence of such incidentsD.masses of netizens’ urgent appeals
4. What attitude does the author hold to criminalizing child supervision negligence in China?
A.Indifferent.B.Negative.C.Objective.D.Supportive.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 较难(0.4) |
2 . Flying devices called drones(无人机) may be one of the most important technologies of the future.
The number of jobs for people who know how to design, build and control them is increasing. Because of this increase, several U.S. universities have started offering degrees in unmanned aircraft systems, or UAS.
One of these universities is the University of Washington in Seattle. Ward Handley is seeking a master’s degree in UAS at the university. When the drone program first began, he did not think it was a good idea. “Drones can be used to invade privacy(侵犯隐私).” He said. But later, Handley changed his opinion. He said, “I think there are good enough purposes for them.”
The FAA (the part of the U.S. government that controls air travel and traffic) is creating new rules to control the use of drones, however. A new law requires drone owners to register(登记) their drones. People who do not register their drones could face fines of up to US$20,000.
The new rules may also present problems for students. One problem is finding a legal place to fly.
Students at Blue Mountain Community College fly inside the college gym. In Seattle, University of Washington students test their drones in a big room.
Christopher Lum, a scientist at the University of Washington, helps students explore how drones can safely share the sky with regular aircraft. Lum explained why they test drones inside a building, “We need to register our aircraft and get permission to fly outside. That process can take months.”
At this time, Kansas State University is the only school with permission to offer unmanned aircraft flight classes to students outside. The FAA selected Kansas State University and 15 other universities to be part of a national research group.
Lum and some of his students recently moved their research to Australia. Australia has fewer rules limiting drones. A professor at Western Washington University also took his department’s drones to Canada for the same reason.
1. Degrees in UAS were created in several U.S. universities because of ________.
A.the increasing interest in the field
B.the increasing employment opportunities
C.the support from the government
D.the development of this technology
2. Why didn’t Handley think the drone program was a good idea at first?
A.Drones can be used for bad purposes.
B.The use of drones was very limited.
C.Few people can benefit from the program.
D.The university didn’t attach great importance to the program.
3. According to Lum, why does he teach flight classes inside a building?
A.It’s safer for the students.
B.It’s very expensive to register the aircraft.
C.It takes a very long time to get official permission.
D.He hasn’t got permission from the university.
4. What can we infer from the last two paragraphs?
A.Australia is promoting the use of drones.
B.Kansas State University is the first to offer a UAS degree.
C.Australia has fewer rules than Canada to control the use of drones.
D.The U.S. has more rules than Canada to control the use of drones.
2017-08-06更新 | 51次组卷 | 1卷引用:湖北省天门、仙桃、潜江三市2016-2017学年高二下学期期末考试英语试题
共计 平均难度:一般