组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:90 题号:12813202

In 2018 biologist Jann Vendetti published a paper that described the discovery of five species of non-native snails and slugs(蜗牛和鼻涕虫)in Southern California. The research would not have been possible without some 1,200 volunteers who uploaded nearly 10,000 photos to the SLIME project (Snails and Slugs Living in Metropolitan Environments) on an app called iNaturalist.

“So the entire existence of that paper is dependent upon these citizen scientists. How do you credit those people?” said Greg Pauly from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles. “There are some very specific requirements that a lot of journals and a lot of academic societies use. And those requirements largely would exclude nonprofessional scientists. And to me, that’s absurd.” That’s why Pauly, together with Vendetti, and several Australian biologists are arguing that criteria must change to recognize citizen scientists as authors on scientific journal articles.

They propose what they’re calling “group co-authorship.” The author list on Vendetti’s snail-and-slug paper includes the phrase “citizen science participants in SLIME.” But the phrase is absent when you look up the paper on Google Scholar. The publication software simply isn’t equipped to handle that kind of authorship, and so it erases the group’s vital contribution.

In another case, several years ago in Australia, a team of researchers tried to condition native lizards not to eat the poisonous cane toads. The only reason it was successful was because they partnered with the traditional landowners in northwestern Australia, and this group was called the Balanggarra Rangers.

Several journals flat-out refused to allow for the inclusion of the Rangers as group co-authors. Eventually, the researchers did convince the editors of some journals to allow it, but the group’s title was shortened, as if it was a first and last name, in online indexing software: “B. Rangers.”

The researchers argue that these errors and omissions don’t only make the critical contributions of a native community as invisible, they could also be seen as showing prejudice.

“If the person who had made that contribution was a graduate student who was trying to pursue a career in the sciences, we would all say, ‘Oh, of course that person should be a co-author’. But we don’t necessarily extend that same line of reasoning to citizen scientists.”

Allowing for group co-authorship is not a new idea. In 2004 the journal Nature published a paper titled “Initial Sequencing and Analysis of the Human Genome.” It listed as the sole author the “International Human Genome Sequencing Association.” “So let’s just choose this group-authorship model and turn it into group co-authorships. This really shouldn’t be that hard.”

1. What can be learned about Vendetti’s snail-and-slug paper?
A.It is the first paper to credit citizen scientists on the title page.
B.It describes snails and slugs living in metropolitan environments.
C.It is available on the publication software Google Scholar.
D.It includes 10,000 photos of snails and slugs in Southern California.
2. What can be inferred about Balanggarra Rangers?
A.They are familiar with native animals and plants.
B.They make a living by hunting native lizards.
C.They are good business people.
D.They are world famous as B. Rangers.
3. Why is the example of a graduate student mentioned in the 7th paragraph?
A.To point out the omissions in the line of reasoning.
B.To highlight the contribution of a native community.
C.To argue against showing favor for a particular group.
D.To prove that not crediting citizen scientists is unfair.
4. The author’s purpose of writing the article is to ________.
A.expose the unfair practice in the scientific community
B.call for the wide recognition of group co-authorship
C.call on more people to become citizen scientists
D.explain the origin of the term group co-authorship

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】In the early years of America, the average mother had eight to ten children. Living conditions were hard. Many children died at an early age. Families needed a lot of help on the farm. So it was good to have many children.

But over the years birth rate(比率) fell. Families began to have fewer and fewer children. By 1900, the average woman had only three or four children. In 1936, during the Great Depression, the average American mother gave birth to only two children.

Things changed after World War Two. Suddenly, it seemed like every family started having babies. Parents were hopeful about the future. People felt the need for a family and security after the long, difficult years of the war. From 1950 to 1960, the number of children between the ages of five and 14 increased by more than ten million.

Many of the new parents moved to homes in the new suburbs. Usually a developer would buy land, then clear it, level it and build houses on it. Young families would buy the houses with money that they borrowed from local banks.

Life there was different. Families moving in found that their new friends were happy to help them get started. When little Bobby outgrew his clothes, his mother gave them to little Billy across the street. People felt safe enough to leave their doors unlocked.

Parents did everything they could to make life good for their children. Between 1950 and 1960, the number of boys playing on baseball teams increased from less than one million to almost six million. The number of Girl Scouts(童子军) increased by two million.

Bicycle sales doubled. And it wasn’t just two-wheeled transportation that experienced an increase after the war.

1. How did the birth rate change in America according to the passage?
A.It first fell and then rose.B.It first rose and then fell.
C.It rose slowly all the time.D.It remained the same.
2. What does “a developer” in Paragraph 4 refer to?
A.A person who works in the local banks.
B.A person who moves from cities to the suburbs.
C.A person who designs and creates new products.
D.A person who builds and sells houses to make money.
3. Which of the following best describes life in the new suburbs?
A.Stressful.B.Simple.C.Easy.D.Harmonious.
4. What will probably be talked about following the last paragraph?
A.The increase in car production and sales.
B.The improvement in children’s education.
C.The changes in American population.
D.The flow of the suburban population.
2022-01-26更新 | 50次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇议论文。全文以Banksy的画作被取走的例子导入,接着讨论街头艺术家们面临的进退两难的困境,并围绕这些街头艺术作品的产权归属问题进行探讨。

【推荐2】Early one morning in February, a team of specialists pulled up next to a building in Nottingham. They worked quickly but carefully, removing a small section of the wall on which "Hula-hoop Girl" had been painted by Banksy, an outstanding street artist. John Brandler, a collector, said that he had purchased the artwork from the building's landlord. Local residents were horrified, as the mural (壁画) had spread cheer during the lockdowns in Britain.

It was not the first time Banksy's artwork had been carried off. So many of Banksy's pieces, in particular, have been taken and sold into private collections that they have been brought together to form an exhibition. "The Art of Banksy", the world's largest display of his work, opened in London in May as a paid-for, ticketed exhibition. The show invites art lovers to take cash out to view privately held works intended to be publicly accessible and free. Banksy has criticised the practice, saying that he will not authenticate artworks removed from their original site.

Street art is an unusually risky art form. Painters rarely seek permission to turn a building into a canvas, and so while the artwork belongs to them, the backdrop does not. If they want to protect their pieces from unwanted buyers, artists should ask for permission from the building owner and sign a contract. Another different problem is posed by many street artists' decision to remain anonymous. Artists shield themselves from accusations of deliberately damaging public property by using secret identities, but potentially lose out on the chance to protect their works from copyright theft.

But the legal protections are improving as more people come to appreciate street art's value. Ina case last year, a judge found that famous graffiti (涂鸦) in New York was protected from removal because it had "significant artistic value and cultural importance". Copyright lawsuits are also increasingly common.

1. What is the main idea of the first paragraph?
A.Local residents are criticizing the removal.
B.Banksy's artwork was taken off by a collector.
C.Hula-hoop Girl has been saved by John Brandler.
D.Banksy is an outstanding street artist around the world.
2. What is Banksy's attitude to the exhibition "The Art of Banksy"?
A.Neutral.B.Positive.
C.Indifferent.D.Disapproving.
3. The underlined-word "anonymous" in paragraph 3 means "          ".
A.famousB.modestC.unidentifiedD.autonomous
4. Which of the following is a suitable title for the text?
A.What is street art?B.Who owns street art?
C.The art of BanksyD.Value of street art
2022-03-20更新 | 110次组卷
阅读理解-六选四(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐3】Directions: Read the following passage. Fill in each blank with a proper sentence given in the box. Each sentence can be used only once. Note that there are two more sentences than you need.

Screen Time: How Much Is Too Much?

Many children spend a lot of time watching or playing with electronic media—from televisions to video games, computers and other devices.     1     Perhaps parents now should ease up on their concerns about screen time, at least for older boys and girls.

Until last year, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) suggested that children and teenagers have no more than two hours of screen time a day. It also suggests that parents balance a child’s screen time with other activities.

    2     Christopher Ferguson, who teaches psychology at Stetson University in Florida, notes a lack of evidence supporting reports that too many hours spent playing video games or watching TV is truly harmful.

Ferguson seems interested in one idea: the link between video games and violent or risky behavior. When he saw results from a recent British survey on screen time, he wanted to know more. The British study found a small negative effect—about a one percent increase—in aggression and depression among children who had six or more hours of screen time a day.     3     So, Ferguson and his team examined answers from a survey on risky behaviors. The study involved about 6,000 boys and girls in Florida, whose average age was 16.

Data from this survey found that American children are also fairly resistant to the negative effects of electronic media. Among those who used screens up to six hours a day, the survey found: a 0.5 percent increase in criminal behavior; a 1.7 percent increase in signs of depression; and a 1.2 percent negative effect on school grades.     4     To further argue his point that screen time is not harmful, Ferguson adds that children should become familiar with screen technology. Electronic devices, he says, are a part of our everyday lives.

A.Some negative experiences on social media can and do affect some children.
B.However, some experts question claims that too much screen time is harmful.
C.He wanted to see if there was a similar effect among young people in the United States.
D.So, it is natural that parents should wonder about all the time children spend looking at a screen.
E.The researchers found no increase in risky sex or driving behaviors, use of illegal substances or eating disorders.
F.The researchers suggested that for those children, technology use might get in the way of taking part in other important activities.
2019-04-19更新 | 16次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般