Many people think of sharks as dangerous monsters. But human beings pose a far greater danger to these creatures than they do to us. Although shark attacks do occur, they are quite rare. On the other hand, according to one estimate, humans kill 100 million sharks every year. This statistics is a warning that many kinds of sharks may become extinct.
The killing of sharks is a problem for the whole planet. Sharks are apex predators, which means that they eat other species, but few creatures eat them. As sharks die off, the populations of animals that sharks consume will increase. This, in turn, means that the populations of the creatures that those animals eat will shrink. That includes some sea creatures that humans consume, such as shrimp. It also includes fish that eat algae, which can cause algae to spread so much that it damages coral reefs.
Reducing shark populations affect more than just the ocean. Ocean plants produce much of the oxygen on the planet. These plants can be harmed when changes in shark population upset the ecosystem.
Try to refuse shark products. Shark liver oil is used in many popular cosmetics. Pet foods, vitamins, energy drinks and leather goods can also be made from shark parts. And shark meat is sold around the world, sometimes under misleading names such as rock salmon or whitefish. Most sharks killed worldwide are hunted for their fins, which are used to make shark fin soup. The process is cruel: Fisherman cut the shark's fin off and then dump the shark back into the water, still alive. Then the shark dies slowly, sometimes over several days. Sharks breathe by swimming, so a shark that can't swim will die.
Sharks often die because they become tangled in nets meant for other kinds of fish. If you eat seafood, make sure it comes from fisheries that care for the oceans.
Many organizations try to protect sharks. They can teach you about these essential creatures and give more advice on how to keep them alive. These organizations also need your support to continue protecting these important creatures.
1. What can we expect if sharks die off?A.All sea creatures will reduce. |
B.Coral reefs will be no longer harmed. |
C.Fisheries will have difficulty surviving. |
D.Sea ecologic environment will be damaged. |
A.Ways to save sharks. |
B.Knowledge about sharks. |
C.Reasons for saving sharks. |
D.Process of making shark products. |
A.Stuck. | B.Bent |
C.Shaped. | D.Explored. |
A.Shark Extinction, Danger Free |
B.Shark Attack, Life Threatened |
C.Shark Protection, Ocean Healthy |
D.Shark Benefits, Opinions Different |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Nature is all about relationships: the interconnected links between the living and lifeless, and how they harmonize beautifully into a whole that might not be immediately apparent to us humans, as the complexities of the world sometimes escape the grasp of our relatively short-sighted understanding. Perhaps that's why the urgency of the climate crisis and other environ-mental issues don't truly hit home for some; because that important data is presented in a dry, factual way that doesn't touch the deeper parts of our collective soul, in a way that would move us to realize what is being lost.
Clare Celeste is an environmentally-minded artist creating artworks that aim to highlight the precious biodiversity of the planet. Using paper that is complexly cut and then hand-assembled piece by piece, Celeste forms imaginary landscapes of plants and animals that are folded or pressed between glass.
Growing up in Brazil, Celeste says that her earliest childhood memories were of green, tropical ecosystems slowly being eaten up by the rapid expansion of nearby cities.
Celeste said, “When I made a series of combinations, I realized that many of the species in the illustrations had already gone extinct. Humans have wiped out 68 percent of all our planet's biodiversity since 1970, so working with old illustrations can be very heartbreaking as much of the diversity in these beautiful old illustrations has been wiped out by human activities.”
Celeste explains some of the motivations behind this series of paper works: “I wanted to convey the beauty of our planet's plants and animals, while also introducing a more architectural or human-made element with the geometric (几何图形的) patterns. Having grown up in Brazil, I was surrounded by dense urban spaces that often had rich jungle growth just wanting to break through the concrete architecture. I suggest we go back to our love: our love of nature, of our children, of future generations. Because when we love something deeply, we are required to act—to save it when it is threatened.”
1. What can we infer from the first paragraph?A.People are connected with each other. |
B.People find data on nature boring to study. |
C.People can't solve the climate crisis on their own. |
D.People don't fully understand environmental issues. |
A.Cities were rich in green plants. |
B.Buildings were decorated with plants. |
C.Urbanization destroyed the local biodiversity. |
D.Nature was a mixture of natural artworks. |
A.Most species die without adapting to environment. |
B.Humans feel painful at the loss of species. |
C.Her paper cuts represent the extinction of species. |
D.Human activities have severely damaged biodiversity. |
A.The desire to protect the biodiversity. |
B.The desire for a good childhood memory. |
C.The idea of imagining landscapes. |
D.The hope of preserving natural beauty. |
【推荐2】Every day for a week, a strange, happy visitor would drop by to play with Vanessa Prior’s pet dog Bobby. Prior thought Bobby had made a new dog friend. It seemed very friendly and got well along with Bobby. They would run after each other, play on the pool cover, gently wrestle (摔跤) or nap side by side.
At first she thought it was a wild dog. But when she posted a photo of the two playing on her Facebook, a pet rescue centre called her. The group told her the Atlanta Wolf Project had been trying to catch the wolf for months, but they failed. Prior gave them new hope.
Because of the wolf’s friendship with her pet dog, it was likely to come back to her backyard. Researchers hoped Prior could help them. When they put some traps (陷阱) in the back of her yard, Prior got a very complicated feeling. She couldn’t describe what it was. The wolf would be in a safe place, but she would do something that harmed Bobby’s feelings.
Researchers told Prior that they would take the rare, black wolf to the Yellow River Wildlife Sanctuary where it would live with another wolf. They didn’t think it a satisfying situation for a wild animal like a wolf to have a connection with humans’ life. They need to keep a natural awareness to humans and pets and keep to themselves.
Wolf experts added they would look into the genetics of the animal to try to learn why it liked to get close to people and tried to play with their pets. Some experts believe it could have a history with well-meaning humans. Prior had not expected that she and Bobby should meet such a special and lovely wolf. They just hoped the dear friend all the best.
1. What happened to Vanessa Prior according to the first two paragraphs?A.She didn’t like her dog’s new friend. |
B.She was awarded for her helpful picture. |
C.She realised her dog made friends with a wolf. |
D.She called the pet rescue centre to catch the wolf. |
A.annoyed | B.enjoyable | C.hopeful | D.bittersweet |
A.It is a kind and sociable animal. |
B.It was once kept as a human pet. |
C.It will be sent to the wild to live with other animals. |
D.It has a great awareness of keeping away from humans. |
A.In a medical report. | B.In a travel guide. |
C.In a nature magazine. | D.In a scientific research. |
【推荐3】“THEY’RE ALL IN TROUBLE,” says Kenyan ecologist Paula Kahumbu. “All elephants are in major, major trouble.”
Populations of the three species have declined: savanna (热带草原) elephants forest elephants and the smaller-eared Asian elephants. And we’re to blame. We’ve expanded (扩张) into elephant territory, building homes and roads, cutting down forests and planting crops. Besides, with the rise of poaching (偷猎), the number of elephants has decreased and became dangerously low in the past five decades.
“Poaching doesn’t just destroy animals,” says Kahumbu, “it gradually weakens society.” That’s why her organization monitored poaching cases in Kenyan courts, launched a campaign called Hands Off Our Elephants and educated children on the value of wildlife. Kahumbu’s goal is noble and urgent: to change “the whole national awareness about conservation.”
Now, she’s taking her message to an international stage with Secrets of the Elephants, a four-part series on National Geographic. It explores the hidden lives of elephants in four habitats — Asia, plus African forests, deserts, and savannas — as well as the people who are racing to save the animals.
“We kind of know what they need, but we aren’t always generous enough.” Secrets of the Elephants, she hopes, will familiarize people with the wildlife that lives among them.
While making the series, the difficult situation of some elephants shocked her. “You look at their faces and they look so sad,” she says. She particularly noticed this in Asia, where Asian elephants and people live in increasingly close distance.
“Despite decades of research into African elephants, much research into Asian elephants has fallen behind — which is why our programme in the following pages will focus on this species,” she adds.
1. What does paragraph 2 focus on?A.The features of three species of elephants. | B.The different situations of the elephants. |
C.The causes for the decrease of the elephants. | D.The impact of Human behaviors on elephants. |
A.She monitored poachers hunting elephants. | B.She filmed a feature about elephants. |
C.She started a national wildlife protection movement. | D.She changed people’s awareness of wildlife protection. |
A.They like to get close to humans. | B.They are almost ignored by experts. |
C.They remain mysterious to humans. | D.They are gradually losing their habitat. |
A.Take action: Stop Poaching | B.Film series: Secrets of the Elephants |
C.Kahumbu: A Brave Kenyan Ecologist | D.Endangered: Three Species of Elephants |
【推荐1】Yvon Chouinard, who started the company Patagonia, gave all the stocks of the company to a trust and a non-profit group in September 2022.
Mr Chouinard is a rock climber who began climbing in the 1960s. Back then, he created a company that made climbing equipment. The business closed, but Mr Chouinard was left with a lifelong love of the outdoors and a respect for the environment.
Mr Chouinard began Patagonia in the 1970s. Patagonia sells clothes aimed at outdoor activities. Over time, the company changed the way it did business to do a better job of protecting the environment. Since 1986, Patagonia has given 1% of the money it makes from sales to groups that work to protect the environment.
Mr Chouinard, who is now 83 years old, was worried about what might happened after he died. He made the decision after considering other options, including selling the company and donating the profits. “But we couldn’t be sure a new owner would maintain our values or keep our team of people around the world employed,” he said. So he came up with a new and unusual plan: he gave his company away. And he did it in a way that helped protect both the company and the environment.
Mr Chouinard gave away all the voting stock of the company(2% of the total stock)to a small group called the Patagonia Purpose Trust. It will make all the decisions about the way the company is managed. The other 98% of the company has been given to a non-profit group called the Holdfast Collective and it will use every dollar received from Patagonia to protect nature and biodiversity.
1. What do we know about Patagonia?A.It has a history of more than 60 years. |
B.It is a company making climbing equipment. |
C.It pays special attention to environmental protection. |
D.It is a non-profit organization fighting against climate change. |
A.Patagonia would become non-profit. |
B.Patagonia would be run in a different way. |
C.Patagonia would be managed in the wrong hand. |
D.Patagonia would encounter a great economic challenge. |
A.Tolerant and generous | B.Caring and far-sighted |
C.Hardworking and warm-hearted | D.Optimistic and perseverant |
A.Kill two birds with a stone. | B.Two heads are better than one. |
C.Actions speak louder than words. | D.Where there is a will, there is a way. |
【推荐2】It was Lefteris Arapakis’s first expedition on a fishing boat, and he didn’t expect what the nets would pull up. There were scorpionfish, red mullet and sea bream. But there was also a bright red can of Coke.
Arapakis, whose family had plied (定期往来) the waters near Athens for five generations, pulled the can out of the net and turned it over to look at the sell-by date stamped on the bottom —1987, seven years older than him. It had been in the Mediterranean for almost three decades.
Every day, the fishing boat — and thousands just like it on the crystalline Mediterranean — caught old bottles, plastic foam, flip-flops and other detritus (碎屑) in its nets. And every day, its crew tossed everything back into the undulating waters, only hauling back what would bring cash.
So Arapakis, now 28, had an idea: he would try to convince the fishing industry to treat plastic as a catch. In 2016, he launched a nonprofit focused on sea cleanup and fishing education called Enaleia, a play on Greek words that calls to mind sustainable fishing. Once the fishers brought the plastic ashore, he would recycle it and pay them for their trouble. Six years into the project, he has signed up more than half of Greece’s large-scale fishing fleet — hundreds of ships — to pull in the plastic they gather as they spy the Mediterranean. He plans to keep expanding globally.
This year, after Arapakis spread his efforts across Greece and much of Italy, he expects to gather nearly 200 tons of plastic — enough to fill a football field five feet high with tiny pieces of plastic. That’s more than 7,500 pounds of plastic every week. And others have taken notice: the United Nations Environment Program named him a Young Champion of the Earth in 2020 — its highest environmental honor for people under 30.
“If we hadn’t taken action, we would have had that plastic floating around the Mediterranean forever,” Arapakis said. At the beginning, convincing fishermen to join was painstaking work, requiring a lot of face time in unfamiliar villages. It wasn’t easy: The industry doesn’t always cotton to environmentalists, since many fishermen think the global plastics activists want to take away their livelihoods.
1. According to the passage, when was Arapakis probably born?A.1987. | B.1980. | C.1994. | D.1997. |
A.Because he considered the detritus pollutant. |
B.Because fishers focused only on their own profit instead of sea cleanup. |
C.Because he wanted to launch a nonprofit focused on sea cleanup. |
D.Because he tried to educate the fishers how to deal with plastic. |
A.He made big profits by selling plastic. |
B.He is the youngest person to receive the highest environmental honor. |
C.He has taken timely action to make plastic disappear forever around the Mediterranean. |
D.A lot of fishermen were unwilling to join him at first. |
A.A bright red Coke can floating in the Mediterranean. |
B.An effort of a young to dispose the plastic problem in the Mediterranean. |
C.A nonprofit project aimed at sea cleanup in the Mediterranean. |
D.An acute plastic problem emerging in the Mediterranean. |
【推荐3】European Union member states gave final approval Tuesday to a plan that would require all new cars sold in the EU to be zero-emission (零排放) vehicles starting in the year 2035. It’s part of the EU’s plan to address climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and more ambitious than similar efforts in America. A quarter of the group’s emissions come from the transportation sector, and 70% of that is road traffic.
“The direction of travel is clear: in 2035, new cars and vans must have zero emissions,” European Commission Executive Vice President Timmermans said in a statement. “The new rules on CO2-emissions from cars and vans are a key part of the European Green Deal and will be a big contribution to our target of being climate neutral by 2050,” Timmermans added.
The plan also requires that, by the year 2030, the average emissions of new cars drop by 55% and the average emissions of new vans drop by 50%, compared with vehicle emissions in 2021.
There’s one major warning to the plan. The European Commission said it would carve out a favorable policy for the continued sale of cars that run on e-fuels past 2035 at Germany’s request, according to Reuters. E-fuels are made using captured CO2 emissions. Poland opposed (反对) the new law, the BBC reported, and Italy, Bulgaria and Romania didn’t vote.
But there is no deny that the plan has an extremely good future. President Biden has said he supports the rise of electric vehicles, and in 2021 he signed an official order setting a goal that half of all new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the U.S. in 2030 be zero-emission vehicles, including plug-in hybrids. Several states have announced future bans on gas-powered cars, though.
However, the shift from petrol engines to electric vehicles won’t be as easy as turning a key. Some of the challenges of switching to zero-emission vehicles include the relatively high cost of electric cars and a lack of charging infrastructure (基础设施).
1. What is the purpose of the new vehicle plan?A.To promote car sales in the EU. |
B.To decrease the greenhouse gas emission. |
C.To show the advantages of gas-powered cars. |
D.To introduce new electric vehicles to be sold in the EU. |
A.It wins the support from all the EU citizens. |
B.It can be carried out effortlessly and smoothly. |
C.It calls for improvement of electric vehicles’ charging access. |
D.It may receive strong opposition from electric vehicles makers. |
A.Cautious. | B.Unclear. | C.Positive. | D.Uncaring. |
A.New cars in the EU will be zero-emission from 2035. |
B.The EU reaches an agreement to improve vehicle quality. |
C.The law on zero-emission vehicle causes heated discussion. |
D.The new zero-emission U. S vehicles will win the EU market. |
【推荐1】In my latest novel, Aphrodite’s Tears, I wanted to draw on this ancient Greek tradition of sponge (海绵) diving; and explore the traditions surrounding the way of life. My fictional island of Helios, therefore, has a long association with sponge diving, and the heroine Oriel, a newcomer to the island and a diver herself, is keen to learn all about it.
Damian, the leader of the island, explains to Oriel that in his father’s generation, sponge diving was one of the main industries on the island. A sizeable group of islanders would leave each May-yet in the autumn, a smaller group would return. “In those days,” Damian explains, “one man in three was either dead or crippled (残疾的) from the caisson disease before they reached marriageable age.” Under Damian’s leadership, other means of earning a living are being developed-such as olive oil production. But some of the men continue to follow in their ancestors’ footsteps and dive for sponges, and each year there are still two or three deaths.
The emotional impact of these losses on the little island community is apparent to Oriel when she comes across a shrine (祠堂) by the port. There she sees tiny paintings that tell the story of the sponge divers, and before the paintings, so many flowers and gifts. They are laid by the women of the sponge-diving families, as offerings for protection for their men and as thanks for the miracle of their safe return.
Why, Oriel wonders, would these men take the risk? After all, with synthetic (合成的) sponges flooding the market, sponge diving is nowhere near as lucrative as it used to be. “It comes down to tradition,” Damian explains: “To the romantic young, it naturally seems a grand thing to sail away every summer to the shores of Africa and to come back, pockets full of money, hailed a hero... I have seen young boys playing at sponge fishing: swimming underwater, wearing the sponge-fisher’s mask and carrying their spear, pretending to detach sponges from the bottom of the sea. An aura (气息) of heroism surrounds the profession.”
1. What’s appealing to Oriel on Helios Island?A.The main local industries. |
B.Her ancestors’ way of life. |
C.The scenery of Helios Island. |
D.The tradition of sponge diving. |
A.Pride. | B.Sad. | C.Frightened. | D.Grateful. |
A.Dangerous. | B.Profitable. | C.Traditional. | D.Entertaining. |
A.It brings them much fun. | B.It remains a major industry. |
C.It shows their courageous spirit. | D.It’s turned into a tourist attraction. |
【推荐2】Austrian company Tec-Innovation recently disclosed smart shoes that use sensors to help people suffering from blindness or vision damage to detect obstacles up to four meters away.
Known as InnoMake,the smart shoe may become a possible alternative to the decades-old waking stick that millions of people depend on to get around as safely as possible. The currently available model relies on sensors to detect obstacles and warms the wearer via vibration and an alert sounded on a Bluetooth-linked smartphone. "Sensors on the toe of the shoe detect obstacles up to four meters away.The wearer is then warned by vibration and/or acoustic (听觉的) signals.This works very well and is already a great help to me personally,"Markus Raffer, one of the founders of Tec-Innovation, himself visually damaged,said.
That sounds impressive enough, but the company is already working on a much more advanced version that combines cameras and artificial intelligence to not only detect obstacles but also their nature."Not only is the warming that I am facing an obstacle relevant, but also the information about what kind of obstacle I am facing. Because it makes a big difference whether it's a wall, a car or a staircase, Raffer claimed.
The advanced system is fix in the front of the shoes, in a waterproof and dust proof case. It is powered by a heavy-duty battery that can last for up to one week, depending on use.The battery can be charged in just three hours, using a USB cable.
The next step for Tec-Innovation is to use the data collected by its system to create a kind of street view navigation map for visually damaged people.
"As it currently stands, only the wearer benefits from the data the shoe collects as he or she walks. It would be much more sustainable if this data could also be made available to other people as a navigation aid,"computer scientist Friedrich Fraundorfer explained.
1. InnoMake aims toA.collect data as blind people walk |
B.replace walking sticks completely |
C.clear obstacles in streets for blind people |
D.help blind people walk around more safely |
A.The way that InnoMake works. |
B.The function of InnoMake in life. |
C.The purpose of developing InnoMake. |
D.The advantages of InnoMake over other shoes. |
A.Raffer has benefited a lot from InnoMake. |
B.He faces a lot of difficulties in his daily life. |
C.The company will surely make a huge profit |
D.Raffer cares more about the nature of obstacles. |
A.InnoMake is sure to be a navigation aid. |
B.More wearers will benefit from innoMake. |
C.There's still space for InnoMake to improve. |
D.Data should be shared among more wearers. |
【推荐3】Are you an agreeable person— you know, a nice guy? If so, a logical follow-up might be: How are your finances? And here’s why: Agreeable people have lower savings, they have higher debts, and they’re also more likely to go bankrupt or default (违约) on their loans.
Sandra Matz is a computational social scientist at the Columbia Business School. And using a combination of questionnaires and bank data, she and her colleague found that people who scored as more agreeable on personality tests had a better chance of ending up in terrible financial crisis—especially if they were low-income to begin with.
The researchers also combined personality data on millions of people in the US and the UK with regional data on how many people were unable to pay their debts. And they found again, that the nicer a county or local area’s people on average, the worse their finances. Sandra thinks a factor could be that agreeable people just don’t care much about money. Maybe they pick up the tab (账单) more often, or loan money when they can’t afford to. They’re generous to a fault.
So how do you get them to wise up? We can say, “Don’t care about money just for yourself, but care about it for the people you love. Because if you manage your money badly, it’s not just going to affect you, but it’s also going to affect all the people you care about, and that you love deeply. “ This might translate agreeable people’s superpower —caring about other people— into better financial sense.
So if Sandra does succeed in teaching nice people to be stingy, who then will pick up the tab? Then it’s a matter of negotiating, right? So if the agreeable person says, “I can’t pay all the time, I only want to do that once in a while, but I also want you to give something back. ” That might mean agreeable people need to get a little more comfortable having unpleasant conversations.
1. What did Sandra and her colleague find in their research?A.Kind people had more friends. |
B.Agreeable people were low-income. |
C.Friendly people were rewarded by others. |
D.Nice people had more financial problems. |
A.They never attach importance to their money. |
B.They tend to lend money to others very often. |
C.They are too generous regardless of their money. |
D.They earn less money than their friends and neighbors. |
A.mean |
B.rigid |
C.greedy |
D.sharp |
A.A social report. |
B.A travel advertisement. |
C.A biology interview. |
D.A personal biography. |