You are seated in class as your teacher explains and points things out on the white board. You accidentally dropped your pencil on the floor. As you lean over to pick up your pencil, your cell phone falls out of your coat pocket! Luckily you catch it without your teacher seeing, but it is in plain view of the video camera's shiny lens (镜头) that points straight at you. The classroom phone rings, and after a brief conversation, your teacher walks over to your desk and kneels down beside you. “About that cell phone of yours. …” How did that get you in trouble? How could it possibly be a good idea to put cameras in classrooms?
When students are in their classrooms, teachers are in the classroom too, usually. But when a teacher goes out of the classroom, what usually happens is either everything goes on as usual, or the students talk a little more. It is the teacher's job to keep people quiet. If something horrible happened, somebody in class would usually report it, or it would just be obvious to the teacher when he came back that something had happened.
If we already have cameras in the halls, why spend the money to get thirty more cameras for all the different classrooms? Our school district already has a low budget, so we would be spending money on something completely unnecessary.
Different students react differently when there is a camera in the room. Some students get nervous, trying hard to stay focused on their work with a camera focused on them. 90% of students say that they do better work when they are calmer, and cameras are not going to help. Other students look at cameras as a source of entertainment. These students will do things such as wave at the camera, make faces, or say hi to the people watching through the camera. This could be a big distraction for others who are trying to learn and participate in class.
Instead of solving problems, cameras would cause the problems. That is why I disagree with the idea of putting cameras in classrooms. This plan should not be put to action.
1. How does the author show his point of view in the first paragraph?A.By analyzing the causes. | B.By describing a scene. |
C.By making a comparison. | D.By trying an experiment. |
A.It keeps everything in its usual state. |
B.It is a waste of money and unnecessary. |
C.It helps teachers watch over students' behavior. |
D.It costs more than putting cameras in school halls. |
A.They help students calm down. |
B.They force students to learn more. |
C.They make classes more lively and interesting. |
D.They take students ' attention away from their study. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Many people try to make society change for the better. The real challenge is how to get good solutions to scale up(按比例放大)for major change. New research suggests that social change may depend on the relationship between beneficial behaviors and policies.
The research, conducted by the University of Maine, University of Vermont and Université Laval in Quebec, Canada, attempted to understand how society can accomplish major, transformative social change, particularly the kind of social change necessary to solve the growing problem of climate change.
The researchers studied a behavior that benefits groups, but does not spread without pol- icy support, such as a costly measure to relieve the effects of climate change. They created a mathematical model, which simulates (模拟) a society where agents live in groups and adopt the beneficial behavior of peers. That behavior, given the right conditions, can spread like viral, but not if the institutional costs are too high.
“Large-scale social change is not just policy or behavior, but the emergence of a new self- reinforcing (自我强化)system that combines both. This allows us to ask new questions, such as “how would a new pattern of behavior and policy spread?’” says Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, lead author on the study.
The results showed that both behavioral change and policy change are required to achieve large-scale social change-and that they need to happen together. Though neither can get the job done on its own, policy change is especially critical. They found that sometimes the beneficial behavior can spread too far. In some cases, the spread of behavior beyond groups with supporting policy can reduce its perceived success and slow the spread of the policy, thereby limiting beneficial social change overall.
In future research, the team aims to apply these types of models to all sorts of beneficial social change, particularly the challenge of tackling climate change.
1. What factor may determine social change according to the research?A.Beneficial behavior. |
B.Good policies. |
C.Public awareness. |
D.Rules and beneficial action. |
A.To understand what social change is. |
B.To figure out the way society changes. |
C.To accomplish trans-formative social changes. |
D.To tackle the growing problem of climate change. |
A.Put theory into practice. |
B.Write essays about their study. |
C.Take challenges of climate change. |
D.Do surveys on their research subject. |
A.Travel. |
B.Amusement. |
C.Society. |
D.Economy. |
【推荐2】The Internet is an amazing tool, especially for children who want to learn. But it also has dark side. Parents have to ask themselves, “When is the right time to let my child go online?”
This is a much bigger problem than it used to be. Now we live in a time when a family could have more than one computer. It is common for children to have their own computers or laptops. Some also have phones and tablets (平板电脑).
Parents do have difficulty in acting correctly. On the one hand, it would be foolish to keep children from the Internet as they can learn a lot from it. But on the other hand, parents shouldn’t let children do whatever they like on the Internet. The problem is that everybody is busy nowadays, and this is certainly true for parents. How many parents have the time to sit don with their kids when they do their homework online? Some do, but more are just not able to.
So at what age should children be allowed to use the Internet? According to a survey, the average age when parents allow their children to go online independently is about eight years old.
As a nonparent (无子女者),I do find it hard to agree. I always believe that education is the key to success. However, I think children as young as eight may face a lot of dangers when they use the Internet without parents being around. So I think schools and parents have the responsibility to teach children not only how to use the Internet, but also how to do it safely.
1. What does the author want to tell in paragraph 2?A.It is very easy for children to use the Internet. |
B.Parents spend more time online than their kids. |
C.Computers or laptops aren’t common at home. |
D.Parents don’t care about their kids going online. |
A.They have a lot of time to look after their kids. |
B.They have no trouble in acting in a correct way. |
C.They are unwilling to help their kids with homework. |
D.They can’t stay with them when their kids study online. |
A.parents should keep their kids away from the Internet |
B.kids will not face dangers when they use the Internet |
C.it’s unnecessary to cut out harmful information online |
D.kids should be taught to use the Internet in a proper way |
A.Reasons for Children to Use the Internet |
B.The Age for Children to Use the Internet |
C.The Effects of Children’s Using the Internet |
D.Ways to Keep Children Away from the Internet |
【推荐3】When we visit museums, we see cultural artifacts—from everyday household items to precious carvings and statues, which give us a glimpse into the diverse cultures and communities from around the world.
However, controversy surrounds these artifacts and whether or not countries should return these pieces of culture if they were stolen or forcefully taken during colonization (殖民).
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020, the Dutch advisory committee officially released a national report agreeing to the return of cultural artifacts that were stolen from its previous colonies such as Indonesia, Suriname, and islands on the Caribbean. Through these actions, the Dutch government acknowledged the unfair treatment the colonies had previously experienced and demonstrated respect for the culture of these countries.
By the 18th and 19th centuries, European countries such as Britain, France, and the Netherlands had colonized many African and Asian countries. During their rule, they either seized artifacts or took them as spoils of wars, and brought them to their own countries where they are now on display in museums.
Over the years, European museums have received requests for the return of artifacts. The debate regarding this issue took a turn in 2018 when a French report was released that directed that all heritage objects brought to French museums be restored. With the official release of this report, museums all across Europe began reconsidering their previous policies on colonial treasures.
Those who propose returning these objects to their original homes argue that with technology enabling virtual museum tours, returning these artifacts to their homeland does not take away the opportunity to learn about them. Furthermore, the country of origin will receive a significant part of their heritage back, and these artifacts will be given a chance to be truly appreciated in proper historical context.
Those against the restoration claim that culture is shared treasure and the artifacts are in fact “cultural ambassadors” that promote tolerance and understanding. They believe that while stealing them was wrong, history is full of “good” and “bad” actors. Moreover, they feel that keeping the cultural objects in the current museums has kept millions of artifacts safe from disfiguration and damage.
1. What did the Dutch government admit?A.The colonies were treated unfairly. | B.The colonies had stolen cultural artifacts. |
C.The colonies had experienced cultural boom. | D.The colonies had been respected for their culture. |
A.Egypt. | B.France. | C.Britain. | D.The Netherlands. |
A.These artifacts reflect a culture of shared treasure. |
B.These artifacts prove that the history is difficult to explain. |
C.These artifacts will be enjoyed in their historical background. |
D.These artifacts help people distinguish good history from bad history. |
A.Are Virtual Museum Tours Meaningful? | B.Do People Appreciate Stolen Treasures? |
C.Will Stolen Treasures Belong to Colonies? | D.Should Museums Return Stolen Treasures? |
【推荐1】If you’ve been painting for a while, you would have heard about some of the age-old “rules” that regularly go the rounds.
Regardless, we tend to love art for what it is and thank goodness— because art would have died out long ago if its success depended on whether the artists followed all the rules in making it. To be fair, a lot of rules are tried-and-true-procedures, ways of doing things that have proved their worth over time. But rules regarding composition (构图), tone and color are all there to be broken if we dare.
Black paint was almost banned by the Impressionists, who preferred to get their darks from mixtures rather than use black in any way. However, John Singer Sargent certainly used black, as did Turner (who is widely regarded as the father of Impressionism), and Renoir is quoted as saying ‘‘I’ve been for 40 years discovering that the queen of all colors is black”.
Even today, many artists will not consider using black paint and this has become one of the “rules”. You’ll often hear that “black is a dead color”— I don’t know who first used that phrase but it is so well-worn that it has become gospel (真理).
Black is still in the palettes (调色板) of many portrait artists and, interestingly, the Swedish artist Anders Zorn famously often used a palette of just black, white, vermilion and yellow ochre, and his paintings are anything but dead! It is well worth the time to look at Zorn’s limited-palette work and marvel at what can be obtained from those four colors.
I tend to use black in my rainy cityscapes. My favorite colors to use with black are some amazing grays that are possible without too much complication. The rebellion is already underway and black paint is being squeezed out of tubes all over the world.
Are you coming over to the dark side?
1. What is the author’s attitude towards breaking rules in art?A.Positive. | B.Carefree. |
C.Doubtful. | D.Unfavorable. |
A.To highlight the value of old rules. |
B.To provide useful instruction for readers. |
C.To illustrate actual significance of black paint. |
D.To recommend distinguished artists in impressionism. |
A.Having large numbers of favorite palettes. |
B.Preferring traditional styles to modern ones. |
C.Using simple colors for expressive paintings. |
D.Classifying interesting portraits as dead works. |
A.The reflection on the trend of art. | B.The invitation of the use of black. |
C.The guidance on painting cityscapes. | D.The consequence of following rules. |
【推荐2】We have long been attracted by quick solutions that could increase our intelligence. Today, people’s hopes lie in brain training apps, some of which claim to result in “smarter minds”. But is this quick solution all it is said to be?
There are plenty of brain training apps, but they all share the same characteristics: they turn mental exercises like simple arithmetic (算术), memory tests and logic and pattern-matching problems into quick games. Some apps tell us that the more you play these mini-games, the smarter you will get. It is really a big promise.
Many of the apps say they are based on “science”, a claim I found surprising as a former neuroscientist (神经系统科学家). The concept that increasing intelligence would be as simple as practicing a few mini-games every day flies in the face of what we have discovered about how humans think and learn.
After surveying thousands of users across a wide variety of apps, researchers at Western University in Canada discovered that brain training had no great effect on cognitive (认知的) functioning in the real world. The positive effects that have been found are limited to the very specific mini-games and tasks that users are trained on, such as the ability to memorize lists of words or numbers, or perform mental arithmetic, with little benefit to other skills.
If you are expecting them to improve your ability to write a novel or make a complex computer program, I am afraid you will want to look elsewhere. Puzzle video games such as “Baba Is You” and “Return of the Obra Dinn”, see players apply their skill at logic, memory and concentration in a far more complex way than any brain training mini-game.
1. What does the author say about brain training apps?A.They have scientific support. | B.They work in the form of games. |
C.They require problem-solving skills. | D.They are based on complex arithmetic. |
A.Goes into details of. | B.Takes advantage of. |
C.Goes against. | D.Comes from. |
A.Limited. | B.Indirect. | C.Damaging. | D.Far-reaching. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Intolerant. | C.Uninterested. | D.Favorable. |
Mr.Dyson accused the museum of not keeping true to itself. He may be right, but these days, museums everywhere can no longer afford to be unique centers of scholarship and learning.Among competition for sponsorship, they must use exhibitions of populist culture, nice cafes and shops or, best of all, a new building by Frank Gehry to increase visitor numbers.
On the one hand, some producers can be too old-fashioned and too concerned with the importance of product engineering and the functionality of their goods.On the other hand there are those who believe that how a product looks is more important.Design is indeed a broad term, involving both function and form.Typically, in any given product area, it changes from the former to the latter. Clothing is a good example.But surely you would have to be a very shallow person to think something's appearance was more important than what it did.
Today nearly all goods at any given price-point do much the same job.So almost the only way producers can differentiate their products from those of their competitors is to create some sort of emotional connection with the consumer, which could be through the visual appeal of the product or its packaging; or the imagery(意象)created by advertising. And what of the Dyson vacuum cleaners? Mr. Dyson may believe that people buy these machines because of the graphs showing their superior suction(喝酒), but most vacuum cleaners do a good job; the main reason people pay extra for a Dyson is because it is a vacuum cleaner with a trendy brand. With its inside workings exposed, it is a bit like a Richard Rogers building with all its pipes shown in bright colors on the outside instead of being hidden inside. Functional it may be, but it is a bit of a trick, too.
1. Mr. Dyson left the Design Museum because he thought the museum .
A.didn't increase the number of visitors |
B.couldn't provide scholarships for learners |
C.hadn't great appeal for serious industrial designs |
D.wasn't loyal to its original purpose of learning |
A.affording protection |
B.indicating one's identity |
C.making someone beautiful |
D.providing warmth |
A.A product with convenient packaging sells well. |
B.The majority of consumers prefer to buy branded goods. |
C.Emotion contributes much to the development of advertising industry. |
D.Most similarly priced products are of a comparable standard. |
A.it has a fashionable range |
B.it has very good suction |
C.it sells well around the world |
D.it is invented by James Dyson |
A.Optimistic | B.Skeptical |
C.Objective | D.Disapproving |