组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:93 题号:14493240

You are seated in class as your teacher explains and points things out on the white board. You accidentally dropped your pencil on the floor. As you lean over to pick up your pencil, your cell phone falls out of your coat pocket! Luckily you catch it without your teacher seeing, but it is in plain view of the video camera's shiny lens (镜头) that points straight at you. The classroom phone rings, and after a brief conversation, your teacher walks over to your desk and kneels down beside you. “About that cell phone of yours. …” How did that get you in trouble? How could it possibly be a good idea to put cameras in classrooms?

When students are in their classrooms, teachers are in the classroom too, usually. But when a teacher goes out of the classroom, what usually happens is either everything goes on as usual, or the students talk a little more. It is the teacher's job to keep people quiet. If something horrible happened, somebody in class would usually report it, or it would just be obvious to the teacher when he came back that something had happened.

If we already have cameras in the halls, why spend the money to get thirty more cameras for all the different classrooms? Our school district already has a low budget, so we would be spending money on something completely unnecessary.

Different students react differently when there is a camera in the room. Some students get nervous, trying hard to stay focused on their work with a camera focused on them. 90% of students say that they do better work when they are calmer, and cameras are not going to help. Other students look at cameras as a source of entertainment. These students will do things such as wave at the camera, make faces, or say hi to the people watching through the camera. This could be a big distraction for others who are trying to learn and participate in class.

Instead of solving problems, cameras would cause the problems. That is why I disagree with the idea of putting cameras in classrooms. This plan should not be put to action.

1. How does the author show his point of view in the first paragraph?
A.By analyzing the causes.B.By describing a scene.
C.By making a comparison.D.By trying an experiment.
2. What does the author think of putting cameras in classrooms?
A.It keeps everything in its usual state.
B.It is a waste of money and unnecessary.
C.It helps teachers watch over students' behavior.
D.It costs more than putting cameras in school halls.
3. How do video cameras in classrooms affect students?
A.They help students calm down.
B.They force students to learn more.
C.They make classes more lively and interesting.
D.They take students ' attention away from their study.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。本文介绍的是一项研究,该研究的目的是试图了解社会如何实现重大的、变革性的社会变革,特别是解决日益严重的气候变化问题所必需的那种社会变革。

【推荐1】Many people try to make society change for the better. The real challenge is how to get good solutions to scale up(按比例放大)for major change. New research suggests that social change may depend on the relationship between beneficial behaviors and policies.

The research, conducted by the University of Maine, University of Vermont and Université Laval in Quebec, Canada, attempted to understand how society can accomplish major, transformative social change, particularly the kind of social change necessary to solve the growing problem of climate change.

The researchers studied a behavior that benefits groups, but does not spread without pol- icy support, such as a costly measure to relieve the effects of climate change. They created a mathematical model, which simulates (模拟) a society where agents live in groups and adopt the beneficial behavior of peers. That behavior, given the right conditions, can spread like viral, but not if the institutional costs are too high.

“Large-scale social change is not just policy or behavior, but the emergence of a new self- reinforcing (自我强化)system that combines both. This allows us to ask new questions, such as “how would a new pattern of behavior and policy spread?’” says Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, lead author on the study.

The results showed that both behavioral change and policy change are required to achieve large-scale social change-and that they need to happen together. Though neither can get the job done on its own, policy change is especially critical. They found that sometimes the beneficial behavior can spread too far. In some cases, the spread of behavior beyond groups with supporting policy can reduce its perceived success and slow the spread of the policy, thereby limiting beneficial social change overall.

In future research, the team aims to apply these types of models to all sorts of beneficial social change, particularly the challenge of tackling climate change.

1. What factor may determine social change according to the research?
A.Beneficial behavior.
B.Good policies.
C.Public awareness.
D.Rules and beneficial action.
2. What is the purpose of the research?
A.To understand what social change is.
B.To figure out the way society changes.
C.To accomplish trans-formative social changes.
D.To tackle the growing problem of climate change.
3. What will the researchers do next?
A.Put theory into practice.
B.Write essays about their study.
C.Take challenges of climate change.
D.Do surveys on their research subject.
4. In which section may the text appear in a newspaper?
A.Travel.
B.Amusement.
C.Society.
D.Economy.
2023-02-13更新 | 183次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约290词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。主要讨论的是孩子在什么时候上网合适。

【推荐2】The Internet is an amazing tool, especially for children who want to learn. But it also has dark side. Parents have to ask themselves, “When is the right time to let my child go online?”

This is a much bigger problem than it used to be. Now we live in a time when a family could have more than one computer. It is common for children to have their own computers or laptops. Some also have phones and tablets (平板电脑).

Parents do have difficulty in acting correctly. On the one hand, it would be foolish to keep children from the Internet as they can learn a lot from it. But on the other hand, parents shouldn’t let children do whatever they like on the Internet. The problem is that everybody is busy nowadays, and this is certainly true for parents. How many parents have the time to sit don with their kids when they do their homework online? Some do, but more are just not able to.

So at what age should children be allowed to use the Internet? According to a survey, the average age when parents allow their children to go online independently is about eight years old.

As a nonparent (无子女者),I do find it hard to agree. I always believe that education is the key to success. However, I think children as young as eight may face a lot of dangers when they use the Internet without parents being around. So I think schools and parents have the responsibility to teach children not only how to use the Internet, but also how to do it safely.

1. What does the author want to tell in paragraph 2?
A.It is very easy for children to use the Internet.
B.Parents spend more time online than their kids.
C.Computers or laptops aren’t common at home.
D.Parents don’t care about their kids going online.
2. What can we learn about many parents?
A.They have a lot of time to look after their kids.
B.They have no trouble in acting in a correct way.
C.They are unwilling to help their kids with homework.
D.They can’t stay with them when their kids study online.
3. According to the text, the author thinks
A.parents should keep their kids away from the Internet
B.kids will not face dangers when they use the Internet
C.it’s unnecessary to cut out harmful information online
D.kids should be taught to use the Internet in a proper way
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.Reasons for Children to Use the Internet
B.The Age for Children to Use the Internet
C.The Effects of Children’s Using the Internet
D.Ways to Keep Children Away from the Internet
2023-10-13更新 | 92次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。本文主要介绍了欧洲的一些国家开始通过法律,把一些原来抢劫来的文物物归原主的情况。

【推荐3】When we visit museums, we see cultural artifacts—from everyday household items to precious carvings and statues, which give us a glimpse into the diverse cultures and communities from around the world.

However, controversy surrounds these artifacts and whether or not countries should return these pieces of culture if they were stolen or forcefully taken during colonization (殖民).

On Wednesday, October 7, 2020, the Dutch advisory committee officially released a national report agreeing to the return of cultural artifacts that were stolen from its previous colonies such as Indonesia, Suriname, and islands on the Caribbean. Through these actions, the Dutch government acknowledged the unfair treatment the colonies had previously experienced and demonstrated respect for the culture of these countries.

By the 18th and 19th centuries, European countries such as Britain, France, and the Netherlands had colonized many African and Asian countries. During their rule, they either seized artifacts or took them as spoils of wars, and brought them to their own countries where they are now on display in museums.

Over the years, European museums have received requests for the return of artifacts. The debate regarding this issue took a turn in 2018 when a French report was released that directed that all heritage objects brought to French museums be restored. With the official release of this report, museums all across Europe began reconsidering their previous policies on colonial treasures.

Those who propose returning these objects to their original homes argue that with technology enabling virtual museum tours, returning these artifacts to their homeland does not take away the opportunity to learn about them. Furthermore, the country of origin will receive a significant part of their heritage back, and these artifacts will be given a chance to be truly appreciated in proper historical context.

Those against the restoration claim that culture is shared treasure and the artifacts are in fact “cultural ambassadors” that promote tolerance and understanding. They believe that while stealing them was wrong, history is full of “good” and “bad” actors. Moreover, they feel that keeping the cultural objects in the current museums has kept millions of artifacts safe from disfiguration and damage.

1. What did the Dutch government admit?
A.The colonies were treated unfairly.B.The colonies had stolen cultural artifacts.
C.The colonies had experienced cultural boom.D.The colonies had been respected for their culture.
2. Which country played a decisive role in returning stolen artifacts?
A.Egypt.B.France.C.Britain.D.The Netherlands.
3. Why do some people support the return of stolen artifacts?
A.These artifacts reflect a culture of shared treasure.
B.These artifacts prove that the history is difficult to explain.
C.These artifacts will be enjoyed in their historical background.
D.These artifacts help people distinguish good history from bad history.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.Are Virtual Museum Tours Meaningful?B.Do People Appreciate Stolen Treasures?
C.Will Stolen Treasures Belong to Colonies?D.Should Museums Return Stolen Treasures?
2023-06-04更新 | 23次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般