组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:23 题号:19176296

When we visit museums, we see cultural artifacts—from everyday household items to precious carvings and statues, which give us a glimpse into the diverse cultures and communities from around the world.

However, controversy surrounds these artifacts and whether or not countries should return these pieces of culture if they were stolen or forcefully taken during colonization (殖民).

On Wednesday, October 7, 2020, the Dutch advisory committee officially released a national report agreeing to the return of cultural artifacts that were stolen from its previous colonies such as Indonesia, Suriname, and islands on the Caribbean. Through these actions, the Dutch government acknowledged the unfair treatment the colonies had previously experienced and demonstrated respect for the culture of these countries.

By the 18th and 19th centuries, European countries such as Britain, France, and the Netherlands had colonized many African and Asian countries. During their rule, they either seized artifacts or took them as spoils of wars, and brought them to their own countries where they are now on display in museums.

Over the years, European museums have received requests for the return of artifacts. The debate regarding this issue took a turn in 2018 when a French report was released that directed that all heritage objects brought to French museums be restored. With the official release of this report, museums all across Europe began reconsidering their previous policies on colonial treasures.

Those who propose returning these objects to their original homes argue that with technology enabling virtual museum tours, returning these artifacts to their homeland does not take away the opportunity to learn about them. Furthermore, the country of origin will receive a significant part of their heritage back, and these artifacts will be given a chance to be truly appreciated in proper historical context.

Those against the restoration claim that culture is shared treasure and the artifacts are in fact “cultural ambassadors” that promote tolerance and understanding. They believe that while stealing them was wrong, history is full of “good” and “bad” actors. Moreover, they feel that keeping the cultural objects in the current museums has kept millions of artifacts safe from disfiguration and damage.

1. What did the Dutch government admit?
A.The colonies were treated unfairly.B.The colonies had stolen cultural artifacts.
C.The colonies had experienced cultural boom.D.The colonies had been respected for their culture.
2. Which country played a decisive role in returning stolen artifacts?
A.Egypt.B.France.C.Britain.D.The Netherlands.
3. Why do some people support the return of stolen artifacts?
A.These artifacts reflect a culture of shared treasure.
B.These artifacts prove that the history is difficult to explain.
C.These artifacts will be enjoyed in their historical background.
D.These artifacts help people distinguish good history from bad history.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.Are Virtual Museum Tours Meaningful?B.Do People Appreciate Stolen Treasures?
C.Will Stolen Treasures Belong to Colonies?D.Should Museums Return Stolen Treasures?

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】On average, American kids ages 3 to 12 spent 29 hours a week in school, eight hours more that they did in 1981. They also did more household work and participated in more of such organized activities as soccer and ballet (芭蕾舞). Involvement in sports, in particular, rose almost 50% from 1981 to 1997: boys now spend an average of four hours a week playing sports; girls log half that time. All in all, however, children’s leisure time dropped from 40% of the day in 1981 to 25%

“Children are affected by the same time crunch (危机) that affects their parents,” says Sandra Hofferth, who headed the recent study of children’s timetable. A chief reason, she says, is that more mothers are working outside the home. (Nevertheless, children in both double-income and “male breadwinner” households spent comparable amounts of time interacting with their parents 19 hours and 22 hours respectively. In contrast, children spent only 9 hours with their single mothers.)

All work and no play could make for some very messed-up kids. “Play is the most powerful way a child explores the world and learns about himself,” says T. Berry Brazelton, professor at Harvard Medical School Unstructured(unorganized)play encourages independent thinking and allows the young to handle their relationships with their peers, but kids ages 3 to 12 spent only 12 hours a week engaged in it.

The children sampled spent a quarter of their rapidly decreasing “free time” watching television. But that, believe it or not, was one of the findings parents might regard as good news. If they’re spending less time in front of the TV set, however, kids aren’t replacing it with reading. Despite efforts to get kids more interested in books, the children spent just over an hour a week reading. Let’s face it, who’s got the time?

1. By mentioning the same time crunch” (Line 1, Para. 2) Sandra Hofferth means ______.
A.children have little time to play with their parents
B.both parents and children suffer from lack of leisure time
C.children are not taken good care of by their working parents
D.both parents and children have trouble managing their time
2. According to the author a child develops better if _______.
A.he has plenty of time reading and studying
B.he has more time participating in school activities
C.he is left to play with his peers in his own way
D.he is free to interact with his working parents
3. We can infer from the passage that _______.
A.extracurricular activities(after-class activities) promote children’s intelligence
B.most children will turn to reading with TV sets switched off
C.efforts to get kids interested in reading have been fruitful
D.most parents believe reading to be beneficial to children
2020-05-13更新 | 85次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。文章主要讨论了食品标签对消费者和生产者的影响。

【推荐2】Labeling can be very helpful when determining certain things about a food item. “USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Organic” and “raised without antibiotics (抗生素)”, for example, have specific standards, and the product will need to be true to those claims.

Natural claims like “all natural”, “100% natural”, and “made with natural ingredients (成分)” are not defined in USDA. The USDA must approve these special claims prior to food being sold, but the only standard they must meet is that artificial ingredients or colors cannot be added during processing, and the processing method cannot fundamentally alter the product. While that is certainly valuable information to know, the problem is in consumers’ understanding of what “natural” means. The definitions do not address human health, the use of synthetic pesticides (合成杀虫剂), hormones, or antibiotics in crop and livestock production.

Study after study on the topic reveals that people think a product labeled as “natural” delivers benefits far beyond what it does. Most consumers mistakenly assign health and environmental benefits to natural-labeled food.

In a 2017 study, respondents incorrectly believed that natural-labeled foods had 18 percent fewer calories across a variety of foods. In a 2010 study, respondents believed that meat products labeled as “all natural” meant no antibiotics or hormones were used to raise the animals. Some also believed the label meant animals were raised free range.

Consumers aren’t getting what they think they’re getting. But the more serious problem is how this harms food producers who are actually meeting the standards for more strict labels that are actually doing good, like ones around organic practices or animal welfare. Farmers and producers doing the work end up at a competitive disadvantage in the marketplace if consumers treat foods labeled natural as alike. The economic problem raised by natural labels is that consumers could be paying extra for product benefits they are not receiving while producers of products with those benefits lose sales.

1. Which of the following is undefined by authorities?
A.USDA organic.B.All natural.
C.Artificial color free.D.Raised without antibiotics.
2. What mistake may a consumer make according to the text?
A.Being unaware of food safety.
B.Paying more on over-processed food.
C.Buying food failing to meet the USDA standards.
D.Misunderstanding what is claimed on a food label.
3. Why are the two studies mentioned in paragraph 4?
A.To advocate sensible consumer behavior.
B.To suggest a possible solution to a problem.
C.To provide evidence for the author’s point of view.
D.To demonstrate how far studies on food safety have gone.
4. What is a consequence of the problem discussed in the text?
A.Wasting resources.B.A market crash.C.Cheating.D.Unfairness.
2024-01-19更新 | 49次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了回收通常是一种有效的方法来重复利用自然物质资源,塑料回收现在不起作用,将来也不会起作用。作者呼吁人们停止使用一次性塑料制品。

【推荐3】Recycling in general can be an effective way to reuse natural material resources. The U.S.’s high recycling rate of paper, 68 percent, has proved this point. But although some materials can be effectively recycled and safely made from recycled content, plastics cannot. Plastic recycling does not work and will never work.

The problem with recycling plastic lies not with the concept or process but with the material itself.   There are thousands of different plastics, each with its own characteristics. They all include different chemicals that cannot be recycled together, making it impossible to sort the trillions of pieces of plastics into separate types for processing. What’s more, plastic recycling costs more than new plastic because collecting, sorting, transporting, and reprocessing plastic waste is very expensive.

Despite this obvious failure, the plastics industry has begun a decades-long campaign to keep the lie that the material is recyclable, which reminds the public of the tobacco industry’s efforts to tell smokers that filtered (过滤的) cigarettes are healthier than unfiltered cigarettes.

Traditional mechanical recycling, in which plastic waste is ground up and melted (熔化), has been around for many decades. Now the plastics industry is promoting the benefits of so-called chemical recycling, in which plastic waste is broken down using high heat and turned into a low-quality fossil fuel. In 2018, Dow Chemical claimed that the Renewlogy chemical-recycling factory in Salt Lake City was able to reprocess mixed plastic waste through the “Hefty EnergyBag” program and turn it into diesel fuel (柴油). As Reuters showed in a 2021 survey, however, the pyrolysis (高温分解) process was not worth it.

We’re not making a case for hopelessness. Just the opposite(相反的). We need the facts so that individuals and policymakers can take action. Proven solutions to the plastic-waste and pollution problems exist and can be quickly copied across the country. These solutions include placing bans on single-use plastic bags and unrecyclable single-use plastic food-service products, and installing dishwashing equipment in schools.

Consumers can put pressure on companies to stop filling store shelves with single-use plastics by not buying them and instead choosing reusables and products in better packaging. And we should all keep recycling our paper, boxes, cans, and glass, because that actually works.

1. What is the problem with recycled plastic?
A.It costs too much to produce.
B.It can hardly be selected out.
C.It is generally of poor quality.
D.It can’t be stored in large numbers.
2. What is the plastics industry trying to do?
A.To compete with the tobacco industry.
B.To cut down the cost of recycling plastic.
C.To uncover the lie of the tobacco industry.
D.To prove the possibility of recycling plastic.
3. What is the fourth paragraph mainly about?
A.Traditional recycling proves to be safer.
B.Chemical recycling turns out to be a failure.
C.Chemical recycling can save energy resources.
D.Traditional recycling can deal with limited waste.
4. What is the author’s purpose in writing the text?
A.To show the difficulty in recycling plastic.
B.To introduce a new way of recycling plastic.
C.To stress the importance of recycling plastic.
D.To call for a ban on single-use plastic products.
2023-03-27更新 | 188次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般