Contributors
Yasin Osman
Illustrator, Toronto, Canada
" As Kids See It"
Osman is an award-winning photographer and cartoonist whose work has appeared in The New Yorker and Vice. In 2018 and 2019, his photography exhibition, Dear Ayeeyo, was shown in Toronto and London, England. Osman is also the founder of Shoot for Peace, a program fighting against gun violence. See his latest illustration on page 38.
Clayton Hanmer
Illustrator, Ontario, Canada
" Fact Check"
Hanmer's energetic work has been published in The New York Times and National Geographic Kids. He has illustrated several children's books, including 2020's Trending: How and Why Stuff Gets Popular. Hanmer's work is displayed in both private and corporate collections through the Canada Council Art Bank. Find his latest illustration on page 14.
Luc Rinaldi
Writer, Toronto, Canada
" House Calls"
Rinaldi's stories have appeared in Maclean's, Toronto Life and The Walrus. As a former editor of Pivot Magazine, he has won several awards for his business writing. A frequent music reviewer for publications like Maisonneuve, he recently recorded his own album, which will be released later this year under the artist name Longtime Listener. Read his story on page 18.
Jason McBride
Writer, Toronto, Canada
" Good News: Five Reasons to Smile"
McBride has written for Report on Business Magazine, Toronto Life and Maclean's. In 2015, he won a gold National Magazine Award for his profile of Canadian filmmaker John Greyson. His biography (传记 ) of the writer Kathy Acker will be published by Simon& Schuster next year. Check out his roundup of uplifting stories from around the world on page 11.
1. What do we know about Osman?A.He is a peace-loving artist. | B.He often writes music reviews. |
C.He comes from London, England. | D.He shows no interest in photography. |
A.11. | B.14. | C.18 | D.38. |
A.Both are known as a writer and filmmaker. |
B.Both worked as an editor of Pivot Magazine. |
C.Both contribute to Toronto Life and Maclean's. |
D.Both once won a gold National Magazine Award. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Climate change will bring and has already brought a wide variety of threatening destruction to human existence. Some of these are well-known and already operative, like the wildfires racing along California’s freeways or the permanent droughts that have been upsetting Mediterranean farmers. But are these all terrible disasters we can come up with that are brought about by climate change?
Absolutely not. None of the challenges posed by our warming climate has appeared larger in the popular imagination than sea-level rise, as global populations and wealth are heavily concentrated in low-lying coastal cities. The best available models suggest that 37 million people currently live in places that will be below high tide by 2050-in an optimistic low-carbon-emissions scenario (设想).
Or rather, that’s what such models suggested before this week. On Tuesday, a new study revealed that those alarming statistics were wildly inaccurate. The actual impacts of sea-level rise are going to be much, much worse.
Previous estimates of the impact that rising tides would have on coastal cities relied on essentially a three-dimensional map of Earth obtained from satellite readings. But those readings were fundamentally unreliable because they often measured the planet’s upper surfaces — such as treetops and tall buildings — rather than its ground level. These mistakes led scientists to overestimate the elevation (海拔) of many regions of Earth.
In a new study published by the journal Nature Communications, scientists from Princeton, University detail this methodological problem, then use artificial intelligence to determine the previous literature’s error rate. Their research yields some amazing updates to our conventional understanding of what the next century has in store for our coastlines.
In its optimistic scenario, the Princeton study projects that lands currently occupied by 150 million people will lie below high tide in 2050. But as warming destroys many of the world’s agricultural regions, climate change could accelerate migration from rural areas to coastal cities.
The new study does include one piece of slightly encouraging news. While previous models suggested that 28 million humans currently live in places that already lie below high tide, the actual number is closer to 110 million — which means seawalls and other barriers have proven sufficient to keep many cities dry even as sea levels have risen around them. Still, the scale of barrier construction necessary to save low-lying cities from collapse is now, apparently, far greater than previously understood when the task already looked terribly expensive, particularly for developing countries.
If the Princeton researchers’ projections are correct, avoiding mass death and suffering in the coming decades will require not only rapidly reducing carbon emissions and strengthening construction of seawalls but also furthering mass migrations away from low-lying cities and islands and toward higher ground.
1. The first paragraph is mainly intended to .A.introduce the topic of this passage |
B.show various disasters caused by climate change |
C.call on people to fix attention on climate change |
D.lay emphasis on the seriousness of climate change |
A.the Princeton study reveals an optimistic picture of sea rising. . . |
B.the three-dimensional map produced by satellite is not accurate |
C.some measures are mentioned by the writer to deal with sea rising |
D.more people are likely to live in coastal cities in the coming years |
A.it’s cheap to construct seawalls as well as other barriers |
B.the scale of barrier construction is much greater than before |
C.developed countries have less trouble in dealing with rising sea levels |
D.seawalls do have the function to prevent coastal cities being drowned |
A.How to protect cities from rising seas. |
B.Rising seas are going to drown more cities. |
C.Climate change is endangering human existence. |
D.Less emission of carbon, fewer fires and droughts. |
【推荐2】Most autonomous vehicles test-driving in cities navigate by using 3-D maps marking every edge of roadside with almost centimeter-level accuracy. But few places have been mapped in such detail, which has left most areas like smaller towns inaccessible to those driverless cars.
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) now have developed a new navigation system that guides autonomous vehicles without such accurate maps. This technology can help driverless cars travel almost anywhere.
The navigation system maps out a course down unfamiliar roads much as a human driver would by continually scanning its surroundings, with a laser sensor, to measure how close it is to the edges of the road. Meanwhile, the car also follows a tool like a smart phone map app that provides directions to its destination, as well as information about the rules of the road, such as speed limits and the positions of stoplights. Teddy Ort, a roboticist at MIT, test-drove a car equipped with this navigation system on a one-way road. It slowly traveled one kilometer without any human assistance.
This system assumes that a car has a clear path down the road, but it can be paired with other existing computing technology to discover in-road obstacles, says Ort. The researchers also plan to build a version of this system which can spot markings painted on streets, so that the car can drive on two-way roads. “Self-driving cars with this navigation system may need other sensors to work in different conditions,” says Alexander Wyglinski, an electrical engineer at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. “Since laser sensors don't work well in rain or snow, these cars might need additional imaging technologies to drive safely in bad weather."
1. What may be a problem for most driverless cars?A.They fail in test-driving. | B.Their maps are out-dated. |
C.They run in limited areas. | D.Their guides are unreliable. |
A.By detecting road conditions. | B.By including accurate maps. |
C.By removing in-road obstacles. | D.By featuring a smart phone app. |
A.Its further research areas. | B.Its testing results. |
C.Its potential in bad weather. | D.Its reliance on laser sensors. |
A.Autonomous Cars Beat Human Drivers |
B.Self-driving Cars Take over Remote Areas |
C.New Mapping Tech Empowers Driverless Cars |
D.Smart Navigation Improves Mapping Accuracy |
【推荐3】Can dogs and cats live in perfect harmony in the same home? People who are thinking about adopting a dog as a friend for their cats are worried that they will fight. A recent research has found a new recipe of success. According to the study, if the cat is adopted before the dog, and if they are introduced when still young (less than 6 months for cats, a year for dogs), it is highly probable that the two pets will get along swimmingly. Two-thirds of the homes interviewed reported a positive relationship between their cat and dog.
However, it wasn’t all sweetness and light. There was a reported coldness between the cat and dog in 25% of the homes, while aggression and fighting were observed in 10% of the homes. One reason for this is probably that some of their body signals were just opposite. For example, when a cat turns its head away it signals aggression, while a dog doing the same signals submission.
In homes with cats and dogs living peacefully, researchers observed a surprising behaviour. They are learning how to talk each other’s language. It is a surprise that cats can learn how to talk ‘Dog’, and dogs can learn how to talk ‘Cat’.
What’s interesting is that both cats and dogs have appeared to develop their intelligence. They can learn to read each other’s body signals, suggesting that the two may have more in common than we previously suspected. Once familiar with each other’s presence and body language, cats and dogs can play together, greet each other nose to nose, and enjoy sleeping together in the sofa. They can easily share the same water bowl and in some cases groom (梳理) each other.
The significance of this research on cats and dogs may go beyond pets —to people who don’t get along, including neighbors, colleagues at work, and even world superpowers. If cats and dogs can learn to get along, surely people have a good chance.
1. The underlined word swimmingly in paragraph 1 is closest in meaning to________.A.early | B.sweetly |
C.quickly | D.smoothly |
A.they are cold to each other |
B.they look away from each other |
C.they misunderstand each other’s signals |
D.they are introduced at an early age |
A.They eat and sleep together |
B.They observe each others behaviors |
C.They learn to speak each other’s language |
D.They know something from each other’s voice |
A.We should learn to live in harmony |
B.We should knows more about animals |
C.We should live in peace with animals |
D.We should learn more body languages. |
【推荐1】Yu Pengnian is an 88-year-old real estate Chinese businessman. He amassed a fortune of $1.3 billion dollars during his career but instead of keeping the money and living like an emperor, he decided to give it all away. All of his fortune will be spent on helping poor Chinese students get a better education.
And Yu isn’t the only super-rich person in China who has this spirit of giving. Chen Guangbiao, a Jiangsu recycling tycoon, has given millions of dollars to charity and promises to give all of his money to charity when he dies.
Yu and Chen are among the many businessmen who have become prosperous during China’s economic rise. An American business magazine, Forbes, estimates that there are 117 billionaires in China and hundreds of thousands of millionaires. What sets Yu and Chen apart from the rest, though, is their tremendous generosity when it comes to donating money to charity.
Last week Bill Gates and Warren Buffett came to Beijing. Gates and Buffett, two of the world’s richest men, are also the world’s biggest philanthropists. They invited fifty of China’s richest people to have dinner with them and talk about the spirit of giving. At first, only a few people accepted their invitation. It seemed some of the invited guests were afraid that Buffett and Gates were going to pressure them into giving their wealth to charity.
A lot of people are angry at the billionaires who are not willing to give away their fortunes. They criticize them for being miserly and not caring about the poor and the less fortunate. But I think this criticism is wrong. A gift, any gift, should come from the heart. Instead of criticism, these reluctant billionaires should be encouraged to follow the examples of Yu Pengnian and Chen Guangbiao. Encouragement is always a better strategy than criticism. As we say in English, “You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.”
1. He amassed a fortune of $1.3 billion dollars during his career… The word “amassed” means________.A.stimulated | B.contemplated | C.immigrated | D.accumulated |
A.helping poor Chinese students get a better education |
B.helping the students in earthquake-stricken area |
C.helping his off-springs lead a rich life in the future |
D.achieve his aim of living like an emperor |
A.Yu Pengnian is the only super-rich person in China who has the spirit of giving. |
B.Chen Guangbiao is a real estate Chinese businessman. |
C.Yu and Chen become wealthy during the rise of China’s economy. |
D.When Bill Gates and Warren Buffett invited fifty of China’s richest people to have dinner with them, they all felt honored and accepted their invitation at once. |
A.When it comes to charity work, they are very generous. |
B.They had dinner with Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, talking about the spirit of giving. |
C.They are pressured into giving their fortune to charity. |
D.They are both businessmen. |
A.The author wants to tell us that flies prefer honey to vinegar. |
B.The author wants to prove that encouragement is always a better strategy than criticism when it comes to charity. |
C.The English saying expresses the main theme of the passage. |
D.The author wants to criticize those billionaires who are not willing to give away their fortunes for being miserly and not caring about the poor and the less fortunate. |
【推荐2】When she was just 9 years old, Hilde Lysiak became famous across the United States for reporting on difficult news stories. Now Hilde has written a book telling her own story, and sharing some of the challenges she faced.
Hilde Kate Lysiak’s father was a reporter for the New York Daily News. When she was young, he often took her to work with him, and she developed a strong interest in news stories and reporting. When she was 8, Hilde started her own newspaper, called the Orange Street News (OSN). Her family lived on Orange Street. Hilde did the writing, her sister Izzy took pictures, and her father helped her organize and print the newspaper. Following the rules her father had taught her, she researched and reported stories in her monthly newspaper.
OSN suddenly became famous when a murder happened in town, and 9-year-old Hilde was the first person to report it. Soon, news organizations around the country were doing stories on Hilde. Some people criticized her parents for allowing her to report on something as unpleasant as a murder. Others criticized Hilde for “pretending to be a reporter”. Some people even suggested she should be playing with dolls.
Hilde was upset by the complaints. She responded with a You Tube video. “I never began my newspaper so that people would think I was cute,” she said. “I want to be taken seriously. I’m sure other kids do, too.” That wasn’t the last time Hilde had trouble getting people to take her seriously. Sometimes, it was because of her age. Other times, it was because she was a girl. But she never let that stop her. Hilde continued reporting.
Hilde’s activities as a reporter have made her famous, and she has earned several awards. With her father, Hilde has written a series of books for young people, called Hilde Cracks the Case. The books are based loosely on stories that Hilde wrote. The books have now been turned into a TV show called Home Before Dark.
1. What caused Hilde to be interested in news reporting?A.Her unusual writing skills. | B.Her experience with her father at work. |
C.Her mother’s encouragement. | D.Her passion for reading newspapers. |
A.Hilde took pride in the Orange Street News. |
B.All the media misunderstood Hilde’s behaviour. |
C.Not everyone was happy about Hilde’s efforts. |
D.Unpleasant stories were prohibited from being reported. |
A.Determined. | B.Adaptable. |
C.Awkward. | D.Reliable. |
A.Challenges Hilde Faced When She Was Young |
B.A Biographical Novel Written by Hilde Lysiak |
C.The Orange Street News: a Popular Newspaper |
D.Hilde Lysiak: Young Reporter Tells Her Own Story |
【推荐3】Emma Hart Willard (1787-1870) was an American pioneer educator. In her time colleges and universities were for men, and women were not permitted to attend. Emma received advanced education at home from her father and became a school teacher at twenty. She continued to teach at school for several years after her marriage, then began offering college lessons in her home to women students. Later she founded a school in New York State, which was the first school for higher education in the U. S. for women. Emma Willard also tried to persuade New York state to pass a law to allow women to attend public colleges and universities, though that did not come about until after her death. Some years later people remembered her for her life-long efforts and elected her to the U. S. Hall of Fame (荣誉) in 1905.
1. During Emma Willard’s lifetime, women in the U. S. ________.A.were allowed to receive higher education |
B.went to separate colleges and universities |
C.started to enjoy equal rights to education |
D.began to fight for the rights to education |
A.He allowed her to run a school at home. |
B.He urged her to become a school teacher. |
C.He taught her college lessons himself. |
D.He sent her to college. |
A.It is a building set up in memory of the great people of the U. S. |
B.It is a grand hall where honored people receive prizes from the U. S. government. |
C.It is a place where honored people in the U. S. are buried. |
D.It is a club of VIPs to which respected people are elected. |
A.She was the first American woman to get a college education. |
B.She was the first American woman to become a college teacher. |
C.She fought for equal rights for women in the U. S. |
D.She was a pioneer (先锋) in winning higher education for women in the U. S. |