Phil Wise is a wildlife scientist from the Save the Tasmanian Devil (袋獾)Program. The scientists working with this program study Tasmanian devils, check their health, and track the devils found in the wild. Because a disease is reducing the number of devils, Oddity, a young Tasmanian devil, and 14 others were raised in a preserve and then brought to Maria Island to be set free into the wild.
Life on this island off the coast of Tasmania was a big change for Oddity and the others. These devils bad little experience with other kinds of animals and had to explore the land and find new bones.
Though they are raised in zoos all over the world, devils live wild only in Tasmania. They eat dead animals they find, which helps clean up the environment. Devils also eat animals such as wallabies, wombats, and possums, helping to keep those populations balanced.
But a disease called Devil Facial Tumor Disease (DFTD) is killing devils on mainland Tasmania, putting them in danger. DFTD spreads when a diseased animal bites a healthy animal. The goal of the scientists w ho set Oddity and the others free was to create a lot of devils which are free of DFTD on Maria Island. Oddity is a part of this “insurance population” of devils raised in zoos and wildlife preserves. This means that if the facial disease causes the Tasmanian devil to die out in the wild, devils like Oddity can be sent back into disease-free areas of Tasmania, giving devils a chance to survive.
Oddity started his new life on Maria Island. And the other animals did so well that 13 more devils were set free. The 28 original Tasmanian devils have reproduced; there are now around 80 devils. They are doing well on Maria Island. and the plan is considered a success. Wise says he is “very happy to know that animals are getting a chance to be free in the wild in an area that is free of DFTD It is the final aim of all who work to protect animals.”
1. Why were some Tasmanian devils sent to Maria Island?A.To save their lives. | B.To treat their illness. |
C.To make a further study. | D.To provide pleasure for visitors. |
A.They live mainly on plants. |
B.They mostly live in the wild. |
C.They need to be protected in the zoo. |
D.They help keep the balance of nature. |
A.Well-trained wildlife. | B.Healthy baby devils. |
C.Animals with DFTD. | D.Disease-free devils. |
A.They are wonderful. | B.They are dangerous. |
C.They are the same as before. | D.They are affected by human |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】In the 1980s, millions of western monarchs gathered in trees from northern California down to western Mexico. Now, their wintering sites are mostly on California’s central coast.
Western monarch butterflies travel south from the Pacific Northwest to California each winter. They return to the same places and even the same trees, where they gather. The monarchs usually arrive in California at the beginning of November. They spread across the country once warmer weather arrives in March.
The western monarch butterfly population has decreased by more than 99 percent since the 1980s. Another monarch population on the eastern side of the Rocky Mountains travels from southern Canada and the northeastern US to spend the winter in western Mexico. Scientists estimate the monarch population in the eastern US has fallen about 80 percent since the mid-1990s.
Monarchs from across the West migrate (迁徙) yearly to about 100 wintering sites along central California’s Pacific coast. One of the best-known wintering places is the Monarch Grove Sanctuary in the city of Pacific Grove.
Pacific Grove, California, known as “Butterfly Town, USA”, has worked for years to help the decreasing monarch population. The city holds a parade to celebrate the butterflies every October. It also bans human interference with the monarchs. The crime carries a $ 1,000 fine.
In 2020, no monarchs appeared in Pacific Grove. But in 2021, an early count found that more than 13,000 of the insects had moved in.
Scientists do not know why the population increased in 2021. But Jepsen, director of Endangered Species at Xerces Society, said it is likely a combination of reasons, including better conditions on their breeding grounds. The non-profit science group Xerces Society carries out the official study every year. Volunteer counters have reported the presence of as many as 50,000 monarchs in the last few weeks.
Monarch butterflies lack legal protection that could keep their territory from being destroyed. Last year, the butterflies were denied federal protection. But the insects are now among the candidates for listing under the federal Endangered Species Act.
1. What is the text mainly about?A.Introducing California’s central coast. |
B.Revealing the migration and quantity change of monarchs. |
C.Attracting more visitors to Pacific Grove in California. |
D.Introducing the reason for western monarchs’ migration. |
A.Apparent. | B.Unique. | C.Multiple. | D.Mysterious. |
A.Disturbance. | B.Commitment. | C.Adaptation. | D.Consumption. |
A.To provide readers with more interesting information. |
B.To urge to add more animals into the list of endangered species. |
C.To express the author’s satisfaction with protective measures. |
D.To introduce the development of legal basis for protecting Monarch butterflies. |
【推荐2】Some of the most painful moments I spend as a vet (兽医) are those spent with my customers assisting my animal patients from this world to the next. Making this final decision is not easy, and I have often felt powerless to comfort the sorrowful owners.
That was before I met Shane.
I had been called to examine a ten-year-old dog named Belker who had developed a serious health problem. The dog’s owner—Ron, his wife, Lisa, and their little boy, Shane-we’re hoping for a miracle (奇迹). But I told the family there were no miracles left for Belker, and offered to perform the euthanasia (安乐死) for the old dog in their home. As we made the arrangements, Ron and Lisa told me they bought it would be good for the four-year-old Shane to observe the euthanasia. They felt Shane could learn something from the experience.
The next day, I felt the familiar catch in my throat as Belker’s family surrounded him. Shane seemed so calm, patting the old dog for the last time, that I wondered if he understood what was going on.
A few minutes later, Belker slipped peacefully away. The little boy seemed to accept Belker’s death without any difficulty of confusion. We sat together for a little while after Belker’s death, wondering aloud about the sad fact that animal lives are shorter than human lives.
Shane, who had been listening quietly, piped up: “I know why.’’
Shocked, we all turned to him. What came out of his mouth next astonished me. I’d never heard a more comforting explanation.
He said, “Everybody is born so they can learn how to live a good life: like loving everybody and being nice, right?” The four-year-old continued,” “Well, animals already know how to do that, so they don’t have to stay as long.”
1. Shane’s parents wanted Shane to witness the euthanasia mainly because .A.they hoped he could gain something from it |
B.they knew he hated to part with Belker |
C.they wanted him to remember Belker forever |
D.they intended him to learn to carry out euthanasia |
A.Belker got sick mainly because of lack of care. |
B.There was no hope for Belker to recover but to suffer. |
C.Shane didn’t feel sad about Belker’s death. |
D.Belker didn’t want to live any longer because of the pain. |
A.words failed the vet when he tried to comfort Belker’s family |
B.the vet was familiar with the feelings of Belker’s family |
C.the vet would rather not perform the euthanasia |
D.the vet’s throat was uncomfortable with Belker’s family around |
A.He knew little about animal lives. |
B.He felt unexpected about Belker’s death. |
C.He had a unique opinion about life. |
D.He was an outgoing and warm-hearted boy. |
【推荐3】If you can potty-train(坐便训练) a child, you can potty-train a cow. At least, that was the theory a group of researchers in Germany decided to test. Farmed cattle produce roughly 66—88 pounds of waste and 8 gallons of urine(尿) each day and are free to relieve themselves where they please. However, the spread of their waste into the soil can have negative effects on the environment.
A team of scientists from FBN and FLI in Germany and the University of Auckland in New Zealand began to potty-train the little cows, in the process they called “MooLoo training”. In the first phase of training, the cattle were put in a closed public toilet. And whenever they urinated, they were given a reward. “Once they were allowed outside, the little cows would go in the toilet to get their reward, but they soon learned that there’s only a reward if they urinate.” FBN’s Neele Dirksen, first author of the study, told CNN.
To encourage little cows to use the toilets, researchers also came up with a punishment. “We first used in-ear headphones and we played a very unpleasant sound whenever they urinated outside,” said Langbein. “We thought this would punish the animals, but they didn’t care. Ultimately, a splash(溅泼) of water on them worked well as a gentle punishment.” The little cows were trained for 45 minutes every other day. And after 10 training days, the team managed to successfully train 11 out of the 16 little cows involved in the experiment, which was more than they had expected.
The results showed that little cows performed at a similar level to children when learning to potty-train, and did better than very young children. “It is possible to potty-train little cows,” Langbein said, “I hope that in a few years all cows will go to a toilet.”
1. Why did researchers potty-train the cattle?A.To test cattle’s level of intelligence. |
B.To spread the cattle’s waste into the soil. |
C.To prevent cattle from producing more waste. |
D.To avoid the environment damage caused by cow’s waste. |
A.By sending signals. | B.By rewarding them. |
C.By starving them. | D.By controlling remotely. |
A.Striking them on the ear. | B.Scaring them by loud noises. |
C.Splashing water on them. | D.Locking them up. |
A.It is unexpected. | B.It is abnormal. |
C.It is disappointing. | D.It is reasonable. |
【推荐1】Calculated every year by Global Footprint Network(GFN),Earth Overshoot Day(地球生态超载日)is the day when human has used up all the natural resources—produce,meat,fish,water and wood.This means we use up them ahead of time before the end of the year.
It is just like spending your entire years' money by August and then borrow money from friends,knowing fully well you cannot pay back. GFN says the same thing happens in the case of the earth."Because we give out more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than our oceans and forests can take in,and we harvest forests more quickly than they can regrow,"he said.
In a perfect world,we should only spend what we have.This means Earth Overshoot Day would fll on 31 December or perhaps in the following year. Unfortunately,the day has been climbing up quickly since 2014 when it fell on 19 August.In 2015,it was 13 August,and this year, the earliest so far—8 August!
According to GFN,Australia tops the list,with the United States coming in a close second.If the world's population started to live like either of these countries,we would need more resources to meet our needs.
Fortunately,experts say the situation isn't as bad as it sounds. Many countries have already taken measures to reduce carbon emissions(释放)by using wind or solar energy.People can also help by eating less meat, walking, cycling or taking public transportation,as well adopting the three Rs: Reduce,Reuse&Recycle.If we work together,we can help push back Earth Overshoot Day to December 31 or even beyond.
1. How does the author explain Earth Overshoot Day?A.By giving us some data. |
B.By comparing it to personal money. |
C.By describing the process of waste. |
D.By introducing the present situation of the earth. |
A.Uncertain. | B.Negative. | C.Skeptical. | D.Positive. |
A.Earth Overshot Day falls on different days every year. |
B.Earth Overshoot Day falls on 8 August. |
C.Earth Overshoot Day falls on 31 December. |
D.Earth Overshoot Day is put forward year by year. |
A.To warn people to plan for their future. |
B.To tell people the importance of nature. |
C.To teach people how to protect the earth. |
D.To call on people to care about the earth. |
Domaske, 28, has developed a fabric(织物) called QMilch from high concentrations of the milk protein casein (酪蛋白). “It feels like silk and it doesn’t smell----you can wash it just like anything else,“ Domaske told Reuters. Made from all natural materials, QMilch has many health benefits, says Domaske. The amion acids (氨基酸)in the protein fight bacteria and aging, and can help regulate both blood circulation and body temperature, she says.
Domaske’s fashion label MCC is popular among people, and has now started weaving the milk fiber into its collection.
Currently MCC’s line of clothes----which feature flowing wrap dresses with modern cuts and bright patterns----are made from combinations of various fibers, including QMilch. But Domaske plans to design a collection made entirely from the milk fiber.
Milk fabric has been around since the 1930s, but was always produced in environmentally unfriendly ways that used a lot of chemicals. Unlike early forms, QMilch is made almost entirely from casein without chemicals.
“We have developed an all-natural fiber consisting of a very high concentration of casein, with a few other natural ingredients – and in only two years,” Domaske, a former microbiology student, say.
The casein is taken from dried milk powder and then heated up in a type of meat-mincing machine(绞肉机)with other natural ingredients. The fiber comes out in threads and is then made into yarn(纱线)on a spinning machine.
Domaske says it would take about 6 liters of milk to produce an entire dress, which costs about $200 to $270. Luckily, for that kind of money, the clothes don’t come with a date when they are no longer usable----during the heating process, the molecules(分子)bond in such a way that the protein won’t break down.
Due to its anti-bacterial qualities, the fiber can also be used in medicine and makeup, and some auto companies have ever looked into using it in car seat covering.
1. Which of the following feature of QMilch is NOT mentioned in the passage?
A.It is beneficial to one’s health. |
B.It feels soft and has a special smell. |
C.It is easy to clean. |
D.It is a man-made fiber that uses no chemicals. |
A.are fashion labels created by Domaske’s students |
B.are characterized by their modern cuts and bright patterns |
C.are made completely from various chemicals |
D.are produced in environmentally unfriendly ways |
a. Casein is heated
b. Milk powder is acquired.
c. Casein is taken from dried milk powder.
d. The fiber is spun into yarn.
e. Threads of fiber are produced.
f. Clothes are woven.
A.a,c,b,e,d,f | B.b,c,a,d,e,f. |
C.b,c,a,e,d,f | D.c,a,e,b,d,f |
A.this new type of clothing will never go out of fashion |
B.these new clothes are reasonably priced |
C.the new clothes are heat-resistant |
D.milk fiber will have a good sales market |
【推荐3】Kaitlin Woolley and Ayelet Fishbach report in Psychological Science that a meal taken “family-style” from a central plate can greatly improve the outcome of later negotiations.
Having conducted previous research in 2017 revealing that eating similar foods led to people feeling emotionally closer to one another, Dr Woolley and Dr Fishbach wondered whether the way in which food was served also had a psychological effect. They theorized that, on the one hand, sharing food with other people might indicate food scarcity(短缺)and increase a feeling of competition. However, they also reasoned that it could instead lead people to become more aware of others' needs and drive cooperative behavior as a result. Curious to find out, they did a series of experiments.
For the first test they included 100 pairs of participants from a local cafe, none of whom knew each other. The participants were seated at a table and fed corn chips with salsa. Half the pairs were given their own basket of 20 grams of chips and a bowl of 25 grams of salsa, and half were given 40 grams of chips and 50 grams of salsa to share. As a cover for the experiment, all participants were told this snack was to be consumed before the game began.
The game asked the participants to negotiate an hourly wage rate during a fictional strike. Each person was randomly assigned to represent the union or management and follow a set of rules.
The researchers measured cooperation by noting the number of rounds it took to reach an agreement, and found that those who shared food resolved the strike significantly faster(in 8. 7rounds)than those who did not(13.2 rounds). A similar experiment was conducted with 104 participants and Goldfish crackers(饼干), this time negotiating an airline's route prices. The results were much the same, with the food-sharers negotiating successfully 63. 3% of the time and those who did not share doing so 42. 9%of the time.
1. What does the "family-style" meal in the report refer to?A.A meal taken at home. | B.A meal shared with others. |
C.A meal consumed by oneself. | D.A meal taken in a family atmosphere. |
A.To show the way food is served. |
B.To prove sharing food increases competition. |
C.To confirm sharing food can promote cooperation. |
D.To find out whether sharing food can get people close emotionally. |
A.To hide the intention of the experiment. |
B.To avoid the distraction during the game. |
C.To reward them for their participation. |
D.To add to their energy. |
A.By making a questionnaire. |
B.By giving participants interviews. |
C.By analyzing the reasons for cooperation. |
D.By comparing the results of the experiments |