组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 政治与经济 > 法律法治
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.94 引用次数:314 题号:15238853

The Big Debate

Are road tests necessary for teen drivers?

Some say new drivers should be able to get a license without taking a road test.

What you need to know
● The minimum age to get a driver’s license in most states is 16. Teens must complete a driver’s education course, pass a written test, and take a road test.
● Since the pandemic, Wisconsin has waived (放弃) road tests for drivers ages 16 and 17. The state is considering making this change permanent. Iowa and Nebraska have similar waivers.
● Studies show that teens ages 16-19 are at the highest risk of any age group to be in a motor vehicle crash.
Yes - of course teen drivers need a test

Even after taking a driving course and practicing for hours, teens do not have enough real-world experience to start driving on their own. It’s important to test a teen’s knowledge of the rules of the road—and not just with a written test. Plus, a road test ensures that every driver who passes has a certain level of knowledge. Nothing can substitute for a road test.

No - it’s not necessary for safe driving

After 50 hours of supervised driving plus a driver’s education course, teens are more than prepared to get a license. And think of the time that will be saved. It lets busy motor vehicle departments complete work that piled up during the pandemic. Experts agree that practice is the best way to reduce car accidents. Skipping the road test and letting teens drive earlier gives them time to get better.

What do you think?

What do you think? Are road tests necessary for teen drivers? Now that you’ve read more of the issue, have a parent or guardian visit the week junior.com/polls with you so you can vote in our debate. Vote YES if you think road tests are necessary for teen drivers or NO if you don’t. We’ll publish the results next week.

1. What is a must in getting a driver’s license in most states?
A.Being older than 19.B.Having driving experience.
C.Passing required tests.D.Completing all school courses.
2. Why do some people support skipping teens’ road test?
A.It gets teens prepared.B.It reduces car accidents.
C.It saves time and effort.D.It promotes driving education.
3. Who are supposed to vote?
A.Teens.B.Parents.C.Drivers.D.Experts.
【知识点】 法律法治 应用文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约170词) | 容易 (0.94)
名校

【推荐1】NOTICE

Lake Castle Administration

State of Georgia

Smoking Ban(禁令) in Public Places

Public Notice Number 328ROD47                                Date- -July 20th

All individuals are informed that a legislation (法律) regarding(关于) “Ban of Smoking in Public Places” has been approved. Staring from 25th July the law will come into effect(生效、实施). Any person found including in smoking at any point of time, with any substance will be fined(罚款) a sum of 1,000 dollars.

No “First Warming”will be issued. This notice itself serves that purpose. Notice regarding this ban is being displayed in various TV channels, newspaper and radio stations.


Details of the Ban:

First Offence--$ 1 ,000 Fine

Second Offence-- $ 2 ,000 Fine

Third or more Offence-- $4,000 Fine

Fine is payable at Municipality Collection Centre of the State of Georgia.

H. M. Swinson,

Medical Heath Officer,

Georgia

1. When will the new law go into operation?
A.Three days later.B.Five days later.
C.A week later.D.A month later.
2. From the notice, we can know that ________.
A.special smoking places will be set up
B.Smokers breaking the law will be warned firstly
C.one will be fined $4.000 at most by law
D.more people will give up smoking
3. Where should the fines be paid?
A.At Lake Castle Administration.B.At Municipality Collection Centre.
C.At H. M. Swinon, Medical Health Officer.D.At federal Government of Stare.
2021-06-26更新 | 73次组卷
阅读理解-六选四(约270词) | 容易 (0.94)
名校
【推荐2】Directions: Read the following passage. Fill in each blank with a proper sentence given in the box. Each sentence can be used only once. Note that there are two more sentences than you need.

To sue or not to sue?

The rise and rise of the compensation culture

Perhaps it’s not surprising that Roslyn Darch of Houston, Texas, USA felt annoyed when she tripped (绊倒) over a kid running around furniture store, and broke her ankle.     1     The owners were clearly surprised at the size of Roslyn’s payout. Particularly since the kid she tripped over was her own son.

Some argue that this is just greed --- that the amount of money is far too much for the injury suffered---and it’s not the shop’s fault that a mother can’t control her child anyway.     2     Whatever you think, the compensation culture which has grown up in the USA is spreading, and it will affect all of us.

    3     Sandra York received $113,000 from a Philadelphia restaurant after slipping on a spilt soft drink. However, the drink was on the floor because York had thrown it over her boyfriend thirty seconds earlier, during an argument.

If you think that going on holiday is a good way to get away from all this trouble, think again ---millions of people complain to the British Tourist Authority every year, and many receive some form of compensation. Staff at British travel company Thomson Holidays are used to dealing with requests for compensation following poor weather, cancelled flights and lost luggage, but one spokesman revealed, “We recently had a claim from someone who said their holiday was ruined because they didn’t get on with their travelling companion.     4    

A.Not everyone takes it for granted to ask for compensation for physical injuries.
B.And it’s not the only claim for physical injuries that are keeping the lawyers busy.
C.And we regularly get complaints from holidaymakers travelling abroad who say the locals don’t speak English!
D.Others would say that it’s good to see the law taking the side of the individual against the big corporations, for a change.
E.It’s difficult for the British Tourist Authority to settle the complaints.
F.But a few months later, she was $780,000 richer after successfully suing (起诉) the shop.
2019-11-12更新 | 86次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约440词) | 容易 (0.94)

【推荐3】Lawmakers in Massachusetts have introduced a law that would ban children in the seventh grade or younger from playing tackle football(冲撞式橄榄球).The Act for No Organized Head Impacts to Schoolchildren, or the NO HITS Act, was introduced last month in an effort to protect children’s heads from blows while at a particularly fragile age.

The bill, which would still allow flag or touch football to be played, would cause fines of up to $2,000 for each time the law is broken. People who frequently break the law, or those whose actions cause physical harm, would face bigger fines.

“It’s all about kids’ health and we have a number of studies that say that repeated contacts(接触) to the head are very bad for you and the younger that starts, the worse it is," said Rep. Paul A. Schmid III (D),who introduced the bill with House Minority Leader Bradley Jones (R).

According to a 2017 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers examining 111 brains belonging to former NFL (National Football League) players found the brain disease Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, or CTE, in 110 of them. The disease is associated with repeated head injuries, not just concussions(脑震荡),and is generally found in athletes, retired soldiers and others with a history of repetitive brain injuries, according to the Concussion Legacy Foundation, a non—profit organization that works to study, treat and prevent future                                                     cases of brain injuries among athletes and other at—risk groups.

Similar laws have been considered elsewhere in the country, including California and Illinois last year, though they didn’t secure enough votes to become law. Those against previously proposed(提议的)bans have argued that adequate progress has been achieved to make the sport safer and that the sport offers too many benefits for children to totally avoid it.

Several former NFL players, who have been directly or indirectly affected by CTE, have argued differently, however. “I made the mistake of starting tackle football at 9 years old. Now, CTE has taken my life away.Y outh tackle football is all risk with no reward," Pro Football Hall of Famer Nick Buoniconti told CNN last year.

1. Why was the law introduced by lawmakers in Massachusetts?
A.To make tackle football safer for players.
B.To ban children from doing sports too young.
C.To encourage the popularity of some safe sports.
D.To keep young children from suffering brain injuries.
2. What is Paragraph 2 mainly about?
A.The reason why the sport is forbidden.
B.The consequences of breaking the new law.
C.The causes of the new law in Massachusetts.
D.The fines of playing tackle football incorrectly.
3. What does the author want to show by mentioning the 2017 study?
A.Future cases of brain injuries can be reduced.
B.NFL players used to pay much attention to CTE.
C.Repeated head blows can result in brain diseases.
D.Brain injuries can really be prevented with action.
4. Which would most probably show Nick Buoniconti’s opinion?
A.Tackle football is less dangerous than people think.
B.Young children should avoid playing tackle football.
C.Tackle football should be made easier to play than before.
D.Young children often make mistakes while playing tackle football.
2020-10-28更新 | 65次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般