In a series of Instagram posts this week the actress Kate Beckinsale shows her growing friendship with a fox in her mother’s London garden, encouraging him on to her lap by handfeeding him bits of ham and naming him Peepo. It’s as if Beckinsale is auditioning (试演) for alive-action of Snow White, commanding a series of forest animals at her finger tips.
Beckinsale-like pretty much one woman on every urban UK street—is a “fox feeder”. This troubles me. Not because of the old horror stories about city foxes stealing babies from their beds, but because it means that I have to accept that I’m not very cool. Foxes, on the other hand, are unbelievably cool. They were voiced in Wes Anderson’s stop-motion film Fantastic Mr Fox by the silver fox himself, George Clooney.
To be anti-fox is to be with Dahl’s boring rule-followers, Boggis, Bunce and Bean. To be pro-fox is to be with Ricky Gervais delightedly, filming Foxes partying in his Hampstead garden, or the DJ Annie Mac filming, this summer, a fox strolling into her kitchen from her London patio. The fox takes a cold glance at Mac sitting on the sofa, ignores her, then cuts her shoe before loping off out the door. It was a mint green Nike Air Force 1, retailing at about 100 a pair.
The London Wildlife Trust estimates that there are 10, 000 foxes in the capital and about half of them sleep in our garden. They have wandered into the house and learnt how to open the lock on our food waste bin by rolling it over and over down the street at 2 am until the lid swings open.
A few days ago I was at my front door late at night finding my key awkwardly when a fox walked behind me. Even though her dinner plans-the food-waste picnic hamper were right there, she seemed more interested in going to the house party without being invited. Only after I’d banged the door in her face did I feel safe. Do you still think it kind and safe to feed foxes?
1. What is the purpose of Kate’s feeding the fox in paragraph 1?A.To attract her fans on Instagram. | B.To promote the live-action of Snow White. |
C.To show that Kate is an animal lover. | D.To introduce the topic of the passage. |
A.Boggis | B.Annie Mac |
C.Wes Anderson | D.Kate Beckinsale |
A.Old horror stories make the author dislike foxes. |
B.Wes Anderson starred in the film Fantastic Mr Fox. |
C.George Clooney is a voice actor in Fantastic Mr Fox. |
D.More and more people realize the danger of feeding foxes in the city. |
A.Foxes are pretty cool animals. |
B.Foxes should be driven out of the city. |
C.Feeding foxes in the city might not a proper action. |
D.Foxes and human beings are living in harmony in the city. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Recently, Australian scientists learned something unexpected about magpies(喜鹊)when they tried to attach trackers to them to learn more about their habits.
The birds the scientists hoped to study were Australian magpies. They’re medium-sized black and white birds from the same bird “family” as crows(乌鸦). They live in groups of up to 12 birds and work together to defend the area they live in.
The researchers were eager to try a new tracker on the magpies. They hoped to learn more about how far the birds flew and what they did during a normal day. The scientists are concerned that magpies may have a hard time adjusting as the world warms up because of climate change.
To keep the trackers on the birds without causing flying problems, the researchers developed a special harness (背带). It was tough, so it wouldn’t come off by accident. But it had a special release controlled by magnets (磁铁). This was meant to allow the scientists to free the birds from the harnesses at a special magnetic bird feeder, without having to catch the birds again.
The researchers placed trackers on five magpies using their special harnesses. But just ten minutes after setting up the last magpie, they noticed something unusual: an adult female magpie was helping another magpie get free from its harness. In a few hours, most of the other magpies had also been freed from their harnesses. By the third day, none of the birds had trackers anymore.
The scientists were disappointed about the trackers, but they realized that the magpies had taught them something else: magpies are able and willing to help each other out. This is called “rescue behavior”, and it’s not that common in the animal world, especially among birds.
1. Why did the researchers do the research?A.To test some new trackers. |
B.To help prevent climate change. |
C.To know how magpies fly. |
D.To study the living habits of magpies. |
A.By letting it come off by accident. |
B.By making use of a special device. |
C.By catching them and setting them free. |
D.By stopping them from flying around. |
A.They didn’t really like it. |
B.They could hardly feel it. |
C.They were happy about it. |
D.They were curious about it. |
A.They are really smart. |
B.They are quite self-centered. |
C.They are unwilling to help each other. |
D.Their “rescue behavior” is common among birds. |
【推荐2】New York’s Central Park has a statue dedicated to him, and there’s even been a movie about him: a sled dog named Balto. Now he is the focus of a DNA study, 90 years after he died, to see what made the dog so famously tough (坚韧).
In 1925, this Siberian husky was part of an expedition in Alaska called the serum run, the goal of which was to bring life-saving medicine to young people that were threatened by a deadly disease in the remote town of Nome, over 600 miles away. Balto led the long-distance stretch, and wound up getting most of the honor.
After Balto’s death in 1933, his remains were preserved and put on display at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History.
“Balto’s fame and the fact that he was taxidermized gave us this cool opportunity 100 years later to see what that population of sled dogs would have looked like genetically and to compare him to modern dogs,” said Katherine Moon, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California.
Her team took skin samples from the dog’s belly and reconstructed its genome — the complete set of genes in an organism. They compared this genetic material with that of 680 contemporary dogs from 135 breeds.
Contrary to a legend that thought that Balto was half wolf — as suggested in an animated Universal Pictures film that came out in 1995 — this analysis found no evidence he had wolf blood. It turned out Balto shared ancestors with modern day Siberian Huskies and the sled dogs of Alaska and Greenland.
Moon’s team also compared Balto’s genes with the genomes of 240 other species of mammals.
This allowed researchers to determine which DNA fragments (片段) were common across all those species and have not therefore changed over the course of millions of years of evolution. This stability suggests that these fragments of DNA are associated with important functions in the animal, and that mutations (基因突变) there could be dangerous.
The bottom line from the research was that Balto had fewer potentially dangerous mutations than modern breeds of dogs did, suggesting he was healthier.
1. Why did Moon and her team study the DNA of Balto?A.Balto saved the lives of many people. | B.Balto achieved a long-distance transport. |
C.Balto was a focus of the Central Park. | D.Balto was amazingly tougher than others. |
A.Gene. | B.Evolution. | C.Toughness. | D.Changelessness. |
A.Balto had blood of wolves. | B.Balto had fewer harmful mutations. |
C.Balto was a modern husky. | D.Balto was a special mammal species. |
A.A dog’s heroic act. | B.A great honor to a dog. |
C.A DNA study of a tough dog. | D.A new research into DNA. |
【推荐3】Carers at a place called TRC waved a happy goodbye this week to Bear, a much-loved green sea turtle (龟) who swam to freedom from Mooloolaba Beach. Bear was found injured on a shore in February. Its bone was injured and it was covered by small harmful creatures. Bear spent 116 days receiving care at TRC.
Though Beal’s carers got to know him well—such as what food he preferred and that he was very cheeky—it was important he didn’t become too used to being cared for by people. “When we care for a turtle. we’d try to communicate as little as possible,” Ms Attwood said. “When a turtle is sent back into the ocean, we don’t want them to rely on humans for food. They need to know how to search for food themselves. The one time we may need to communicate with a turtle more often is if they need any special treatments.”
So where will be Bear? Bear will most likely stay swimming around the Indo-Pacific area. Green turtle loves to eat sea grass, which is why coral reefs (珊瑚礁) are always a popular place. The Great Barrier Reef is a common area turtles like to visit. Bear is now carrying certain equipment, so his former carers and turtle experts around the world will be able to follow where he goes in the future.
Bear is a type of green sea turtles. They’re called green sea turtles because they have green fat under the back. We can tell them apart from other kinds of sea turtles because they have only a pair of scales (鳞) in front of their eyes. And green sea turtles are the largest types of sea turtle. They grow to about 110-190 kg. But they are dying out due to humans who want their eggs, meat and skin. Some are accidentally caught by fishing ropes.
1. What did Bear seem to look like after staying at TRC?A.It suffered from a terrible disease. |
B.It grew much bigger a period later. |
C.It found it hard to stay with its carers. |
D.It gradually returned to good condition. |
A.To protect both themselves and the turtle. |
B.To increase turtles’ ability to survive in the wild. |
C.To follow turtles’ habit of loving to stay alone. |
D.To give turtles some very special treatments. |
A.It may stay at TRC for a long time. |
B.It may learn how to swim in water again. |
C.It may be found in the Great Barrier Reef. |
D.It may take on a color different from green. |
A.The reason of people’s catching turtles. |
B.Green sea turtles’ body characteristics. |
C.The green sea turtles’ importance to nature. |
D.Efforts made to prevent harming sea turtles. |
Complete the following sentence: “You go to the library to check out ...?” The obvious answer is “books”. But a harder question might be, “What do we mean by ‘books’?” Nowadays, electronic books, or “ebooks”, have become more and more popular in American society.
The biggest online bookseller Amazon, for example, recently announced that less than four years after introducing them to its catalog, it is now selling more electronic versions of its book titles than printed ones.
Last week, Pew Internet Project released a survey about the use of ebooks by library customers. It found that 12% of Americans aged 16 and older who read ebooks say they had borrowed at least one from a library within the past year. But the survey found that the broader public, including 58% of those who have library cards and 53% of people who own electronic book readers, are not aware that they can find and check out ebooks from public libraries, even though three quarters of the libraries offer that service.
Pew Internet Project director Lee Rainie noted that ebook borrowing is becoming more popular at the same time that publishers, who are selling plenty of ebooks and fewer hardcopy editions, are worried that free ebook checkouts at the library will hurt sales. In February, for example, the big publisher Penguin Books stopped supplying new ebooks and audio books to libraries. Penguin just reached an agreement to resume supplying one big library system in New York City but not until six months after new titles are released. That way, those who want the latest books will have to buy them.
So things are a little murky (阴暗的) in the library world when it comes to electronic books. More and more customers want them, but publishers are giving the libraries a hard time about offering them. Demand is not the problem. Supply may soon be.
1. What is the function of the two questions in the first paragraph?A.To introduce the topic of the passage. | B.To stress the popularity of ebooks. |
C.To show what the author cares about. | D.To remind us of the change at the library. |
A.It has sold ebooks for five years. | B.Its ebooks are cheaper than printed books. |
C.It has the best ebooks among all libraries. | D.Its ebooks sell better than printed books. |
A.few library customers know how to read ebooks |
B.the promotional effort at ebook readers is not big enough |
C.library customers should be reminded about the ebook service |
D.more library cards should be offered to readers free of charge |
A.Because they are not allowed to offer ebooks. |
B.Because they wanted to increase the sales of printed books. |
C.Because they didn’t want their ebooks to be copied. |
D.Because their products were not welcomed there. |
【推荐2】There was a strange stillness. The birds, for example—where had they gone? Many people spoke of them, puzzled, and disturbed. The feeding stations in the backyards were deserted. The few birds seen anywhere were dying; they trembled violently and could not fly. It was a spring without voices. On the mornings that had once throbbed (跳动) with the dawn chorus of robins, catbirds, doves, jays, wrens, and scores of other bird voices, there was now no sound; only silence lay over the fields and woods and wetlands.
Rachel Carson was a scientist by profession. But these lines from the opening chapter of her 1962 book Silent Spring, A Fable for Tomorrow, show her talent as a writer. By imagining a world without birds, she aimed to alert not only the scientific community but also the public to the damaging effects of human activity on ecosystems—in particular, to the harmful use of pesticides, such as DDT. She believed that the chemical industry was knowingly causing harm to plants, animals and even humans, and wished to see pesticides used in a more responsible, limited and carefully monitored way.
Carson urged people to make themselves aware of the facts and do something about the situation. Silent Spring contains a lot of scientific research and case studies. The book details the gypsy moth wipeout programme, which killed birds. The Book also gives examples of other wipeout programmers that did nothing to reduce the problems they were originally designed to solve.
Carson’s message caused a great increase in environmental awareness. Its impact was immediate and far-reaching: The use of DDT was banned and the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)was established in the US. Silent Spring was therefore regarded as a milestone in the launch of the green movement in the Western world.
Her book not only changed the world; half a century later it remains a book that deserves to be reread today. Unless we do listen to Rachel Carson’s warning, one day we may wake up to the strange and quiet horror of another silent spring.
1. What is the function of the first paragraph?A.To describe a real scene. |
B.To recommend a scientist. |
C.To introduce the topic. |
D.To provide background information. |
A.DDT was doing harm to the ecosystems on earth. |
B.Pesticides had been used both responsibly and carefully. |
C.The human activities did not cause damage to natural ecosystems. |
D.The lines from the opening chapter of her book were just a fantasy. |
A.It was seen as a far-reaching green movement. |
B.It prohibited the use of pesticides around the world. |
C.It brought the author a good reputation around the world. |
D.It raised people’s consciousness of environmental protection. |
A.Concerned. | B.Disapproving. |
C.Doubtful. | D.Objective. |
【推荐3】Life today is much easier than it was hundreds of years ago, but has brought new peoplems. One of the biggest is pollution. Pollution come in many ways. We see it, smell it, drink it and even hear it.
Men have been polluting the earth. Many years ago, the pollution was not so serious because there were not so many people. When the land was used up or the river was dirty in one place, men moved to another place.
Air pollution is now the most serious. Air makes people sick. And lots of people now are trying to use something to clear the air. Water pollution kills our fish and pollutes our drinking water. Noise pollution makes us become angry more easily.
Many countries are making rules to fight air pollution. They stop people from burning coal in houses and factories in the city, and from putting dirty smoke into the air.
Pollution by SO2 is now the most dangerous kind of air pollution. It is caused by heavy traffic. It is true that if there are fewer people driving, there will be less air pollution.
Although most of the pollution is caused by us, we are the ones who can change the situation. The earth is our home. We must take care of it. And we must pay more attention to the information in pollution at the same time.
1. Why was the pollution in the past less serious?A.Because life in the past was easier. | B.Because there were not so many people. |
C.Because men stayed in one place. | D.Because people used less coal to make fire. |
A.Air pollution. | B.Noise poliution. | C.Light pollution. | D.Water pollution. |
A.Try to use something to clear the air | B.Ask people to use public transport more. |
C.Stop putting dirty smoke into the air. | D.Encourage people to move to another place |
A.Because there are so many factories. |
B.Because the global warming is becoming worse and worse. |
C.Because carbon dioxide emissions are increasing. |
D.Because there is heavy traffic. |
A.To prove life is much easier today. | B.To call on us to take care of our earth. |
C.To show the danger of pollution. | D.To introduce how to fight air pollution. |