If you want to make sure that you understand this story as fully as possible, you might consider printing the article and reading it on paper. That is one of the findings of a recent study of research done on the differences between paper and screen reading.
Virginia Clinton carried out the research examination. Clinton looked at 33 past studies done between 2008 and 2018 that examined paper versus screen reading. Her examination found that reading from paper generally led to better understanding and improved a person’s performance on tests connected to the reading material. And, she found no major differences in reading speed between the two. Such differences were notable only when the reading materials were expository texts — or explanatory and based on facts. Clinton said she found no major difference when it came to narrative, fictional texts.
Clinton also found that paper readers usually have a higher recognition of how well they have understood a text than screen readers. This skill is called metacognition. The word “cognition” means the mental action of increasing knowledge and understanding. “Metacognition” simply means thinking about one’s own thinking.
Clinton said, “We think that we’re reading the story or the book better than we actually are. We think we understand what we are reading better than how we are actually reading.” Yet, this inflated(夸大的)sense of understanding, or over-confidence, is especially common among screen readers.
Clinton said there are many possible reasons for such findings. Over-confidence of screen readers, for example, could be the result of a less focused mind. Clinton said, “If you are enjoying the reading, you’re going to be more concentrated. You’re going to be paying better attention. Preferences are a key issue here.”
Several studies have found that people often think of paper materials as more important and serious. “If you are reading from paper, your mind thinks, ‘This is something important. I need to pay attention to it’,” Clinton said. Readers might connect computer screens with fun, less serious activities — such as checking social media or watching Netflix. That, Clinton said, could explain why most studies find no major difference in screen and paper among narrative, fictional reading materials. Clinton described this kind of reading as “enjoyment reading”.
Although her findings may support paper reading over screen reading, Clinton points to new and developing tools that can be used to improve a screen reader’s understanding and focus. “For example, when you’re reading off of a screen it can be programmed that you have to answer questions and get them right before you can continue. Paper can’t make you do that.”
1. Which of the followings is not true about Clinton’s research?A.In order to carry out the research, Clinton checked over 30 studies that shared similar topic. |
B.When it comes to fictions, paper readers and screen readers tend to have the same speed. |
C.Paper readers usually are more aware of their level of understanding about the text. |
D.Whether a reader likes the reading or not does not influence his or her degree of concentration. |
A.Matt always tries to figure out the personality of the characters when reading a book. |
B.Tom often writes down his mind map and evaluates it after solving a math problem. |
C.“I think I am in love with you.” Ted said to Mary without a second thought. |
D.We are expected to pay attention to others’ feelings when talking with them. |
A.It can be programmed to check understanding. |
B.It provides the same reading materials. |
C.It has tools to force readers to continue reading. |
D.It encourages readers to read at a high speed. |
A.Screen time makes reading more effective. |
B.Paper reading is more effective than screen reading. |
C.Screen-reading is more suitable for some readers. |
D.Computer reading is improving paper reading. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Three very strong women — my mother, my grandmother and Melinda — deserve big credit for helping me become the man I am today. But Blanche Caffiere, a very kind teacher and librarian I’ve never written about before, also had a huge influence on me.
Mrs. Caffiere died in 2006, shortly after reaching her 100th birthday. Before she passed away, I had an opportunity to visit her and thank her for the important role she played in my life.
When I first met Mrs. Caffiere, she was the elegant and engaging school librarian at Seattle’s View Ridge Elementary, and I was a fourth grader. I was desperately trying to go unnoticed, because I had some big weaknesses, like dysgraphia (书写障碍), and had a totally messy desk with books around. And I was trying to hide the fact that I liked to read — something that was cool for girls but not for boys.
Mrs. Caffiere took me under her wings and helped make it okay for me to be a messy, nerdy boy who was reading lots of books. She pulled me out of my shell. She started by asking questions like, “What do you like to read?” and “What are you interested in?” Then she found me a lot of books. For example, she gave me great biographies she had read. Once I’d read them, she would make the time to discuss them with me. “Did you like the book? Why? What did you learn?” She listened to what I had to say patiently. Through those book conversations in the library and in the classroom we became good friends.
Teachers generally don’t want to burden their students with extra reading beyond the homework they’ve given. But I learned from Mrs. Caffiere that my teachers had so much knowledge to share. Looking back on it, there’s no question that my time with Mrs. Caffiere helped spark my interest in libraries and my focus on helping every child in America get the benefit of great teachers. I should give great thanks to the devoted teacher and librarian who helped me find my strengths when I was nine years old. It’s remarkable how much power one good person can have in shaping the life of a child.
1. Which of the following best describes the writer when he was in his fourth grade?A.Elegant and engaging | B.Shy and untidy |
C.Weak and desperate | D.Curious and friendly |
A.She forced the writer to read more books. |
B.She helped the writer to overcome his weaknesses. |
C.She turned the writer into a book lover. |
D.She encouraged the writer not to hide his love of reading. |
A.She had the greatest influence on the writer. |
B.She influenced the writer’s decision on helping American children. |
C.She used to give the writer too much homework to help him learn. |
D.She hadn’t seen the writer since he left the school. |
A.A Teacher Who Changed My Life. |
B.The Story of a Kind Teacher. |
C.My School Life with Great Teachers. |
D.Every Student Deserves to Be Encouraged. |
【推荐2】But would a faster reading speed mean that we could learn more? Some people claim that it’s possible. In July last year, six-time speed reading champion Anne Jones sat down to read Harper Lee’s Go Set a Watchman. Just 25 minutes and 31 seconds later, she finished it - which equals a reading rate of around 3, 700 words per minute. Jones runs training courses teaching speed reading, recall and concentration techniques and there are numerous speed reading apps that have appeared on the market over the past few years. But do they actually work?
First, we need to understand how we read. The human eye movement system is central to our reading ability. Read over that sentence again, and think about how your eyes scan across the words. They don’t move smoothly over them. Instead, they make a series of short, sharp jumps, skipping over a few characters before briefly landing on a word. The movements are known as saccades and the pauses are called fixations.
Reading isn’t just about seeing the words - you need to comprehend them to build up a picture about what the text means. People are able to get through a block of text faster, but at the cost of accuracy and understanding. In other words, if you use a speed reading app, then you’ll probably get the gist (主旨) of a piece of text, but you’ll struggle to recall details about what you’ve just read.
So, does speed reading work? Well, yes and no. It really depends on what you’re reading and why you need to read it. As yet, there isn’t a trick that enables you to read a piece of text both quickly and accurately - there’s always going to be a trade-off.
1. What’s the main idea of the passage?A.Speed reading is bad at times. | B.Speed reading is a waste of time. |
C.Speed reading can work sometimes. | D.Speed reading is always enjoyable. |
A.Reading apps ensure us to read much faster. |
B.Fast reading makes us learn more knowledge. |
C.Reading is no more than seeing the text words. |
D.Reading ability is related to eye movement system. |
A.balance. | B.change. | C.business. | D.bargain. |
A.The advantages of faster or slower reading. |
B.The reasons why to do faster or slower reading. |
C.The cases where to do faster and slower reading. |
D.The methods with making use of faster or slower reading. |
【推荐3】How to Pick a Great Book to Read
The world is full of great books,just waiting to be read.How can you pick one you'll really like? Here are some tips:
What makes you happy?
Fact or fiction?
Some books are entirely made up and imagined.Those are called fiction books.Novels,short stories are all examples of fiction.These books can transport you to another world or help you imagine something beyond your own experience.
Non-fiction books give you the who,what,when and why.
Find a family favorite.
What was your mother's favorite book when she was your age? Or your dad's?
Ask an expert.
Launch a book swap.
A.Ask them and give it a read. |
B.Many of them read novels from start to finish. |
C.Why not get some friends together and trade favorite books? |
D.If you have a favorite hobby,look for books about that activity. |
E.They tell stories using facts—but that doesn't mean they're boring. |
F.Read the passage and decide for yourself whether it seems knowledgeable. |
G.Your local library is a great place to find books that you'll love,and you don't have to search all by yourself. |
【推荐1】What’s really green?
Most of us are aware that we must protect the environment. But recently, some “green truths” have turned out only half true, or even completely false. Here are some common ones.
Paper shopping bags are better than plastic ones.
Plastic bags cause litter, bring dangers to wild animals and take long to break down. So people think paper bags are better. However, making a paper bag uses four times as much energy as making a plastic bag and three times the amount of water, besides producing more greenhouse gases.
Actually, neither are environment-friendly. So, take a reusable bag with you when shopping.
Running your car air conditioning burns more gas.
Running your car air conditioning (A/C) will affect your gas mileage, costing you more money and producing more pollution. However, if you want to save gas by turning off the A/C and rolling down your windows, you have to drive at low speed. At high speed, the aerodynamic drag (空气阻力) caused by open windows will actually cost you more gas. It does help save some gas if you turn off your A/C a few minutes before arriving at your destination.
It’s better to take a shower than a bath.
It depends on your shower time and size of your bath. If you spend over eight minutes in a shower, you’ll use as much water as in a bath. Therefore, the key is to keep your shower time as short as possible.
When you turn off a device, it stops using power.
When we turn off a device like television, it goes into stand-by mode. However, devices in this mode still use power. To ensure your device is truly off, just remove the plug (插头).
1. What is the problem of paper shopping bags?A.They are a threat to wild animals. | B.They cause litter. |
C.They are energy-consuming to produce. | D.They can’t break down. |
A.Bring a plastic bag when shopping. | B.Have a quick shower. |
C.Drive at high speed with open windows. | D.Keep your television in stand-by mode. |
A.To clear up some misunderstandings. | B.To persuade people to live green. |
C.To inform people of some green products. | D.To evidence some green truths. |
【推荐2】In today’s world, sleep experts say that for a better night’s rest, Americans should turn off their smartphones or iPad before sleeping. Such electronic products make the brain more active, and then influence their sleep. But according to a latest survey, more than 90% of Americans regularly use a computer or some other kinds of electronic products in the hour before bed.
Researchers are finding that man-made light from some electronic products at night may reduce the brain chemicals(化学物质) that help sleep. The researchers showed that sitting in the light from computer tablets clearly lowered levels of the chemical which manages our body clocks and plays a role in the sleep cycle.
In the study, the researchers let volunteers read, play games and watch movies on a tablet for different time while measuring(测量) how much light their eyes received. They found that two hours of sitting before a bright tablet screen at night reduced the sleep chemical levels by about 22%.
Studies of students using computers at night have got the similar results. And researchers say that may not only cause sleeplessness, but also raise the risk of obesity(肥胖症), diabetes(糖尿病) and other diseases.
To be on the safe side, the researchers advise us to use computers less before bed, or at the very least turning down your screen as much as possible.
1. What can we learn from the first paragraph?A.Americans don’t get enough sleep. |
B.Electronic products are very popular. |
C.The brain becomes more active at night. |
D.Sleep experts never use smartphones. |
A.listening to music |
B.playing computer games |
C.watching movies |
D.reading electronic books |
A.making a survey about sleep |
B.using smartphones in the daytime |
C.sitting in a bright room |
D.using computers at night |
A.Learn to use smartphones or iPad. |
B.Watch some relaxing TV programs. |
C.Turn down the screen to the lowest. |
D.Try to sleep earlier than before. |
【推荐3】Many of us have experienced the following: the day before an exam, we try to squeeze a huge amount of information into our brain. But just as quickly as we acquire it, the knowledge we have gained is gone again. The good news is that we can solve this problem. With expanded time intervals between a person’s learning events, we keep the knowledge for a longer time.
But what happens in the brain during the spacing effect? It is generally thought that during learning, neurons (神经元) are activated and form new connections. In this way, the learned knowledge is stored and can be regained by reactivating the same set of neurons. However, we still know very little about how pauses positively influence this process.
Neurobiologists Annet and Pieter did an experiment, during which mice had to remember the position of a hidden chocolate piece in a maze (迷宫). On three continuous chances, they were allowed to explore the maze and find their reward—including pauses of different lengths. “Mice trained with the longer intervals between learning phases (阶段) were unable to remember the position of the chocolate as quickly,” explains Annet. “But the next day, the longer the pauses, the better was the mice’s memory.”
“If three learning phases follow each other very quickly, we naturally expect the same neurons to be activated,” Pieter says. “After all, it is the same experiment with the same information. But after a long break, we imagine the brain interprets the following learning phase as a new event and processes it with different neurons.”
However, the researchers found the opposite. In fast continuous learning phases, the mice activated mostly different neurons. When taking longer breaks, the same neurons active earlier were used again later. Reactivating the same neurons could allow the brain to strengthen the connections between these cells. With spaced learning, we may reach our goal more slowly, but we benefit from our knowledge for much longer.
1. How does the author mention the problem in paragraph 1?A.By introducing a theory. | B.By telling a story. |
C.By making an assumption. | D.By presenting a case. |
A.To examine the influence of rewards on memory. |
B.To explore how brain works during the spacing effect. |
C.To confirm neurons’ functions in the learning process. |
D.To determine the best intervals between learning phases. |
A.The surprising result of the study. | B.The serious limitation of the study. |
C.The future goal of the researchers. | D.The major worry of the researchers. |
A.Learn Better by Distributing Tasks | B.Remember More by Taking Breaks |
C.Clearing Minds Aids People in Memory | D.Spacing Effect Patterns Work Differently |
But when the Coke billboards went up this summer on buildings near the Piazza San Marco,which is at the historic heart of Venice, there was a public debate.
"We can't commercialize everything, " said Alessandra Mottola Molfino, a Venetian.
"We couldn't stay quiet, " said Maria Camilla Bianchini d'Alberigo, president of a heritage protection association.
City of officials. however, argue that without these ads, the city could not afford to maintain its heritage. Many have been damaged by centuries of wear and are even a threat to public safety.
"I can't turn down the image of a bottle when there are pieces of the Palazzo Ducale falling to the ground, " said Renata Codello, a Culture Ministry official.
The Culture Minister has a budget of about $ 47 million (315 million yuan) for restoration of monuments. but Italy has a rich architectural heritage, and funds are always tight. Of that amount, $ 1. 8 million was given to the entire Veneto region, which includes Venice.
Two years ago, the city signed an agreement with the Dottor Group, a company responsible for the restoration of the Bridge of Sighs and the Palazzo Ducale. It allows it to sell ad space.
But there is a condition in the agreement: The ads should not offend public taste.
In August, Venice banned US actress Julianne Moore's Bulgrari ad from a billboard in the Piazza San Marco.
The photo shows a naked Moore covered with lion cubs. handbags and jewelry. Mayor Giorgio Orsoni called the image too racy (猥亵) and unsuitable for the Piazza San Marco.
"l consider the fact that Venice is part of the real world_ but we cannot accept these Hollywood-style images. There are wise sponsors. and we need to come up with advertising that suits Venice. not Times Square, " he said in a speech.
1. The article is mainly about__________in Venice.
A.restoration of cultural heritage |
B.widespread commercialization |
C.the conflict between ads and cultural heritage |
D.the difficulty of restoring monuments |
A.introduce other monuments of the ancient city |
B.show many ancient structures need repairing |
C.indicate that the view is blocked by huge ads |
D.attract readers' interest in the famous city |
A.is in favor of | B.is worried about | C.objects to | D.doesn't mind |
A.They support commercialization. |
B.They feel the ads are damaging the city. |
C.The ads are usually racy and in an American style. |
D.The ads don't present a traditional view of Venice. |
A.Hollywood stars' ads cannot go up in Venice |
B.people can buy Bulgari or Coca-cola on the Bridge of Sighs |
C.the Dottor Group may stop its restoration work for lack of funds |
D.the mayor of Venice is expecting new advertising |
【推荐2】If you’ve experienced the care of a kind hardworking doctor, one way to thank your doctor is writing a thoughtful thank-you note. Finding the right words isn’t always easy. To help you create a meaningful message for the doctor, you can learn from the thank-you notes below.
The first example: Post-surgery (术后) thank-you note
Thank you so much for your excellent work during my foot surgery. I experienced the least pain during the recovery. I feel much better now, and I am confident that I’ll be returning to my favorite sport soon. Your kindness and devotion to patients really shine bright in everything you do. Thank you again.
The second example: Post-delivery (产后) thank-you note
Dear Pam Smith, thank you for delivering my baby. All of your care and concern leading up to the delivery made me feel confident in going into the delivery room. The baby class you recommended was a lifesaver, and I can’t thank you more for your help through this entire process.
The third example: Say thanks for taking care of your loved one
Thank you for your kindness with my mother, Susan Meyer. The entire family was concerned when she fell sick last month, and you really helped us a lot. If it weren’t for you, I don’t know how I would have handled everything as an office lady. My mother is better now. We all send our love and thanks!
The fourth example: Say thanks to your family doctor
I appreciate your reliable care year after year. Your guidance during my annual physical keeps me in my best shape, and I owe much of my success to you. Best wishes from a dedicated patient.
1. What can we learn from the first example?A.Its writer might have cut off his feet. | B.Its writer is fond of sports. |
C.The doctor is good at curing mental illness. | D.The doctor caused much pain during the operation. |
A.She supported her in having another baby. |
B.She helped her in the baby class |
C.She gave her a lot of confidence. |
D.She saved her baby’s life. |
A.The third example. | B.The second example. |
C.The first example. | D.The fourth example. |
The studies, most conducted within the past decade, included about three million adults from around the world. The result of these studies by researchers at the National Center for Health Statistics in Maryland, part of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, shows that slightly overweight or obese people were six percent less likely to die from all causes compared to people of normal weight. But the researchers found that seriously obese individuals were still at a 30 percent greater risk of death compared to healthy-weight individuals.
Study lead author Katherine Flegal says she was not surprised that overweight people would not have a higher death risk. “Because we'd actually already read a lot of this literature and realized that death rates for overweight would be at least not higher than normal[weight," she said. “I guess l was a little bit surprised that it was definitely lower. And l was also surprised that the lower rates of obesity didn't seem to differ from normal weight."
But Flegal stresses the difference in death rates appear to be small between normal-weight people and overweight and mildly obese individuals.
The finding by Flegal and colleagues have raised new questions about the reliability(可靠性)of the so-called "body mass index" or BMI, a measurement of body fat as a ratio(比例,比率)of height to weight, that has become popular in recent years among public health experts to measure potential health risks.
But Heymsfield warns that individuals should not conclude that it's okay to put on extra kilograms, since being at a healthy weight lowers the risk for heart disease and diabetes.
1. Katherine Flegal feels surprised at the fact that____.
A.obese people have higher death rates |
B.slightly obese people have lower death rates |
C.obese people tend to die early |
D.death rates have nothing to do with body weight |
A.BMI may not be so reliable. |
B.The study provides further evidence for BMI. |
C.BMI tells nothing about potential health risks. |
D.BMI has been much questioned recently. |
A.It's OK to put on extra weight. |
B.It doesn't matter if you are slightly obese. |
C.Obese people are much healthier. |
D.Body weight has nothing to do with death rates. |
A.Technology. | B.Dieting. | C.Health. | D.Death. |