A handful of healthy soil could contain great numbers of living organisms. However, poisonous pesticides (杀虫剂) are causing harm and destruction to them, according to a recent analysis.
For the analysis, researchers looked through nearly 400 published studies including over 2,800 experiments on how pesticides affect soil organisms. They found that pesticides harmed organisms critical to maintaining healthy soils, but these harms have never been considered in the safety reviews of the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).Poisonous pesticides are driving factors in the sharp decline of many soil organisms, such as ground beetles. They have been identified as the most significant driver of soil biodiversity loss in the last ten years.
However, that research has always been ignored. The EPA, which is responsible for pesticide supervision(监管)in the country, openly acknowledges that somewhere between 50 and 100 percent of all agriculturally applied pesticides end up on the soil. Yet, to assess pesticides’ harms to soil species, the agency just uses a single test species, the European honeybee, to estimate risk to all soil organisms. It spends its entire life above ground in artificial boxes.
Worse still, as soil health gain popularity globally, pesticide companies have jumped up to green wash and promote their products. Every major company is now advertising its role in improving soil health, such as advocating planting cover crops. As general beliefs, these practices are indeed good for soil health and, if adopted responsibly, are a great step to take. But companies know that these practices are often accompanied by increased pesticide use. Chemicals and pesticides have to be applied more frequently to kill weeds before crops are planted.
The long-term environmental cost can no longer be overlooked. Soils are some of the most complex ecosystems on Earth, containing nearly a quarter of the planet’s biodiversity. Protecting them should be a priority, not an afterthought.
1. What does the underlined word “They” refer to in Paragraph 2?A.Soil organisms. | B.Ground beetles. |
C.Artificial boxes. | D.Poisonous pesticides. |
A.The honeybee is a typical species living in nature. |
B.The assessment of pesticides’ harms is one-sided. |
C.Less than half of applied pesticide go to the soil eventually. |
D.The EPA attaches great importance to pesticide inspection. |
A.To obey the EPA’s rules. |
B.To increase their product sales. |
C.To protect the environment. |
D.To shoulder their social responsibility. |
A.Soil: essential to agriculture. |
B.Pesticides: harmful to soil health. |
C.Organisms: significant to harvest. |
D.Pollution: destructive to biodiversity. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Commercial aviation (航空) alone contributes around three percent of total global carbon emissions (排放). But the industry is actively looking for green solutions in the form of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). In a study released this week, a team of researchers from the U. S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) details a method of transforming food waste into SAF that can be used in existing engines. Making SAF is a more complicated process—it’s got to be very similar to the petrol-based aviation fuel we use today in commercial flights.
The researchers use volatile fatty acids (挥发性脂肪酸)(VFAs) from smelly food waste and transform it into simple paraffin molecules (石蜡分子) that can be used in fuel and really aren’t all that chemically different from traditional emissions-heavy fuels. There are other renewable biofuels that have been made from biomass (生物质), specifically oil and fat from vegetables and animals, but using the ever-mounting pile of food waste to fuel flights broadens those possibilities.
Derek Vardon, a senior research engineer at NREL, says major companies are eager to get involved in SAF because some sustainable solutions, such as battery-operated commercial flights, just aren’t possible yet with current battery technology. A battery-powered plane would be too heavy to fly long distances—“So using SAF that works in the same way as the fuel we have is a simpler way to trade out traditional emissions-heavy fuels.” Vardon also says that “because the wet waste would normally go to a landfill and break down to release greenhouse gases, the process of making and using SAF could actually have a negative carbon footprint when it is dramatically used.”
A major question as the researchers move forward with this type of research is if it is possible to run an airplane engine on fully renewable biofuel. Rolls-Royce recently did a test on one of their engines with 100 percent SAF and it worked. “This fuel is not crazy and we can solve these problems,” Vardon says.
1. Which of the following is TRUE about SAF?A.It can be used to reduce carbon emissions globally. |
B.It’s less functional than the petrol-based aviation fuel. |
C.It’s composed of VFAs and simple paraffin molecules. |
D.It is virtually impossible to be made from biomass like oil and fat. |
A.The benefits of food rubbish-generated SAF. | B.The environmental impacts of the wet waste. |
C.The simple process of making and using SAF. | D.The future of battery-operated commercial flights. |
A.To promote its production. | B.To confirm the potential of SAF. |
C.To show off its powerful airplane engines. | D.To express doubt about the research. |
A.Natural emergence of renewable biofuels | B.Green alternative to emissions-heavy fuels |
C.Unavoidable decline of commercial aviation | D.Gradual reduction in greenhouse gas emissions |
【推荐2】When we think of Antarctica, the first thing that comes to our mind is a picture of penguins and large areas covered with snow. Large amounts of white snow spreading over thousands of kilometers is a pretty good description of Antarctica.
Research and observations conducted over the past few years have led to the conclusion that the Antarctic Peninsula's snow is turning green.
Scientists fear that such profound growth of algae can set off more global warming, causing even more snow to melt. To better understand that, we must consider that white snow reflects most of the sunlight that falls on it. However, as the surface of the snow darkens, it absorbs more and reflects less of the sunlight.
A.This is due to algal growth. |
B.But, that legendary snow is not completely white anymore. |
C.Sometimes, they can be present below the surface of the snow. |
D.The algae grow so quickly that they occupy great areas of the snow. |
E.The Antarctic is the area of the continent with the most vegetation. |
F.More sunlight implies more heat trapped on the surface of the Earth. |
G.Scientists are estimating the area covered by these green snow algae. |
【推荐3】Darshan Karwat is making headlines for having maintained an incredibly plain and continued lifestyle during his student years. The man gave up fast food, new clothes, and even toilet paper, until he got to a point where his trash(垃圾)for an entire year fit in just two plastic bags!
Karwat, who is originally from India, started the trash-free experiment when he lived in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and managed to keep it going for two and a half years. In the first year, he produced only 7.5 pounds of trash, and in the second year, he brought that number down to 6 pounds, which is a mind-blowing 0.4 percent of the 1,500 pounds of yearly trash produced by the average American.
Looking back, Karwat says that his inspiration to start the project came from a radio show The Story, on which he heard of a British couple who lived trash-free.
His trash mostly consisted of a few chip bags, glass milk-bottle caps, fruit stickers, and broken glass. He obviously had to make lots of sacrifices to achieve this – he stopped buying any kind of packaged food including cheeses, only drank milk from recycled glass bottles, and gave up on buying new clothes or stuff for his home – no gadgets, furniture, or even cups. He began carrying his own fork, spoon, plate, and a bowl everywhere he went, just to avoid plastic cutlery(餐具).
“I needed to change the way I lived, and I had to get creative,” he added. “When a restaurant furnished a napkin-wrapped(包纸的)fork and knife, I asked the server to change them for cutlery without the napkin. I’d remember to say “No straw!” after asking for water and to make sure the veggie(素食者)burger I ordered didn’t come with a wooden pick holding it together. I did what I had to do, and it was awkward.”
1. What is the passage mainly about?A.How a person inspires others |
B.How Darshan Karwat gets famous. |
C.Darshan Karwat and his no trash experiment. |
D.A plain and sustainable lifestyle attracts the public. |
A.Because he is from India. |
B.Because he has been in university. |
C.Because he heard a story on the radio. |
D.Because a British couple reminded to do so. |
A.Cheeses. | B.Furniture. |
C.Milk. | D.Gadgets. |
A.he seldom went to a restaurant |
B.it wasn’t convenient to live the life |
C.the server seemed cold to him |
D.he was proud of what he had been doing |
【推荐1】Leap days(闰日)play an important role in keeping our calendars on track. It's all thanks to Julius Caesar.
Most years, the calendar is made up of 365 days. However, the Earth's turning around the sun is actually a little longer than that. It's about 365 1/4 days. This makes the calendar year a bit shorter than a solar year. If you're trying to set up an exact system for measuring the passing of time and changing seasons, this throws small trouble in the work. That was back in 46 B. C. when Julius Caesar was developing what came to be known as the Julian Calendar. He decided that every four years an extra day would be added to the calendar on the advice of an astronomer, Sosigenes.
At first, Caesar's way seems simple and direct. You “bank” those extra quarter days for a few years, and then spend them on a leap day. But as the centuries went on, people began to notice something was wrong—it was speeding ahead of the solar year. By the end of the 16th century, the calendar year had been as much as 10 days ahead. The solar year is actually a little shorter than Caesar and Sosigenes thought. “It's not exactly a quarter of an extra day. It's a little less,” says physicist Judah Levine. “So adding one day every four years was too much.”
Astronomers now know that a solar year is actually 365. 24219 days long. This may not seem like much under the Julian Calendar, but that little mistake led to about 11 minutes off a year. So in 1582, Pope Gregory decided to reset the calendar. He came up with something called “the century rule”. If the number of years is a multiple(倍数)of 100 and is divisible(可整除的)by 400, and if the number of years is not a multiple of 100 and is divisible by 4, an extra day is added. Pope Gregory was also responsible for setting leap day as February 29.
The calendar won't skip(跳跃)another leap year until 2100. That little setup has kept our calendars fairly accurate(精确的)for over 400 years.
1. Who first came up with the idea of leap days?A.Sosigenes. | B.Julius Caesar. | C.Pope Gregory. | D.Judah Levine. |
A.To add one extra day to every year. |
B.To make the Julian Calendar unique. |
C.To teach people a method of saving time. |
D.To make the calendar year equal to the solar year. |
A.It couldn't direct people in actual life. |
B.It didn't completely agree with the solar year. |
C.The calendar year was late more than 10 days. |
D.It's not enough to add a leap day every 4 years. |
A.1900. | B.1986. | C.2024. | D.2038. |
People like the Secretary of Education simply don’t know what they’re talking about when they knock students. Nor do those who complain about falling academic standards.
The vast majority of the nation’s 12 million students are struggling to pay for their educations. They are part of the invisible workforce. Many hold down full-time jobs. They’re frying hamburgers, photographing weddings, working in construction, and waiting on tables. The fact that they even show up for classes is a wonderful event.
The financial situation of most students explains a lot about what is happening in schools. Why are the traditional courses so unpopular? Why are students flocking to accounting and computer science and any professional programs that seem to lead to careers?
Answer: Today’s working student has been forced into a kind of premature matter-of-fact way of viewing things. Romance is gone. The notion of transforming one’s self through study alone has disappeared. Today’s students seek freedom from manual labor, and the status conferred by a good job.
There are other consequences. Today’s students don’t have much time or energy to be devoted, and carry out independent research or even do serious homework. That’s the secret behind falling academic standards. Students have become consumers. They want grades and certifications. Their professors can’t be expected to give a grade of failure to students who are clearly tired from the effort to pay their bills.
There’s a lot wrong with this situation. It’s twisting the definition of education out of shape. Worse, it’s creating a generation that is totally unpleasant. The brightest students turn out to be yuppies (雅皮士). The vast majority are, at least, good-natured semi-literates.
The time has run out for philosophical debates about fixed courses of study. What this country needs is someone to stand up and say that being a full-time student during one’s formative years is an honorable calling worthy of support. If families can’t or won’t give it to their children, then the government should.
1. The author’s purpose in writing this article is to __________.
A.awaken the whole society to the problems today’s college students face |
B.warn Americans that academic standards are falling |
C.advise college students to study hard |
D.provide a suggestion that only full-time students be enrolled |
A.criticize | B.sympathize | C.complain | D.urge |
A.Many students are often absent from classes. |
B.Traditional courses are not popular. |
C.Students commit crimes with computers. |
D.Students don’t devote much time and energy to their homework. |
A.today’s students do not believe in love stories any more |
B.today’s students become more practical in dealing with things |
C.students think there is no affection any more and break up with their lovers |
D.today’s students hold matter-of-fact opinions on love |
A.We should encourage students to give up full-time jobs. |
B.Families should offer their children more help financially. |
C.We should stand up and say something for today’s college students. |
D.We should make more strict regulations to force students to study hard. |
【推荐3】Progressives often support diversity missions as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.
A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender equality” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.
Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government board are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas (配额). If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.
The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which clearly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.
The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest. Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of “equal protection”.
But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the percentage of women in the general population, but so what?
The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.
Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.
Writing in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt ”phenomenon, where the same elite women occupy multiple seats on a variety of boards.
Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do little to help average women.
1. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will __________.A.help little to reduce gender bias. |
B.pose a threat to the state government. |
C.raise women’s position in politics. |
D.greatly broaden career options. |
A.the harm from absolute board decision. |
B.the importance of constitutional guarantees. |
C.the pressure on women in global corporations. |
D.the needlessness of government interventions. |
A.the underestimation of elite women’s role |
B.the objection to female participation on boards. |
C.the entry of unqualified candidates into the board. |
D.the growing tension between labor and management. |
A.Women’s need in employment should be considered. |
B.Feasibility should be a prime concern in policy making. |
C.Everyone should try hard to promote social justice. |
D.Major social issues should be the focus of the government. |
【推荐1】Mutualism—win-win ecological partnerships perfected over evolutionary time-lengths—is a less-known ecological relationship that is also weak and easily hurt by the effect of a rapidly changing planet.
Bees and flowers are typical examples of mutualism. Some bee tongues are perfectly evolved to tap into certain flowers. By specializing in those plants, the longer-tongued bees reduce competition with insects that can't access those sweet foods.
That mutualistic relationship, however, has been impacted in at least one population of bees and flowers. As certain flowers in Colorado have become rarer due to warming temperatures, the tongues of the bumblebees(大黄蜂)that historically fed on them have become shorter.
Like many of their relatives, bumblebees are on the decline. To find out what's going on, a team of researchers headed to Colorado. The researchers examined bumblebee samples collected on three mountains from 1966 to 1980 and also gathered a fresh set, which they collected in the same places from 2012 to 2014. They performed the task of measuring all the historic and recently caught bees' tongues.
As the team reports in Science, both of the species tongues have declined in length over time. The team found a nearly 25-percent decrease in tongue length between the bees collected decades ago and those living in the same region today.
Next they turned to the flowers. Looking at contemporary and historic botanical data, the scientists confirmed that the number of flowers with short tubes did not increase in large quantities. They found that in response to warmer temperatures, flowers have been moving up the mountains and becoming rarer at lower altitudes. This altitude-climbing effect has ultimately resulted in an approximate loss of millions of flowers.
The findings paint a telling picture: hotter summers caused bumblebees' choice flower species to disappear, forcing them to evolve shorter tongues to tap into the remaining food sources. Then, competition with generalist species, more time and energy needed and a forced reliance on alternative sources all likely contributed to the bees' overall decline.
1. What was the cause of bumblebees' tongues shortening in Colorado?A.Decrease of certain flowers. | B.Fight within populations. |
C.The pollution of their food. | D.Common growth problems. |
A.Clear results were published. | B.It was based on assumptions. |
C.It was carried out for decades. | D.It intended to study bee diseases. |
A.For more sunlight. | B.For cooler environment. |
C.For more growing space. | D.For defence against insects. |
A.A research on bees' tongues. | B.Facts and causes of bees' decline. |
C.The relation of flowers and bees. | D.The climate influence on mutualism. |
【推荐2】Exposed soil isn’t part of nature’s master plan. Good examples where soil is naturally found with no plants growing in are beneath freshly removed trees, or where the ground has been burnt by a land fire. In these situations bare soil isn’t bare for long; within days seedlings (芽) begin to appear and cover the ground. In a few months’ time, the scar is hardly noticeable.
Unlike these natural examples, ploughed (耕犁) fields and freshly dug gardens are obvious examples created by man. But, left to nature, even these bare soils soon turn green with a large number of tiny seedlings. In fields, gardens and on grasslands, roadside and sports fields, along streets and on paths and pavements, we are constantly battling to stop weeds from growing. All we are doing is stop the recovering powers of nature.
Whenever soil is exposed, weeds act like a kind of medicine to reduce the potentially harmful rays of the sun, so the sooner plant growth covers the soil over again, the better.
Weeds also help to improve the fertility (肥沃) of the soil. Their roots get the soil together, improving its structure and creating a more stable environment in which soil life can grow fast. Those weeds with a deep root draw up plant nutrients from deeper in the ground, making them available to plants growing near the soil surface. Above ground, the stems (茎) of weeds help trap fallen leaves which break down into the soil, adding to the fertility of the soil.
As the soil becomes more fertile, different kinds of plants start to replace the “pioneering” weeds. Bushes move in to take the place by gradually shading them out, followed in turn by trees, which eventually push up through the bushes, finally shading them out too. Fallen leaves from the bushes and trees carry on the job of building soil fertility that was begun by those very first weeds that grew on the bare soil. Then, when one of these mature trees is removed in a storm, leaving a wound of bare soil in the earth, the whole process starts again.
1. When will soil be left bare?A.A land fire has just happened. | B.A young tree is planted in. |
C.No one ploughs the land. | D.No crops are planted in. |
A.Seedlings appearing in gardens. |
B.Reducing harmful rays of the sun. |
C.Removing weeds from pavements. |
D.Replacing plants in sports fields. |
A.They create soil life. |
B.They help improve the soil. |
C.They get nutrients from the sun. |
D.They break down fallen leaves. |
A.By adding more weeds to the soil. |
B.By taking out the weeds constantly. |
C.By removing the previous bushes. |
D.By making use of the fallen leaves. |
【推荐3】Scientists have long considered the question of whether and how plants communicate. For years, the topic sparked controversy. Books like 1973’s The Secret Life of Plants suggest that plants grow well if you sing or play classical music. Such statements were later debunked: Any evidence that music helps plants grow is not convincing at all. Still, researchers firmly believe there is some sort of communication going on between plants.
Plant communication is a complicated topic. What we do know is that plants have a wide range of mechanisms for communicating with each other and their surroundings. “It’s quite clear that plants are not just unresponsive victims, but that they are very aware of nearby things,” says Richard Karban, an entomologist at the University of California. “And they respond to reliable information.”
When a plant sends out chemicals in the air in response to a perceived threat, other sensitive leavcs on that same plant, as well as the leaves of their neighbors, perceive those signals and subsequently increase their own defenses. Karban’s research, for instance, shows that plants sound the alarm when they’re attacked by pests, so that other plants respond by growing faster and stronger. Even other species, like tobacco, can sense and react to the alarm.
In a study published in the journal Cell this March, Lilach Hadany, a professor at Tel Aviv University, put tomato and tobacco plants in an isolated box and then recorded ultrasonic (超声的) sounds. They experimented with, cutting stems or leaving them without water to simulate drought. The researchers found that the plants emitted (popping and clicking sounds at around 60 decibels in response, approximately as loud as human chatter. These sounds were at an ultrasonic frequency that humans can’t naturally hear, however. Hadany’s team even matched different sounds to the plants’ environment. And each type of stress could be matched with a specific, identifiable sound.
“We don’t know if they’re using the sound, or if the sounds are emitted in a completely passive way due to physiological changes,” Hadany says. “But we do know they are in the air, and they contain information.”
1. What does the underlined word “debunked” in Paragraph 1 mean?A.Confirmed. | B.Ignored. | C.Disproved. | D.Promoted. |
A.Plants can make no response to their attackers. |
B.Chemicals are sent by plants to attack the perceived threat. |
C.Plants rely little on their neighbors’ information to survive. |
D.The alarm sounded by one plant travels beyond plants and species. |
A.The sounds are loud enough to scare away pests. |
B.The sounds are produced when plants are in danger. |
C.The sounds can be heard by man without equipment. |
D.The sounds can be matched to the human environment. |
A.To inform readers. | B.To compare things. |
C.To warn readers. | D.To advertise things. |