组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:276 题号:17844575

A handful of healthy soil could contain great numbers of living organisms. However, poisonous pesticides (杀虫剂) are causing harm and destruction to them, according to a recent analysis.

For the analysis, researchers looked through nearly 400 published studies including over 2,800 experiments on how pesticides affect soil organisms. They found that pesticides harmed organisms critical to maintaining healthy soils, but these harms have never been considered in the safety reviews of the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).Poisonous pesticides are driving factors in the sharp decline of many soil organisms, such as ground beetles. They have been identified as the most significant driver of soil biodiversity loss in the last ten years.

However, that research has always been ignored. The EPA, which is responsible for pesticide supervision(监管)in the country, openly acknowledges that somewhere between 50 and 100 percent of all agriculturally applied pesticides end up on the soil. Yet, to assess pesticides’ harms to soil species, the agency just uses a single test species, the European honeybee, to estimate risk to all soil organisms. It spends its entire life above ground in artificial boxes.

Worse still, as soil health gain popularity globally, pesticide companies have jumped up to green wash and promote their products. Every major company is now advertising its role in improving soil health, such as advocating planting cover crops. As general beliefs, these practices are indeed good for soil health and, if adopted responsibly, are a great step to take. But companies know that these practices are often accompanied by increased pesticide use. Chemicals and pesticides have to be applied more frequently to kill weeds before crops are planted.

The long-term environmental cost can no longer be overlooked. Soils are some of the most complex ecosystems on Earth, containing nearly a quarter of the planet’s biodiversity. Protecting them should be a priority, not an afterthought.

1. What does the underlined word “They” refer to in Paragraph 2?
A.Soil organisms.B.Ground beetles.
C.Artificial boxes.D.Poisonous pesticides.
2. What can we learn from Paragraph 3?
A.The honeybee is a typical species living in nature.
B.The assessment of pesticides’ harms is one-sided.
C.Less than half of applied pesticide go to the soil eventually.
D.The EPA attaches great importance to pesticide inspection.
3. Why do pesticide companies advocate planting cover crops?
A.To obey the EPA’s rules.
B.To increase their product sales.
C.To protect the environment.
D.To shoulder their social responsibility.
4. Which of the following is a suitable title for the text?
A.Soil: essential to agriculture.
B.Pesticides: harmful to soil health.
C.Organisms: significant to harvest.
D.Pollution: destructive to biodiversity.
【知识点】 环境保护 说明文 植物

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一则新闻报道。文章主要介绍了美国国家可再生能源实验室的研究人员利用食物垃圾生产可持续航空燃料,该燃料有望给未来客机提供动力。

【推荐1】Commercial aviation (航空) alone contributes around three percent of total global carbon emissions (排放). But the industry is actively looking for green solutions in the form of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). In a study released this week, a team of researchers from the U. S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) details a method of transforming food waste into SAF that can be used in existing engines. Making SAF is a more complicated process—it’s got to be very similar to the petrol-based aviation fuel we use today in commercial flights.

The researchers use volatile fatty acids (挥发性脂肪酸)(VFAs) from smelly food waste and transform it into simple paraffin molecules (石蜡分子) that can be used in fuel and really aren’t all that chemically different from traditional emissions-heavy fuels. There are other renewable biofuels that have been made from biomass (生物质), specifically oil and fat from vegetables and animals, but using the ever-mounting pile of food waste to fuel flights broadens those possibilities.

Derek Vardon, a senior research engineer at NREL, says major companies are eager to get involved in SAF because some sustainable solutions, such as battery-operated commercial flights, just aren’t possible yet with current battery technology. A battery-powered plane would be too heavy to fly long distances—“So using SAF that works in the same way as the fuel we have is a simpler way to trade out traditional emissions-heavy fuels.” Vardon also says that “because the wet waste would normally go to a landfill and break down to release greenhouse gases, the process of making and using SAF could actually have a negative carbon footprint when it is dramatically used.”

A major question as the researchers move forward with this type of research is if it is possible to run an airplane engine on fully renewable biofuel. Rolls-Royce recently did a test on one of their engines with 100 percent SAF and it worked. “This fuel is not crazy and we can solve these problems,” Vardon says.

1. Which of the following is TRUE about SAF?
A.It can be used to reduce carbon emissions globally.
B.It’s less functional than the petrol-based aviation fuel.
C.It’s composed of VFAs and simple paraffin molecules.
D.It is virtually impossible to be made from biomass like oil and fat.
2. What is the focus of Vardon’s words in paragraph 3?
A.The benefits of food rubbish-generated SAF.B.The environmental impacts of the wet waste.
C.The simple process of making and using SAF.D.The future of battery-operated commercial flights.
3. What is the author’s purpose of referring to Rolls-Royce’s test in the last paragraph?
A.To promote its production.B.To confirm the potential of SAF.
C.To show off its powerful airplane engines.D.To express doubt about the research.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.Natural emergence of renewable biofuelsB.Green alternative to emissions-heavy fuels
C.Unavoidable decline of commercial aviationD.Gradual reduction in greenhouse gas emissions
2022-05-16更新 | 122次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约240词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:本文为一篇说明文。文章讲述了因为气候变化,大量的藻类生长出来,将南极从一篇白雪景象变成了一篇绿色的景象。

【推荐2】When we think of Antarctica, the first thing that comes to our mind is a picture of penguins and large areas covered with snow. Large amounts of white snow spreading over thousands of kilometers is a pretty good description of Antarctica.     1    

Research and observations conducted over the past few years have led to the conclusion that the Antarctic Peninsula's snow is turning green.     2     These algae (藻), even though they are individually incapable of being seen by eyes, are visible from space. These algae produce colonies called algal blooms, which spread over large areas.

    3     As a result, Antarctica is visible as many patches of green algae are on white snow from space. Algae are green because of the presence of the pigment chlorophyll, which helps in photosynthesis (光合作用). Not just green though, red algae have also been found on Antarctica's snow, leaving the snow painted red. These green and red algae are not just present on the surface of the snow.     4     When the upper layer of snow melts, the algal bloom remains visible in the layers below.

Scientists fear that such profound growth of algae can set off more global warming, causing even more snow to melt. To better understand that, we must consider that white snow reflects most of the sunlight that falls on it. However, as the surface of the snow darkens, it absorbs more and reflects less of the sunlight.     5     This will cause warming of the surrounding area at a faster rate, melting more snow day by day.

A.This is due to algal growth.
B.But, that legendary snow is not completely white anymore.
C.Sometimes, they can be present below the surface of the snow.
D.The algae grow so quickly that they occupy great areas of the snow.
E.The Antarctic is the area of the continent with the most vegetation.
F.More sunlight implies more heat trapped on the surface of the Earth.
G.Scientists are estimating the area covered by these green snow algae.
2022-04-13更新 | 454次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐3】Darshan Karwat is making headlines for having maintained an incredibly plain and continued lifestyle during his student years. The man gave up fast food, new clothes, and even toilet paper, until he got to a point where his trash(垃圾)for an entire year fit in just two plastic bags!

Karwat, who is originally from India, started the trash-free experiment when he lived in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and managed to keep it going for two and a half years. In the first year, he produced only 7.5 pounds of trash, and in the second year, he brought that number down to 6 pounds, which is a mind-blowing 0.4 percent of the 1,500 pounds of yearly trash produced by the average American.

Looking back, Karwat says that his inspiration to start the project came from a radio show The Story, on which he heard of a British couple who lived trash-free.

His trash mostly consisted of a few chip bags, glass milk-bottle caps, fruit stickers, and broken glass. He obviously had to make lots of sacrifices to achieve this – he stopped buying any kind of packaged food including cheeses, only drank milk from recycled glass bottles, and gave up on buying new clothes or stuff for his home – no gadgets, furniture, or even cups. He began carrying his own fork, spoon, plate, and a bowl everywhere he went, just to avoid plastic cutlery(餐具).

“I needed to change the way I lived, and I had to get creative,” he added. “When a restaurant furnished a napkin-wrapped(包纸的)fork and knife, I asked the server to change them for cutlery without the napkin. I’d remember to say “No straw!” after asking for water and to make sure the veggie(素食者)burger I ordered didn’t come with a wooden pick holding it together. I did what I had to do, and it was awkward.”

1. What is the passage mainly about?
A.How a person inspires others
B.How Darshan Karwat gets famous.
C.Darshan Karwat and his no trash experiment.
D.A plain and sustainable lifestyle attracts the public.
2. Why did Darshan Karwat have the idea of living trash-free?
A.Because he is from India.
B.Because he has been in university.
C.Because he heard a story on the radio.
D.Because a British couple reminded to do so.
3. What did Karwat buy when he was making no-trash experiment?
A.Cheeses.B.Furniture.
C.Milk.D.Gadgets.
4. What Karwat said in the last paragraph shows that       .
A.he seldom went to a restaurant
B.it wasn’t convenient to live the life
C.the server seemed cold to him
D.he was proud of what he had been doing
2020-03-17更新 | 125次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般