组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:279 题号:17893108

The global population reached 8 billion on 15 November 2022, and India was estimated to surpass(超过)China as the world’s most populous country in 2023, according to World Population Prospects 2022, released on World Population Day.

“This year’s World Population Day falls during a milestone year, when we anticipate the birth of the Earth’s eight billionth inhabitant. This is an occasion to celebrate our diversity, recognize our common humanity, and marvel at advancements in health that have extended lifespans and dramatically reduced maternal and child mortality rates(死亡率),” said UN Secretary – General António Guterres. “At the same time, it is a reminder of our shared responsibility to care for our planet and a moment to reflect on where we still fall short of our commitments to one another,” he added.

The global population is growing at its slowest rale since 1950. The latest projections by the United Nations suggest that the world’s population could grow to around 8.5 billion in 2030 and 9.7 billion in 2050. It is projected to reach a peak of around 10.4 billion people during the 2080s and to remain at that level until 2100.

“The relationship between population growth and sustainable development is complex” said Liu Zhenmin, an official of the UN. “Rapid population growth makes defeating hunger and increasing the coverage of health and education systems more difficult. Conversely, achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, especially those related to health and education, will contribute to reducing fertility(能生育性)levels and slowing global population growth.”

Countries with ageing populations should take steps to adapt public programmes to the growing numbers of older persons, including by establishing universal health care and long-term care systems.

“Further actions by governments aimed at reducing fertility would have little impact on the pace of population growth between now and mid-century, because of the youthful age structure of today’s global population. Nevertheless, the cumulative(累计的)effect of lower fertility, if maintained over several decades, could slower global population growth greatly in the second half of the century,” added John Wilmoth, an official of the UN.

1. Which of the following statements would António Guterres agree with?
A.We human beings should reflect on our diversity.
B.The global population growth goal has been achieved since 2022.
C.Governments shall try to keep their promises to population growth.
D.It is sure that the world’s population can grow to 9.7 billion in 2050.
2. What’s Liu Zhenmin’s attitude towards population growth?
A.Objective.B.Satisfied.C.Doubtful.D.Puzzled.
3. What does the underlined word “Conversely” in the fourth paragraph mean?
A.As a result.B.First of all.C.On the contrary.D.Most importantly.
4. How does John think of further actions by governments in the short run?
A.There are many different debates on them.
B.They contribute to population’s structure.
C.They ignore world economy’s development.
D.There is little influence on population growth.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】Researchers have found multilingualism(多语言能力)is good for economy. Countries which actively encourage the development of different languages gain a range of rewards,from   more successful exports to a more creative workforce.

“Language matters on a larger national level and at the level ot smaller companies,” said Hogan-Brun,a researcher in language study. Switzerland,for example,owes 10% of its GDP to its multilingual background. The country has four national languages. Britain,on the other hand,is thought to lose about 3.5%of its GDP every year since 95%of its population speaks English,which is the primary language of the country.

What Hogan-Brun said is reasonable. Languages partly can help build trade relations. A study of small and medium-sized companies in Sweden and Germany found that those that invested more in languages were able to export more goods. German companies that invested heavily in multilingual staff added 10 export countries to their markets. Companies that invested less said they missed out on business deals.

Researchers have also long stressed the individual benefits of speaking more than one   language. Several studies show that languages help promote earning power. According to a   Canadian study,women and men who can speak several languages earn 3.6%and 6.6%more   than their English-only colleagues respectively. The twist:This is true even if they don’t use   their second language for work. “It seems that you don’t have to actually speak a second   language on the job to receive the financial rewards,”said an economics professor. He thought   that this was because knowing a second language was seen as a sign of power. Beyond these,   immediate economic rewards,languages can help a country’s workforce in long-term ways. Multilingualism has been shown to delay memory loss. It has also been associated with a better ability to concentrate and process information.

1. What can multilingual countries expect?
A.Large numbers of imported goods.
B.New chances of developing education.
C.Productive workers with great creativity.
D.Powerful comprehensive natmnal power.
2. Why does the author list the statistics in paragraph 2?
A.European countries are rich.
B.Language research is important.
C.The number of English speakers is increasing.
D.Multilingualism can promote national economic growth.
3. What does the author intend to do in paragraph 3 ?
A.Add some forecast intormation.
B.Support Hogan-Brun’s viewpoint.
C.Introduce a new topic for discussion.
D.Give some advice to small companies.
4. What can we learn from the text?
A.Women learn more languages than men.
B.bood native language is a sign of power.
C.Being multilingual benefits brain health.
D.Canadians prefer using their second language.
2021-12-25更新 | 151次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。专家们现在认为,随着人工智能继续改变企业,到2025年,目前几乎50%的职业将完全没有必要。未来越来越多的工作需要创造性智能、社交技能和使用人工智能的能力。

【推荐2】From self-driving cars to carebots(护理机器人)for elderly people, rapid development in technology has long represented a possible threat to many jobs normally performed by people.But experts now believe that almost 50 percent of occupations existing today will be completely unnecessary by 2025 as artificial intelligence continues to change businesses.

“The next fifteen years will see a revolution in how we work, and a revolution will necessarily take place in how we plan and think about workplaces,” said Peter Andrew, Director of Workplace Strategy for CBRE Asia Pacific.

A growing number of jobs in the future will require creative intelligence, social skills and the ability to use artificial intelligence.

The report is based on interviews with 200 experts, business leaders and young people from Asia Pacific, Europe and North America. It shows that in the US technology already ravages more job opportunities than it creates.

But the report states: “Losing occupations does not change what people do.” Growth in new jobs could occur as much, according to the research.

“The growth of 20 to 40 person companies that have the speed and technological know-how will directly challenge big companies,“ it states.

A 2014 report by Pew Research found 52 percent of experts in artificial intelligence and robotics were optimistic about the future and believed there would still be enough jobs in the next few years. The optimists pictured “a future in which robots do not take the place of more jobs than they create,” according to Aaron Smith, the report’s co-author.

“Technology will continue to affect jobs, but more jobs seem likely to be created. Although here have always been unemployed people, when we reached a few billion people there were billions of jobs. There is no shortage of things that need to be done and that will not change,” Microsoft’s Jonathan Grudin told researchers.

1. Why does the author mention self-driving cars and carebots in the first paragraph?
A.To support his argument.B.To provide examples.
C.To introduce the topic.D.To make comparisons.
2. What does the underlined word “ravages” mean in paragraph 4?
A.LosesB.providesC.developsD.destroys
3. What can be inferred from the report?
A.Big companies will face fewer challenges.
B.Small companies will surely defeat big companies.
C.Work efficiency and technological operation will be of vital importance for companies.
D.In the future, everyone will be equipped with great social skills and the ability to use AI.
4. In which column will the passage be found most probably?
A.ScienceB.Education
C.EconomyD.Fashion
2023-04-11更新 | 106次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约520词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要以人们喜欢怀念过去的美好时光为主题,分析了其背后的原因以及对我们的启示。

【推荐3】Why can’t we stop longing for the good old days?

People in many countries are longing for the good old days. But when exactly were the good old days? Podcaster Jason Feifer devoted an episode of his program to this question. The most popular answer seemed to be the 1950s, so Mr. Feifer asked historians whether Americans in that decade thought it was particularly pleasant. Definitely not. In the 1950s, American sociologists worried that rampant individualism was tearing the family apart. There were serious racial and class tensions, and everyone lived under the nuclear threat.

In fact, many in the 1950s thought that the good old days were to be found a generation earlier, in the 1920s. But in the 1920s, child psychologist John Watson warned that because of increasing divorce races, the American family would soon cease to exist. Many people at the time idealized the Victor inn era, when families are strong and children respected their elders.

Why are human beings always so nostalgia for past eras that seemed difficult and dangerous to those who lived through them? One possibility is that we know we survived past dangers, so they seem smaller now. But we can never be certain we will solve the problems we are facing today. Radio didn’t ruin the younger generation, but maybe the smart phone will.

Another reason is that historical nostalgia is often colored by personal nostalgia. When were the good old days? Was it, by chance, the incredibly short period when you happened to be young? A U.S. Poll found that people born in the 1930s and 1940s thought the 1950s was America’s best decade, while those born in the 1960s and 1970s preferred the 1980s.

This kind of nostalgia has neurological roots. Researchers have found that we encode more memories during adolescence and early adult hood than any other period of our lives, and when we think about the past, this is the period we most often return to. Moreover, as we grow more distant from past events, we tend to remember them more positively.

Obviously, some things readily were better in the past. But our instinctive nostalgia for the good old days can easily deceive us, with dangerous consequences. Longing for the past and fear of the future inhibit the experiments and innovations that drive progress.

Vaccination, steam engines, railroads and electricity all met with strong resistance when they were first introduced. The point isn’t to show how silly previous generations were. The same kinds of anxieties have been expressed in our own time about innovations like the internet, video games and stem-cell research.

And not all fears about the future are unbounded. New technologies do result in accidents, they disturb traditional cultures and habits, and they destroy old jobs while creating new ones. But the only way to learn how to make the best use of new technologies and reduce risks is by trial and error. The future won’t be perfect, but neither were the good old days.

1. The word “rampant” in paragraph 1 is closest in meaning to ________.
A.limitedB.reasonable
C.uncontrolledD.traditional
2. According to the passage, the 1950s was a period of time ________.
A.when American families still remained strong and children respected their elders
B.that saw a sharp increase in individualism and divorce rate in American society
C.that was believed by Americans born in the 1930s and the 1940s to be the best decade
D.when radical and class tensions became more serious but people no longer lived under the nuclear threat
3. What can be inferred from the last three paragraphs?
A.The current generation is not as silly as the previous generations.
B.It is unwise to be simply opposed to any new inventions and technologies.
C.People are constantly deceived by their instinctive nostalgia for the good old days.
D.The internet, video games and stem-cell research pose great threats to humanity.
2022-11-13更新 | 30次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般