Ekaterina Sky is a wildlife conservation (保护)artist. She began her art journey at the School of Fine Arts in Yaroslavl, Russia. There, she completed a fine arts program, which gave her the background she needed to become a conservation artist. She also received a scholarship to the Art School of Museum of Tel-Aviv. There, she expanded upon her knowledge and skills, learning to create her own unique style. She combined her love for animals and art to create the works we see today.
Ekaterina painted pictures at wildlife reserves and rescue centers, in high schools and in visitors’centers. She painted a piece for the Burning Man festival, choosing to paint primates(灵长类动物的)eyes since they are closely related to humans. This piece gave her the confidence to start a world tour, as she had never painted a picture that size before.
Ekaterina went on a tour to different countries worldwide, painting pictures of various endangered species. She hoped that her paintings would encourage viewers to look deeply into their own lifestyles and question how they might harm animals. She said, “We all can make a difference if we look at ourselves as a small piece of a greater whole.”
With each picture, she made the audience look directly into the animals’ eyes. She painted pictures to encourage people to show more compassion and care to animals and raise awareness of the importance of efforts in wildlife conservation. “As I believe, we connect through our eyes, which are windows into our soul, and I believe that when we get to meet someone’s soul, we don’t have a heart to hurt them,” she said.
1. What does paragraph 1 mainly tell us about Ekaterina Sky?A.Her art works. | B.Her unique drawing skills. |
C.Her love for animals. | D.Her road to a conservation artist. |
A.The painting gave her confidence. | B.Primates are closely related to humans. |
C.She’d like to make more money. | D.She wanted to expand on her skills. |
A.Pity. | B.Blame. | C.Motivation. | D.Gratefulness. |
A.Reducing garbage thrown by tourists. | B.Introducing various animals worldwide. |
C.Drawing attention to endangered animals. | D.Advertising the school she graduated from. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】When the British poet Alfred Lord Tennyson described nature as “red in tooth and claw”, he was telling us that the natural world can be cruel as well as beautiful.
Most people living in urban areas rarely encounter wild animals in their natural surroundings.
Earlier this year, a herd of elepants in Yunnan left their home in the Xishuangbanna National Nature Reserve and went on a meandering journey through the province. They destroyed crops and buildings along the way. Villages in their path had to be evacuated because of the potential dangers they posed to villagers. Animal experts haven’t determined why the elephants went on their journey.
Maybe we should try to stay away from them.
A.A walk in the woods can be dangerous. |
B.It is a way to protect the wild animals, and it’s also our responsibility. |
C.In Canada, people have a more realistic attitude towards wild animals. |
D.In simple terms, we should try to keep proper distance from wild animals. |
E.Hence they misunderstand that wild animals are just as friendly as Disney characters. |
F.Thanks to active environmental conservation, the number of the elephants grew larger. |
G.A reasonable possibility is that they probably needed more room and more food to survive. |
【推荐2】In our human-centric view, the ability to shoot ink or change colors may seem odd, but you know what’s really odd? Menopause (更年期). You can count species other than humans known to experience and outlive menopause on one hand. Only Oracs (虎鲸) and some whale populations have females that live long past their reproductive years to become grandmothers. But a new, landmark study confirms that at least one population of chimpanzees can now be added to the list.
The discovery comes as the result of 21 years’ worth of observing the Ngogo community of wild chimpanzees in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Studying urine from 66 Ngogo females, aged 14 to 67, showed that their hormone levels changed after approaching 50, confirming they were in menopause. Interestingly, 50 is also the age when many people begin to experience menopause. “It’s really cool to finally have that piece of the puzzle come into place,” says Catherine Hobaiter, a primatologist who was not part of the new study.
But Catherine points out that the Ngogo community lives in a chimp paradise: the resource-rich, well-protected Kibale National Park that also lacks leopards, their main predator. And because the Noggo community is found in the heart of the park, its only neighbors are other chimps — not humans who can expose chimpanzees to viruses that have devastated other communities. “The Ngogo population may be an outlier (局外人) when it comes to the rest of the species,” she cautions.
And there is a question concerning “the grandmother effect”, according to which a grandmother has a decidedly beneficial effect on her children and grandchildren. Chimpanzees do not form long-term pair-bonds and females leave in search of new communities when they reach maturity, which means grandmother chimpanzees likely don’t know who their grandchildren are in the same way humans or even orcas do. What they do after the menopause remains a question of interest. “And that’s all future work to be done.” said Catherine.
1. What can be learned about menopause?A.It is rare among animals. | B.It is unique to human beings. |
C.It just occurs at the age of 50. | D.It is experienced only by females. |
A.Scientist have found the solution to menopause. |
B.What happens to the 66 Ngogo females remains a puzzle. |
C.There is a puzzle whether chimpanzee females experience menopause. |
D.The latest discovery casts new light on the puzzle of animal menopause. |
A.To stress the importance of protecting chimpanzees from viruses. |
B.To remind researchers of the potential limitation of the new study. |
C.To prove that Ngogo chimpanzees are perfect subjects of the study. |
D.To argue that the discovery of the new study is completely groundless. |
A.By offering a definition. | B.By drawing a conclusion. |
C.By presenting relevant facts. | D.By giving examples and opinions. |
【推荐3】During most time of the 1930s, the Great Plains region was destroyed by drought and high winds. Howling across the Great Plains, these winds swept up the soil of the over-farmed land and created serious sandstorms of dust. These black sandstorms were so thick that daylight seemed more like dusk. Year after year having passed without rain, the winds continued to blow, and the dust swirled endlessly. During this terrible period, the region came to be called the Dust Bowl.
But the causes of the sandstorms weren’t just drought and winds. In a strange way, patriotism(爱国主义)was partly to blame. During World War Ⅰ, the U. S. government encouraged farmers to support the war by planting more wheat. As farmers increased their production, their own profits increased. Following the invention of the farm tractor, farmers plowed up thousands of acres of grassland and planted wheat. Wheat production rose fast, but nature soon turned success into disaster.
When the drought began, farmers didn’t realize that, by plowing up the grassland, they had destroyed the land’s natural protection against soil erosion(侵蚀). As the drought continued, one powerful windstorm after another blew across the Great Plains. Crops dried up and were blown away.
Nothing grew for years. Eventually most of the rich topsoil(表土层)was blown away. As years passed, all the moisture(水汽)in the ground disappeared, leaving even the deep roots of trees in dust.
The Great Plains became a deserted place, as thousands of people fled to California to escape the dust and look for work. Most found only low-paying agricultural jobs. But there were those who refused to leave. For these farmers, a program encouraged them to make use of new ways that would protect the precious topsoil from eroding. But bringing the soil back to life took time, and the farmers still needed rain. Rain meant more to the farmers than it ever had before. It meant a future.
1. Which of the following is the main cause of turning the Great Plains into the Dust Bowl?A.The land was over-farmed. |
B.The high winds blew away good soil. |
C.There was lasting drought for years. |
D.There were many thick black sandstorms. |
A.Show up the grassland for farming. |
B.Open up the grassland for farming. |
C.Give up the grassland for farming. |
D.Give out the grassland to the farmers. |
A.the time order | B.giving examples |
C.exploring causes and effects | D.explaining the process |
A.Measures to be taken. | B.Future of the destroyed region. |
C.Results of the disaster. | D.People’s reaction to the disaster. |
【推荐1】Until recently, several lines of evidence — from fossils genetics, and archaeology — suggested that humans first moved from Africa into Eurasia (the land of Europe and Asia) about 60,000 years ago, quickly replacing other early human species, such as Neanderthals and Denisovans, that they may have met along the way.
However, a series of recent discoveries, including 100,000-year-old human teeth found in a cave in China, have clouded this straightforward statement. And the latest find, a prehistoric jawbone at the Misliya Cave in Israel dating back to nearly 200,000 years ago, which is almost twice as old as any Homo sapiens (智人) remains discovered outside Africa, where our species was thought to have originated from, has added new and unexpected twist.
The find suggests that there were multiple waves of migration across Europe and Asia and could also mean that modern humans in the Middle East were interacting, and possibly mating, with other human species for tens of thousands of years. “Misliya breaks the mould (模式) of existing assumptions of the timing of the first known Homo sapiens in these regions,” said Chris Stringer, head of human origins at the Natural History Museum in London. “It’s important in removing long-lasting-constraint (限制) on our thinking.”
Prof. Hershkovitz, who led the work at Tel Aviv University said, “What Misliya tells us is that modern humans left Africa not 100,000 years ago, but 200,000 years ago. This is revolution in the way we understand the evolution of our own species.” He also added that the record now indicates that humans probably travelled beyond the African continent whenever the climate allowed it. “I don’t believe there was one big departure from Africa,” he said. “I think that throughout hundreds of thousands of years humans were coming in and out of Africa all the time.”
The discovery means that modern humans were potentially meeting and interacting during a longer period with other ancient human groups, providing more opportunity for cultural and biological exchanges. It also raises interesting questions about the fate of the earliest modern human pioneers. Genetic data from modern-day populations around the world strongly suggest that everyone outside Africa can trace their ancestors back to a group that left around 60,000 years ago. So, the inhabitants of the Misliya Cave are probably not the ancestors of anyone alive today, and scientists can only guess why their branch of the family tree came to an end.
1. What does the underlined word “they” refer to in Paragraph 1?A.Early human species living in Europe. |
B.Neanderthals and Denisovans. |
C.People first moving from Africa into Eurasia. |
D.Ancient people living in Africa all the time. |
A.Our ancestors were powerful and kind of aggressive. |
B.Our ancestors left Africa much earlier than thought. |
C.The origins of modern humans are from Europe. |
D.Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans once lived together. |
A.Climate was a big factor in human migration from Africa. |
B.There was a large-scale human migration from Africa. |
C.Human migration was occasional in Africa 200,000 years ago. |
D.The Misliya find is against our understanding of human evolution. |
A.They were ancestors of people living in China. |
B.They left evidence for their mysterious disappearance in history. |
C.They probably contributed little to present-day people genetically. |
D.They could be traced by their remains left on their travelling route. |
【推荐2】A simple blood test that can tell how well a person is likely to age is on the horizon after scientists uncovered blood signature patterns which predict ill health. The breakthrough means doctors will soon be able to check the likelihood of dementia(痴呆), cardiovascular disease and a range of other conditions many years before patients show any symptoms.
Researchers at Boston University learned to recognize combinations of specific biomarkers (生物标志物), or chemicals found in the blood, of 5,000 people in a study. They then matched these with the participants’ health outcomes over a period of eight years. They found specific patterns associated with disease and disability-free aging, as well as patterns associated with the threat of several diseases.
While various techniques already exist for predicting specific conditions, such as heart disease, the new approach will, for the most part, enable doctors to paint a comprehensive picture of their patient’s overall future health. It also promises to give people the chance to change their lifestyles or begin preventative treatment to circumvent diseases considered as a risk by their blood composition.
“These signatures show differences in how people age, and they show promise in predicting healthy ageing, changes in cognitive(认知的) and physical function, survival and age-related diseases like stroke, type 2 diabetes and cancer,” the research team said. “We can now measure thousands of biomarkers from a small amount of blood with the idea of eventually being able to predict who is at risk of a wide range of diseases long before any clinical signs become apparent.”
1. What can the new technique be used to do?A.Cure a person’s dementia. |
B.Prevent people from aging. |
C.Tell a person’s future health. |
D.Change people’s blood composition. |
A.understand | B.spread | C.record | D.avoid |
A.Its practical use. | B.Its original theory. |
C.Its development process. | D.Its widespread popularity. |
A.In an economic report. | B.In a medical magazine. |
C.In an investigation report. | D.In an entertainment newspaper. |
【推荐3】You awake with a pounding heart and sweaty hands. Relax, you think to yourself — it was just a bad dream. But are nightmares truly benign(良性的)? Psychologists aren’t so sure. Although some continue to believe nightmares reduce psychological tensions by letting the brain act out its fears, recent research suggests that night ordeals (折磨) are more likely to increase anxiety in waking life.
In one study Australian researchers asked 624 high school students about their lives and nightmares during the past year and assessed their stress levels. It is well known that stressful experiences cause nightmares, but if nightmares serve to ease that tension, troubled sleepers should have an easier time coping with emotional ordeals. The study, published in the journal Dreaming, did not confirm that hypothesis (假设) : not only did nightmares not stave off anxiety, but people who reported being distressed about their dreams were even more likely to suffer from general anxiety than those who experienced an upsetting event such as the divorce of their parents.
It is possible, however, that something is going wrong in the brains of individuals who experience a lot of anxiety, so that normal emotional processing during dreaming fails, says Tore Nielsen, director of the Dream and Nightmare Laboratory at Sacred Heart Hospital in Montreal.
But Nielsen’s most recent results, published in the Journal of Sleep Research last June, actually bear out the Australian findings. To find out how REM sleep — during which most dreaming takes place — affects our emotions, the Canadian researchers showed horrible images(such as death scenes)to a group of healthy volunteers just before they went to bed. When the subjects viewed the same pictures in the morning, those who had been robbed of dream-filled REM sleep were less emotionally affected than those deprived of (剥夺) other sleep periods. The same was true for those who experienced fewer negative emotions in their dreams. In other words, having nightmares did not make dreamers more relieved in waking life — just the opposite.
What is not clear from these studies is whether nightmares play a causal role in anxiety. Most researchers agree that if the dreams give rise to constant anxiety and concern, it may be a good idea to talk to a mental health professional about it.
1. What is the attitude of the researchers towards the nature of bad dreams?A.Skeptical. | B.Approval. | C.Indifferent. | D.Unfavourable. |
A.accelerate | B.reduce | C.benefit | D.harm |
A.Those who suffered from the divorce of their parents tend to have more nightmares. |
B.Those deprived of REM sleep tend to be less emotionally affected when shown disturbing images. |
C.Those who have trouble in sleeping have an easier time coping with emotional sufferings. |
D.Those who experienced fewer negative emotions in their dreams are more likely to be affected when shown disturbing images. |
A.To inform us that nightmares may fuel anxiety instead of serving as an emotional release. |
B.To inform us that people with stressful experiences are more likely to cause nightmare. |
C.To inform us that having nightmares makes dreamers reduce their tensions in waking life. |
D.To inform us of suggestions on how to release anxiety when you have a bad dream. |