Last summer, staff at the San Diego Zoo welcomed 41 baby turtles (海龟) from the Indian narrow-headed softshell turtle species, which is native to South Asia. It makes the Zoo the first officially recognized organization in North America to hatch (孵化) and raise the species.
Three Indian narrow-headed softshell turtles have been at the Zoo for over 20 years. All that time, zoo staff had been hoping they would one day reproduce. “This is a thrilling moment for us, and a big step forward in the protection of this species,” said Kim Gray, director of the Zoo.
The eggs were found in two separate nests (窝). Some of the turtles hatched in their habitat, while most of the eggs were stored in an artificial box to create the best conditions for survival. Turtle experts at the zoo say eggs in the habitat are often difficult to find, as the turtles like to lay their eggs overnight and cover them with dirt.
The species is listed as endangered on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List, though it’s unclear how many remain in the wild. Environ- mental pollution, habitat destruction, the international pet trade and human food harvesting have all led to the species’ reduction over the years.
“We have been caring for these turtles for a very long time, and part of that care is to gain a greater understanding of the species’natural history,” Kim Gray added. “With the knowledge we gain here at the Zoo, we can better assist our partners in India to help this essential species develop and grow in their native habitat.”
1. Why did Kim Gray feel excited at this reproduction?A.The Zoo got officially recognized. |
B.It was a breakthrough in turtle protection. |
C.A great many turtles were hatched at once. |
D.An endangered turtle species was saved. |
A.Their dark color. | B.The artificial box. |
C.Their being dirt-covered. | D.The low light at night. |
A.The time when listed as endangered. | B.Human activities to save them. |
C.Their existing number in the wild. | D.Factors endangering them, |
A.Pet lovers. | B.Zoologists. |
C.Environmentalists. | D.Zoo visitors. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】The Battista family of New York City was on vacation in Ocean City, Maryland when their 2-year-old Fisher went lost on July 4, 2020.
The Battistas immediately blanketed the area with missing posters, barraged (炮击) social media, and even got Fisher face-time on a local floating billboard (广告牌).
With no leads, the family decided to remain in the area for an extended stay. They hired a tracker and even consulted with an “animal communicator” in hopes of tapping into Fisher’s whereabouts (行踪) — all to no avail.
The family also set up a find-fisher Facebook page, which quickly gathered 8,000 followers, and launched an online fundraiser to raise awareness and help them in their efforts to bring their beloved fur baby home.
“Signs have been posted, and we’ve extended our stay in Ocean City and arranged to bring in a professional dog tracker, in addition to making continuous searching trips in a car, on foot, and on a bike,” Matthew Battista wrote.
On April 20, 2021, 290 days after Fisher made his unauthorized Independence Day exit, Baltimore City resident Wayne Horn was repairing his motorcycle when he noticed a stray (走失的) dog in the road. When a friend of Horn’s posted picture of the found dog to Facebook, the responses of “That’s Fisher!” came back faster than a boomerang (回旋镖).
Informed of the news, Elissa Battista recognized Fisher immediately. “From the moment I saw the photos I knew it was him from the markings and his little tongue sticking out,” she posted to Facebook.
The reunion was quickly arranged. The Battistas had some local friends pick him up from the Horns, and then Elissa made the five-hour trip to retrieve Fisher and bring him home. Apart from minor signs of possible frostbite (冻伤), Fisher was in excellent shape.
1. What was described in detail in the text?A.Battistas’ regret for losing their loved dog. |
B.Online responses to the Battistas’ request. |
C.Different comments on the touching story. |
D.Efforts made to search for the lost dog. |
A.Online viewers recognized its photos posted online. |
B.One of family members discovered it in the road. |
C.Wayne Horn sent it back shortly after he found it. |
D.A professional dog tracker brought it back soon. |
A.Break down. | B.Take apart. | C.Pay back. | D.Get back. |
A.Chance favors the prepared mind. | B.Loyalty always comes first. |
C.Never giving up pays off. | D.Misfortune may be an actual blessing. |
【推荐2】Parrots have been known to mimic words, but have you ever thought how they communicate? The sounds they make may sound meaningless to us, but new research has found that wild parrots are actually given names by their parents.
According to a study led by Karl Berg of Cornell University in the US, nestlings (雏鸟) are given a unique sound of their own, which stays with them for their entire lives.
In the study, the team placed hidden cameras in the nests of 17 different wild parrots. After studying their sounds, the team found slight differences in the calls parents used to communicate with each chick. And even before the nestlings had learned to communicate properly, the baby birds seemed to recognize and mimic their calls.
Sounds very similar to humans, doesn't it?
The study also proved that these signature calls are acquired socially not genetically. To do this, scientists switched the eggs in nine of the 17 nests, so that half of the parrots were raising nestlings that were not theirs. Using the recordings, the scientists concluded the nestlings all used names similar to those the parents (whether biological or nonbiological) called them for the first weeks of their lives. Lucie McNeil, from National Geographic, said, “this would be the first proven example of a non- human species teaching acoustical(声学的)communication.”
Lead scientist for the study, Karl Berg told National Public Radio of the US, “Most people say, ‘Well, all those calls are just noise’, but I think they're having conversations.”
When asked what else the parrots might be saying, Berg replied, “The theory is that these birds are deciding where the food is.” “Do we want to go 3 km North-northwest?” “Do we want to go to that field?’ They are sort of arguing or discussing.” Natural science author, Virginia Morell wrote: “Very gradually, scientists are learning to understand the conversations of very different animals that live lives rich with plans, quarrels and romance.”
You never know, if the science of animal translation keeps advancing, we might one day be watching a reality series about parrots.
1. What did the new research find about wild parrots?A.They can talk by learning from people. |
B.The sounds they make are meaningless. |
C.They have names given by their parents. |
D.They have a unique way of making sounds. |
A.Different parrots are called differently by their parents. |
B.Baby parrots can tell who their biological parents are. |
C.Baby parrots can mimic their biological parents' calls better. |
D.Parrots are the most skilled animals in acoustical communication. |
A.To see whether the parents could recognize their own babies. |
B.To see whether the parrots made the same sounds all their lives. |
C.To see whether the signature calls were acquired socially or genetically. |
D.To see whether biological and nonbiological parents named babies differently. |
A.A new research in the US | B.Parrots can really talk |
C.Conversations of animals | D.Parrots make meaningless sounds |
【推荐3】You must have been amused by videos of dogs waving tails happily at their owner’s home-coming greetings, or pictures of cats looking so guilty after making the house a mess. A variety of domestic animals can distinguish between their owner’s voice and the voices of others, and can even detect changes in tone. But whether wild animals can recognize individual humans is a bit unclear.
A new study led by Roberta Salmi is the first to show that wild gorillas, too, are able to recognize familiar human voices based on their relationship with the speaker.
Over the course of about six months, the researchers played the gorillas audio recordings of three groups: long-term keepers who knew and worked with the gorillas for at least four years and had positive relationships with them; people who the gorillas knew and had negative interactions with, including vets and the service workers; and people who were unfamiliar to the animals. All the participants said the same phrase, “Good morning. Hello,” which is how keepers typically greet the gorillas.
The gorillas had the least reactions to the voices of their keepers. However, when they heard the voices of people they didn’t know or with whom they’d had negative experiences, the gorillas responded with signs of vigilance. They stopped eating their treats or whatever else they were doing and started looking toward the sound to judge whether the voices were a threat.
“It’s something we do too,” said Salmi, “If it’s not a threatening sound, I keep doing my own business. If I hear that there is someone in my house, I immediately stop what I’m doing to hear what’s going on.”
If wild gorillas are able to distinguish by voice and have different reactions to humans, according to whether they are hunters or researchers, it would be extremely helpful. “They know when something is wrong and can try to hide or escape danger,” Salmi said. “It would help me sleep better to know that researchers aren’t making the gorillas become easier targets to hunters.”
1. Why does the author mention dogs and cats in paragraph 1?A.To praise how clever dogs and cats can be. |
B.To raise a question for the upcoming research. |
C.To show the close bond between home animals and humans. |
D.To imply the difference between domestic and wild animals. |
A.they don’t get along well. | B.they feel bored with their keepers. |
C.they have got used to their voices. | D.they are unfamiliar with their keepers. |
A.Anger. | B.Anxiety. | C.Caution. | D.Disappointment. |
A.Further research on gorillas are needed. |
B.Gorillas can be taught to distinguish human voices. |
C.Wild gorillas have the ability to protect themselves. |
D.Researchers can stop hunters from doing harm to gorillas. |
【推荐1】Chances are you can name a few animals that are facing extinction. But what about plants? With some 40% of plant species under threat of extinction—and given humankind’s reliance on the plant world-one might think there’d be more urgency around protecting them. Yet in the United States, for example, plants receive less than 4% of federal funding for endangered species, despite comprising 57% of the endangered species list.
Much of mankind suffers from “plant blindness”. Defined by botanists Elisabeth Schussler and James Wandersee, plant blindness is the inability to see or notice the plants in one’s own environment, which leads to the inability to recognize the importance of plants in the biosphere (生物圈) and in human affairs.
Now a paper published by Oxford University Press might have found a cure for that. Having noticed that nature shows increased viewers’ interest in the animals on the shows, the researchers set out to discover if nature documentaries could do the same for plants. For the paper, they focused on The Green Planet, the 2022 BBC plant-focused documentary narrated (解说) by Sir David Attenborough.
To figure out if the documentary engaged viewers enough to want to learn more, the researchers looked at people’s online behavior around the time of the broadcast. They noted which species appeared on the show and then looked at data on Google Trends and Wikipedia page hits for those same species before and after the episodes (集) of the documentary aired. The researchers found some 28. 1% of search terms representing plants mentioned in the BBC documentary had peak popularity in the UK, measured using Google Trends, the week after the broadcast of the relevant episode. Wikipedia data showed this as well. Almost a third (31%) of the Wikipedia pages related to plants mentioned in The Green Planet showed increased visits the week after the broadcast. The investigators also note that people were more likely to do online searches for plants that enjoyed more screen time on The Green Planet.
1. What problem does the author talk about in the first paragraph?A.Mass animal extinction. | B.Humans’ heavy reliance on plants. |
C.Sharp increase in endangered species. | D.Insufficient plant conservation efforts. |
A.By interviewing the viewers online. |
B.By analyzing data on TV viewing habits. |
C.By studying online searches of certain species. |
D.By noting the number of nature documentaries aired. |
A.Screen time determines website visits. |
B.Nature documentaries increase plant awareness. |
C.Watching more TV will help protect biodiversity. |
D.Well-made documentaries enjoy peak popularity. |
A.A Wild Reason to Watch More TV |
B.Best-ever Documentary: The Green Planet |
C.A Great Chance to Stop Wildlife Extinction |
D.Most Common Phenomenon: Plant Blindness |
【推荐2】Where should an adventurous tourist go? After you've done sightseeing in London, shopping in New York, enjoyed the local food in Paris, and danced to your heart's content at the Brazilian carnival, where else can you go? What attractive tourist destination awaits you?
Well, Antarctica sounds like the holiday of a lifetime! It's considered the last great wilderness on Earth. Just a few scientists in research stations share the icy landscape with penguins and other animals which can struggle with the low temperatures.
Tourism began in Antarctica in the 1950s and it's still small part. About 37,000 tourists are expected there this season, but many won't even leave the boat.
The BBC’s Juliet Rix visited the frozen continent and asked herself if she should be there at all, causing potential problems to such a sensitive environment. Her tour guide admitted that all visitors leave a footprint and they all go to the same places, the accessible coastline, which is also where the penguins and seals go to raise.
But some people believe that if carefully controlled, tourism can be good for Antarctica. It has no native population and it needs advocates. Visitors to the icy continent might be ready to support and even to fund its preservation. And they're likely to engage in the discussion about global warming, which has led to the melting of glaciers.
According to Rix, guidelines are followed when you're about to set foot in Antarctica and tourists have to disinfect their boots to make sure no alien species are introduced.
And once on land, there's no eating or smoking. Rocks, bone fragments—nothing should be taken as a souvenir and nothing should be left behind.
Tourists fortunate enough to visit the Antarctic must be aware that this is not their home and keep their fingers crossed that future generations will also be able to enjoy such breathtaking views.
1. What can we infer from the second paragraph?A.The Antarctic has become the best place for people to travel. |
B.Only scientists can be allowed to go to Antarctic. |
C.Antarctic is less affected by human activities. |
D.No animals can survive in Antarctic expect penguins. |
A.whether tourists should go to Antarctic or not should be considered carefully |
B.governments should take measures to stop tourists from going to Antarctic |
C.the animals’ habitat in Antarctic has been seriously affected by tourism |
D.only journalists begin to pay attention to the environmental protection in Antarctic |
A.Clean. | B.Move. |
C.Remove. | D.Change. |
【推荐3】When you were trying to figure out what to buy for the environmentalist on your holiday list, fur probably didn’t cross your mind. But some ecologists and fashion (时装) enthusiasts are trying to bring back the market for fur made from nutria (海狸鼠).
Unusual fashion shows in New Orleans and Brooklyn have (showcased) nutria fur made into clothes in different styles. “It sounds crazy to talk about guilt-free fur — unless you understand that the nutria are destroying vast wetlands every year”, says Cree McCree, project director of Righteous Fur.
Nutria were brought there from Argentina by fur farmers and let go into the wild. “The ecosystem down there can’t handle this non-native species (物种). It’s destroying the environment. It’s them or us.” says Michael Massimi, an expert in this field.
The fur trade kept nutria check for decades, but when the market for nutria collapsed in the late 1980s, the cat-sized animals multiplied like crazy.
Biologist Edmond Mouton runs the nutria control program for Louisiana. He says it’s not easy to convince people that nutria fur is green, but he has no doubt about it. Hunters bring in more than 300,000 nutria tails a year, so part of Mouton’s job these days is trying to promote fur.
Then there’s Righteous Fur and its unusual fashion. Morgan says, “To give people a guilt-free option that they can wear without someone throwing paint on them — I think that’s going to be a massive thing, at least here in New York.” Designer Jennifer Anderson admits it took her a while to come around to the opinion that using nutria fur for her creations is morally acceptable. She trying to come up with a label to attach to nutria fashions to show it is eco-friendly.
1. What is the purpose of the fashion shows in New Orleans and Brooklyn?A.To promote guilt-free fur. |
B.To expand the fashion market. |
C.To introduce a new brand. |
D.To celebrate a winter holiday. |
A.Nutria damage the ecosystem seriously. |
B.Nutria are an endangered species. |
C.Nutria hurt local cat-sized animals. |
D.Nutria are illegally hunted. |
A.It’s formal. | B.It’s risky. | C.It’s harmful. | D.It’s traditional. |
【推荐1】LONE TREE, colorado-patanjali Rao, a 15-year-old Colorado high school student and young scientist, who has used artificial intelligence (AI) and created apps to deal with social problems, has been named Time magazine's first-ever "Kid of the Year".
Time says Rao stood out for creating a world-wide community of young inventors and inspiring them to go after their goals. Rao insists that starting out small doesn't matter, as long as you have a passion (热爱)for it.
Rao's sense of invention started early. At age 12, she developed a portable device to discover lead in water. She has also created an app called Kindly that uses artificial intelligence to help prevent cyberbullying (网络欺凌). It allows teens to type in a word or phrase to find out if the words they are using are bullying and lets them decide what they are sending.
She said that "Work is going to be in our generation's hands pretty soon. So if no one else is going to do it, I'm going to do it.”
Rao has partnered with schools, museums, and science, technology, engineering and math organizations, and other societies to work for thousands of other students.
In a world where science is increasingly questioned or challenged, Rao insists that devotion to science is an act of kindness and the best way that a younger generation can better the world. “We have science in everything we're involved in, and I think the biggest thing to put out there is that science is cool, innovating is cool, and anybody can be an innovator," Rao says.
"Anybody can do science.”
1. What do we know about Rao?A.She has created apps to deal with mental problems. |
B.She has set a good example for the younger generation. |
C.She has been named Time magazine's "Youth of the Year”. |
D.She thinks that only the younger generation can better the world. |
A.Time waits for no man. |
B.Ups and downs make one strong. |
C.Passion and devotion help to promote excellence. |
D.Good habits formed at youth make all the difference. |
A.A newspaper | B.A diary. |
C.A travel brochure. | D.A history book. |
【推荐2】Want to help fight global warming? Take off your tie, says the Italian health ministry. It has urged employers to let their staff dress casually at work in the summer so that the air conditioning can be turned down.
“Taking your tie off immediately lowers the body temperature by 2 or 3 degrees centigrade,” the ministry said in a statement. “Allowing a more sensible use of air conditioning brings about electricity savings and protects the environment.”
It called on all public and private offices to let employees wear no tie during heatwaves like the one that has brought Africa-like temperatures to many parts of Italy this week.
The move reacts to a similar action from Italy’s biggest oil group, ENI, which told its staff earlier this month they need not wear a tie at work. The tie makers, however, were left hot under the collar.
“Italy confirms (证实) that it is a strange country,” Flavio Cima said angrily in a letter to financial daily IL Sole~24ORE under the headline: “I, tie maker, am responsible for global warming.”
“We can now happily continue with our lifestyle, using cars, consuming fuel, heating and cooling our homes at leisure. On one condition: we should not wear a tie while we do so,” he wrote.
“I should have listened to my friends and become an oil producer instead.”
Italy is one of the European Union’s worst performers on the pollution front and is among the EU countries expected to exceed (超出) their greenhouse gas emission (排放) targets.
1. What’s the purpose of the move of taking off ties?A.To dress casually. | B.To fight global warming. |
C.To keep the body temperature. | D.To improve working conditions. |
A.ENI. | B.Flavio Cima. |
C.A financial daily. | D.The Italian health ministry. |
A.Angry. | B.Speechless. |
C.Delighted. | D.Puzzled. |
A.He stands by the oil group. | B.He agrees with the ministry. |
C.He admits his responsibility. | D.He argues against taking off ties. |
【推荐3】A water lily painting, Water Lily Pond, by Claude Monet, the French impressionist artist, was sold for more than S80 million on Tuesday, breaking the auction (拍卖) record for himself. Water Lily Pond was part of a four-work collection of water lily paintings that Monet put up for sale during his lifetime.
The four paintings of Monet’s water lily garden were signed and dated by the artist in 1919. One of the other paintings is at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, while another was sold at auction in 1992 for $12. 1 million and is in a private collection now. The final painting in the series was cut into two before World WarⅡ.
“After a fierce bidding battle between a number of buyers in the room and on the telephone, the painting finally was sold to a collector for $80.4 million, setting a new world record price for the artist at auction,” said Olivier Camu, a scholar of impressionist art.
The last record for a Monet work was set in May when Le Pont du Chemin de fer a Argenteuil was sold for $41.4 million. The painting sold on Tuesday was bought at a 1971 New York auction for $320,000. It has not been exhibited since then.
Monet’s later works had unique characteristics, especially Les Grandes Decorations, another good example, which was bedded in Musee de I`Orangerie in Paris five months after Monet’s death in 1926.
Monet created his water lily garden in Giverny, France. He selected different water lilies in an effort to get as many different colored flowers as possible, specially creating the garden as a base for his paintings.
1. According to the passage, Water Lily Pond broke the last record for Monet’s paintings by __________.A.$12 million | B.$39 million |
C.$41.4 million | D.$0.32 million |
A.It was once auctioned in America. |
B.It was cut into halves before World War II. |
C.It had been kept in New York for over 40 years. |
D.It was once put in Musee de I`Orangerie. |
A.Exciting. | B.Inspiring. |
C.Disappointing. | D.Frightening. |