组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 动物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:135 题号:19014043

Whales are an important part of the ocean. They maintain the ocean ecosystem by providing important nutrients for phytoplankton (浮游植物), microscopic organism (微生物) in the ocean, to grow as food for fish and other animals. Phytoplankton also carry out photosynthesis (光合作用) to keep carbon dioxide level low in the atmosphere to keep the Earth cool. So, without whales, the oceans wouldn’t be healthy.

Currently, North Atlantic right whales are critically endangered. Scientists from University of South Carolina and Cornell University imagined that it is the warmer ocean waters that force whales to go to new places that don’t have rules, such as speed limits for ships, shorter fishing seasons, etc., to protect whales.

To see if climate changes can explain the loss of whales, scientists analyzed the water temperature near the Gulf of Maine, the feeding place of the whales. The temperature is affected by the position of Gulf Stream which brings warm water from the south.

They also looked at population data for the whales and their food, which is primarily small shrimps and crabs called copepods. They estimated how the whale population changed based on the number of whale sightings, whale birth and their bodies. Finally, they analyzed how the change in the water temperature related to the change in the whale population.

The result showed that since 2010, the Gulf Stream has been farther north than ever before, bringing warmer waters to the region. The population data shows a significant decrease in copepods population beginning in 2010. This means there has been less food available for the whales.

The best explanation is that global warming is causing the northward shift of the Gulf Stream, which is consistent with climate change, and making the waters near the Gulf of Maine warmer. However, copepods prefer cold water. Warmer water wakes them too early, they miss the nutritious spring phytoplankton bloom they need to grow. Besides, when the Gulf Stream is farther north, less copepods are brought into the Gulf of Maine.

With food levels too low, fewer whales are born, and fewer survive. To find enough food, some whales swim north to the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Therefore, there were more whale sightings there. It also explains why there were more whale deaths in the area in 2017 and 2019. By looking at the carcasses, scientists know that ships hit the whales, or they got trapped in fishing gear. So, climate change both makes the whales’ food shorter and causes them to move to new places, making it harder to protect them.

Global warming doesn’t only change the weather; it changes the ocean. To protect ocean species and keep our oceans healthy, governments need to adjust how they manage the ocean.

1. Scientists in the study collected the following types of data EXCEPT the ______.
A.temperatures of watersB.population of whales
C.population of copepodsD.population of phytoplankton
2. Which of the following statements is FALSE according to the article?
A.Whales move to get enough copepods to eat.
B.Copepods need phytoplankton to grow.
C.Phytoplankton cause global warming.
D.Global warming causes the shift of Gulf Stream.
3. What does the underlined word “carcass” in paragraph 7 mean?
A.dead bodyB.wounded body
C.trapped bodyD.lost body
4. What should the governments do to save the whales according to the author?
A.Governments should control ocean traffics that kill the whales.
B.Governments should take means to slow down global warming.
C.Governments should ban fishing in the area where the whales live.
D.Governments should keep the warm water away from the Gulf of Maine.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
【推荐1】While every dog owner knows their dogs can read their moods perfectly, scientists have always been a piffle doubtful.Now thanks to some researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria; we finally have some convincing evidence.
For their study, biologist Corson Miller and his team exposés eleven selected dogs to digital images of women that were either angry or happy.Half the dogs were rewired for touching the screen when shove a happy face, while the other half gilt their             treat for selecting those that appeared angry.
Interestingly, the dogs were not provided with the entire face.Some dogs were show Ti only upper halves while the others observed lower halves.That's because the scientists believe humans show their eruptions on their equities face.
After some training on how to recognize small differences like the wrinkles between the eyes or the changes in their shape that accompany the happy or angry expressions, the dogs were mostly able to identify the correct expression not only on a familiar             face but on a strange face, the researchers concluded the dogs were smart-enough to read human emotions.
They also found those being trained to read angry expressions took a longer time to learn.They guess it may be because dogs find angry faces disgusting, causing them to withdraw quickly.However, once the smart dogs realized they were getting rewired, the trepidation seem end to disappear.In fact, the dogs had such a good time playing the computer "game" That scientists had a hard time keeping them away from the touch screens after the study was completed.
The researchers also noticed only dogs with a male owner had a harder time understanding the expressions correctly.Since the touches careen models were all females, this confirmed what has been observed in previous studies-dogs are more efficient             at reading facial expressions of people that are the serene gender as their owner.
1. How did the scientists conduct the experiment?
A.By leaving dogs to women who are either happy or angry.
B.By mixing the selected dogs together.
C.By rewarding only half of the dogs touching the screen.
D.By showing digital pictures of women's happy or angry faces.
2. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A.The dogs were not all provided with the entire face,
B.According to their size, the dogs were given either upper or lower halves.
C.The dogs could read even small changes that accountancy facial expressions after some training.
D.The dogs couldn't read strangers facial emotions.
3. The underlined word "trepidation" in Paragraph 5 probably means         .
A.horrorB.curiosity
C.excitementD.doubt
4. How might the results change if the dogs with female owners are shown pictures of male faces?
A.They could only tell commotions on partial faces rather than on entire face's.
B.They found it hard to tell the moods on the faces of a different gender.
C.They found it easy to tell the emotions on the entire -face.
D.They would be scared away at the sight of the pictures.
2016-12-12更新 | 125次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】Climate change is changing the migration routes of animals worldwide. Take the mule deer for example. Every spring in Wyoming, green-up first appears at lower altitudes before progressing up the mountainside. Migrating mule deer follow and seek food on this green wave. But as a changing climate leads to more frequent and more severe droughts, the greenery is not as abundant as it used to be.

Ellen Aikens, a researcher from the University of Wyoming, tracked mule deer as they surfed the green wave. In comparison to wet years, the green-up lasted across the landscape for about half as long in drought years and was also fragmented. Although the deer were able to keep up with the faster green wave, the nutritional value was lower, leaving the animals less prepared for the challenges of the year ahead.

Meanwhile in Europe, the population of Bewick’s swans that spend the winter in the Netherlands is declining. But when researchers looked at the data more closely, they found an increase in the wintering population of swans in Germany. It turns out that since the 1970s, the swans’ wintering habitat has shifted an average of 13 kilometers to the east each year.

“The swans like to spend time where it’s 5℃. And the temperature line has shifted in the same rate as the swans shifted eastward,” said Rascha Nuijten, an ecologist at the Netherlands Institute of Ecology.

These findings are important to our understanding of the conservation of migrant animals. When it comes to protecting a certain species, it’s not just about the current situation. Nature is dynamic. And the species that is present now might not be present in 10 years, not because we didn’t protect it but because maybe it is dynamic in its way. We need to include the dynamics of nature into our legislation and management.

1. What’s the challenge the mule deer face?
A.Wet years.B.Low altitudes.
C.Fast green wave.D.Lack of quality food.
2. What do we know about Bewick’s swans from Paragraph 3?
A.They are endangered.
B.They used to spend winter in Germany.
C.They move their wintering habitats eastward.
D.Germany has more of them than the Netherlands.
3. What does Rascha Nuijten intend to tell us?
A.Its warmer in the east.
B.The 5℃ line shifts at a fast rate.
C.The swans move with the temperature line.
D.Climate change affects the swans’ feeding habits.
4. What is the purpose of the passage?
A.To introduce two research findings.
B.To appeal to protect animals in a dynamic way.
C.To discuss methods of fighting climate change.
D.To explain why animals change their migration routes.
2021-10-08更新 | 187次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,主要讲的是德国的研究人员进行了一系列实验,以观察狗是否理解人类是否故意做某事。

【推荐3】What does your dog do if you lie down on the floor and put your arms or legs out straight to exercise? Does your dog come to your rescue in the same way as if you fell down, or realize you mean to do that? Researchers in Germany carried out a series of experiments to see whether dogs understand if humans do things on purpose.

For their study, they had 51 dog owners drop off their pets to the laboratory. First, the dogs learned that a human experimenter would feed them treats through a gap in a glass partition (隔断). And the researchers designed two situations, which were known as “unwillingness vs. inability”. In the “unwillingness” situation, the experimenter held the food in front of the dogs but didn’t give it to them on purpose, often teasing (戏弄) them before pulling it away. For the “inability” situation, they had two conditions, one where the person seemed clumsy (笨拙的) and he appeared as if he were trying to give the treat to the dogs, but it fell down. In the other, the gap was enveloped and the pet couldn’t get the treat.

In all of these experiments, the experimenter left the treat on the floor in front of the dogs, and the dogs were easily able to get to the treat. How quickly they got back the food depended on the specific situation. The researchers predicted correctly that the dogs would wait longer to go to get the treat if they thought the experimenter didn’t want them to have it, while they went to get it quickly when the treat was meant for them. “They probably understood that -This guy is not very skilled but he wants to give the food to me.” Bräuer suggests.

Bräuer says that there could be other factors that led to the dogs’ such performance in the experiments. Although she thinks the findings are important, Bräuer says she is looking forward to what other scientists around the world will say.

1. What does the underlined word “enveloped” probably mean in Paragraph 2?
A.Covered.B.Widened.C.Created.D.Noticed.
2. What was most likely to happen in the situation where the feeder appeared clumsy?
A.The dogs would leave the food where it was.
B.The dogs would try to break through the gap
C.The dogs would go and get the food quickly.
D.The dogs would wait a while before getting the food.
3. Which of the following words can best describe Bräuer?
A.Careful and open-minded.B.Determined and creative.
C.Humorous and lovingD.Strict and patient.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.How quickly dogs react?B.How quickly dogs learn?
C.Can dogs predict your behaviors?D.Can dogs understand your intention?
2022-10-20更新 | 100次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般