Protected areas have mixed success in protecting wildlife, according to the largest study on the effects of reserves(保护区).
A team led by researchers from the U.K. examined water bird data from 1,506 protected areas and analyzed more than 27,000 bird populations across the world. The authors write that their study, published in Nature, is the first robust(强有力的), global assessment of protected areas’ influence on bird populations. The scientists found that protected areas with management of water birds and their habitats were more likely to benefit those populations.
“Our study shows that, while many protected areas are working well, many others are failing to have positive effect,” lead author Hannah Wauchope of the University of Exeter says in a statement. The study compared water bird populations before and after the establishment of protected areas and also compared trends of similar populations within and outside of protected areas. Water birds respond quickly to changes in site quality, making them a good group to look at when studying the impact of protected areas.
“In the majority of places we looked at, wildlife populations were still stable or were increasing, but they weren’t doing any better than in unprotected areas,” Wauchope says. “That’s disappointing, but not surprising. There seems to be this disconnect between people talking about how much land is protected and whether those areas are actually doing anything positive.”
This research comes ahead of a United Nations meeting in China to discuss biodiversity goals for the next decade. Several countries have already devoted to protecting 30 percent of the planet by 2030, yet researchers say protection alone does not necessarily ensure positive outcomes for species.
“We are not saying protected areas don’t work,” Wauchope concludes in the statement.” The key point is that their effects vary hugely, and the biggest thing this depends on is whether they are managed with species in mind—we can’t just expect protected areas to work without effective management.”
1. What can we know from paragraph 2?A.The researchers may come from any European countries. |
B.The team analyzed lots of water bird data all over the world. |
C.Many readers comment that the study is robust and influential. |
D.The protected areas with no management can benefit water birds. |
A.They can create significant financial profits. |
B.They can quickly respond to environmental changes. |
C.They can help change the quality of waters. |
D.They can’t be found outside protected areas. |
A.Every protected area was doing much better than unprotected areas. |
B.It’s unexpected to find out the uselessness of some preserves. |
C.Most wildlife population were sill stable or were increasing. |
D.The researchers thought that the protected areas don’t work at all. |
A.Unprotected areas are always better than protected areas. |
B.Unprotected areas show no improvement of animal protection. |
C.Protected areas need effective management based on a study. |
D.Protected areas can greatly contribute to animal protection. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】For many of us, the closest we get to wild animals is at a zoo. These places let us see amazing animals from big cats to tiny lizards, and what they are like. It’s an enjoyable and educational experience for us, but is it the best environment for these animals?
Some people have questioned the cruelty of keeping animals captive (圈养的) for entertainment, but zoos are keen to show that they help wildlife by educating us about conservation. In the UK, the introduction of the Zoo Licensing Act of 1981 required zoos to educate the public.
Probably the biggest claim from zoos today is that they help protect species in the wild that are under threat due to climate change. Robert Young, Chair in Wildlife Conservation at Salford University said, “There are quite a lot of different species around the planet which we wouldn’t have today if it wasn’t for zoos.”
A.Animal welfare was not a priority. |
B.Animal protection is becoming a global issue. |
C.What we should do next is not to disturb wildlife. |
D.New opportunities to meet wildlife are being explored. |
E.Some zoos have programs to preserve the future of endangered species. |
F.Long ago, people could only see wild animals as dead exhibits in a museum. |
G.Since then, more zoos have been involved in raising people’s awareness of wildlife conservation. |
【推荐2】When we see a person in deep sorrow, our immediate reaction is to lend a hand. Not to do so would be a moral failure. But what if we see an animal in deep sorrow, does the same logic apply?
This question was raised following the "rescue" of a group of penguins from an icy gully in Antarctica. It was filmed for the BBC wildlife series Dynasties.
The film crew was alarmed when they saw that a group of penguins had fallen into a gully and been trapped with their young. The crew dug a shallow ramp so that a few of the penguins could save themselves.
The case has taken the international media by storm. Viewers watching this episode let out a sigh of relief on social media. "I'm so glad. I understand not getting directly involved, but a helping hand isn't intervening right?" viewer Kathryn Shaw tweeted.
However, others think that human intervention is unnatural. It's an unwritten rule among documentary filmmakers that they are there to observe, not to intervene, according to CBS News. For example, in another episode of Dynasties, David the chimpanzee, was left to die after he was filmed being beaten up by other chimps.
"Tragedy is a part of life. You can't have sunshine throughout your life. To have done anything else would only make matters worse and distort (扭曲)the truth," said the show's creator David Attenborough,according to The Times.
In this case, however, Mike Gunton, the executive producer of the series, said that this was a one-off situation. "There were no animals going to suffer by intervening. It wasn't dangerous. You weren't touching the animals and it was just felt by doing this…they had the opportunity to not have to keep slipping down the slope," he told the BBC.
Such cases are familiar to Paul Nicklen, wildlife photographer for National Geographic.
"I have a practical view when it comes to the natural rhythm (节律)of life," he told Metro. "If it's ever a dangerous situation, no matter how gut-wrenching, you stay out of the way. Even when you are watching a male polar bear eat the young."
But he said that he would help animals if he saw no real gain or disruption (扰乱) to the ecosystem.
Indeed, there will always be two sides to the coin, and human beings will forever be conflicted in such circumstances. "There's no rule book in those situations. You can only respond to the facts that are right there in front of you," Will Lawson, the show's director, told Daily Mail.
1. The case has taken the international media by storm because ______ .A.people all over the world prefer documentaries of Antarctica |
B.people were very curious about how the penguins died |
C.what the film crew did upset people all over the world |
D.it has caused a heated discussion on human intervention in wildlife |
A.highly embarrassing | B.slightly worrying |
C.very comforting | D.extremely upsetting |
A.is a topic rarely mentioned by international media |
B.once resulted in chimpanzee's death directly |
C.is usually not expected in making documentary films |
D.surely breaks the natural rhythm of life |
【推荐3】Iman, the last Sumatran rhino(犀牛) in Malaysia, died in 2019 — bringing the endangered species one step closer to extinction. Now, Malaysian scientists are hoping to use tissues and cells from Iman and other dead rhinos to bring the population back.
“Before the three rhinos (the last survivors in Malaysia) died, we got their cells, and the cells are still alive — which is why I’m quite confident,” Dr. Lokman said. “If we don’ t have any cells, or have just tissue that isn’t living anymore, we wouldn’t be able to do anything. But now we have a living thing that we can use.”
The cells came from the rhinos’ hearts, lungs and brains. What is the most important is that the team collected stem cells (干细胞). One possible approach is to develop these stem cells into an egg(卵子)and sperm (精子), to create an embryo (胚胎) that will be placed into a surrogate mother (代孕母亲). She will likely be another rhino, either a Sumatran rhino from another country or another species. The other method is to take the egg of a surrogate animal, remove the nucleus (细胞核), and join it with a Sumatran rhino’s body cell. This technique was famously used to clone Dolly the sheep in 1996. Dr. Lokman and his colleagues are trying both ways. The team is still in the early stages; next, they need to find a suitable surrogate female.
Sumatran rhinos are listed as critically endangered by the World Wildlife Fund. There are less than 80 alive in Indonesia and Thailand. The fall in the population was first caused by hunting. Later, the situation was worsened by the loss of habitats and human activity. Unfortunately, there are now only five remaining rhino species worldwide, and all are threatened. Some sub-species have already died out; the western black rhino was declared extinct in 2013. And it is a pity that the last male northern white rhino died in 2019.
1. What makes it possible for the team to bring the Sumatran rhinos population back?A.They have collected three rhinos living cells. |
B.They have carried out similar experiments before. |
C.There is a baby Sumatran rhino living in Malaysia. |
D.There are still some cells alive in the dying rhino. |
A.Both have been used for Dolly. | B.Both change the cell’ s nucleus. |
C.Both involve a surrogate female. | D.Both rely on the Sumatran rhinos’ stem cells. |
A.Her admiration for cloning technology. |
B.Her satisfaction with the scientists’ efforts. |
C.Her disappointment at protection measures. |
D.Her deep worry about the rhino population. |
A.Last Sumatran rhino in Malaysia has died. |
B.Scientists hope to clone Sumatran rhinos. |
C.Stem cells are giving birth to new rhino babies. |
D.Sumatran rhinos are listed as critically endangered. |
【推荐1】Imagine living in a cool, green city alive with parks and threaded with footpaths, bike lanes and buses which transport people to shops, schools and service centers in a matter of minutes.
This fancy dream is behind the idea of the 15-minute city, where all basic needs and services are within a quarter of an hour’s reach, improving public health and lowering vehicle emissions.
Artificial intelligence could help urban planners realize that vision faster, with a new study from researchers at Tsinghua University in China demonstrating how machine learning can generate more efficient spatial layouts (空间布局) than humans can.
Automation scientist Zheng Yu and his colleagues wanted to find new solutions to improve our cities which are fast becoming blocked. They developed an AI system to tackle the tough tasks of urban planning and found it can produce urban plans that outperform human designs by about 50 percent in three aspects: access to services, green spaces and traffic levels.
Starting small, Zheng’s team tasked their model with designing the urban area only a few square kilometers in size (about 3×3 blocks). After two days of training, the AI system searched for the ideal road designs and land use to fit with the concept of the 15-minute city and local planning policies and needs.
While the AI model has some capabilities that could extend its use for planning larger urban areas, designing entire cities will be more complex. Drafting a neighborhood consisting of 4×4 blocks contains twice as many planning decisions as designing 3×3 blocks, the researchers said. But automating even a few steps in the planning process can save huge amounts of time: the AI model can compute in seconds certain tasks that take human planners between 50 to 100 minutes to work through.
Rather than AI replacing people, Zheng and his colleagues think their AI system can work as an “assistant” to urban planners, who could generate concept designs optimized (优化) by the system, and reviewed, adjusted and evaluated by human experts based on community feedback.
1. According to the text, which of the following is NOT a benefit of the “15-minute city” concept?A.Better public health. | B.Lower vehicle emissions. |
C.Decreased access to green spaces. | D.Fast and convenient service. |
A.High levels of pollution. | B.Limited access to public services. |
C.Shortage of affordable housing. | D.Rising crowding and traffic problems. |
A.It can design entire cities efficiently. |
B.It takes longer to train for larger urban areas. |
C.It can complete tasks much faster than human planners. |
D.It is limited to planning only a few square kilometers at a time. |
A.Designing better cities with AI |
B.The 15-Minute City: A Dream or Reality? |
C.Improving Public Health with Greener Cities |
D.The Role of Machine Learning in Urban Design |
【推荐2】What to Do If Your Child Can’t Sleep
Sleep issues are not particular to infants and toddlers, but can linger well into the school-going age bracket. If parents have reached the stage where their older child doesn’t sleep well, they may feel resigned to the situation – and it’s true that the older the child is, the more difficult it may be to change deeply rooted sleep associations and expectations – but there’re still some things you can do.
Sleep strategies – Explain: Talk to your child about the changes that you intend to make. Do this during the daytime, on a walk or over lunch. Let your child be involved in the decisions to give them a sense of control over the situation. Ask for their input, suggestions and their own impressions of what they would like their bedtime to include. Then rearrange the bedroom together, or simply choose the books and pajamas.
Environment: Make sure your child’s bedroom is a calm, safe place. Avoid too many distractions or stimulating activities in advance of sleep. Keep electronics and televisions out of the bedroom and limit their use at least 1-2 hours before bedtime, as using gadgets shortly before sleep can make it difficult for your child to “switch off”. If lots of non-sleep time is spent in the bedroom, the room itself does not represent the big separation that is sleep.
Diet and exercise: Outdoor exercise and fresh air are significant components to healthy sleep, and at least one hour a day is the recommendation. Don’t do this too close to sleep time though, as that’s when you need to be helping relax your child’s body, not stimulate it.
A growing child will need good sleep, so they need three structured meals and plenty of water throughout the day. But sugary or processed foods should be avoided. Allow them time to digest the food they’ve eaten before having them go to bed, although warm milk can help promote sleep.
1. According to the article, the underlined word “bracket” in paragraph 1 probably means _____.A.a kind of basket | B.a particular range |
C.a kind of relationship | D.the name of an age group |
A.To strengthen their connection with their children. |
B.To warn their children that they should sleep well. |
C.To inform their children that some changes about their sleeping habits will be made. |
D.To make the children feel they have the ability to make their own decisions about their sleep issues. |
A.Boiled eggs. | B.Candy bars. |
C.Warm milk | D.Homemade dumplings. |
【推荐3】A drug designed entirely by artificial intelligence is about to enter clinical human trials for the first time. The drug, which is intended to treat obsessive-compulsive disorder ( OCD)(强迫症),was discovered using Al systems from Oxford-based biotech company Exscientia. While it would usually take around four and a half years to get a drug to this stage of development, Exscientia says that by using the Al tools it's taken less than 12 months.
The drug, known as DSP・1181, was created by using algorithms (算法)to examine potential compounds (化合物),checking them against a huge database of parameters, including a patient's genetic factors. Speaking to the BBC, Exscientia chief executive Professor Andrew Hopkins described the trials as a “ key milestone in drug discovery “ and noted that there are “ billions” of decisions needed to find the right molecules (分子)for a drug, making their eventual creation a “ huge decision. “ With Al, however, “the beauty of the algorithms is that they are unknowable, so can be applied to any disease.”
We've already seen multiple examples of Al being used to diagnose illness and analyze patient data, so using it to engineer drug treatment is an obvious progression of its place in medicine. But the Al - created drugs do bring about some relevant questions. Will patients be comfortable taking medicine designed by a machine? How will these drugs differ from those developed by humans alone? Who will make the rules for the use of Al in drug research? Hopkins and his team hope that these and a great many other questions will be explored in the trials, which will begin in March.
1. What is special about the drug designed by Al?A.It's a better cure for OCD. |
B.It has no side effect on humans. |
C.Its development takes less time. |
D.It doesn't need clinical human trials. |
A.Trials. | B.Algorithms. |
C.Compounds. | D.Molecules. |
A.Optimistic. | B.Doubtful. |
C.Disappointed. | D.Puzzled. |
A.Medical Trials by Al | B.An Example in Medical Trials |
C.A Creation in Al Development | D.Al - designed Drugs to Be on Trial |