组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 人与动植物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:101 题号:19161465

Protected areas have mixed success in protecting wildlife, according to the largest study on the effects of reserves(保护区).

A team led by researchers from the U.K. examined water bird data from 1,506 protected areas and analyzed more than 27,000 bird populations across the world. The authors write that their study, published in Nature, is the first robust(强有力的), global assessment of protected areas’ influence on bird populations. The scientists found that protected areas with management of water birds and their habitats were more likely to benefit those populations.

“Our study shows that, while many protected areas are working well, many others are failing to have positive effect,” lead author Hannah Wauchope of the University of Exeter says in a statement. The study compared water bird populations before and after the establishment of protected areas and also compared trends of similar populations within and outside of protected areas. Water birds respond quickly to changes in site quality, making them a good group to look at when studying the impact of protected areas.

“In the majority of places we looked at, wildlife populations were still stable or were increasing, but they weren’t doing any better than in unprotected areas,” Wauchope says. “That’s disappointing, but not surprising. There seems to be this disconnect between people talking about how much land is protected and whether those areas are actually doing anything positive.”

This research comes ahead of a United Nations meeting in China to discuss biodiversity goals for the next decade. Several countries have already devoted to protecting 30 percent of the planet by 2030, yet researchers say protection alone does not necessarily ensure positive outcomes for species.

“We are not saying protected areas don’t work,” Wauchope concludes in the statement.” The key point is that their effects vary hugely, and the biggest thing this depends on is whether they are managed with species in mind—we can’t just expect protected areas to work without effective management.”

1. What can we know from paragraph 2?
A.The researchers may come from any European countries.
B.The team analyzed lots of water bird data all over the world.
C.Many readers comment that the study is robust and influential.
D.The protected areas with no management can benefit water birds.
2. Why are water birds chosen as the study subject?
A.They can create significant financial profits.
B.They can quickly respond to environmental changes.
C.They can help change the quality of waters.
D.They can’t be found outside protected areas.
3. What can we know according to Wauchope?
A.Every protected area was doing much better than unprotected areas.
B.It’s unexpected to find out the uselessness of some preserves.
C.Most wildlife population were sill stable or were increasing.
D.The researchers thought that the protected areas don’t work at all.
4. What is the main idea of this passage?
A.Unprotected areas are always better than protected areas.
B.Unprotected areas show no improvement of animal protection.
C.Protected areas need effective management based on a study.
D.Protected areas can greatly contribute to animal protection.
【知识点】 人与动植物 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-七选五(约280词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章介绍了动物园的变化,从圈养动物到保护动物。

【推荐1】For many of us, the closest we get to wild animals is at a zoo. These places let us see amazing animals from big cats to tiny lizards, and what they are like. It’s an enjoyable and educational experience for us, but is it the best environment for these animals?

    1     Later on, live animals were captured by explorers, brought home and put on show to the public in menageries (野生动物园).     2     Modern zoos, however, have transformed the living environments for animals, making bigger enclosures, removing bars, and to some extent, copying their natural habitats.

Some people have questioned the cruelty of keeping animals captive (圈养的) for entertainment, but zoos are keen to show that they help wildlife by educating us about conservation. In the UK, the introduction of the Zoo Licensing Act of 1981 required zoos to educate the public.     3    

Probably the biggest claim from zoos today is that they help protect species in the wild that are under threat due to climate change. Robert Young, Chair in Wildlife Conservation at Salford University said, “There are quite a lot of different species around the planet which we wouldn’t have today if it wasn’t for zoos.”     4     Actor Leonardo DiCaprio recently praised Chester Zoo in the UK for its conservation work. It brought “a rare fish species back from the dead” after breeding and releasing a school of golden skiffia fish back into their native river.

    5     For instance, a virtual reality zoo enables the public to see rare animals and have amazing interactions. Jon Coe, a zoo designer, told the BBC, “Taking a walk through a her d of elephants in Serengeti National Park in Africa, I think, is going to be possible pretty soon.”

A.Animal welfare was not a priority.
B.Animal protection is becoming a global issue.
C.What we should do next is not to disturb wildlife.
D.New opportunities to meet wildlife are being explored.
E.Some zoos have programs to preserve the future of endangered species.
F.Long ago, people could only see wild animals as dead exhibits in a museum.
G.Since then, more zoos have been involved in raising people’s awareness of wildlife conservation.
2024-06-04更新 | 50次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约450词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】When we see a person in deep sorrow, our immediate reaction is to lend a hand. Not to do so would be a moral failure. But what if we see an animal in deep sorrow, does the same logic apply?

This question was raised following the "rescue" of a group of penguins from an icy gully in Antarctica. It was filmed for the BBC wildlife series Dynasties.

The film crew was alarmed when they saw that a group of penguins had fallen into a gully and been trapped with their young. The crew dug a shallow ramp so that a few of the penguins could save themselves.

The case has taken the international media by storm. Viewers watching this episode let out a sigh of relief on social media. "I'm so glad. I understand not getting directly involved, but a helping hand isn't intervening right?" viewer Kathryn Shaw tweeted.

However, others think that human intervention is unnatural. It's an unwritten rule among documentary filmmakers that they are there to observe, not to intervene, according to CBS News. For example, in another episode of Dynasties, David the chimpanzee, was left to die after he was filmed being beaten up by other chimps.

"Tragedy is a part of life. You can't have sunshine throughout your life. To have done anything else would only make matters worse and distort (扭曲)the truth," said the show's creator David Attenborough,according to The Times.

In this case, however, Mike Gunton, the executive producer of the series, said that this was a one-off situation. "There were no animals going to suffer by intervening. It wasn't dangerous. You weren't touching the animals and it was just felt by doing this…they had the opportunity to not have to keep slipping down the slope," he told the BBC.

Such cases are familiar to Paul Nicklen, wildlife photographer for National Geographic.

"I have a practical view when it comes to the natural rhythm (节律)of life," he told Metro. "If it's ever a dangerous situation, no matter how gut-wrenching, you stay out of the way. Even when you are watching a male polar bear eat the young."

But he said that he would help animals if he saw no real gain or disruption (扰乱) to the ecosystem.

Indeed, there will always be two sides to the coin, and human beings will forever be conflicted in such circumstances. "There's no rule book in those situations. You can only respond to the facts that are right there in front of you," Will Lawson, the show's director, told Daily Mail.

1. The case has taken the international media by storm because ______ .
A.people all over the world prefer documentaries of Antarctica
B.people were very curious about how the penguins died
C.what the film crew did upset people all over the world
D.it has caused a heated discussion on human intervention in wildlife
2. The underlined word "gut-wrenching" in Paragraph 9 probably means ______ .
A.highly embarrassingB.slightly worrying
C.very comfortingD.extremely upsetting
3. From this essay, we can learn that human intervention ______ .
A.is a topic rarely mentioned by international media
B.once resulted in chimpanzee's death directly
C.is usually not expected in making documentary films
D.surely breaks the natural rhythm of life
2019-05-21更新 | 104次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】Iman, the last Sumatran rhino(犀牛) in Malaysia, died in 2019 — bringing the endangered species one step closer to extinction. Now, Malaysian scientists are hoping to use tissues and cells from Iman and other dead rhinos to bring the population back.

“Before the three rhinos (the last survivors in Malaysia) died, we got their cells, and the cells are still alive — which is why I’m quite confident,” Dr. Lokman said. “If we don’ t have any cells, or have just tissue that isn’t living anymore, we wouldn’t be able to do anything. But now we have a living thing that we can use.”

The cells came from the rhinos’ hearts, lungs and brains. What is the most important is that the team collected stem cells (干细胞). One possible approach is to develop these stem cells into an egg(卵子)and sperm (精子), to create an embryo (胚胎) that will be placed into a surrogate mother (代孕母亲). She will likely be another rhino, either a Sumatran rhino from another country or another species. The other method is to take the egg of a surrogate animal, remove the nucleus (细胞核), and join it with a Sumatran rhino’s body cell. This technique was famously used to clone Dolly the sheep in 1996. Dr. Lokman and his colleagues are trying both ways. The team is still in the early stages; next, they need to find a suitable surrogate female.

Sumatran rhinos are listed as critically endangered by the World Wildlife Fund. There are less than 80 alive in Indonesia and Thailand. The fall in the population was first caused by hunting. Later, the situation was worsened by the loss of habitats and human activity. Unfortunately, there are now only five remaining rhino species worldwide, and all are threatened. Some sub-species have already died out; the western black rhino was declared extinct in 2013. And it is a pity that the last male northern white rhino died in 2019.

1. What makes it possible for the team to bring the Sumatran rhinos population back?
A.They have collected three rhinos living cells.
B.They have carried out similar experiments before.
C.There is a baby Sumatran rhino living in Malaysia.
D.There are still some cells alive in the dying rhino.
2. What do the two methods have in common?
A.Both have been used for Dolly.B.Both change the cell’ s nucleus.
C.Both involve a surrogate female.D.Both rely on the Sumatran rhinos’ stem cells.
3. What feeling does the author express in the last paragraph?
A.Her admiration for cloning technology.
B.Her satisfaction with the scientists’ efforts.
C.Her disappointment at protection measures.
D.Her deep worry about the rhino population.
4. What’s the main idea of the passage?
A.Last Sumatran rhino in Malaysia has died.
B.Scientists hope to clone Sumatran rhinos.
C.Stem cells are giving birth to new rhino babies.
D.Sumatran rhinos are listed as critically endangered.
2021-06-05更新 | 91次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般