组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 动物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:117 题号:19433753

Scientists exploring a marine trench(海沟) near Japan were surprised to find a type of snailfish in one of the deepest parts of the ocean, at 8, 336 meters below the surface. The creature is probably the deepest fish anyone will ever find.

“They can’t really go any deeper,” says deep-sea scientist Alan Jamieson of the University of West Australia, who led the team that made the discovery, considering the theoretical limit of fish physiology(生理机能) is around 8, 400 meters to ensure that fish cells don’t become too small at such enormous pressures. “If anyone does find fish deeper than this, it will not be by much,” Jamieson says. The previous record holder, a junior snail fish seen in the Mariana Trench, was filmed at a depth of 8, 178 meters in 2017.

Prosanta Chakrabarty, director of fishes at Louisiana State University’s Museum of Natural Science, is impressed that the fish could survive so far down, where the water pressure is 800tes that of the surface. “At that depth, everything from gas exchange for breathing to nearly every physiological function seems impossible,” he says. “I can barely swim to the bottom of a swimming pool without my ears exploding.”

Jamieson’s team discovered the snail fish in August 2022 at the bottom of the Izu-Ogasawara Trench, near the main islands of Japan. To explore deep ocean trenches, the team was using manned and unmanned underwater vehicles equipped with cameras, lights and batteries, along with a weight to carry the equipment to the seafloor, unexpectedly photographing the fish.

The warmer water seems to be why the snail fish survive. These snail fish are living near the edge of what’s possible. “The difference is less than a degree, so we wouldn’t care,” Jamieson says. “But it makes a difference to sea animals.”

In an e-mail to Scientific American, Dahiana Arcila, a scientist who studies fishes noted the part played by technology in the discovery. “Detectors and landers will gain a deeper understanding of the unexplored regions of our planet’s oceans,” she wrote.

1. What can we learn from the first paragraph?
A.The snail fish is native to the marine trench.
B.The finding is within the expectations of the scientist.
C.It was the Japanese scientists that conducted the exploration.
D.The fish maybe the deepest one in the ocean now and forever.
2. What do the explorations in 2017 and 2022 have in common?
A.They both made record-breaking discoveries.
B.They both used manned and unmanned vehicles.
C.They both expanded the limit of fish physiology.
D.They both found snail fish at a depth of 8, 400 metres.
3. How does Prosanta Chakrabarty feel about the latest finding?
A.Concerned.B.Confused.C.Surprised.D.Disappointed.
4. What does the author want to show by mentioning an e-mail in the last paragraph?
A.To emphasize the necessity of marine exploration.
B.To encourage a deeper exploration of unknown oceans.
C.To stress the role of advanced technology in the research.
D.To confirm the importance of the discovery to our planet.
【知识点】 动物 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约420词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】James Sulikowski, from the Shark and Fish Conservation Lab at the School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences at Arizona State University, was one of the scientists who captured the seven foot porbeagle (鼠鲨) shark in the Atlantic.

In a Facebook post, the lab said the shark had been growing for years with a plastic strap around its gills. “Photos ... show the female shark’s head was slowly being sliced off by the unyielding strap,” it said. “The piece of circular plastic had become lodged around her neck when she was younger. As she grew, it began to cut through her skin into her muscle, if we had not removed it, she surely would have died.”

In a message to Newsweek, Sulikowski said the strap was probably one that would normally go around a bait box. “The box went overboard, and the porbeagle shark, when younger, ate the fish in the box,” he said. “While doing so, [the] strap got wrapped around the sharks head. As the shark grew, the strap dug into the shark’s flesh. If we didn’t remove it, the shark would have surely died.”

The photos of the shark being strangled follow the discovery of a dead minke whale that had been killed by a piece of fishing line. The male minke whale was found on a beach in Dennis, Massachusetts. The fishing line had become “wrapped around its head and through its mouth, creating a bridle,” the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) said in a Facebook post.

The IFAW said the initial autopsy (验尸) suggests the whale died from injuries caused by the entanglement. It also said there were signs of possible infection. “The entanglement likely contributed to the cause of death, though additional lab results are pending.”

The problem of plastic pollution in the ocean is getting worse. It is thought there is currently over 150 million metric tons of plastic in the world’s oceans, and more and more is entering every year. A report published earlier this year estimated the amount of plastic entering the ocean every year will have doubled by 2040, amounting to 600 million metric tons.

More than one million seabirds and 100,000 marine animals are killed every year by plastic waste. “Plastic in all forms are an issue,” Sulikowski said. “We need more research to understand the extent of the long term effects of this type of pollution.”

1. What do you know about the shark?
A.Her head was sliced off.
B.The strap cut through her skin when she was younger.
C.She was in more danger as she grew.
D.Scientists had not removed the strap.
2. According to the initial autopsy, the cause of the whale’s death is ______.
A.the entanglement.B.a piece of fishing line.
C.infection.D.not decided.
3. What can you infer from the text?
A.The present amount of plastic in the ocean is about 300 million tons.
B.The next 20 years will see an increase of 450 million tons of plastic in the ocean.
C.More than 150 million metric tons of plastic is going into ocean every year.
D.About 300 million tons of plastic is going into ocean every year.
4. What can be the best title of the text?
A.Scientists saved a shark whose head was being sliced off.
B.The death of a whale and a shark worried IFAW.
C.Plastic pollution is threatening certain animals’ lives.
D.Plastic pollution is getting worse and worse.
2020-11-10更新 | 103次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约280词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐2】George, once known as “Midnight Memory Maker,” had been given away after his original owner, Todd Mathieson, died and his wife, Diane, could no longer care for him. She found a new home for George so that he could continue to race for a number of years.

In September, 2018, George was turned over to the Animal Rescue League (ARL) of Boston. When he arrived at the league’s adoption center in Dedham, he was slightly underweight, and in need of medical care. But, over all, he was in good health, the league said.

George recuperated (休养) for a few months in Dedham before being put into foster care. “He was highly intelligent, elegant, well-trained and had clearly known love. He was very engaged with humans,” Cordula Robinson, George’s foster parent, said in the statement.

Robinson wanted to help George go home. She contacted animal rescue agencies up and down the East Coast to see if anyone recognized him. To her surprise, someone from New Jersey recognized George as once belonging to Todd Mathieson. He was well known and owned a stable in Connecticut, said Michael DeFina, a spokesman for the ARL. George is notable for his distinctive colors, such as white patches on his hooves (蹄子) that look “like socks,” DeFina said. They went through show photos to confirm George’s identity and contacted his original hostess.

Diane Mathieson was “overwhelmed and ecstatic (欣喜若狂)” about the possibility of reuniting with George.

After 13 years apart, George was transported to his family in Ocala, Florida, where he will enjoy his retirement. “He seems to be walking taller,” Diane said.

1. Why was George given away by his original family?
A.He was a trouble-maker in the community.B.He often got lost for his poor memory.
C.The family couldn’t provide enough care.D.His wife had found him a new home.
2. What did Cordula Robinson do for George?
A.Bring him to the adoption center.B.Help his reunion with the family.
C.Take some show photos for him.D.Build an elegant stable for him.
3. Who is the owner of George now?
A.Todd Mathieson.B.Cordula Robinson.
C.Michael DeFina.D.Diane Mathieson.
4. What can we infer about George?
A.He used to be a race horse.B.He enjoyed his retirement.
C.He lost both of his parents.D.He was hard to recognize.
2020-09-24更新 | 91次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐3】Fire ants dig tunnels efficiently by only a small percentage of the group doing most of the work. Free-loaders just sit around while their hard-working colleagues get things done. But might freeloaders actually be necessary for society to function efficiently? The answer could be yes.

Fire ants are highly social organisms. So, Goldman, a physicist at Georgia Tech, and his colleagues wanted to know how individual ants knew what to do without a central leader issuing orders. To find out, Goldman's team labeled individual fire ants with paint and then watched them dig their narrow tunnels —barely wide enough for two workers. Turns out, just 30 percent of the ants did 70 percent of the labor. “I was surprised that we ended up with so few workers actually doing the work at any one time. ” A quarter of the ants never even entered the tunnel. Others crawled inside, but left without digging single grain of dirt. These idling behaviors ensured the tunnels did not get clogged with insect traffic, which would make the construction process stop.

And when the scientists removed the five hardest working ants from the colony, others immediately jumped in to compensate (补偿) — with no reduction in the group's productivity. It seems that it doesn’t matter which ants are working or freeloading at a given time, as long as there is some division of labor to keep the tunnels flowing smoothly. The findings are in the journal Science.

The study could have implications for robotics. Imagine groups of robots sent to search rubble (碎石) for disaster survivors. Or nanobots (纳米机器人) coursing through our bodies to diagnose illness and deliver targeted medical treatment. Such robot groups will need to avoid getting jammed up in tight spaces. It might be necessary to program them so some just sit back and watch their comrades work.

1. How do fire ants get the work done when digging tunnels?
A.Only the leaders do most of the work.
B.They all work under the order of one leader.
C.They all cooperate together to do the work efficiently.
D.Individual fire ants know their tasks and work efficiently.
2. The underlined word “clogged ” in the second paragraph can be replaced by _______.
A.crowdedB.transported
C.organizedD.covered
3. What will happen if the hardest-working ants are taken away?
A.The ants will have no idea what to do.
B.Other ants will take their place and do the work.
C.The tunnels will get blocked and the work will stop.
D.The leader will compensate them and give them food as the reward.
4. We can learn from the passage that _______.
A.fire ants are the most diligent insects.
B.scientists may diagnose illness more easily.
C.people may feel happy when they watch their colleagues do nothing.
D.scientists can deal with robotics better when coming to specific programs.
2020-12-14更新 | 209次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般