Whales are threatened by a variety of human activities off the West Coast of the United States, including fishing, ship traffic, and pollution. They have bad effects on whale populations, but are rarely addressed by current whale-protection policies in California, according to a study from the University of California, Davis.
The study, published for open access this week in the journal Marine Policy, examines the main causes of death for nine whale species in the California Current Ecosystem, which stretches from British Columbia, Canada to Baja California, Mexico. The whales considered in the study include gray, blue, fin, minke, North Pacific right, and killer whales.
“We find that it is people that deem fishing causes whale death,” said co-leading author Eliza Oldach. “But a number of human activities have made the modern ocean a really tough environment for whales to survive. We’re excited about efforts that look broadly to rebuild healthy oceans.”
The report found that main contributors to whale death are currently, targeted with relevant policy responses: noise, water quality and marine (海洋的) rubbish. But three other threats-nutritional stress, disease and predation (捕食) -need to also be considered to provide a more whole approach toward managing whale deaths.
“Gray whales migrate (迁徙) over 5,000 miles between their breeding grounds at either end of the California Current,” said co-leading author Helen Killeen. “Throughout their journey, they must pass through a large number of human activities, fighting with changes to their environment caused by climate change.”
The study comes as the California Ocean Protection Council (COPC) aims to develop a plan for achieving zero death for whales in the California Current Ecosystem this year. Achieving such a goal requires understanding the key drivers of whale deaths and opportunities for policy change, the report said.
1. Which activity will lead to whales’ death?A.Going fishing with your friends in a river. | B.Playing with your friends beside the sea. |
C.Going sailing with your family on weekends. | D.Throwing rubbish in the sea as you are playing. |
A.Catch. | B.Complain. | C.Think. | D.Describe. |
A.Gray whales are fond of travelling. | B.Gray whales’ migration is full of danger. |
C.Human being is the only killer of whales. | D.Whales’ death is mainly caused by climate. |
A.Get rid of the present policy. | B.Plant more trees along the sea. |
C.Know what actually leads to it. | D.Find a right place for them to live. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】One morning a deer rushed into a courtyard where a little boy was playing. The deer hooked the boy's clothing with its antlers(角).This scared the little boy so much that he let out a loud cry which brought his mother running out to see what was happening. She came out just in time and saw the deer running off towards the mountains with her little boy.
The mother was so afraid !She ran after the deer as fast as she could and not too far away. she found her son sitting on the grass safely. Seeing his mother. the little boy laughed and reached out his arms to her. His mother held him tight. She was so happy that she cried.
She hurried back with her dear son. When she got home, she was amazed at what she saw. The huge tree behind her house had fallen down while she was out running after the deer. The whole house was destroyed under the tree's great weight.
Then the mother remembered the day about a year before when a deer fleeing from a hurt had run into her house. She felt sorry for the frightened deer, so she covered it with some cloth and let it return to the forest.
The deer seemed to understand that she had saved its life. When leaving, it kept bowing its head to her as if it were thanking her for her kindness.
She never imagined that the deer could remember her help. It somehow knew the tree were going to fall and kill her and her son, so it came back to save them.
When the mother remembered all this, she said, “Saving the life of another is the same saving the life of your own.”
1. What made the mother run out of the house?A.The boy's crying. | B.The boy's running. |
C.The deer's coming. | D.The deer's escaping. |
A.her son was injured. |
B.a deer went into her house. |
C.the deer was taking her son to the mountains. |
D.her son was running to the mountains with the deer. |
A.The deer hurt her son. | B.The house disappeared. |
C.The house was destroyed. | D.The huge tree was cut down. |
A.They were close friends. | B.The mother once saved its life. |
C.The deer once visited their house. | D.The mother drove away the hunter. |
【推荐2】How to Keep Pets Safe in a Disaster
Families with new pets may experience a number of unfamiliar situations, but figuring out what to do when facing extreme circumstances like natural disasters can be a particular challenge.
Create a disaster plan
Preparing before a natural disaster is key to keeping everyone in your family, including your pets, safe. Stock your home with supplies needed to shelter in place in the event of an emergency, and figure out where you’ll go if you have to escape from your home.
Microchip (植入微型芯片) your pets
Have your pets microchipped and ensure your contact information is filed correctly in case your pets get lost. Pet microchips are radio-frequency identification implants (植入物).
Develop crate (A -f) acceptance
Even the disaster has ended, it’s important not to let your pets run freely. They may be frightened by the visual of the aftermath. When an all-clear signal is given, ensure your pets are tied or crated before you venture out so they don’t potentially hurt themselves or become lost.
A.Always bring pets with you. |
B.Be careful after the all-clear |
C.Bring pets inside at the first sign of danger |
D.Remember to choose a pet-friendly destination |
E.They aren’t tracking devices but contain unique ID numbers |
F.Pets may become anxious while experiencing a natural disaster |
G.In an emergency, your pet may need to spend a long time in a crate for safety |
【推荐3】While it might seem like a basic skill to us, self-recognition is an indication that an animal is capable of higher mental processes. It’s most commonly tested using mirrors. Many animals will react to their reflection as though it is another individual, but some are able to recognize that what they’re seeing is themselves.
A few years ago, a team of scientists investigated whether a fish species called cleaner wrasse (清洁隆头鱼) could pass the mirror test. They marked the fish with what looked like a parasite on their throats, and placed a mirror in the tank. Many of the animals saw the mark in their reflections and erased it off their throats, indicating they realized they were looking at themselves.
In a new study, the researchers took it one step further — they wanted to check whether the fish could recognize themselves in a photograph. They presented each cleaner wrasse with four photos: one of themselves, one of an unfamiliar fish, one with their own face on a different fish’s body, and one with an unfamiliar face on their own body.
Cleaner wrasses always attack intruders (侵入者). In this case, they attacked the photos of unfamiliar fish but not the photos of themselves. They also didn’t attack the photos of their face on another body but did attack those of a stranger’s face on their own body, indicating the fish discern facial features more than bodily ones. These photo tests show that the fish aren’t just recognizing themselves by matching movements in a mirror. They can actually build a mental model of their own faces. After all, only fish that had been trained on mirrors could pass the photo tests.
“This study is the first to indicate that fish have an inner sense of self,” said Masanori Kohda. “Since the target animal is a fish, this finding suggests that nearly all social vertebrates (脊椎动物) also have this higher sense of self.”
1. What is the purpose of the new study?A.To find if all fishes have an inner sense of self. |
B.To find if the fish species could pass the mirror test. |
C.To see whether the fish could identify themselves in a picture. |
D.To see whether all social vertebrates have an internal sense of self. |
A.Recognize. | B.Attack. | C.Show. | D.Build. |
A.By analyzing data. | B.By presenting facts. |
C.By conducting questionnaires. | D.By making comparisons. |
A.What kind of fish has self-recognition? |
B.A research on the self-recognition of the fish. |
C.The fish capable of higher mental processes. |
D.Does all social vertebrates have self-recognition? |
【推荐1】We’ve known that sitting for long periods of time every day has countless health consequences, like a higher risk of heart disease. But now a new study has found that sitting is also bad for your brain.
A study published last week, conducted by Dr. Prabha Siddarth at the University of California, showed that sedentary(久坐的) behavior is associated with reduced thickness of the medial temporal lobe(中颞叶), a brain area that is critical to learning and memory.
The researchers asked a group of 35 healthy people, ages 45 to 70, about their activity levels and the average number of hours each day spent sitting and then scanned their brains. They found that the subjects who reported sitting for longer periods had the thinnest medial temporal lobes. It means that the more time you spend in a chair the worse it is for your brain health, resulting in possible damage to learning and memory.
What is also interesting is that this study did not find a significant association between the level of physical activity and thickness of this brain area, suggesting that exercise, even severe exercise, may not be enough to protect you from the harmful effects of sitting.
It then surprisingly turned out that you don’t even have to move much to enhance cognition(认知); just standing will do the trick. For example, two groups of subjects were asked to complete a test while either sitting or standing. Participants are presented with conflicting stimuli(刺激) , like the word “green” in blue ink, and asked to name the color. Subjects thinking on their feet beat those who sat by a 32-milicond(毫秒) margin.
The cognitive effects of severe physical exercise are well known. But the possibility that standing more and sitting less improves brain health could lower the bar for everyone.
I know, this all runs counter to received ideas about deep thought, from our grade school teachers, who told us to sit down and focus, to Rodin’s famous “Thinker,” seated with chin on hand.
They were wrong. You can now all stand up.
1. What can we infer from Paragraphs 3 and 4?A.Severe exercise can lessen the damage of sitting. |
B.Severe exercise can greatly improve our brain health. |
C.Sedentary behavior will possibly damage our brain. |
D.Brain health has nothing to do with sedentary behavior. |
A.Blank. | B.Edge. |
C.Decrease. | D.Difference. |
A.Sitting more is good for our mental health. | B.Sitting is better when we think. |
C.Exercise more can improve our cognition. | D.We should stand while thinking. |
【推荐2】While Jenny Loucas had enjoyed a wonderful holiday in Greece, her luggage disappeared after she had checked it in for the flight home to London. Two months later, Easyjet has confirmed that her luggage has been permanently lost.
Ms. Loucas’s case is far from unique. One insurance firm, Spain’s Mapfre, said that the number of passengers reporting missing luggage this summer was 30% higher than in 2019, the last year of normal travel before the pandemic. That year 19 million bags and suitcases were late arriving around the world, and 1.3 million were never seen again.
The situation has been blamed on staff shortages both at the carriers, the airport security staff that have to scan all the checked-in luggage, and the ground handling firms that are employed to get all these suitcases and bags onto the planes and then back to the moving belts.
To try to keep tabs (标签) on their items of luggage, a growing number of passengers are turning to technology.
Apple has reportedly seen a rise in sales of its AirTag tracking device. The AirTag works by sending out a secure Bluetooth signal that can be detected by nearby devices in the Find My network. These devices send the AirTag’s location to the iCloud, allowing the user to go to the Find My app and see it on a map.
Other travelers are attaching trackers that use GPS to their luggage. Yet while such tagging devices may give a passenger peace of mind, travel industry expert Eric Leopold says they don’t solve the core issue -- stopping the accumulation that prevent bags from catching the same flights as their owners.
SeeTrue is one company that hopes to help airports and airlines get luggage onto planes more efficiently. The firm makes software that can do the security scans on check-in luggage much faster than human security staff.
For UK tech firm AirPortr, its approach is to remove the need for passengers to have to queue up at the airport to check in their luggage before their flight. Instead passengers can use its app and website to arrange for their luggage to be taken door-to-door.
1. Why is the story of Jenny Loucas mentioned in the first paragraph?A.To prove airport service is far from satisfying. |
B.To show losing luggage can ruin a great holiday. |
C.To explain the risks of traveling outweigh its benefits. |
D.To introduce the topic of airlines losing luggage. |
A.Staff’s careless handling. | B.Unreasonable flight schedules. |
C.Lack of airport hands. | D.Low efficiency of scanners. |
A.Unfavorable. | B.Approving. | C.Objective. | D.Interested. |
A.Apple | B.Mapfre | C.AirPortr | D.SeeTrue |
【推荐3】German physicist Albert Einstein is one of the most famous scientists of all time, the personification of genius and the subject of a whole industry of scholarship. In The Einsteinian Revolution, two experts on Einstein’s life and his theory of relativity―Israeli physicst Hanoch Gutfreund and German historian of science Jurgen Renn—offer an original and penetrating(厚利的) analysis of Einstein’s revolutionary contributions to physics and our view of the physical world.
By setting Einstein’s work in the long course of the evolution of scientific knowledge, Gutfreund and Renn discover the popular misconception of Einstein as an unconventional scientific genius who single-handedly created modern physics—and by pure thought alone.
As a large part of the book explains, Einstein typically argued that science progresses through steady evolution, not through revolutionary breaks with the past. He saw his theory of relativity not as something from scratch, but a natural extension of the classical physics developed by pioneers such as Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei and English physicist Isaac Newton in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, as well as nineteenth-century physicists.
The authors highlight how classical physics cannot be separated cleanly from modem Einsteinian physics. The book also includes substantial sections on Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo whose methods inspired Einstein. When Einstein considered himself as standing on their shoulders, he meant that, without their contributions, he would not have formulated(阐述) the theory of relativity.
The Einsteinian Revolution is an important and thought-provoking contribution to the scholarly literature on Einstein and his surprising scientific creativity between 1905 and 1925. Gutfreund and Renn might not have given the final answer as to why Einstein, of all people, revolutionized physics in the way that he did. But they argue in fascinating detail that, to understand his genius, one must take into account not just the earlier history of physics but also the history of knowledge more broadly. Although not always an easy read, the book will interest physicists and historians alike.
1. Where is the text most probably taken from?A.An essay on Albert Einstein. | B.An introduction to a book |
C.A guidebook to a course. | D.A review of physics development |
A.Unclear. | B.Favorable. | C.Dismissive | D.Opposing. |
A.Up to standard | B.From nothing. |
C.By learning from others. | D.With previous knowledge. |
A.Their ideas were rejected by Einstein, |
B.Their devotion to physics impressed Einstein |
C.Their researches contributed to Einstein’s success. |
D.Their hard work deserved the worldwide respect. |