A few weeks ago, someone posted a photo on my small town’s community webpage. It was of the construction site of our new child-care facility, located at the elementary school. Crews had just finished fixing a very large, permanent sign. In all capital letters, it read: EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING CENTER.
My cheeks heated. Although I rarely post, my fingers itched. I had to comment. “Looks great,” I wrote, “but it’s spelled American! It should be centre’.”
About 15 years ago in Calgary, my two children started attending a brand-new elementary school. The door plate on the counsellor’s room read, “counselor”. I frowned (皱眉) every time I passed by. At the same school, my kindergarten-age daughter was sent home with a list of words to learn, with at least one word incorrect. I corrected the teacher. I didn’t bother correcting the “counselor”. But as a daily defender of Canadianisms, inaccuracies like these scream out to me. Worse, they feel like a punch to the gut — especially when they’re huge and can be clearly read from blocks away. We’re practically American as it is. If we proudly announce new “centers”, will our uniqueness continue to fade?
Languages are living things, always changing with the times. That is why educational settings must be careful — including a child-care facility being built by the school district itself. A habit set in childhood is a habit set for life. My own daughter, as she was about to graduate from high school, wrote an essay using “practice” as a verb. I tried to persuade her to change it to “practise”. She refused. She said that spelling it like that would best range.
That’s the point. If becoming Americanized makes us “normal”, I’m all for being strange. So whoever ordered the sign, please ask a worker to remove the final “e” and “r” and flip them the other way around. The effort would be slight but the impact would be grand.
1. Why did the author post comments about the school sign?A.It was put in a wrong place. | B.The words couldn’t be read clearly. |
C.Americans were confused by the words. | D.It used the American spelling for one word. |
A.She liked English as an American Canadian. |
B.She attached great importance to education. |
C.She tried to keep Canadian English unique. |
D.She hated correcting American spellings of words. |
A.Teaching the different spellings of words. |
B.Making changes with the times in teaching. |
C.Developing students’ habit of writing correctly. |
D.Requiring students to know about living languages. |
A.A trend for American English. | B.A defence of Canadian spelling. |
C.Away to change Canadian English. | D.A struggle to use English correctly. |
相似题推荐
“Have a nice day. Next!” This version of the expression is spoken by a salesgirl at the supermarket who is rushing me and my groceries out the door. The words come out in the same tone (腔调) with a fixed procedure.
The expression is one of those behaviors that help people get along with each other. Sometimes it indicates the end of a meeting. As soon as you hear it, you know the meeting is at an end. Sometimes the expression saves us when we don't know what to say. “Oh, you just had a tooth out? I'm terribly sorry, but have a nice day. ”
The expression can be pleasant. If a stranger says “Have a nice day” to you, you may find it heartwarming because someone you don't know has tried to be nice to you.
Although the use of the expression is an insincere, meaningless social custom at times, there is nothing wrong with the sentence except that it is a little uninteresting. The salesgirl, the waitress, the teacher, and all the countless others who speak it without thinking may not really care about my day. But in a strange and comfortable way, it's nice to know they care enough to pretend they care when they really don't care all that much. While the expression may not often be sincere, it is always spoken. The point is that people say it all the time when they like.
1. How does the author understand Maxie's words?
A.Maxie shows her anxiety to the author. |
B.Maxie really wishes the author a good day. |
C.Maxie encourages the author to stay happy. |
D.Maxie really worries about the author's safety. |
A.The salesgirl is rude to the customers. |
B.The salesgirl is bored with her work. |
C.The salesgirl cares about me. |
D.The salesgirl says the words as usual. |
A.as a habit | B.as thanks |
C.sincerely | D.encouragingly |
【推荐2】Do you think the United Kingdom and the United States are alike? Winston Churchill once joked that the people of Britain and the people of America are separated only by their language. Do you think that is true? The British and the Americans both speak English as the official language. However, each uses some different words. We Americans are similar to the British. After all, our country was once owned by the UK, so we have a lot in common. But there are many differences between us.
The UK has a king or queen, and the leader of the government is the Prime Minister. The US has no kings or queens. Our leader is the President.
Both the British and Americans use pounds and ounces, pints, quarts, and gallons. Both use miles, yards, and feet. Our money is different, though. The British use pounds and pence. Americans use dollars and cents.
Driving in a car is very different in the UK. They drive on the left side of the road. We drive on the right. What we call the hood of the car, the British call the “bonnet”. British cars run on “petrol” , which we call gasoline.
In our everyday life, we do many of the same things as the British. But we describe them differently. A young mother here might push a baby in a baby carriage. A British mum pushes a “pram”. The British watch “telly”, while we watch TV. We like to eat French fries, but the British call them “chips”. Millions of Americans drink coffee, but most British prefer tea.
So we are different in many ways. But we stay friendly anyway.
1. What can we know from Winston Churchill's joke?A.The UK and the US are very similar. |
B.The people of the UK and the US are the same. |
C.The languages of the UK and the US are the same. |
D.There are many differences between the UK and the US. |
A.miles and dollars | B.pints and pence |
C.gallons and feet | D.yards and cents |
A.TV. | B.Pram. | C.Hood. | D.French fries. |
A.We Stay Friendly | B.A Common Language? |
C.English as the Official Language | D.Differences Between the UK and the US |
【推荐3】One silly question I simply can’t stand is “How do you feel?” Usually the question is asked of a man in action—a man on the go, walking along the streets, or busily working at his desk. So what do you expect him to say? He’ll probably say, “Fine, I’m all right,” but you have put a bug in his ear —maybe now he’s not sure. If you are a good friend, you may have seen something in his face, or his walk that he overlooked that morning. It starts worrying him a little. First thing you know, he looks in a mirror to see if everything is all right, while you go merrily on your way asking someone else, “How do you feel?”
Every question has its time and place. It’s perfectly acceptable, for instance, to ask “How do you feel?” if you’re visiting a close friend in the hospital. But if the fellow is walking on both legs, hurrying to make a train, or sitting at his desk working, it’s no time to ask him that silly question.
When George Bernard Shaw, the famous writer of plays was in his eighties, someone asked him “How do you feel?” Shaw put him in his place. “When you reach my age,” he said, “either you feel all right or you’re dead.”
1. The question “How do you feel?” seems to be correct and suitable when asked of ________.A.a friend who is ill | B.a man working at his desk |
C.a person having lost a close friend | D.a stranger who looks somewhat worried |
A.cheerfulness | B.cleverness |
C.ability | D.politeness |
A.made him laugh | B.shown concern for him |
C.made fun of him | D.given him some kind of warning |
【推荐1】“Listen!” Mr. Lee said seriously at the beginning of his first class, “I will put a lie into each of my classes. Your job is to try and catch me in the Lie of the Day.”
That was really a clever way to fix our attention on the dry and boring subject- geography. Then in the following weeks, we didn’t let off every single word of what he was saying in class and challenged (质疑) his lectures. When his class ended with nobody seeing through the lie, Mr. Lee would say, “Ah ha! Each of you has a lie in your notes. Discuss among yourselves what it might be, and I will tell you at the end of this term.”
Mr. Lee’s special style of teaching worked. All of us reviewed and discussed about our notes actively.
One Monday at the end of the term, Mr. Lee listened carefully to what we were questioning for almost ten minutes. Then he finally said, “Do you still remember the first lesson how I said that every lecture has a lie?”
Confused (疑惑), we said yes.
“Well, that was a real big lie. In fact, all the lectures I’ve given before are completely true. But I am glad you worked so hard. Move on.”
Hearing this, all eyes in the classroom went wide.
While my knowledge of geography has been forgotten over time, the lessons have stayed with me. “Experts” can be wrong and say things that sound right, so build a habit of evaluating (评估) new information and check it against things you already accept as a fact.
1. We can know that Mr. Lee was ________.A.wise | B.serious | C.boring | D.confusing |
A.he always told lies |
B.the students always questioned him |
C.everyone had to write down all of his words |
D.it was difficult for the students to see through the lie |
A.the students opened their eyes | B.Mr. Lee opened the students’ eyes |
C.the students got shocked and amazed | D.the students had a look at the classroom |
A.Mr. Lee was an expert |
B.it’s easy to forget the knowledge of geography |
C.Mr. Lee succeeded drawing the students’ attention |
D.the students would never check what the teachers said again |
A.A Real Lie | B.Learn to Question |
C.A Special Teaching Style | D.The First Geography Lesson |
【推荐2】When I first heard about bungee jumping, I thought it was just another crazy fashion that people did for excitement. I said that I would do it if given a chance, a chance I would never get. But then I heard about a jump arranged on November 18 and I had to try it.
The site was the Blue River Dam platform, more than 200 feet above the ground. The setup was simple: two harnesses (背带)and several bungee ropes.
There are two methods to jump — the swan dive and the backward fall. The swan dive involves a jump forward and away from the platform. Then you count to two and hold the shoulder straps (皮带) to protect your face. The backward fall requires your hands to be across your chest on the shoulder straps, and you jump away from the platform backwards. It’s the safest way. And it is emotionally easier if you don’t like looking down from a great height; for this reason I chose the backward fall.
But, I was still not convinced about ropes. A man handed me a piece of the stuff. My friend and I tried to break it but we failed. The rope could not break. And if one did, there were three more there just like it. I knew that to do this I had to find the strength inside, because no one else was able to help me. After a few seconds of struggle I jumped. The experience was beyond words. And there was a misunderstanding that the end of the fall produced a painful bounce (反弹) effect. Truly, there was a bounce, but it was not painful, at least not until the next day.
1. The author said that he would do bungee jumping because he_______.A.wanted to follow fashion |
B.wanted to do it for excitement |
C.liked challenging himself |
D.thought he would never get such a chance |
A.Because it was an easier way to jump. |
B.Because it was an interesting way. |
C.Because he wanted to protect his face. |
D.Because he didn’t want to look down. |
A.Three. | B.Four. |
C.Five. | D.Six. |
A.The fall didn’t cause any pain at all. |
B.The author might feel the pain the next day. |
C.The author felt the pain the moment he jumped. |
D.The author felt helpless when he did bungee jumping. |
【推荐3】I just got back from an extraordinary trip to the Arctic North of Norway, and I felt excited and alarmed at the same time. I knew before I went there that the Arctic was the centre of global warming, but seeing the changes first-hand is haunting.
There is one scene I will never forget. It came just a few days into the trip. I was on board the ship National Geographic Endeavor, and was halfway between the Arctic Circle and the North Pole. I had never been so far north or in a more remote place on Earth. But I was in good company. The Aspen Institute had invited 100 politicians, scientists, businessmen, religious and labor leaders to see the impacts of global warming with their own eyes.
One day, we had the electrifying experience of watching polar bears play on the ice. We tend to think of the Arctic as an expanse of white, but it isn’t. The sea is dark. The pack ice comes in deep, beguiling blues. Polar bears are yellowish. And all of these colors pop against a steely grey sky.
On one ice sheet, we saw two polar bears, their furs covered with red from a just completed dinner. One was moving in and out of the water; the other was busy eating the seal. Off to the side, a smaller bear peaked over the ice with its black snout(鼻子), waiting for the big ones to get off the kill so it could go over to the remains. All three bears seemed powerful and vibrant.
But later, we sailed passing an island where a polar bear sat on the shore, stranded because the sea ice had receded so far from shore. This bear will not eat until next winter—it simply cannot hunt without the ice. Polar bears can survive for long stretches without eating, but seeing that lone bear brought home just how dependent these iconic creatures are on sea ice. Scandinavians, after all, call them the Ice Bear.
I have read enough climate reports to know that with summer sea ice disappearing at alarming rates, the bear I saw stranded that day is one of many. Now I have a permanent memory of what a hungry, stranded bear looks like.
1. What does the underlined word “haunting” most probably mean?A.Surprising. | B.Exciting. | C.Fascinating. | D.Unforgettable. |
A.were experts at global warming | B.came from all walks of life |
C.had been to the Arctic before | D.were mostly adventurers |
A.To do some research on global warming. |
B.To witness the influence of global warming. |
C.To experience the beautiful sight of global warming. |
D.To see the various animals face to face. |
A.Their furs were red in colour. | B.There was blood on their furs. |
C.They were very hungry. | D.They seemed black all over. |
【推荐1】While many of us may have been away somewhere nice last summer, few would say that we’ve “summered.” “Summer” is clearly a noun, more precisely, a verbed noun.
Way back in our childhood, we all learned the difference between a noun and a verb. With such a tidy definition, it was easy to spot the difference. Not so in adulthood, where we are expected to “foot” bills, “chair” committees, and “dialogue” with political opponents. Chances are that you didn’t feel uncomfortable about the sight of those verbed nouns.
“The verbing of nouns is as old as the English language,” says Patricia O’Conner, a former editor at The New York Times Book Review. Experts estimate that 20 percent of all English verbs were originally nouns. And the phenomenon seems to be snowballing. Since 1900, about 40 percent of all new verbs have come from nouns.
Even though conversion (转化) is quite universal, plenty of grammarians object to the practice. Some most leading experts, William Strunk Jr. and E. B. White, in The Elements of Style—the Bible for the use of American English—have this to say: “Many nouns lately have been pressed into service as verbs. Not all are bad, but all are questionable.” The Chicago Manual of Style takes a similar standpoint, advising writers to use verbs with great care.
“Sometimes people object to a new verb because they resist what is unfamiliar to them,” says O’Conner. That’s why we’re comfortable “hosting” a party, but we might feel upset by the thought of “medaling” in sports. So are there any rules for verbing? Benjamin Dreyer, copy chief at Random House, doesn’t offer a rule, but suggests that people think twice about “verbifying” a noun if it’s easily replaceable by an already existing popular verb. Make sure it’s descriptive but not silly-sounding, he says.
In the end, however, style is subjective. Easy conversion of nouns to verbs has been part of English grammar for centuries; it is one of the processes that make English “English”. Not every coined word passes into general use, but as for trying to end verbing altogether, forget it.
1. What can we learn about the verbing of nouns?A.It hasn’t recently been opposed by many grammarians. |
B.It is more commonly accepted by children than adults. |
C.It hasn’t been a rare phenomenon in the past century. |
D.It can be easily replaced by existing verbs in practice. |
A.Cautious | B.Objective. |
C.Optimistic. | D.Unconcerned. |
A.Predictable. | B.Practicable. |
C.Approaching. | D.Impossible. |
A.Are 40 Percent of all new verbs from nouns? |
B.Are Summering and Medaling Annoying? |
C.Are You Comfortable about a New Verb? |
D.Are There Any Rules for Verbing? |
【推荐2】Thanks to the field of linguistics we know much about the development of the 5,000 plus languages in existence today. We can describe their grammar and pronunciation and see how their spoken and written forms have changed over time. For example,we understand the origins of the Indo-European group of languages, which includes Norwegian, Hindi and English,and can trace them back to tribes in eastern Europe in about 300 BC.
So, we have mapped out a great deal of the history of language, but there are still areas we know little about. Experts are beginning to look to the field of evolutionary biology to find out how the human species developed to be able to use language. So far, there are far more questions and half-theories than answers.
We know that human language is far more complex than that of even our nearest and most intelligent relatives like chimpanzees. We can express complex thoughts, convey subtle emotions and communicate about abstract concepts such as past and future.And we do this following a set of structural rules,known as grammar.Do only humans use an innate system of rules to govern the order of words? Perhaps not, as some research may suggest that dolphins share this capability because they are able to recognize when these rules are broken.
Human brains allowed language to evolve ina way. At some point, our brains became able to make our mouths produce vowel and consonant sounds, and we developed the capacity to invent words to name things around us.
More questions lie in looking at the influence of genetics on brain and language development. It seems to have a connection with speaking and how our brains control our mouths and face. Monkeys have a similar gene, but it did not undergo this change. It’s too early to say how much influence genes have on language, but one day the answers might be found in our DNA.
1. What have experts known about language?A.How the human developed to use language. |
B.How language changed over time. |
C.How chimpanzees convey their emotions. |
D.How genes affect language. |
A.the inborn system of rules to govern the order of words. |
B.the capability to invent words and name things. |
C.the grammar of dolphin language follows the same rules as human language. |
D.the capability to produce vowel and consonant sounds. |
A.the history of language. |
B.brain development. |
C.evolutionary biology. |
D.linguistic rules. |
A.The languages in the world. |
B.The connection between genes and language. |
C.How human brains produced language. |
D.How human language evolved. |
【推荐3】Emotions, thoughts and ideas. We use language to transform abstract ideas into concrete ( 具体的) communication tools. How could we go ahead as a culture unless we shared a common understanding for popular words in the English language, such as book, friend or laugh, or uncommon words like biblioklept or hirquiticke?
But that doesn’t mean words don’t fall out of fashion. In 2021, nine words were decided as “historical” and removed from dictionaries. Aerodrome, for example, was determined to be deleted from the Merriam-Webster dictionary because nowadays we usually call airplane landing fields “airports.”
So who, exactly, makes the decision to remove a word from a dictionary?
The removal of dictionary words is left to lexicographers (词典编撰者), who not only decide which words to remove but also add new words and update changing definitions. Lexicographers also are responsible for adding new words. In 2022, for example, “demisexual” and “vaxxed” were added to the Oxford English Dictionary.
Truth is, it’s actually quite difficult for a word to lose its place in a dictionary. Lexicographers don’t take word-removal lightly. When a word comes into question, dictionary editors will first do series of online surveys among dictionary users. Editors then will examine its meaning, usage and popularity across many large language databases that cover a variety of frequently-used examples. Based on the survey results and collected information, lexicographers will hold rounds of formal discussions and vote for the final decision. Often, words that are removed from printed dictionaries are allowed to remain part of online dictionaries.
Despite the careful word addition and removal process, dictionaries aren’t immune to mistakes. For a time, “redripening” appeared in most dictionaries as one word, when it actually should have been “red-ripening.”
1. Why was “aerodrome” removed from the Merriam-Webster dictionary?A.Its definition was wrong. | B.It was invented long time ago. |
C.It was decided by the editors. | D.It wasn’t applicable to modern life. |
A.Strict. | B.Creative. | C.Painful. | D.Natural. |
A.To introduce a newly-removed word. |
B.To stress the huge popularity of this word. |
C.To show dictionaries sometimes make mistakes. |
D.To reveal the disadvantage of the removal process. |
A.Who Are Lexicographers? | B.Why Does a Dictionary Become Outdated? |
C.What Caused Words to Change? | D.How Are Words Removed from a Dictionary? |