组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 语篇范围 > 体裁分类 > 议论文
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:119 题号:21266871

While many of us may have been away somewhere nice last summer, few would say that we’ve “summered.” “Summer” is clearly a noun, more precisely, a verbed noun.

Way back in our childhood, we all learned the difference between a noun and a verb. With such a tidy definition, it was easy to spot the difference. Not so in adulthood, where we are expected to “foot” bills, “chair” committees, and “dialogue” with political opponents. Chances are that you didn’t feel uncomfortable about the sight of those verbed nouns.

“The verbing of nouns is as old as the English language,” says Patricia O’Conner, a former editor at The New York Times Book Review. Experts estimate that 20 percent of all English verbs were originally nouns. And the phenomenon seems to be snowballing. Since 1900, about 40 percent of all new verbs have come from nouns.

Even though conversion (转化) is quite universal, plenty of grammarians object to the practice. Some most leading experts, William Strunk Jr. and E. B. White, in The Elements of Style—the Bible for the use of American English—have this to say: “Many nouns lately have been pressed into service as verbs. Not all are bad, but all are questionable.” The Chicago Manual of Style takes a similar standpoint, advising writers to use verbs with great care.

“Sometimes people object to a new verb because they resist what is unfamiliar to them,” says O’Conner. That’s why we’re comfortable “hosting” a party, but we might feel upset by the thought of “medaling” in sports. So are there any rules for verbing? Benjamin Dreyer, copy chief at Random House, doesn’t offer a rule, but suggests that people think twice about “verbifying” a noun if it’s easily replaceable by an already existing popular verb. Make sure it’s descriptive but not silly-sounding, he says.

In the end, however, style is subjective. Easy conversion of nouns to verbs has been part of English grammar for centuries; it is one of the processes that make English “English”. Not every coined word passes into general use, but as for trying to end verbing altogether, forget it.

1. What can we learn about the verbing of nouns?
A.It hasn’t recently been opposed by many grammarians.
B.It is more commonly accepted by children than adults.
C.It hasn’t been a rare phenomenon in the past century.
D.It can be easily replaced by existing verbs in practice.
2. What is most leading experts’ attitude towards the practice of the verbing of nouns?
A.CautiousB.Objective.
C.Optimistic.D.Unconcerned.
3. What does the author think of ending the verbing of nouns?
A.Predictable.B.Practicable.
C.Approaching.D.Impossible.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.Are 40 Percent of all new verbs from nouns?
B.Are Summering and Medaling Annoying?
C.Are You Comfortable about a New Verb?
D.Are There Any Rules for Verbing?
19-20高三下·吉林长春·阶段练习 查看更多[25]

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约470词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】Every day, millions of shoppers hit the stores in full force, searching wildly for the perfect gift. Aside from purchasing holiday gifts, most people regularly buy presents for other occasions throughout the year, including weddings, birthdays, anniversaries, and graduations. This frequent experience of gift-giving can cause uncertain feelings in gift-givers. Many enjoy the opportunity to buy presents because gift-giving offers a powerful means to build stronger bonds, while many worry that their purchases will disappoint rather than delight the intended recipients (接受者).

Anthropologists describe gift-giving as a positive social process, serving various political, religious, and psychological functions. Economists, however, offer a less favorable view. According to Waldfogel, gift-giving represents an objective waste of resources. People buy gifts that recipients would not choose to buy on their own, or at least not spend as much money to purchase (a phenomenon referred to as ‘‘the deadweight loss of Christmas”).

What is surprising is that gift-givers have much experience acting as both gift-givers and gift-recipients, but nevertheless tend to overspend each time they set out to purchase a meaningful gift. In the present research, we propose a unique psychological explanation for this overspending problem — gift-givers link how much they spend with how much recipients will appreciate the gift. Though it seems natural to gift-givers, such an assumption may be unfounded. Indeed, we propose that gift-recipients will be less likely to base their feelings of appreciation on the value of a gift than givers assume.

Why do gift-givers assume that gift price is closely linked to gift-recipients’ feelings of appreciation? Perhaps givers believe that more expensive gifts communicate a stronger sense of thoughtfulness and consideration. According to Camerer and others, gift-giving represents a symbolic ritual (习俗), by which gift-givers attempt to signal their positive attitudes towards the recipient and their willingness to invest resources in a future relationship. In this sense, gift-givers may be motivated to spend more money on a gift in order to send a “stronger signal”. As for gift-recipients, they may not interpret smaller and larger gifts as representing smaller and larger signals of thoughtfulness and consideration.

The idea of gift-givers and gift-recipients being unable to account for the other party’s viewpoint seems confusing because people slip in and out of these roles every day. Yet, despite the experience as both givers and receivers, people often struggle to apply information gained from one role in another. In theoretical terms, people fail to use information about their own preferences and experiences to produce more efficient outcomes in their exchange relations. In practical terms, people spend hundreds of dollars each year on gifts, but somehow never learn to estimate their gift expense according to personal insight.

1. The author uses “the deadweight loss of Christmas” in Paragraph 2 to express ________.
A.gift-givers don’t spend much money during holidays
B.gift-givers don’t ask recipients what gifts they prefer
C.gift-givers buy improper and expensive gifts
D.gift-givers have difficulty in choosing gifts
2. According to the passage, people buy gifts to ________.
A.receive gifts in return
B.enjoy the feeling of shopping
C.help recipients to save money
D.better relationships with recipients
3. What can we learn from the passage?
A.People’s high living standards require expensive gifts.
B.Gift-givers buy gifts based on their experiences as recipients.
C.Anthropologists think gift-giving meets different human needs.
D.Recipients judge the depth of friendship according to the gift price.
4. Why did the author write this article?
A.To criticize people’s gift-buying habits.
B.To analyze people’s gift-giving behaviors.
C.To offer advice on how to improve relationships.
D.To remind people not to overlook others’ preferences.
2021-07-10更新 | 159次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】Most cities were built on rivers. People originally settled in Paris because of the Seine, and in London for the Thames. A third of New York City's surface area is water. For centuries, city folk used rivers for shipping, wastes, fishing and play.

The Industrial Revolution ruined rivers for more than a century. Huge new urban populations overwhelmed them with the pollution from wastes, factories and ships.

In recent decades, rivers lost their industrial function and cities began cleaning them up. The Thames is now the cleanest it has been in 150 years and proud of seals and the occasional whale, sometimes alive. In cities from Chicago to provincial China, dirty riverside warehouses have been turned into restaurants and apartments.

But rivers also need to regain their original purpose as transport centers. Cities are shifting more traffic back to the river—but this time cleanly and silently, using the coming generation of electric ferries. Ferries already transport 2.1 billion passengers a year. Numbers have been rising in San Francisco, New York and Sydney, while London plans to double its annual total of riders to 20 million by 2035.

Imagine using the huge capacity of shipping to take delivery trucks off the roads. One of the newer Thames boat with a capacity of 1,750 tons can replace 44 large trucks. Even without being electric-powered, it uses much less energy per ton and causes less noise pollution.

In other words, we need to turn truck drivers into boat captains. Delivery companies will need to build new distribution centres on cheap riverside land. When their boats stop at the new downtown wharves, electric cargo bikes will deliver packages the last mile.

Boat-to-bike is more complicated than delivery by truck, because it adds a stage. You might have to pay more to get your parcels the same day. As for the advantage, it will unblock city centres. Rivers are the reason our cities are where they are. We just forgot about them.

1. Why is the Thames mentioned in paragraph 3?
A.To praise the efforts of the government.
B.To explain the current healthy ecosystem.
C.To stress the importance of the Industrial Revolution.
D.To show the return of some rivers' original conditions.
2. What's the advantage of boat-to-bike delivery?
A.It cleans up the rivers.B.It speeds up the delivery.
C.It is likely to reduce the cost.D.It eases the pressure of traffic.
3. Which is the following may the author agree with?
A.Boat-to-bike delivery is too complex to make.
B.Rivers should serve as the transport center like before.
C.London has doubled its number of electric-bike riders.
D.The cleanups of the river put an end to its industrial function.
2020-12-27更新 | 58次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本篇是议论文。Arthur Brooks 在给哈佛大学毕业生做演讲时,提醒大 家不要相信两个常见却糟糕的建议:1. 找到你所热爱的工作,这样你就会觉得工作非 常轻松;2. 拯救世界。同时,他提出了能让人真正收获职业幸福感的建议:1. 通过努力而非走捷径,以获取成功;2.   为他人服务,不管是做何种工作。

【推荐3】Arthur Brooks, who teaches hundreds of anxious Harvard students how to be happy, has a happiness formula (配方), and he doesn’t think young people hear it enough.

When delivering the speech at the Catholic University on Saturday, Brooks warned new graduates against two common but terrible pieces of advice. One is to go find a job you love, and you’ll never work a day in your life; the other is you should save the world. To the first, he claimed it’s a great way to ruin youngsters’ life. He explained that expecting a job to be fun all the time is too ideal, which will set people up to hate any job, especially when the work unavoidably becomes difficult and not fun. As to the second, Brooks responded, “To expect one’s day job to solve the world’s various problems is another factor for disappointment in reality.”

Some may guess that the actual cause for job satisfaction are money, fame, power and admiration. However, Brooks never agrees with them. He has put forward his two answers to finding happiness at work.

The first key, according to Brooks, is what he calls earned success. For Brooks, happiness at work is not determined by your job title or income but the investment you put into your day. Put simply, “Don’t cut corner.” Brooks said, “What matters is that at the end of the day, you can say, you did your work with efforts and excellence.”

Some experts agree that positive relationships at work are a necessary ingredient for job satisfaction. Brooks’ second answer is in line with that finding: do your job in a way that serves others, not just yourself. He told graduates that for the greatest happiness, it does not matter if their job is fun all the time or whether it fixes the world. Instead, deeper satisfaction comes from work that can make a difference in the lives of some. And serving others comes from how you do your job, not whether you work in an bank, put roofs on houses or raise children as a fulltime mother.

1. What is the common problem of the two suggestions in paragraph 2?
A.They are fancy but impractical.
B.They fail to meet financial needs.
C.They set people to hate their jobs.
D.They may ruin young people’s life.
2. What do the underlined words “Don’t cut corner” indicate in paragraph 4?
A.Finish your work at the end of the day.
B.Pursue big job titles for your job happiness.
C.Invest in your work to increase your income.
D.Work hard with excellence to gain satisfaction.
3. What is the main idea of paragraph 5?
A.Put others first whenever possible.
B.Positive relationships develop in fun jobs.
C.Deeper satisfaction comes from serving others.
D.Types of jobs determine the difference one makes.
4. What is the happiness formula at work according to Brooks?
A.Love your work and save the world.
B.Earn your success and provide services.
C.Make differences and live to the fullest.
D.Stay excellent and make wise investments.
2023-08-21更新 | 127次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般