As a popular subject of study among evolutionary ecologists, the threespined stickleback (三刺鱼) is known for their different shapes, sizes, and behaviours — they can even live in both sea water and fresh water, and under a wide range of temperatures. But what makes that?
The researchers tracked six populations of the fish before and after seasonal changes to their environment, using genome sequencing (基因组测序). Seasonal changes result in great changes in habitat structure and balance of salt and fresh water, and only those fish able to tolerate these rapid changes survive into the next season.
“These changes probably resemble the habitat shifts experienced by stickleback populations during the past 10,000 years, ” says Professor Barrett. “We hope to gain insight into the genetic changes that may have resulted from natural selection long in the past.”
Remarkably, the researchers discovered the evidence of genetic changes driven by the seasonal shifts in habitats, which mirrored the differences found between long-established freshwater and saltwater populations. “These genetic changes occurred in independent populations over a single season, highlighting just how quickly the effects of natural selection can be detected, ” says Professor Barrett, “the findings suggest that we may be able to use the genetic differences to predict how populations may adapt to the environment.”
The research emphasizes the importance of studying species in dynamic environments to gain a better understanding of how natural selection operates. In the further research, they plan to investigate how repeatable the observed genetic changes are, by testing whether they show up year after year. Doing so would demonstrate their ability to reliably forecast the evolutionary future of these populations.
1. What does the underlined word “that” refer to in Paragraph 1?A.The threespined stickleback is under a wide range of temperatures. |
B.The threespined stickleback is popular with evolutionary ecologists. |
C.The threespined stickleback can adapt to different living conditions. |
D.The threespined stickleback has different shapes, sizes, and behaviours. |
A.The difficulties of the research. | B.The purpose of the research. |
C.The background of the research. | D.The methods of the research. |
A.Habitat shifts. | B.Genetic changes. |
C.Seasonal changes. | D.Independent populations. |
A.To know what natural selection is. |
B.To study species in dynamic environments. |
C.To test the reliability of the present discoveries. |
D.To forecast the evolutionary future of certain species. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Scientists have solved the mystery of why the overwhelming majority of mammoth fossils(化石) are male.
Much like wild elephants today, young male Ice Age mammoths probably travelled around alone and more often got themselves into risky situations where they were swept into rivers, or fell through ice or into mud, lakes or sinkholes that preserved their bones for thousands of years, scientists say.
Females, on the other hand, travelled in groups led by an older matriarch who knew the landscape and directed her group away from danger.
“Without the benefit of living in a herd led by an experienced female, male mammoths had a much higher risk of dying in natural traps such as mud holes, rock cracks and lakes,” said co-author Love Dalen of the Swedish Museum of Natural History in a report published on Thursday in the journal Current Biology.
The study used genetic data to determine the sex of 98 woolly mammoth fossils in Siberia. Researchers found that 69% of the samples were male, a heavily unbalanced sex ratio, assuming that the sexes were fairly even at birth.
“We were very surprised because there was no reason to expect a sex bias in the fossil record,” said first author Patricia Pecnerova, also of the Swedish Museum of Natural History.
Therefore, researchers believe that something about the way they lived influenced the way they died.
Most bones, tusks, and teeth from mammoths and other Ice Age animals haven’t survived,” explained Dalen.
“It is highly likely that the remains that are found in Siberia these days have been preserved because they have been buried, and thus protected from weathering.”
These giant, tusked plant eaters disappeared about 4,000 years ago. While there is no scientific agreement about the causes of their disappearance from the planet, most believe that climate change, excessive hunting by humans and the spread of other animals into mammoth feeding grounds were influential factors.
1. The underlined word “matriarch” in paragraph 3 means ________.A.figure head | B.female leader |
C.experienced animal | D.mature mammoth |
A.The increasing competition for food. |
B.The cooling of the earth’s temperature. |
C.The disappearance of male mammoths. |
D.The risky behaviour of younger mammoths. |
A.A newspaper article. | B.An academic essay. |
C.A historical description. | D.A science fiction story. |
【推荐2】It’s a sunny afternoon at the Bronx Zoo, in New York City. Children are excited as a female Asian elephant named Happy comes into view. Waving her ears from side to side and wrapping her trunk around the fence leisurely, Happy seems to be living a happy life.
The Bronx Zoo is one of about 60 zoos in the U. S. where you can see an elephant. With the number of Asian elephants declining every year—only about 50,000 are left in the wild—a zoo might be the only chance any of us will ever get to see one.
But the Nonhuman Rights Project(NhRP), an animal—rights group, says Happy is lonely. A fence separates her from Patty, another elephant. Contact through a fence isn’t enough, the NhRP says. Steven is the group’s president. “We understand what Happy’s life means to her,” he says, “which is almost nothing at all.”
So the NhRP is taking the Bronx Zoo to court. The group says Happy should be moved to a protected area where she can have space to hang about and interact with other elephants. The NhRP’s case against the Bronx Zoo is the first of its kind in the U. S. The group is relying on a legal order meant for humans. It says a person who has been unlawfully imprisoned must be released. The NhRP will argue in court that Happy should have that same right.
Experts say elephants are intelligent and thrive when they form social ties in the wild. Joyce Poole studies them in Africa. She thinks keeping elephants in a city is “a recipe for disaster”. “As you can imagine, if you were locked behind bars and lost freedom, would there be much you could do?” she says.
But the Bronx Zoo insists that Happy is well cared for according to animal protection laws Besides, some people claim removing animals like Happy from zoos would be a mistake because zoos reach more people than any other group involved with conservation. They believe if there’s a time when children can no longer visit zoos to grow up with a connection to the animals, it’ll come at a great cost.
1. What do the first two paragraphs mainly tell us?A.Asian elephants are becoming extinct. | B.Zoos allow people to bond with wild animals. |
C.Zoos are the safest shelter for Asian elephants | D.The elephants in zoos are disturbed by visitors |
A.The zoo breaks animal protection laws. | B.They find Happy is suffering from ill health. |
C.They think the zoo restricts Happy’s freedom | D.The zoo fails to meet the visitors’ requirements. |
A.Opposed. | B.Uncaring. | C.Supportive. | D.Cautious. |
A.The court will stand by the Bronx Zoo. | B.Children will have less access to nature. |
C.More wild animals will be released from zoos. | D.It will be challenging for the NhRP to win the case. |
1. Where can you most probably see this?
A.In a nature park. | B.In a zoo. | C.In a museum. |
A.not to watch the birds |
B.not to feed the birds |
C.not to bite the birds |
A.The birds might hurt you. |
B.Feeding grapes can make the birds ill. |
C.You may feed the birds with small bread. |
【推荐1】One of the winners of this year’s Nobel Prize in Chemistry was Danish scientist Morten Meldal. When describing his career, Meldal said he started out as an engineer but changed to chemistry because he “wanted to understand the world.”
Meldal’s experience may come as a surprise to students. They might believe they have to center their work and school lives in one field to be successful. But a study from professors at Michigan State University shows that is not always the case.
Michele Root-Bernstein and Robert Root-Bernstein (her husband) published their study in the Creativity Research Journal. They said that a large number of Nobel Prize winners can be described as “polymaths”.
The writers looked at past Nobel Prize winners and their students. They decided that when students of winners go on to win Nobel Prizes, some of what they learned from their teachers is how to live a life with many interests. They are, in a way, learning how to be creative.
Having many interests, the Root-Bernsteins wrote, permits scientists to look for creative ways to solve problems. In fact, one important part of science is not discovering answers, but recognizing problems that need to be solved.
The prize winners, the Root-Bernsteins said, transfer “skills, techniques and materials from one field to another.” They said Alexis Carrel won his Nobel Prize in medicine in 1912 by using techniques he learned from the clothing business. He realized that people who used thread to make and fix clothing had a skill that could be used in operations to put new organs into people’s bodies.
The Michigan State University professors study creativity. They found Nobel winners are nine times more likely to have experience in working with wood, metal or in the arts than most scientists. The researchers say that unlike many people who spend long hours at work and give up some of their outside interests, Nobel winners believe their hobbies are important to creativity.
1. What comes as a surprise to students according to the passage?A.Meldal’s winning Nobel Prize. | B.Meldal’s original working field. |
C.Meldal’s desire to understand the world. | D.Meldal’s study with Michigan State University. |
A.People who are equipped with various interests. |
B.People who only concentrated on just one field. |
C.People who are committed lifelong to their career. |
D.People who are admired for established achievements. |
A.Subjective. | B.Doubtful. | C.Objective. | D.Opposed. |
A.A Creative Scientist | B.An Amazing Rise to Fame |
C.A Born Nobel Prize Winner | D.A Secret to Winning Top Prize |
【推荐2】Mime (哑剧) opens up a new world to the beholder, but it does so tnsidiously (隐匿地), not by purposely injecting points of interest in the manner of a tour guide. Audiences are not unlike visitors to a foreign land who discover that the modes, manners, and thoughts of its inhabitants are not meaningless oddities, but are sensible in context.
I remember once when an audience seemed puzzled at what I was doing. At first, I tried to gain a more immediate response by using slight exaggerations. I soon realized that these actions had nothing to do with the audience's understanding of the character. What I had believed to be a failure of the audience to respond in the manner I expected was, in fact, only their concentration on what I was doing; they were enjoying a gradual awakening — a slow transition of their understanding from their own time and place to one that appeared so unexpectedly before their eyes. This was evidenced by their growing response to succeeding numbers.
Mime is an elusive art, as its expression is entirely dependent on the ability of the performer to imagine a character and to re-create that character for each performance. As a mime, I am a physical medium, the instrument upon which the figures of my imagination play their dance of life. The individuals in my audience also have responsibilities—they must be alert collaborators. They cannot sit back, mindlessly self-content, and wait to have their emotions aroused by fantastic musical sounds or visual rhythms or acrobatic feats, or by words that tell them what to think. Mime is àn art that, paradoxically, appeals both to those who respond instinctively to entertainment and to those whose appreciation is more analytical and complex.
Between these extremes lie those audiences conditioned to resist any collaboration with what is played before them, and these the mime must charm despite themselves. There is only one way to attack those reluctant minds — take them unaware! They will be delighted at an unexpected pleasure.
1. The author most likely includes the incident described in paragranh 2 in order to ______.A.show how challenging the career of a mime can be |
B.eliminate some misconceptions about what a mime is like |
C.portray the intensity required to see the audience's point of view |
D.indicate the adjustments an audience must make in watching mime |
A.easy to summarize | B.difficult to define |
C.hard to comment | D.natural to imitate |
A.Various dramatic elements. | B.Realistic details. |
C. Audience involvement. | D. Large audiences. |
【推荐3】During the past several years, fake news has been a frequent topic of real news, with articles considering the role of social media in spreading fake news. Something less well-known, though, is that fake news has also become a topic of scientific investigation.
In a paper published in March in the journal Science, David Lazer, Matthew Baum and 14 co-authors consider what we do and don’t know about the science of fake news. They define fake news as “made-up information that imitates news in form but not in process or intention”.
The paper makes a persuasive case that the investigation of fake news is timely and important. One conservative (保守的) estimate is that in the month before the 2016 election, the average American was exposed to somewhere between one and three articles from a known publisher of fake news. Another alarming result is that when it comes to political topics, tweets containing false information spread more rapidly and broadly on Twitter than those containing reliable information.
Researchers mentioned in the paper that in the face of fake news and its spreading by social and other forms of media, “A new system of safeguards is needed.” But what kinds of safeguards can individual news consumers put into place? The simplistic answer is “be more reflective”. Don’ t believe everything you read, but consider the possibility that it’s false. We need to foster standards of discussion in which it’s OK to challenge what others say without the conversation immediately turning into abuse. The most effective lab meetings are like that: If someone disagrees with the presenter, they say so in a polite way. And by doing so, they might be saving the presenter from embarrassment in a more public forum. A community that encourages individuals to point out when statements are false or unclear benefits everybody by helping detect the truth.
In the long run, the truth will win out. Our preferred society encourages the truth to win out before great damage is done.
1. What can we infer from the third paragraph?A.The investigation proved fake news is persuasive. |
B.The spread of fake news has become an alarming issue. |
C.The use of social media might help fake news to spread. |
D.Fake news on political topics received more attention. |
A.Reflecting on what you read. | B.Neglecting the false information. |
C.Challenging what others say. | D.Helping others detect the truth. |
A.Skeptical. | B.Unclear. | C.Indifferent. | D.Optimistic. |
A.Do Not Believe in Everything | B.The Truth Will Finally Win Out |
C.The Truth About Fake News | D.The Spreading of Fake News |