It’s not easy to feel like you’re always under the spotlight being judged for each little mistake you make. Your mind is in an endless circle playing what you said and did over and over again. And you wish you had a time capsule (胶囊) to go back and make things change if you find mistakes. You fear what others will think about you and that they will dislike you. You want to be socially perfect.
Academically, you work long endless hours just to make those excellent marks. Although most would say “it’s good to have high standards (标准)”, they have no idea about the internal bell you put yourself through to achieve perfection. If you come up to less than your desired goal, you will feel as though you have failed, but you’re far from failing; you just don’t see it that way. So instead you are telling yourself that you’re stupid, and not smart. The pressure you place on yourself weighs you down and you wear the “not good enough” label each and every day.
You not only have high standards for yourself but you also have them for others. If people don’t perform up to your expectations then you will think them not good enough. This causes a lot of frustration because you can’t trust anyone to get things right. So instead of being a team player you fly solo and try to do two or three jobs at once. Your unrealistic expectations cause you to criticize and judge others and that leads to problems in other aspects of your life.
The attempt to be perfect is called perfectionism and it’s damaging our emotional and mental health. We fight for perfection of our body, our performance, and our relationships. In a society that overstates mistakes, is it any wonder that so many young people attempt the impossible task of being perfect?
We all have fears and make mistakes, and that’s perfectly OK. It’s our imperfections that makes life interesting and they help us grow into a stronger and more adaptable person. We don’t have to achieve the impossible. We are designed to be perfectly imperfect.
1. Where is the text most likely from?A.A diary. | B.A novel. | C.A magazine. | D.A guidebook. |
A.Nobody is perfect. | B.Be generous with praise. |
C.There is no best, only better. | D.A contented mind is an everlasting feast. |
A.The society plays a role in perfectionism. |
B.More and more people are making mistakes. |
C.Many young people find it impossible to be perfect. |
D.It’s unusual for a society to seek perfectionism nowadays. |
A.It’s unbearable. | B.It`s part of our life. |
C.It has to be overcome. | D.It does harm to our mental health. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the anti-smoking lobby(游说) was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves.
There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one wave after another try to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. The latest was a panel from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the White House, to tell us that the Earth’s atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made. The clear message is that we should get moving to protect ourselves. The president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key point in the preface to the panel’s report: “Science never has all the answers. But science does provide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical that our nation and the world base important policies on the best judgments that science can provide concerning the future consequences of present actions.”
Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insisting that the science about global warming is incomplete, that it’s OK to keep pouring fumes into the air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: by the time 100 percent of the evidence is in, it may be too late. With the risks obvious and growing, a prudent person would take out an insurance policy now.
Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay attention. But it’s obvious that a majority of the president’s advisers still don’t take global warming seriously. Instead of a plan of action, they continue to press for more research — a classic case of “paralysis by analysis”.
To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must press forward on deeper atmospheric and oceanic research. But research alone is inadequate. If the Administration won’t take the legislative initiative, Congress should help to begin fashioning conservation measures. A bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, which would offer financial supports for private industry, is a promising start. Many see that the country is getting ready to build lots of new power plants to meet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the atmosphere, it is crucial that those new plants be environmentally sound.
1. What was an argument made by supporters of smoking?A.Anti-smoking people were usually talking nonsense. |
B.People had the freedom to choose their own way of life. |
C.The number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades was insignificant. |
D.There was no scientific evidence of the correlation between smoking and death. |
A.A protector. | B.A judge. | C.A critic. | D.A guide. |
A.Cautious. | B.Confident. | C.Responsible. | D.Experienced. |
A.Both of them have turned from bad to worse. |
B.The outcome of the latter worsens the former. |
C.A lesson from the latter is applicable to the former. |
D.They both suffered from the government’s neglect. |
【推荐2】Social media companies are often compared to tobacco companies, for they both market harmful products to children and design their products for maximum customer loyalty (that is, addiction), but there’s a big difference: Teens can and do choose, in large numbers, not to smoke. Social media, in contrast, applies a lot more pressure on non-users, at a much younger age and in a more unnoticed way.
Once a few students in any middle school open accounts at age 11 or 12, the pressure on everyone else to join becomes intense. Even a girl who consciously knows that Instagram can foster beauty obsession, anxiety, and eating disorders might sooner take those risks than accept the seeming certainty of being out of the picture and excluded. In this way, social media unlocks a remarkable achievement: It even harms adolescents who do not use it.
A recent study in the University of Chicago illustrated the effects of the social media trap precisely. The researchers asked more than 1,000 college students how much they would need to be paid to deactivate (停用) their accounts on Instagram for four weeks. On average, the students said they would need to be paid roughly $ 50. Then the experimenters told the students that they were going to get most of their friends to do the same, and then asked, Now how much would you have to be paid to deactivate, if most others did so? The answer, on average, was less than zero — most students were willing to pay to have that happen.
Most students are on social media only because everyone else is too. This is the textbook definition of what social scientists call a collective-action problem. It’s what happens when a group would be better off if everyone in the group took a particular action, but each actor is discouraged from acting, because unless the others do the same, the personal cost outweighs the benefit. Cigarettes trapped individual smokers with a biological addiction. Social media, however, has trapped an entire generation in a collective-action problem.
1. What drives teenagers to start using social media?A.The longing to stand out. |
B.The fear of being left out. |
C.The wish to impress others. |
D.The pressure from non-users. |
A.They are happy to interact online. |
B.They are fed up with social media. |
C.They choose Instagram over friends. |
D.They use social media to make money. |
A.Athletes changing strategies to win a race. |
B.Students taking exercise for better health. |
C.Fishermen limiting their catch to protect fish. |
D.Companies investing more for bigger profits. |
A.To present new findings of a research. |
B.To introduce a branch of social science. |
C.To explore a reason for social media addiction. |
D.To argue against the benefits of social media. |
【推荐3】Most people aren’t good at creative problem solving for two reasons: (1) They are not trained in how to be creative. (2) They don’t understand group strength well enough to harness(驾驭)their power to maximize group creativity.
A key element of creativity is applying existing knowledge to a new problem. The more people getting involved in solving it, the more knowledge there is to work on it. Unfortunately, research shows that the traditional brainstorming methods fail to achieve that goal. When groups get together to exchange ideas, they actually come up with fewer ideas overall than if they each had worked alone.
To fix this problem, you should consider the two stages of group problem-solving: divergence(分散)and convergence(集中). Divergence happens when the group considers as many different potential solutions as possible. Convergence happens when the various proposed solutions are evaluated and reduced to a smaller set of candidate solutions to the current problem.
The essential principle of group creativity is that individuals working alone diverge, whereas group members working together converge. In groups, once a member states a potential solution, that makes others think about the problem similarly. That is why groups working together diverge less than individuals working alone.
Therefore, be aware of when to diverge and when to converge. For example, early in the problem-solving process, have group members work alone to write down statements describing the problem. Then get them back to discuss their descriptions. The group discussion will lead everyone to accept one or a small number of these statements to work on—this is healthy convergence.
When starting to generate solutions, you again want divergence. Have people work alone to start. Then collect people’s initial ideas and send them around to others and allow the divergence to continue as everyone individually builds on the ideas of other members.
Finally, let the group discuss the resulting ideas. This discussion will gradually lead the group to converge on a small number of candidate solutions.
This simple method works effectively, because it respects what individuals and groups do best.
1. Research shows that the traditional brainstorming methods ______.A.actually limit group creativity |
B.greatly encourage group creativity |
C.enable people to form more ideas together |
D.prevent people’s involvement in the problems |
A.think the other way round |
B.follow his way of thinking |
C.be more confident in their own ideas |
D.be less willing to share their own ideas |
A.Discuss the problem. | B.Simplify the problem. |
C.Put down group statements together. | D.Write down their individual descriptions. |
A.By adding in collected evidence. | B.By reorganizing his own words. |
C.By drawing on others’ ideas. | D.By making his statement briefer. |
A.To advocate a way to make group thinking more effective. |
B.To demonstrate the difficulty in organizing group thinking. |
C.To highlight the differences between divergence and convergence. |
D.To show the advantage of group thinking over individual thinking. |
【推荐1】Cultural heritage is a variety of local treasures from different places. These treasures often increase people’s pride in their hometown. Thus, protecting cultural heritage is of great significance and importance. In protecting cultural heritage, countries around the world should join hands further to deal with issues. Today there are shared measures to preserve cultural heritage, however, countries still have different views on cultural heritage preservation.
Asian and European architecture is very different, for example. European buildings are often stone structures(结构) that can stand damage caused by wind and rain, while those in the East are more often wooden structures which require renovation(整修). This leads to different views on how to preserve ancient architecture.
From the very beginning, Europeans have the opinion that people should take fewer measures in the process of protecting cultural heritage. For example, the ruins of the Roman Colosseum have simply been left as they are, but Asia has a tradition of renovation of cultural relics and we believe that this measure will not affect their authenticity(真实性). The Ise Grand Shrine building in Japan is rebuilt every 20 years from one generation to the next. Such tradition caused a debate in international cultural heritage preservation circles, as some thought that the rebuilding process would harm its authenticity. Experts around the world travelled to Japan especially to conduct onsite check and discussions, and they finally recognized that the term “authenticity” actually varies(变化) from culture to culture.
The importance of these international exchanges is that they will help the world understand Asia, and accept Asian ways to protect cultural heritage.
1. What is the purpose of paragraph 1?A.To present an argument. | B.To make a comparison. |
C.To draw a conclusion. | D.To give an example. |
A.Views. | B.Damages. | C.Buildings. | D.Structures. |
A.European experts fail to protect cultural relics. |
B.Protecting cultural heritage causes many issues. |
C.Many European ancient buildings are made of wood. |
D.Ways to protect cultural heritage vary from area to area. |
A.International communication is needed. |
B.We should follow western experts’ advice. |
C.Cultural heritage will be damaged through rebuilding. |
D.Asian ways to protect cultural heritage are unacceptable. |
【推荐2】Amy Zhang, aged 21 , knows her parents have been pushing her to get her driver's license. Yet the college senior has no intention of getting it. A driver's license always struck her as a symbol that she was growing up. “I want to have independence and be an adult. But I didn't want to leave my childhood behind. ” she says. Contrary to the popular belief in the 1980s that a driver's license was a marker of independence, Zhang's viewpoint is increasingly common. When it comes to becoming an adult, more American adolescents now say “Don't rush me".
Many educators and parents view this slowdown with concern. They see a generation of young people growing up ill-prepared for life. Teachers say more students seem unable to function without their parents. And parents realize their 20-year-old hardly know how to do the laundry, and seems uninterested in driving anywhere.
But other researchers argue that the change in youth behavior reflects a reasonable adaptation to a culture and society changed from former generations. Instead of simply growing up more slowly, they are redefining what it means to transform into an adult. It is natural that people would start to grow up “slower".
Some researchers have noticed something more fundamental—a change in the definition of adulthood itself. For many young people today, becoming an adult has less to do with external markers—the house, the marriage, the job—than with how they feel internally. It's the acceptance of oneself, making independent decisions, and financial independence. Kelly Williams says in her best-selling book, “These individual actions add up to a generation that is different. ”
Members of this age group today tend to make decisions about work, education, parenthood with care, and when they are ready. They are more politically active, engage in more volunteer work and more connected globally than former generations. Indeed, many of the decisions young people make today are less about adulthood than about the world they are inheriting.
1. What can be concluded from Amy Zhang's case?A.More American adolescents lack a broader vision. |
B.American adolescents seem in no hurry to be an adult. |
C.More young people don't accept American car culture. |
D.American parents are too strict with their children. |
A.Failing to express their concerns timely. |
B.Losing curiosity about the world. |
C.Lacking essential daily skills. |
D.Being tired of traditional education. |
A.How a person feels inside. | B.A happy marriage. |
C.A successful and highly-paid job. | D.How much property they own. |
A.Where the new generation is to go? | B.How Americans interpret adulthood? |
C.What helps youth be independent? | D.Why adolescents say “Don't rush me"? |
Every day animals are abused in their homes or on the streets. It seems as if politicians do nothing to stop this issue. Everyone is worried about education and global warming. What about animals? We should not ignore them just because they cannot talk to us. Animals, like us humans, have rights. Every living being has the right to warm shelter and good food, but most importantly, they have the right to be wanted and loved. They have the right to be a special, much loved member of their own family.
There are many organizations that deal with abused animals or animals that have no home like ASPCA, PETA, the Humane Society and many more. There are organizations that deal with this issue, but that does not mean that we still shouldn’t help. The biggest saying that bothers me is, “I am only one person. I can’t make a difference.” If everyone thought like that, we wouldn’t have the organizations and loving people who help the world every day. By helping one animal, you are making a difference.
There are many things you can do right now to help animals around your neighborhood. You can volunteer at your local animal shelter, raise money for animal shelters, inform your community about animal abuse or you can write to your representatives and tell them that animal abuse needs to be taken seriously.
As you walk down the street, try to help any animals you see walking around. You can easily buy a cheap box of dry cat or dog food to feed the animals. If we do not help our animals now, we may never have animals again. Always remember that with every step you take, you help save an animal’s life and isn’t that worth fighting for?
1. Some people won’t stop kids from abusing animals because ______.
A.they are too busy to worry about the animals |
B.they don’t take animal abuse seriously |
C.they just leave it to the police |
D.they are afraid of being laughed at |
A.is another name for the Humane Society |
B.provides shelter for both animals and humans |
C.deals with such issues as education and global warming |
D.aims at protecting animals from being abused |
A.Dogs have the right to be treated kindly. |
B.One person cannot possibly make a difference. |
C.Cruelty to animals deserves more attention than global warming. |
D.It is the politicians’ duty to stop animal abuse. |
A.criticize those who abuse animals |
B.advise people to stop animal abuse |
C.show how animals are abused |
D.explain why people abuse animals |