组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:71 题号:20434809

It’s not easy to feel like you’re always under the spotlight being judged for each little mistake you make. Your mind is in an endless circle playing what you said and did over and over again. And you wish you had a time capsule (胶囊) to go back and make things change if you find mistakes. You fear what others will think about you and that they will dislike you. You want to be socially perfect.

Academically, you work long endless hours just to make those excellent marks. Although most would say “it’s good to have high standards (标准)”, they have no idea about the internal bell you put yourself through to achieve perfection. If you come up to less than your desired goal, you will feel as though you have failed, but you’re far from failing; you just don’t see it that way. So instead you are telling yourself that you’re stupid, and not smart. The pressure you place on yourself weighs you down and you wear the “not good enough” label each and every day.

You not only have high standards for yourself but you also have them for others. If people don’t perform up to your expectations then you will think them not good enough. This causes a lot of frustration because you can’t trust anyone to get things right. So instead of being a team player you fly solo and try to do two or three jobs at once. Your unrealistic expectations cause you to criticize and judge others and that leads to problems in other aspects of your life.

The attempt to be perfect is called perfectionism and it’s damaging our emotional and mental health. We fight for perfection of our body, our performance, and our relationships. In a society that overstates mistakes, is it any wonder that so many young people attempt the impossible task of being perfect?

We all have fears and make mistakes, and that’s perfectly OK. It’s our imperfections that makes life interesting and they help us grow into a stronger and more adaptable person. We don’t have to achieve the impossible. We are designed to be perfectly imperfect.

1. Where is the text most likely from?
A.A diary.B.A novel.C.A magazine.D.A guidebook.
2. Which of the following is a perfectionist most likely to agree?
A.Nobody is perfect.B.Be generous with praise.
C.There is no best, only better.D.A contented mind is an everlasting feast.
3. What can we infer from Paragraph 4?
A.The society plays a role in perfectionism.
B.More and more people are making mistakes.
C.Many young people find it impossible to be perfect.
D.It’s unusual for a society to seek perfectionism nowadays.
4. What does the author think of the imperfection?
A.It’s unbearable.B.It`s part of our life.
C.It has to be overcome.D.It does harm to our mental health.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约460词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。怀疑者对吸烟有害健康这一科学发现持不接纳态度,最终事实证明科学家是正确的。而如今,对于全球变暖问题,同样的事情仍在上演,人们和政府仍对此不重视。作者表示要进行更深入的研究,同时要采取行动保护地球。

【推荐1】Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the anti-smoking lobby(游说) was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves.

There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one wave after another try to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. The latest was a panel from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the White House, to tell us that the Earth’s atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made. The clear message is that we should get moving to protect ourselves. The president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key point in the preface to the panel’s report: “Science never has all the answers. But science does provide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical that our nation and the world base important policies on the best judgments that science can provide concerning the future consequences of present actions.”

Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insisting that the science about global warming is incomplete, that it’s OK to keep pouring fumes into the air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: by the time 100 percent of the evidence is in, it may be too late. With the risks obvious and growing, a prudent person would take out an insurance policy now.

Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay attention. But it’s obvious that a majority of the president’s advisers still don’t take global warming seriously. Instead of a plan of action, they continue to press for more research — a classic case of “paralysis by analysis”.

To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must press forward on deeper atmospheric and oceanic research. But research alone is inadequate. If the Administration won’t take the legislative initiative, Congress should help to begin fashioning conservation measures. A bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, which would offer financial supports for private industry, is a promising start. Many see that the country is getting ready to build lots of new power plants to meet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the atmosphere, it is crucial that those new plants be environmentally sound.

1. What was an argument made by supporters of smoking?
A.Anti-smoking people were usually talking nonsense.
B.People had the freedom to choose their own way of life.
C.The number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades was insignificant.
D.There was no scientific evidence of the correlation between smoking and death.
2. What can science serve as according to Bruce Alberts?
A.A protector.B.A judge.C.A critic.D.A guide.
3. What does the word “prudent” in paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Cautious.B.Confident.C.Responsible.D.Experienced.
4. Why does the author associate the issue of global warming with that of smoking?
A.Both of them have turned from bad to worse.
B.The outcome of the latter worsens the former.
C.A lesson from the latter is applicable to the former.
D.They both suffered from the government’s neglect.
2024-04-09更新 | 70次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章讨论了社交媒体对青少年的影响,特别是它们如何像烟草公司一样,设计产品以增加用户忠诚度(即成瘾)。文章通过一个大学研究展示了社交媒体如何成为一种集体行动问题,使得大多数学生因为担心被排除在外而继续使用社交媒体。

【推荐2】Social media companies are often compared to tobacco companies, for they both market harmful products to children and design their products for maximum customer loyalty (that is, addiction), but there’s a big difference: Teens can and do choose, in large numbers, not to smoke. Social media, in contrast, applies a lot more pressure on non-users, at a much younger age and in a more unnoticed way.

Once a few students in any middle school open accounts at age 11 or 12, the pressure on everyone else to join becomes intense. Even a girl who consciously knows that Instagram can foster beauty obsession, anxiety, and eating disorders might sooner take those risks than accept the seeming certainty of being out of the picture and excluded. In this way, social media unlocks a remarkable achievement: It even harms adolescents who do not use it.

A recent study in the University of Chicago illustrated the effects of the social media trap precisely. The researchers asked more than 1,000 college students how much they would need to be paid to deactivate (停用) their accounts on Instagram for four weeks. On average, the students said they would need to be paid roughly $ 50. Then the experimenters told the students that they were going to get most of their friends to do the same, and then asked, Now how much would you have to be paid to deactivate, if most others did so? The answer, on average, was less than zero — most students were willing to pay to have that happen.

Most students are on social media only because everyone else is too. This is the textbook definition of what social scientists call a collective-action problem. It’s what happens when a group would be better off if everyone in the group took a particular action, but each actor is discouraged from acting, because unless the others do the same, the personal cost outweighs the benefit. Cigarettes trapped individual smokers with a biological addiction. Social media, however, has trapped an entire generation in a collective-action problem.

1. What drives teenagers to start using social media?
A.The longing to stand out.
B.The fear of being left out.
C.The wish to impress others.
D.The pressure from non-users.
2. What can we learn about the college students in the study?
A.They are happy to interact online.
B.They are fed up with social media.
C.They choose Instagram over friends.
D.They use social media to make money.
3. Which of the following is a collective-action problem?
A.Athletes changing strategies to win a race.
B.Students taking exercise for better health.
C.Fishermen limiting their catch to protect fish.
D.Companies investing more for bigger profits.
4. What is the purpose of the text?
A.To present new findings of a research.
B.To introduce a branch of social science.
C.To explore a reason for social media addiction.
D.To argue against the benefits of social media.
2024-06-02更新 | 41次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
真题 名校

【推荐3】Most people aren’t good at creative problem solving for two reasons: (1) They are not trained in how to be creative. (2) They don’t understand group strength well enough to harness(驾驭)their power to maximize group creativity.

A key element of creativity is applying existing knowledge to a new problem. The more people getting involved in solving it, the more knowledge there is to work on it. Unfortunately, research shows that the traditional brainstorming methods fail to achieve that goal. When groups get together to exchange ideas, they actually come up with fewer ideas overall than if they each had worked alone.

To fix this problem, you should consider the two stages of group problem-solving: divergence(分散)and convergence(集中). Divergence happens when the group considers as many different potential solutions as possible. Convergence happens when the various proposed solutions are evaluated and reduced to a smaller set of candidate solutions to the current problem.

The essential principle of group creativity is that individuals working alone diverge, whereas group members working together converge. In groups, once a member states a potential solution, that makes others think about the problem similarly. That is why groups working together diverge less than individuals working alone.

Therefore, be aware of when to diverge and when to converge. For example, early in the problem-solving process, have group members work alone to write down statements describing the problem. Then get them back to discuss their descriptions. The group discussion will lead everyone to accept one or a small number of these statements to work on—this is healthy convergence.

When starting to generate solutions, you again want divergence. Have people work alone to start. Then collect people’s initial ideas and send them around to others and allow the divergence to continue as everyone individually builds on the ideas of other members.

Finally, let the group discuss the resulting ideas. This discussion will gradually lead the group to converge on a small number of candidate solutions.

This simple method works effectively, because it respects what individuals and groups do best.

1. Research shows that the traditional brainstorming methods ______.
A.actually limit group creativity
B.greatly encourage group creativity
C.enable people to form more ideas together
D.prevent people’s involvement in the problems
2. According to Para. 4, when a member presents an idea, others tend to_____.
A.think the other way round
B.follow his way of thinking
C.be more confident in their own ideas
D.be less willing to share their own ideas
3. What should group members first do early in the problem-solving process?
A.Discuss the problem.B.Simplify the problem.
C.Put down group statements together.D.Write down their individual descriptions.
4. How can each group member make changes to his initial solution?
A.By adding in collected evidence.B.By reorganizing his own words.
C.By drawing on others’ ideas.D.By making his statement briefer.
5. What is the author’s purpose in writing the passage?
A.To advocate a way to make group thinking more effective.
B.To demonstrate the difficulty in organizing group thinking.
C.To highlight the differences between divergence and convergence.
D.To show the advantage of group thinking over individual thinking.
2020-02-15更新 | 1247次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般