组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 人与动植物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:28 题号:20557198

Heavy traffic doesn’t stop big mammals like bears from crossing highways — nor does it keep smaller creatures from being squished (压扁) by cars. In just two years along one highway in Utah, more than 100 animals were killed in traffic accidents. In the United States, there are 21 endangered species whose survival is threatened by traffic accidents.

However, there’s one way to reduce crashes between cars and animals crossing the road: wildlife under and overpasses. Looking much like a regular overpass for cars, but decorated with native plants, they aren’t particularly noticeable unless you know what you’re looking for. The drivers may not be able to see the under crossings. But they’re helping countless species to pass the highways, from gold monkeys in Brazil to water voles in London.

Washington State is one of the latest to join in. Building its first wildlife bridge began in 2015 over Interstate 90 (I-90), which runs from Seattle to Boston. Though it’s just a bare set of arches now, with native plants to be planted next year, deer and wolves are already using it. Along with six underpasses built since 2013, these crossings are the first in a set of 20 along a 15-mile stretch of highway on I-90. These passes will allow black bears and mountain lions to pass through what was once an impenetrable road.

These wildlife crossings aren’t just about saving individual animals — they’re about species survival, too. I-90 is an economically important east-west lifeline in the state. But many of the animals mostly want to move from north to south. Those animals on the south of the highway got trapped in an island. Inbreeding (近亲繁殖) became a potential problem. Localized extinction happens if they don’t have genetic variability. The Snoqualmie overpass helps reconnect these isolated (隔绝的) populations. I-90’s underpasses are important in connecting waterways and species.

1. Why does the author talk about the heavy traffic in Paragraph 1?
A.To show the results of wildlife protection.
B.To indicate its serious threat of over speeding.
C.To raise people’s awareness of the behavior of wildlife.
D.To introduce the following way to protect wild animals.
2. In order to save wildlife, what is suggested to do according to Paragraph 2?
A.Letting drivers see highways.B.Building highway crossing for animals.
C.Decorating busy roads with native plants.D.Noticing under and overpasses while driving.
3. Why are wildlife crossings over I-90 important for species to survive?
A.Because they can protect native plants for animals.
B.Because they are economically important for the country.
C.Because they can help animals trapped in the island on the north.
D.Because they will prevent species from dying out for lacking genetic variety.
4. Which of the following is a suitable title for the text?
A.Isolated Wildlife: A Potential Problem
B.Highway Accidents: A Killer of Wild Animals
C. Wildlife Bridges: A Solution to Wildlife Protection
D.Wildlife Crossing: A Regular Overpass for Wildlife

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。根据英国研究人员领导的一个团队发现,虽然很多保护区的运作良好,但很多保护区并没有产生积极的影响,并分析了出现这种现象的原因,希望世界领导人在未来的十年规划中能讲重点转移到保护区的实际效果上来。

【推荐1】A team led by researchers from the UK examined waterbird data from 1506 protected areas and analyzed more than 27, 000 bird populations across the world. They compared waterbird populations before and after the establishment of protected areas and also compared trends of similar populations within and outside of protected areas.

“Our study shows that, while many protected areas are working well, many others are failing to have a positive effect, ” lead author Hannah Wauchope says in a statement. “In the majority of places we looked, bird populations were stable or were increasing, but some of them weren’t doing any better than in unprotected areas, “ she adds. “That’s disappointing, but not surprising. There seems to be the disconnection between people talking about how much land is protected and whether those areas are actually doing anything positive. ”

This study comes ahead of a United Nations meeting in China to discuss biodiversity goals for the next decade. Several countries have already committed to protecting 30 percent of the planet by 2030, yet the researchers say this alone does not necessarily guarantee positive out- comes for species.

“An obsession(迷恋)with reaching a certain area-based target-such as 30 percent by 2030-without focus on managing existing protected areas appropriately will achieve little, ” co-author Julia Jones says. “When world leaders gather in China later this year to set targets for the next decade, I really hope to see a change of their focus, rather than simply saying how much surface area they are going to protect. ”

According to Thomas Brooks, chief scientist at the International Union for Conservation of Nature, who was not involved in the study, waterbirds are a good example of a group facing the consequences of human behaviors that cause biodiversity loss. These animals respond quickly to changes in site quality and are broadly distributed, clearly reflecting the impact of protected areas.

1. What can be learned about protected areas from the study?
A.They have a negative effect on wildlife.
B.Their bird populations are increasing.
C.Their problems went unnoticed at all.
D.They don’t always help waterbirds.
2. What does the underlined word “this“ in paragraph 3 refer to?
A.Expanding protected areas.
B.Organizing the meeting.
C.Talking about biodiversity.
D.Making a big promise.
3. What does Julia Jones call on world leaders to do?
A.Try to set targets for the next ten years.
B.Focus on the effectiveness of protected areas.
C.Face the consequences of human behaviors.
D.Have a deep understanding of biodiversity.
4. What might Thomas Brooks think of the study?
A.Pioneering.B.Disappointing.
C.Convincing.D.Unsatisfying.
2022-12-16更新 | 114次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】After a morning hike in the Saneum HealingForest,46-year-old firefighter Kang Byoung-wook has tea made from the bark of an elm tree, practices yoga (瑜伽),and makes a picture with dried flowers. He is one of 40 firefighters taking part in a three-day program, the aim of which is to offer“forest healing" (森林治愈);the firefighters all have posttraumatic stress disorder (创伤后应激障碍).

Saneum is one of three official healing forests in South Korea. Soon there will be 34 more. South Koreans-many of whom suffer from work stress, digital addiction, and great academic pressure have accepted the medicalization of nature with great enthusiasm.

There is increasing evidence that being outside in a pleasant natural environment is good for us. But how many of us get to enjoy nature regularly? Fewer and fewer, it seems. According to Lisa Nisbet, a psychology professor at Canada s Trent University, evidence for the benefits of nature is pouring in at a time when we are most disconnected from it.

"We don't think of being outdoors as a way to increase happiness," says Nisbet."We think other things will, like shopping or TV."But South Korea is starting to challenge this opinion.

So what are some of the benefits of nature that Nisbet refers to? Being surrounded by nature has one obvious effect: It calms us and reduces our stress levels. This has been shown to lower blood pressure and heart rates.

Another experiment conducted by psychologist Stephen Kaplan found that people who took a 50-minute walk in a park had better attention and short-term memory than those who took a walk along a city street.

Perhaps what's more surprising is that nature may also make us more creative. David Strayer, a psychologist at the University of Utah, showed as much with a group of participants, who performed 50 percent better on creative problem-solving tasks after three days of wilderness backpacking.

In fact, we may never know exactly what nature does to the brain. Something mysterious will always remain, and maybe that' s as it should be.

1. What is Kang Byoung-wook doing?
A.Getting lost in nature.
B.Building up his strength.
C.Trying to control a forest fire.
D.Helping firefighters under stress.
2. What does Lisa Nisbet think of being outdoors?
A.It is overlooked by people.
B.It has nothing to do with happiness.
C.South Koreans show great interest in it.
D.We need more evidence for its benefits.
3. What benefit of nature did Stephen Kaplan find?
A.It affects people's feelings.
B.It lowers the risks of diseases.
C.It helps improve mental performance.
D.It does more good than physical exercise.
4. What would be the best title for the text?
A.Your life in forests
B.Your brain on nature
C.The future of forest healing
D.The benefits of a stress-free life
2019-06-04更新 | 146次组卷
阅读理解-阅读表达(约420词) | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐3】阅读短文,完成下列任务。

About three years ago, something terrible happened to me. That was the day when it took only six hours to break my body and soul.

One day, my two brothers and I were coming back from the islands where we often risked going and got more fish than others. Suddenly, the sky was covered with dark clouds and in less than a minute we were in a terrible storm. A huge wave covered our boat and my younger brother fell into the sea. My elder brother cried out “Moskoe-strom!” The moment I heard the word I became very frightened. I knew what he meant by that one word well enough.

With the wind and waves, we were going in the direction of the whirlpool. We were hopeless. Nothing could save us. It may appear strange, but at that moment, when we were in the edge of the whirlpool, I felt calmer than when we were moving towards it.

I saw clearly that there were other objects in the whirlpool — trees and barrels. After a while, I became curious about the whirlpool itself. I then made three important observations. The first, the larger the bodies were, the more rapidly they fell; the second, between two objects of equal extent, round objects fell down less rapidly; and the third, between two objects of the same size, objects shaped like a tube fell down more slowly. So I tied myself to a barrel to help me float. I tried to make my brother understand, but he was too frightened and stayed in the heavy boat. Without waiting, I jumped into the sea to try and escape.

As you can see, the reason why I’m here to tell the story is that I made the right decision. Some time after I left the boat, with my brother in it, it was pulled into the bottom of the whirlpool. Soon after that, the whirlpool became less wild. I was still tied to the barrel and the waves soon carried me to an area where the other fishermen were. In the end, a boat picked me up.

1. 推断下列词汇在文章中的含义,从表格中选择恰当的释义。
①appear________②curious________③escape________④wild________
A. to seem to be   
B. to start to be seen   
C. violent and strong
D. wanting to know about something
E. living or growing in natural conditions
F. to get away from a dangerous situation
2. Why could the writer survive in the disaster?
3. What did the writer do to save himself after observing the whirlpool?
4. What is the story trying to say about the relationship between humans and nature?
2021-04-30更新 | 75次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般