组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 人与动植物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:96 题号:20661129

Gardeners who use pesticides (杀虫剂) are contributing to the decreasing population of British songbirds, a study suggests. Researchers have advocated stopping using poisonous chemicals in gardens in order to reduce the loss of birds and adopt wildlife-friendly practices instead. The results of the University of Sussex study, which researchers call the first of its kind, were published in the journal Science of the Total Environment.

The study, which examined information on pesticide use and garden management from 615 garden owners in Britain, found 32 percent of gardens used pesticides, and the number of house sparrows was 25% lower when glyphosate-based herbicides was used regularly. Slug pellets (鼻涕虫杀虫剂) also seemed to have an impact on bird sightings; in gardens where Slug pellets were used, house sparrow numbers were down by almost 40%.

Prof. Dave Goulson, of the school of life sciences at the University of Sussex, said, “The UK has 22 million gardens, which collectively could be a fantastic shelter for wildlife, but not if they are overly tidy and sprayed with poisons. We just don’t need pesticides in our gardens. Many towns around the world are now pesticide free. We should simply ban the use of these poisons in cities, following the example of France.” The Royal Horticultural Society, the UK’s leading gardening charity, said the use of pesticides and herbicides should be avoided if possible and they should only be used, if ever, in small and targeted applications.

The research also found that those who adopted wildlife-friendly practices such as planting native bushes and flowers, or digging a wildlife pond, saw more birds than those who did not. Cannelle Tassin de Montaigu, a PhD researcher within the school of life sciences and an author of the study, said, “It’s encouraging to find that simple measures, such as planting native bushes and trees and creating a pond, together with avoiding the use of pesticides, really make a measurable difference to the number of birds you will see in your garden.”

1. Why are the data mentioned in Paragraph 2?
A.To help gardeners choose the proper pesticides.
B.To compare the effects of two kinds of pesticides.
C.To reveal the serious influence of pesticides on birds.
D.To inform readers of the importance of house sparrows.
2. What can be inferred from Prof. Dave Goulson’s words?
A.Pesticides should be banned from use all over the UK.
B.France has already made city regions pesticide free.
C.The ideal places for wildlife in the UK are extremely tidy gardens.
D.The gardens in the UK are so tidy that pesticides are not needed.
3. What is the last paragraph mainly about?
A.Other methods to keep gardens tidy.
B.Gardeners’ attitudes towards the experiment.
C.Other researchers’ interest in the experiment.
D.Additional ways to increase the number of birds.
4. In which section of a newspaper can we probably find this text?
A.Environment.B.Health.C.Transport.D.Economics.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】In the Watertown offices of planning and design firm Sasaki Associates, there’s a wall that asks employees to respond to the question, “What makes you happy?” Standing out among a sea of sticky notes listing things like “yoga” and “my cat,” one post says “CHICKENS.”

At most companies it would sound like a joke, but not here. Sasaki, which has an on-site, employee-run garden featuring 30 different kinds of fruits, vegetables, and herbs, is soon adding a chicken coop (笼子) to the mix, and workers seem delighted.

In 2015, Sasaki partnered with Green City Growers, a Somerville —based company that installs (安装) and helps maintain urban farms and vegetable gardens, to give its employees a chance to grow their own produce and experience urban agriculture firsthand.

“It builds a culture of inclusion and community,” said James Miner, a managing principal at Sasaki, who brought the farming idea to the company’s parking lot. “It’s something people can get behind and enjoy. You can just take 10 to 12 minutes away from your screen, get your fingers dirty, talk to your neighbors, and hopefully harvest something.”

While Miner hoped a handful of employees would be excited to take part in the gardens, he was happily surprised when nearly 40 percent of the Watertown office’s employees jumped onboard.

Completely, funded by Sasaki, the company’s urban gardens are owned and tended by employees, who can sign up to manage crops by themselves or in groups. Workers bring home whatever produce they grow —cucumbers, tomatoes, eggplants, and scallions are just a few of the foods they’ve had success with.

After the addition of the bright pink chicken coop — which will be designed and 3D —printed in Sasaki’s offices —the employees hope to add a garden and explore beekeeping on the building’s roof. Quite a few closet beekeepers, gardeners, and birdwatchers have emerged from the company’s woodwork to lead the charge on these plans.

“People are looking for a higher sense of meaning at work,” Miner said. “The gardens show what it means to be a part of Sasaki.”

1. What’s employers’ attitude to their workers raising chickens in most companies?
A.Doubtful.B.Interested.C.Disapproving.D.Uncertain.
2. What have the gardens brought to the employees according to James Miner?
A.A sense of community.
B.Environmental awareness.
C.Enough fruit and vegetables.
D.Increased work efficiency.
3. How can the employees obtain their share of the gardens?
A.By discussing.B.By competing.C.By renting.D.By applying.
4. What does Paragraph 7 mainly tell us?
A.The employees are looking forward to more gardens.
B.The company will increase the use of 3D technology.
C.The company will change the employees’ work patterns.
D.The employees aren’t content with their working conditions.
2021-07-15更新 | 144次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:本文是一篇记叙文,文章讲述作者全家搬到了一个新地方,新邻居家的女主人桑迪很怕作者家的狗萨姆,但是后来萨姆却在关键时刻救了桑迪的孩子,从此桑迪改变了对萨姆的看法,萨姆也成了街坊四邻的好朋友。

【推荐2】I’d been telling Sandy about my children, Emma and Tucker, aged seven and four. Sandy, in turn, was telling me about her four children: Jane, Joe, Christopher and eighteen-month-old Kim. She seemed so pleased to have kids move into the neighborhood. That was, until the door opened and out ran Emma and Sam.

Sam was our shiny black dog we had adopted three years earlier. Sam loved to hang with the kids, serving as both playmate and protector. But Sandy began to back up as Sam approached, I had never met anyone who feared dogs. As I saw her reaction, I quickly grabbed Sam by the collar and made him sit.

“I have to get the kids ready to go to their grandmother’s,” Sandy said as she backed away from me, graciously trying to remove herself from the situation.

Suddenly her door opened, and out ran her kids. “Don’t go near it!” she screamed. The kids were circled around their mom, closely watching Sam. Emma showed Joe the proper way to slowly approach a dog. Sam accepted Joe’s affection. The kids were won over, but I knew it would take some time before Sandy would change.

From that time forward, we were careful not to let Sam cross the street to our neighbors without my company. One day, the kids were across the street playing together. Then I noticed the eighteen-month-old heading toward a little hill. Seeing a car approaching, I screamed, “Watch the baby!”

Sam stormed out the door and ran across the street toward the baby. He ran up the hill, stopping just short of knocking into her. He gently pushed her away from the approaching car. The kids, too involved in play to realize the seriousness of the situation a few minutes ago, ran toward her and Sam. The kids all cheered that Sam had come to play.

Within a year, Sam made friends with all the neighbors, and almost every family on our street had a dog. Even Sandy would occasionally come and give Sam a hug.

1. How did Sandy feel at the coming of the new neighbors?
A.Excited that her kids could have friends.B.Curious why they had adopted a dog.
C.Fearful that the dog might hurt her kids.D.Unsure whether the kids could fit in well.
2. What did Sandy’s kids do at the sight of Sam?
A.They held him by the collar to make him sit.B.They formed a circle to protect their mom.
C.They prepared to withdraw from the dog.D.They looked at Sam with watchful eyes.
3. How did Sam save Kim out of danger?
A.By running behind and barking to warn.B.By rushing to Sandy’s house to get help.
C.By rushing around to her front to push her.D.By jumping to the front of the coming car.
4. Which can be a suitable title for the text?
A.A Considerate Act Helps Fit in WellB.A Doggy Push Reaches Far Beyond
C.Dogs Work Magic in Crucial MomentsD.Dogs Are Children’s Best Safety Guards
2023-04-23更新 | 276次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐3】Saving the giant panda from extinction isn't just good for the bears-it's good for the bottom line too,a new analysis by an international team of scientist shows.

The results,published in the journal Current Biology,highlight the economic benefits that they say go hand in hand with environmental conservation. In order to protect giant pandas,the government must protect their forests,which provide a host of often-under appreciated services to the communities that live in and around them. For example,forests allow for the growing of crops and the grazing(放牧)of animals,store clean fresh water and supply firewood,lumber(木材)and many useful plants.They manage storm runoff and help prevent erosion(侵蚀)。

The pandas themselves also hold enormous cultural value that has risen rapidly in recent decades among Chinese residents,the study also points out. "From 1980 to 2010,the cultural values of   pandas and their reserves almost doubled,largely driven by tourism use,rising 500-fold from 1980 to 2010, "they said.

Taking all of these factors into account,the scientists calculated a total economic value of Approximately $2. 6 billion in 2010 in China. Keep in mind,the costs of preserving panda habitat at current levels come to about$255 million. The study authors said that including the global cultural Value of the animals would increase the total economic value to $6. 9 billion per year-or about 27 times the cost of habitat preservation.

The researchers also noted that the investment in panda habitat has improved the living conditions   of local residents. They pointed to data from the Chinese Statistical Yearbook showing that the annual income in Sichuan, Shanxi and Gansu provinces,which sit next to panda reserves,rose by an average of 56%from 2000 to 2010. Farmers in counties within these provinces that were next to the panda reserves saw their annual incomes rise by 64%,on average.

The findings provide a promising example of how conservation efforts can pay off,and they could be applied to many other threatened and endangered species,the study authors said.

1. What does the underlined words "bottom line"refer lo in the first paragraph?
A.Moral standard.B.Economic profits.
C.Overall development.D.Environmental conservation.
2. Which is one of the results of preserving pandas?
A.Less farmland.B.More foreign trade.
C.More forest fires.D.Better farming conditions,
3. In China,about how many times do economic values outweigh preserving cost?
A.26.B.10.
C.4.D.3.
4. What's the main idea of the passage?
A.Protecting pandas takes great efforts.
B.Pandas are a major tourism attraction in China.
C.Conservation of pandas is economically rewarding.
D.Pandas make great contributions to the environment.
2020-04-30更新 | 450次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般