组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:49 题号:21007674

Although being famous might sound like a dream come true, today’s stars, feeling like zoo animals, face pressures that few of us can imagine. They are at the center of much of the world’s attention. Paparazzi (狗仔队) camp outside their homes, cameras ready. Tabloids (小报) publish thrilling stories about their personal lives. Just imagine not being able to do anything without being photographed or interrupted for a signature.

According to psychologist Christina Villareal, celebrities-famous people-worry constantly about their public appearance. Eventually, they start to lose track of who they really are, seeing themselves the way their fans imagine them, not as the people they were before everyone knew their names. “Over time,” Villareal says, “they feel separated and alone.”

The phenomenon of tracking celebrities has been around for ages. In the 4th century B. C. , painters followed Alexander the Great into battle, hoping to picture his victories for his admirers. When Charles Dickens visited America in the 19th century, his sold-out readings attracted thousands of fans, leading him to complain (抱怨) about his lack of privacy. Tabloids of the 1920s and 1930s ran articles about film-stars in much the same way that modern tabloids and websites do.

Being a public figure today, however, is a lot more difficult than it used to be. Superstars cannot move about without worrying about photographers with modern cameras. When they say something silly or do something ridiculous, there is always the Internet to spread the news in minutes and keep their “story” alive forever.

If fame is so troublesome, why aren’t all celebrities running away from it? The answer is there are still ways to deal with it. Some stars stay calm by surrounding themselves with trusted friends and family or by escaping to remote places away from big cities. They focus not on how famous they are but on what they love to do or whatever made them famous in the first place.

Sometimes a few celebrities can get a little justice. Still, even stars who enjoy full justice often complain about how hard their lives are. They are tired of being famous already.

1. It can be learned from the passage that stars today________.
A.are often misunderstood by the public
B.can no longer have their privacy protected
C.spend too much on their public appearance
D.care little about how they have come into fame
2. What does the underlined words mean?
A.to lose their way back
B.to forget their own names
C.to lose their memories
D.to forget their true selves
3. What is the main idea of Paragraph 3?
A.Well-known actors are usually targets of tabloids.
B.Works of popular writers often have a lot of readers.
C.Great heroes of the past were generally admired.
D.The problem faced by celebrities has a long history.
4. What makes it much harder to be a celebrity today?
A.Huge population of fans.B.Availability of modern media.
C.Lack of favorable chances.D.Inadequate social recognition.
5. What is the author’s attitude toward modern celebrity?
A.Sympathetic.B.Skeptical.C.Disapproving.D.Indifferent.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章讲述了一项新的研究表明,在获得学术奖项和以她们的名字命名的奖项方面,女性学者的比例明显不足。

【推荐1】A new study shows that female academics are significantly underrepresented in winning academic prizes and having awards named after them. Analysis of nearly 9,000 awardees and 346 scientific prizes and medals published in Nature Human Behaviour has found that men win eight prizes for every one won by a woman if the award is named after a man. These awards represent almost two-thirds of all scientific prizes. Female academics are, however, more likely to win awards that have been named after other notable female scientists, with 47% of those awards going to women and 53% to men.

Dr Katja Gehmlich, Associate Professor in the Institute of Cardiovascular Science at the University of Birmingham and joint lead author of the study, said, “The gender gap between awardees in scientific prizes is sadly a product of a long, systematic issue of poor representation of women in sciences. Despite decades of efforts to rebalance this issue, our study shows that women are still poorly recognized for their scientific contributions, and men are far more likely to win prizes and awards, in particular, if those awards are named after other men.

“It seems particularly shocking to me that awards named after women still see more than half of prizes going to men. We further propose a list of actions to address and overcome these issues but are aware this will be a long process. The Nominate Her movement is one way that the scientific community can begin to address this,” said Dr Gehmlich.

Prof Stefan Krause from the School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Birmingham and joint lead author of the study said, “Our data is indicative of much wider issues of gender inequality within sciences. Our current publication is an initial attempt to understand the causes of such striking gender inequality and to promote discussion on the subject within our scientific communities.”

“Research culture has a lot to do to improve the gender prize gap, as well as efforts to address the inequality that sees almost two-thirds of prizes currently named after men. More pathways may also be needed, such as renaming or getting rid of gender names associated with some awards,” added Prof Krause.

1. How are awards named after female scientists distributed between genders?
A.Males are in the majority.
B.Females take up a bit more than half.
C.They are almost entirely awarded to females.
D.They are evenly distributed between males and females.
2. What’s Dr Gehmlich’s attitude toward gender inequality in scientific prizes?
A.Doubtful.B.Tolerant.
C.Uncaring.D.Disappointed.
3. What suggestion does Prof Krause offer to narrow the gender gap?
A.Establishing gender rates for awards.
B.Increasing the number of female judges.
C.Encouraging more women to enter scientific fields.
D.Renaming or removing gender names from awards.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.Achievements of women in science
B.The role of men in the scientific world
C.Gender inequality in scientific awards
D.Future of gender equality in academia
2024-05-21更新 | 145次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】At one point or another, you’ve probably heard someone speak with confidence on a topic that they actually know almost nothing about. This phenomenon is known as the Dunning-Kruger effect, which refers to the finding that people who are relatively unskilled or unknowledgeable in a particular subject sometimes have the tendency to overestimate their knowledge and abilities.

In a set of studies, researchers Justin Kruger and David Dunning asked participants to complete tests of their skills in a particular field. Then, participants were asked to guess how well they had done on the test.     1     This effect was most pronounced among participants with the lowest scores on the test.

David dunning explains that “the knowledge and intelligence that are required to be good at a task are often the same qualities needed to recognize that one is not good at that task.” In other words, if someone knows very little about a particular topic, they may not even know enough about the topic to realize that their knowledge is limited. Importantly, someone may be highly skilled in one area, but be influenced by the Dunning-Kruger effect in another field.     2    

If people who know very little about a topic think they’re experts, what do experts think of themselves? Interestingly, Dunning and Kruger found that although experts typically guessed their performance was above average, they didn’t realize quite how well they had done. They often make a different mistake:     3    

What can people do to overcome the effect? Dunning and Kruger once had some of the participants take a logic test and then complete a short training course on logical reasoning. After the training, the participants were asked to assess how they’d done on the previous test.     4     Afterward, the participants who scored in the bottom 25 percent lowered their estimate of how well they thought they had done on the initial test. In other words, one way to overcome the effect may be a learn more about a topic.

The Dunning-Kruger effect suggests that we may not always know as much as we think we do.     5     However, by challenging ourselves to learn more and by reading about opposing views, we can work to overcome the effect.

A.They assume that everyone else is knowledgeable, too.
B.Researchers found that the training made a difference.
C.This happens when people don’t know much about a topic.
D.All of them had a more accurate view of their performance.
E.They found that participants tended to overestimate their abilities.
F.This means that everyone can potentially be affected by the Dunning-Kruger effect.
G.In some fields, we may not know enough about a topic to realize that we are unskilled.
2021-03-15更新 | 42次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】Would you drink water that had once been flushed down a toilet? After it’s been cleaned, that is. The climate is warming, and the population of drought-prone states California continues to grow. So recycling wastewater into drinking water may become a necessity.

But, it can be really hard for people to get over their disgust at the thought of drinking recycled water. People are grossed out by cycled water, because it was once wastewater—you know, the stuff that goes down your kitchen drains, your showers, your toilets. And even though it’s cleaned up to a standard that is identical, if not better, than commercially bottled water, the key barrier to recycled water acceptance is people’s disgust regarding it,” said Daniel Harmon, a psychologist in University of California.

In one experiment, the researchers had some participants watch a short video promoting water conservation. And in another experiment, they added a video explaining why recycled water might trigger disgust even though all pollutants have been removed. And neither video had a strong effect on people’s willingness to drink recycled water or to support the practice.

The messages were not enough to get them to actually use recycled water more. “Disgust is such a powerful reaction that simply giving more information is not going to really be effective.” The study appears in the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology.

Researchers say it’s probably going to take a lot more to get people to embrace recycled water. For example, it might help to see members of their community drinking water that’s gone, as it’s called, from “toilet to tap,” with no ill effects.

It is clear that these kinds of more direct campaigns for acceptance are necessary to get people to get over that psychological barrier—to take that first sip, so to speak. Cheers!

1. Why is it hard for people to accept recycled water?
A.They have a psychological barrier.B.Recycled water contains pollutants.
C.People know little about recycled water.D.Drinking recycled water can lead to illness.
2. What is the author’s attitude towards drinking recycled water?
A.Disapproving.B.Tolerant.C.Ambiguous.D.Supportive.
3. Where is the text probably from?
A.A news report.B.A health handbook.
C.A science fiction.D.A popular magazine.
2021-04-21更新 | 91次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般