组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 语篇范围 > 体裁分类 > 说明文
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:77 题号:21597435

OpenAI’s automated AI-powered chatbot ChatGPT has taken the internet by storm, but not without creating a few issues on the way. With writers, marketers, and seemingly everyone else in between using ChatGPT to generate content, companies worldwide are staring down a tsunami of AI-generated content, With issues of safety and stolen contents constantly swirling around ChatGPT and its output, OpenAI has now released GPT-Classifier, a tool designed to detect whether the text you’re reading was generated by ChatGPT or one of its other GPT tools.

GPT-Classifier attempts to figure out if a given piece of text was human-written or the work of an Al-generator. While ChatGPT and other GPT models are trained extensively on all manners of text input, the GPT-Classifier tool is fine-tuned on a dataset of pairs of human-written text and AI-written text on the same topic. In other words, the GPT-Classifier attempts to compare similarities between known human text and known AI text to find inconsistency that reveal the source writer.

While the idea of easily spotting AI-generated text will be music to the ears of editors and educators, OpenAI has warned that its classifier is not fully reliable.

A test of the GPT-Classifier spotted a human-generated example and marked it very unlikely to be AI-generated, and also correctly indicated that a ChatGPT-generated piece on USB issues was possibly AI generated. Currently, GPT-Classifier correctly identifies 26%of AI-written text while labeling 9%of human text as AI-written. OpenAI also notes that the tool’s accuracy typically improves as the length of the input text increases. For now, although GPT-Classifier is up and running and available for testing, it’s best to take its labeling with a pinch of salt

Even with the GPT-Classifier’s limitations, the demand for reliable ChatGPT detection is likely to see many people turn to this tool. OpenAI’s commitment to building and releasing a free GPT detection tool is important because as more students, Writers, programmers, and others use AI-text generation tools, understanding and detecting this input will become vital.

1. What is paragraph 2 mainly about?
A.GPT-Classifier’s components.B.GPT-Classifier’s vast datasets.
C.GPT-Classifier’s high productivity.D.GPT-Classifier’s working principle
2. What does the underlined part mean in paragraph 4?
A.Accept with certain doubt.B.Reform with sufficient testing.
C.Judge with reasonable grounds.D.Classify with multiple attempts.
3. What does the last paragraph imply?
A.GPT-Classifier wipes out users’ belief in AI.
B.GPT-Classifier demands more students’ trust.
C.GPT-Classifier meets diverse growing needs.
D.GPT-Classifier has a limited range of services.
4. What is the author’s attitude towards the launch of GPT-Classifier?
A.Critical.B.Opposing.C.Tolerant.D.Approving.
【知识点】 说明文 人工智能

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约520词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,介绍了文艺复兴时期的著名艺术家——达·芬奇的生活。达芬奇不仅是一个艺术家,还是一个科学家,他在科学上的贡献同样具有非凡意义。

【推荐1】The outstanding biography portrays the life of the complicated Renaissance artist with details. We come to see da Vinci as not only an inventor of musical instruments and early flying machines, but also a notebook keeper and vegetarian, who had trouble finishing many of the projects and paintings he started.

Yet what is most thrilling is getting to know da Vinci the scientist. Isaacson explains how loving science and applying the scientific method to observing the world was really what made da Vinci a great artist and, Isaacson argues, a genius. Da Vinci was fascinated with observing and understanding phenomena in nature. He wanted to know about everything around him, in minute detail, Isaacson writes. He wondered about questions “most people over the age of ten no longer puzzle about”—for instance, how the tongue of a woodpecker works.

To learn about the world, da Vinci combined his own observations with experimentation. Never formally schooled, “he preferred to induce from experiments rather than deduce from theoretical principles,” Isaacson explains. He recorded his observations, looked for patterns among them, and then tested those patterns through additional observation and experimentation.

When he became fascinated with the idea that he could invent flying machines, he observed various birds and filled notebooks with the function and speed at which their wings flapped. That’s why Isaacson calls da Vinci an exemplar of this scientific method. He goes on: “Galileo, born 112 years after Leonardo, is usually credited with being the first to develop this kind of approach and is often regarded as the father of modern science.” There can be no doubt that this honor would have been bestowed on Leonardo da Vinci had he published his scientific writings during his lifetime.

Da Vinci’s emphasis on empirical observation also helped him improve his art. First, he was able to use what he learned from looking at nature to paint and draw. His studies of the body, animals, motion, shadow and light, perspective and proportion helped him better understand what he was seeing in front of him, and render it in art more accurately and finely than anyone else of his time. Most importantly, his ability to connect art and science, helped him innovate in his work. Da Vinci made surprisingly diverse series of discoveries, including conceptualizing the helicopter and solar power and advancing knowledge about everything from the reproductive organs to botany. This genius is also what drew Isaacson to Albert Einstein and Steve Jobs as subjects: They’re all innovators who were inspired by and drew connections between art and science.

“Leonardo da Vinci is the ultimate example of the main theme of my previous biographies: how the ability to make connections across disciplines-arts and sciences, humanities and technology—is a key to innovation, imagination, and genius,” Isaacson writes. And this wonderful book is a reminder, in a time of increasingly narrow specialization and focus, that the methods of Renaissance men like da Vinci are as relevant as ever.

1. What made da Vinci a great artist?
A.Viewing the world from the perspective of science.
B.Combining experimentation with theoretical principles.
C.Attempting to know about the world like a child.
D.Being filled with ambition to become an artist and inventor.
2. Why does Isaacson mention Galileo in the book?
A.To introduce his important findings.
B.To memorize the father of modern science.
C.To show the prejudice faced by da Vinci during his lifetime.
D.To illustrate the significance of da Vinci’s research method.
3. Which of the following statements is true?
A.Da Vinci improved his art and drew more accurately by painting mostly in the natural world.
B.The methods of Renaissance men like da Vinci can still apply to contemporary scientific research.
C.Albert Einstein and Steve Jobs are as famous as da Vinci because they all have a talent for combining art with science.
D.Da Vinci failed to publish his scientific writing because the scientific method kept in it was too complicated to understand at that time.
4. What might be the best title for the passage?
A.How a Genius Changed the World
B.The Features of Renaissance Art
C.How Science Shaped His Art
D.The Comparison between Induction and Deduction
2023-05-08更新 | 333次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约470词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐2】America's businesses are getting older and fatter, while many new businesses are dying in infancy.

A study last month by the Brookings Institution found that the proportion of older firms has grown steadily over several decades, while the survival rate of new companies has fallen. In addition, young people are starting companies at a sharply lower rate than in the past.

A new report from the National Association of Manufacturers shows a major cause: The cost of obeying government regulations has risen to more than $2 trillion(12.26 trillion yuan) annually, or 12 percent of the GDP, and this cost falls disproportionately on smaller, newer businesses.

It's risky, difficult and expensive to start a business, and getting more so. Governments are imposing various new rules on a seemingly daily basis: health insurance, minimum wage increases and, most recently in California, compulsory paid sick days for even hourly employees. These regulations shift huge social welfare costs directly onto often-struggling small businesses, while being proportionally much less costly for larger companies.

This is partly an unintended issue of resources — established companies can cope with new costs more easily — but it's also deliberate. For instance, big insurance companies got a seat at the table to help write Obama care, but less politically powerful firms — like medical device manufacturers — got squeezed.

Mature, successful corporations can employ ex-lawmakers with connections, distribute campaign contributions and even write regulations for themselves. They are also more likely to want to protect steady revenue streams than revolutionize their industry.

Major companies that have been so ill-managed they would otherwise collapse — airlines, car companies and banks — stagger(蹒跚)on because politicians ride to the rescue with bags of taxpayer money.

The genius of our unique system of government is the determination to protect and defend the rights of the individual over the rights of the nation. As such, the rise of a well-connected oligarchy that protects big business at the expense of small business, and the established over the new, is opposite to American ideals.

Income inequality — which is directly caused by faulty government policy — is being promoted as the reason to impose more of that bad policy. But let's be perfectly clear, we do not have a free market but one where government picks winners and losers through regulations and financial aids.

Politics is, and always has been, about balancing competing interests seeking to benefit themselves, and that's as it should be, but the force of government should never be used to reduce competition, kill innovation or support and extend artificial monopolies(垄断)by harming the consumer, the taxpayer and the economy. Policy must breed our new and small businesses or see the as-yet undreamed of innovations that could be our bright future die in infancy.

1. We can learn from the passage that ______.
A.over several decades, new companies have grown steadily.
B.mature, successful corporations prefer to maintain their stable incomes.
C.less politically powerful firms also have their voice in making regulations.
D.The cost of obeying government regulations falls equally on all businesses.
2. We can infer from the last three paragraphs that ______.
A.the state economy may depend on those innovative businesses.
B.the rise of a well-connected oligarchy is contrary to American ideals.
C.income inequality is what the government should take action to resolve.
D.the government picks winners and losers through the law of free market.
3. It can be concluded from the passage that ______.
A.big insurance companies have better relationship with Obama.
B.most of the ex-lawmakers work in mature, successful corporations.
C.larger and older firms have a command of resources of various aspects.
D.politicians like providing financial aids to the companies of worse operation.
4. As to the development of smaller businesses, the writer is ______.
A.satisfiedB.confident.C.convinced.D.concerned.
2021-11-05更新 | 75次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐3】What kinds of rooms are your favorite spots for studying? We are going to guess that they are probably not painted bright red or yellow. But maybe they should be. Imagine. You are suddenly asked to prepare for an exam. You have two rooms to choose from. One is a pale blue, and the other is a bright red. Which one do you settle into for study? Is one going to get your brain fired up for learning, or let you relax into the best state of concentration?

According to researchers at Curtin University in Australia, it might be best to camp out in the bright red room when you are looking to store information. It might sound strange, since we often think of pale rooms — soft blues or light greens — are relaxing. And they seem to be: The Curtin University study showed that pale colors made participants feel more relaxed and calm, while bright colors increased heart rate. But calming and relaxing, it turns out, may not always be the best environment for deep concentration or knowledge gaining. Reading comprehension was much better in the bright rooms than in the pale rooms. Although participants reported that they generally preferred the pale rooms to study in as an approach to relax into work, the researchers saw just the opposite — that the bright - colored rooms seemed to lead to greater concentration.

While this might seem only surprising, the findings get into a rather controversial (有争议的) area of psychological study. The Yerkes — Dodson Law says that a little bit of stress is good for achieving best performance, while too much stress negatively affects it. The higher heart rate and the reports of the bright colors creating a heavy atmosphere might just suggest that a little stress was good for the brain.

1. What is the common idea mentioned in the first paragraph?
A.Pale colors appeal to all tastes.
B.Few people like bright red or yellow.
C.Light — colored rooms make you feel nervous.
D.Bright — colored rooms are not good for studying.
2. What might directly affect the research results according to Para 2?
A.How participants react to colors.B.Participants’ preferences in colors.
C.What participants read in the rooms.D.Time participants spent in the rooms.
3. What can be concluded from the study by Curtin University?
A.Higher stress leads to better performance.
B.Most people know how to make use of colors.
C.Stress is necessary when you want to concentrate.
D.Being relaxed is very important for people studying.
4. What’s the main idea of the text?
A.Findings about people’s favourite room colors.
B.Room colors can affect one’s academic performance.
C.Bright — colored rooms can create a heavy atmosphere.
D.Light — colored rooms help people feel relaxed into work.
2019-09-11更新 | 97次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般