Why do we find ugly animals so attractive? And what makes odd-looking creatures so cute?
Evolution plays a role. According to Austrian zoologist Konrad Lorenz, human attraction to infantile (婴儿的) features, such as big eyes, large heads and soft bodies, is an evolutionary adaptation that helps ensure that adults care for their children, guaranteeing the survival of their species. Strange-looking animals such as blobfish, pugs, aye-ayes and bulldogs all share these infantile qualities that cause an affectionate response among humans and an innate instinct to nurture and protect. And these infantile characteristics increase a person’s “protective behavior, attention and willingness to care” for the individual and reduce the “likelihood of aggression towards an infant”, says Marta Borgi, a researcher.
Ugly animals often have other value—some, like the blobfish or the naked mole rat, live in extreme environments that they have adapted to in remarkable ways. Scientists are keen to study these animals to understand whether their biology might provide fresh insights that could lead to treatments for human health conditions such as cancer, heart disease and neurodegenerative diseases.
But while many ugly creatures are exquisitely adapted to their life in the wild and can provide enormous benefits to the ecosystems they live in, they often still don’t get as much attention as more traditionally cute and cuddly animals. This can result in a bias (偏见) which leads to many of the less attractive species being overlooked in terms of research.
There are culture-led other factors that also drive our obsession (痴迷) with ugly-cute animals. “The ugly-cute thing is very fashionable,” says Rowena Packer, a lecturer of animal behavior. This is partly driven by social media, with many celebrities (名人) and influencers showing off pet pugs and French bulldogs on Instagram, she says.
But there are some serious welfare concerns around this trend. Vets are urging people not to choose a flat-faced dog breed, because they suffer from serious health problems. Pugs and French bulldogs which have been selectively bred experience breathing difficulties, repeated skin infections and eye diseases. So while goofy features such as bulging eyes and wrinkly faces may make us smile, we might want to reconsider our obsession with “ugly-cute” pets.
1. According to Konrad Lorenz, what features in animals are attractive to humans?A.Shiny colors. | B.Big eyes and large heads. |
C.Unusual body shapes. | D.Soft fur and large faces. |
A.Valued. | B.Reconsidered. | C.Ignored. | D.Misunderstood. |
A.By leading different cultures. |
B.By showing off ugly animals’ behaviors. |
C.By exposing many celebrities and influencers. |
D.By publicizing widely known people’s ugly-cute pets. |
A.How ugly animals adapt to the wild. | B.Why we like ugly-cute animals. |
C.Why lovely animals attract humans. | D.How we handle animals’ health problems. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】For more than a hundred years, the fossil (化石) of Tanystropheus (长颈龙), an ancient animal, has puzzled scientists. Scientists have long known that the species once lived in Switzerland’s Monte San Giorgio basin during the Middle Triassic period. They also knew the 20-foot creature had an incredible long neck, which was half of its entire length. But the remaining details surrounding Tanystropheus remained confusing and have been much argued. Did these animals live on land or in water? What did their young look like? And how did they interact with the other species in their environment? Nobody knew, until now.
Scientists used CT scan technology to digitally reconstruct the head of the Tanystropheus’s fossils, finding evidence that these animals lived in water. Researchers also found evidence that they were likely to use their long necks to approach prey (猎物).
Scientists were also able to clear up puzzles about one smaller and one larger of these animals, whose fossils were both found in the same area of modern-day Switzerland. Previously, it had been thought that the smaller fossils were the baby version of the fully-grown Tanystropheus. The smaller one looked very similar to Tanystropheus but were only about 4 feet long. But researchers could ascertain that they are, in fact, two different species by examining the growth rings in the cross sections of Tanystropheus bones. The fossils further showed the two species had different types of teeth, which led to the conclusion that they used different strategies to catch prey.
Food resources in an ecosystem are limited, and animals that look similar often develop different strategies to survive. This is called “Niche partitioning (利基分割)”. They shared the same habitat but didn’t get in each other’s way too much. “Niche partitioning” in such a highly specialized, extraordinarily long-necked animal showed a less competitive side of evolution during the Triassic period. Scientists said that’s an important ecological phenomenon showing the adaptability of Tanystropheus and the complexity of ecosystems at that time.
1. What does the author intend to tell us in paragraph 1?A.The exact birthplace of Tanystropheus. |
B.The change in Tanystropheus’s body shape. |
C.Some other species related to Tanystropheus. |
D.Some unsolved puzzles about Tanystropheus. |
A.By analyzing the type of its prey. |
B.By studying its original head fossils. |
C.By examining its incredibly long neck. |
D.By comparing its bones with other animals’. |
A.Doubt. | B.Criticize. | C.Determine. | D.Deny. |
A.Saving enough food resources. |
B.Contributing to biological diversity. |
C.Speeding up the evolution of animals. |
D.Driving animals to compete with each other. |
【推荐2】"Fighting like cats and dogs" is a common phrase that people use to mean people argue, fright or don't get along. If you like cartoons, you've probably seen many that describe cats and dogs fighting like sworn enemies(不共戴天的仇敌). There have even been movies made that describe cats against dogs.
As with many questions in life, there's simply no easy answer to the question of whether dogs and cats can get along. Dogs and cats are different in many ways that can make it difficult for them to get along. However, with patience and the right circumstances, cats and dogs can be best buds(兄弟).
For example, dogs tend to be social animals that are naturally playful. Cats, on the other hand, tend to be more independent. A dog that wants to play might seem aggressive and frightening to a cat. This may lead the cat to defend itself against an attack although that's really just a desire to play. Similarly, dogs - especially puppies - like to chase each other. It's a fun game. Chasing cats can be just as fun as chasing other dogs. Again, cats may interpret such playful behavior as a threat.
Even there's something dogs and cats have in common, tails, but tails can make things confusing. When a dog wags (摇摆) its tail, it's sending a friendly message: "I'm happy. Let's play." Cats, however, wag their tails when they are angry. You can see how this might lead cats and dogs to become confused if they're facing each other with wagging tails!
Although dogs and cats aren't really sworn enemies, dogs are hunters by nature. This means that they might hunt and chase anything that moves - including a cat. This natural behavior that could cause problems between dogs and cats can be controlled by special training called socialization when the animals meet for the first time.
1. By saying "fighting like cats and dogs", parents most probably mean that________.A.they like neither cats nor dogs |
B.their kids don't get on well with each other |
C.cats and dogs fight like sworn enemies |
D.the fights between cats and dogs are often made into movies |
A.They couldn't understand each other. |
B.They are worried about their behaviors. |
C.They enjoy exactly the same hobbies. |
D.They wag their tails too often. |
A.Dogs are good at hunting animals. |
B.Dogs don't like cats naturally. |
C.Cats usually like playing with dogs. |
D.Dogs and cats can possibly live in harmony. |
【推荐3】When you look in the mirror, you see yourself. That puts you in the company of animals like dolphins, elephants and chimpanzees. The mirror test is often used as a way of measuring whether animals have self-awareness. And an animal that is aware of itself has a high level of intelligence. Now, a species of fish — the cleaner wrasse — has also spotted its reflection.
Alex Jordan, a biologist at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, is one of the researchers of the study on cleaner wrasse consciousness. He and his team conducted many tests that show the fish does seem to recognize its reflection — when the researchers added a colored mark to its body, the fish would even, to remove the mark upon catching sight of it in the mirror. It seems to indicate the clever fish species has some sense of self or individuality.
But Jordan said, “I’m the last to say that the cleaner wrasse fish is as smart as chimpanzees.” Instead, he believes that the measure scientists have used for nearly 50 years is imperfect.
One problem with the test, for example, is that it uses vision to measure self-awareness. Yet not all animals rely on sight to recognize themselves. It may well be that a bat, for example, which depends on sonar to get around, is self-conscious. Elephants, while able to pass the mirror test, rely more heavily on smell than on sight.
Consciousness in humans or animals is not easy to measure or understand. Philosophers and scientists have long wrestled with the questions of how a sense of self is assessed, and how it relates to physical processes. Jordan believes the cleaner wrasse is self-cognizant, but not the same extent as a human. This means scientists need to reconsider whether some concepts centered on humans can be used in understanding animals.
1. Why are dolphins, elephants and chimpanzees mentioned in the text?A.They are as clever as humans. | B.They have some sense of self. |
C.They have the same intelligence. | D.They are widely used in experiments. |
A.doubt whether the mirror test is reliable |
B.discover the secret about the fish's sight |
C.develop a better method to replace the mirror test |
D.believe the cleaner wrasse is as smart as chimpanzees |
A.Presented with. | B.Ended with. | C.Struggled with. | D.Agreed with. |
A.It is relatively easy to test animals' consciousness. |
B.Some concepts for humans can't be applied to animals. |
C.Animals rely on at least two senses to get to know themselves. |
D.More mirror tests are needed to prove the cleaner wrasse is self-aware. |
【推荐1】Virtual doctor app Babylon Health accidentally showed users videos of other patients’ consultations with their doctors, which are strictly confidential (保密的). The story was first reported and confirmed by BBC News.
The case cropped up after a U.K. user said they were able to access dozens of videos of other patients’ consultations. An investigation by Babylon revealed that the issue affected a small number of other U.K. users. Babylon said a software error was to blame instead of a cyberattack.
The London start-up, which was valued at $2 billion, said it has fixed the problem and informed the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). Founded in 2013 by Dr. Ali Parsa, Babylon has built an app that allows people to make video calls to doctors and other healthcare professionals, and get an electronic prescription. It has around 5.6 million users worldwide.
Rory Glover, from Leeds in the North of England, opened the app on Tuesday to check a prescription and noticed that he had around 50 videos in the “Consultation Replays” section of the app that didn’t belong to him, according to BBC News. “I was shocked,” Glover told the BBC. “You don’t expect to see anything like that when you’re using a trusted app. It’s shocking to see such a monumental error has been made.” Babylon said it takes security very seriously and that it has contacted the affected patients to apologize.
“On the afternoon of Tuesday, June 9, we identified and resolved an issue within two hours whereby one patient accessed the introduction of another patient’s consultation recording,” a Babylon spokesperson said. “Actually, we have a long way to go to cope with the private matter, but we will take it really seriously,” he added.
1. Which of the following has settled the issue mentioned in the text?A.The London start-up. | B.A Babylon spokesperson. |
C.An electronic prescription. | D.The Information Commissioner’s Office. |
A.Changed. | B.Improved. | C.Ended. | D.Occurred. |
A.He failed to properly use a trusted app like Babylon. |
B.He discovered other people’s videos in his own app. |
C.He found that his own videos were scanned by others. |
D.He didn’t take his own app’s security very seriously before. |
A.How to appropriately use Babylon. | B.How to resolve the errors of Babylon. |
C.How to see other’s prescriptions in Babylon. | D.How to avoid being attacked in Babylon. |
【推荐2】Forks trace their origins back to the ancient Greeks. Forks at that time were fairly large with two tines that aided in the carving of meat in the kitchen. The tines prevented meat from twisting or moving during carving and allowed food to slide off more easily than it would with a knife.
By the 7th century A.D., royal courts of the Middle East began to use forks at the table for dining. From the 10th through the 13th centuries, forks were fairly common among the wealthy in Byzantium. In the 11th century, a Byzantine wife brought forks to Italy; however, they were not widely adopted there until the 16th century. Then in 1533, forks were brought from Italy to France. The French were also slow to accept forks, for using them was thought to be awkward.
In 1608, forks were brought to England by Thomas Coryate, who saw them during his travels in Italy. The English first ridiculed forks as being unnecessary. “Why should a person need a fork when God had given him hands?” they asked. Slowly, however, forks came to be adopted by the wealthy as a symbol of their social status. They were prized possessions made of expensive materials intended to impress guests. By the mid-1600s, eating with forks was considered fashionable among the wealthy British.
Early table forks were modeled after kitchen forks, but small pieces of food often fell through the two tines or slipped off easily. In late 17th century France, larger forks with four curved tines were developed. The additional tines made diners less likely to drop food, and the curved tines served as a scoop so people did not have to constantly switch to a spoon while eating. By the early 19th century, four-tined forks had also been developed in Germany and England and slowly began to spread to America.
1. What is the passage mainly about?A.The different designs of forks. |
B.The spread of fork-aided cooking. |
C.The history of using forks for dining. |
D.The development of fork-related table manners. |
A.Middle EastGreeceEnglandItalyFrance |
B.GreeceMiddle EastItalyFranceEngland |
C.GreeceMiddle EastFranceItalyGermany |
D.Middle EastFranceEnglandItalyGermany |
A.Wealthy British were impressed by the design of forks. |
B.Wealthy British thought it awkward to use their hands to eat. |
C.Wealthy British gave special forks to the nobles as luxurious gifts. |
D.Wealthy British considered dining with forks a sign of social status. |
A.They could be used to scoop food as well. |
B.They looked more fashionable in this way. |
C.They were designed in this way for export to the US. |
D.They ensured the meat would not twist while being cut. |
【推荐3】Recently, a group of architects from South Korea are planning to design a smart city with all functional areas people need, including living areas, study rooms, offices an entertainment areas-all within a 10-minute walk from each other.
When explaining the aim of the city, Ben van Berkel, co-founder of design company UNStudio told CNN, “We do this to provide more choices for how residents can spend their living, working and leisure time, thereby saving them the time needed to travel elsewhere in the city - because with time that is saved, more time is created.”
The idea of such a city is not new. In 2016, French-Colombian researcher Carlos Moreno put forward the“15-minute city” concept The COVID-19 pandemic has made them more interested in the concept. During the pandemic, many people have been forced to spend most of their time at home, with limited access to much else outside of their immediate community.
Paloma Ezzet, 16, is an example. She said before the pandemic, she liked to play soccer or go dancing. But during the pandemic, she had to give them up as no such entertainment areas were in her community. “It is gloomy, lonely and frustrating,” Ezzet said.
French professor Roxana Bobulescu agrees that the pandemic has broken our routine, making us rethink our lives and what our cities look like. “If our way of life is no longer making sense, perhaps it’s time to consider other possibilities,” he told the website Business Because.
The well-resourced smart city like the “10-minute city” may be one alternative(替代选择). But not everyone is on board with the idea. Some critics said it would further concentrate wealth in the most accessible and convenient districts.
So with such risk, should people stop considering this concept and give up alternatives altogether? Maybe not. As Bobulescu said, “The seeds are there, and they’ll grow little by little.”
1. What do we know about the“10-minute city”?A.People can walk through the whole city in 10 minutes. |
B.It aims to meet people’s daily needs and bring them convenience. |
C.It enables people to have more leisure time and less working time. |
D.The concept was invented to solve problems caused by COVID-19. |
A.To explain the necessity of the “10-minute city”. |
B.To show the influence COVID-19 has on people. |
C.To describe what kind of community life people desire. |
D.To prove entertainment areas are important to communities. |
A.Disagree with. | B.Care about. | C.In favor of. | D.Back down. |
A.Positive. | B.Negative. | C.Doubtful. | D.Critical. |