From 2018 to 2021, about 10 billion snow crabs (蟹) disappeared from the eastern Bering Sea off the coast of Alaska. “It’s a fishery disaster in the truest sense of the word,” says Cody Szuwalski, a fishery biologist.
Usually, as winter’s thick sea ice melts (融化), the meltwater settles on the seafloor, creating a cold-water pool with temperatures below 2° Celsius on the eastern Bering Sea shelf, which makes perfect habitat for snow crabs. But a sea heat wave in the area in 2018 and 2019 prevented the usual amount of sea ice from forming.
After a close study, Szuwalski and his colleagues have found the water temperature probably didn’t kill the crabs directly, as snow crabs in laboratories can survive in waters up to 12℃. Instead, the crabs might have died from hunger. According to the study, the food demand of snow crabs in labs almost double as water temperature rises from 0℃ to 3℃. The crab population reached historic highs in 2018 thanks to great ocean conditions for newborn crabs around 2010. As a result, the crowded crabs probably needed more food, but because of the smaller foraging (觅食) area, they had even fewer resources to sink their claws into.
“It’s just something we didn’t expect, but now we have to live with,” says Christopher Harley, an ocean scientist. Such effects of ocean heat waves are likely to go beyond snow crabs. In answer to climate change, ecosystems in northern areas of the earth, such as Alaska’s, are changing more rapidly than anywhere else. Scientists can try to help predict (预测) and prepare for changes in the future with the aid of former research. “But the future increasingly holds events that have never happened on record before, like the drop in the snow crab population,” Harley says.
1. Which of the following is suitable for snow crabs to live according to the text?A.Quiet warm water. | B.Large water area. | C.Cold deep water. | D.Cold sea surface. |
A.Polluted seawater. | B.Inability to fight diseases. |
C.Change in water temperature. | D.Too little food for so many snow crabs. |
A.To adapt to climate change. | B.To force people to reduce activities. |
C.To avoid destruction from humans. | D.To remove environmental pollution. |
A.It is useless. | B.It is challenging. | C.It is economical. | D.It is rewarding. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Growing up, Chelsea Wood dreamed of becoming a sea biologist and studying large, exciting animals like sharks. Instead, she later found herself looking through a microscope at the organs of a snail(蜗牛) and saw thousands of little white sausage-shaped parasites(寄生虫). Through the microscope, each parasite had two dark eyespots, which made them surprisingly attractive. “I couldn’t believe that I’d been looking at snails for as long as I had and missing all the cool stuff happening inside them,” says Wood, now a parasitologist at University of Washington.
Nearly half of all known animals on Earth are parasites. According to one study, a tenth of them may already be certain to extinction due to climate change, loss of their hosts, and intentional attempts of wiping them out. But now it seems that few people care.
By definition, parasites live in or on a host and take something from that host. But not all parasites cause harm, and only a small percentage affect their hosts. In fact, parasites play essential roles in ecosystems, keeping some populations in check while helping to feed others. Without parasites keeping them in check, populations of some animals would explode. Many parasites move into their next host by controlling the host they’re in, which drive that host into an animal’s mouth so that the animal can be fed.
Even human health wouldn’t entirely benefit from wiping out parasites. The human immune system(免疫系统) evolved with a group of parasites, and when we killed them off, our immune systems began attacking ourselves. Some people with Crohn’s disease have even purposely infected themselves with intestinal(肠道的) parasites live deserves our attention. If you get to understand them, you may find the bravery and attraction of parasites. They’ve evolved clever means of survival, from becoming a fish’s tongue to controlling the mind of cockroach(蟑螂).
However, scientists aren’t eager to save all the parasites. The guinea worm, for instance, gets a hard pass from even the most stubborn conservationists. It grows to adulthood inside a person’s leg, causing harm to one’s health. Ultimately, the goal of promoting parasite conservation isn’t to make everyone fall in love with them. Instead, it’s to call a relaxation in our war against all of them, because there’s still so much we don’t understand about their value to ecosystems and maybe even to people.
1. What does the author indicate by referring to Chelsea Wood’s story?A.All parasitologists initially intended to study parasites. |
B.Parasites are easily ignored compared with large animals. |
C.Animals like sharks have more research value than parasites. |
D.Scientists study parasites because of their attractive appearance. |
A.introduce an approach | B.draw a comparison |
C.present an assumption | D.illustrate an argument |
A.Parasites can smartly survive without their hosts. |
B.Conservationists believe all parasites should be protected. |
C.Some parasites are important for the balance of our ecosystem. |
D.Parasites can change their hosts by directly moving onto other animals. |
A.Why are parasites Dying Out? |
B.Why Should We Spare Parasites? |
C.How Do Parasites Affect Ecosystems? |
D.How Can We Create a World Without Parasites? |
This is according to a study in which researchers played voice recordings to wild African elephants.
The animals showed more fear when they heard the voices of adult Masai men.
Livestock-herding Masai people do come into conflict with elephants, and this suggests that animals have adapted to specifically listen for and avoid them.
The study is published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Prof Karen McComb and Dr Graeme Shannon from the University of Sussex led the study. They explained that in previous research they had used similar playback experiments to show that elephants could tell --- from the sound of a lion’s roar --- whether the animal was a female or a more dangerous male.
Prof McComb wanted to find out if the animals used their very sharp sense of hearing to identify a potential danger from humans.
The scientists recorded Masai men, women and children saying, in their own language, “Look, look over there, a group of elephants is coming”.
They also recorded Kamba men saying this phrase.
While cattle-herding Masai people often come across free-ranging elephants, which can result in violent conflict, the Kamba people’s more agricultural lifestyle does not generally bring them into aggressive touch with the animals.
When the team played recordings of these different voices through a hidden loudspeaker, they found that elephant family groups reacted more fearfully in response to the voice of a Masai man, than to a Kamba man’s voice.
And the adult male Masai voices encouraged far more of these defensive reactions than the voices of women or boys.
1. An elephant can tell a man from a woman by sense of ________.
A.touch | B.sight | C.smell | D.hearing |
A.By observing the elephants in the zoo. |
B.By playing voice recordings to them. |
C.By recording the behaviours of elephants. |
D.By communicating with them in a special way. |
A.Masai men | B.Masai women |
C.Kamba men | D.Kamba women |
A.Elephants and human beings |
B.Differences between human voices |
C.Elephants recognise human voices |
D.Elephants conflict with human beings |
【推荐3】Nowadays mail delivery is a little different. I still get my mail from my mailbox. Nothing, but my neighbors’ mail. I thought that was curious.
I proceeded to take my neighbors’ mail to them. I was about to put the mail in their mailbox when a tall man came running out shouting about messing with his friend's mail. He snatched (夺过) the mail from my hand, opened the mailbox and pointed to the mail inside.“You were after this.
I shook my head, “No, believe me. I got this mail by mistake in my box today. I was just bringing it to them.” He gave me a funny look and went back into his house.
I got the knock on the door the next morning by two very polite officers. The annoyed tall man had phoned the police and told them I was a crazy old woman going around mixing up everyone's mail. Before I could finish telling them about what was going on, the officers had watched a dog approach my mailbox with mail in his mouth. He took out the mail that was in my box and put letters in. He pushed the door closed with his nose, picked up the new pile of mail he had gotten from my box, and repeated this all the way down the next street. We all started laughing.
The dog had belonged to a mail carrier who had died. No one thought to check (the carrier lived alone) on the man’s dog. The dog had been trained to put mail in and take mail out of the boxes. When he got loose, he assumed his duties.
I went by to talk to the annoyed tall man to fill him in on what had happened. He was very pleased when he realized I was not a mail thief. He did, however, adopt the little guy.
1. Why did the tall man give the author a funny look?A.To show his disbelief. | B.To express his curiosity. |
C.To contain his annoyance. | D.To hide his embarrassment. |
A.By analyzing the case. | B.By witnessing the mix-up. |
C.By questioning the author. | D.By consulting the tall man. |
A.was well-trained and devoted | B.used to live a lonely and busy life |
C.was assigned to replace the carrier | D.guarded the mail in the neighborhood |
A.A mail service | B.A dog’s tale |
C.Special delivery | D.Noble duties |
【推荐1】The effect of climate change extends beyond ruining Earth’s environment and our physical safety. A report published this week suggests that climate change has a negative effect on our mental health, too.
The study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States(PNAS), links an increase in monthly temperatures to a rise in mental health issues. The experimental evidence stems from meteorological (气象的) data paired with information collected from nearly 2 million randomly sampled residents in the United States. The data was collected over the span (跨度) of a decade.
“We find that experiences with hotter temperatures and added rainfall each worsen mental health, that long-lasting warming associates with an increased popularity of mental health issues, and that exposure to tropical cyclones(热带气旋), likely to increase in frequency in the future, is linked to worsened mental health,” authors of the study stated. “These results provide added large-scale evidence to the growing link between climate change and mental health.”
The report specifically focused on mental health outcomes due to the effects of environmental stress - such as temperature, rainfall, and tropical cyclones - but other climate change-related issues are likely to affect mental health as well - specifically, the stress and anxiety of knowing natural disasters could be more frequent as temperatures rise.
1. From the newly-published report, we learn that the climate change may _________.A.save a lot of people’s lives |
B.cause unbelievable disasters |
C.influence people’s mental health |
D.greatly change people’s life styles |
A.To stress the importance of the study. |
B.To show that the study cost too much money. |
C.To explain the difficulties and hardships of the study. |
D.to indicate that the study is objective and believable. |
A.In Paragraph 1 | B.In Paragraph 2 |
C.In Paragraph 3 | D.In Paragraph 4 |
A.The study has its limits. |
B.The results of the study aren’t satisfactory. |
C.The environmental problems can’t be solved. |
D.Mental health is determined by climate change. |
【推荐2】The amount of plastic pollution in the oceans is rapidly increasing. This is problematic, as at least 700 kinds of ocean animals—including sharks, whales, seabirds and turtles—can become caught in the stuff or mistake it for a tasty snack.
While we know that some ocean animals seem to catch plastic because it looks like jellyfish or some other food sources, less research has been carried out into what plastic smells like to ocean animals. But now, a study from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has found the coating (涂层) that naturally builds up on ocean plastics causes the rubbish to give off the smell of food.
The researchers took 15 turtles, each around five months old, and placed them in a lab aquarium. They then piped in smells of clean water, clean plastic, turtle food, and plastic that had been soaking in the ocean environment for five weeks. The turtles showed no reaction to the smells of clean water or clean plastic. But when facing ocean soaked plastic or turtle food, they stuck their noses out of the water and showed increased activity.
“This finding is important because it’s the first proof that the smell of ocean plastics causes animals to eat them,” said Dr Kenneth J Lohmann, who took part in the study. It’s common to find a turtle with its stomach full of plastic materials. There are also increasing reports of sea turtles that have become ill and stuck on the beach due to their taking in plastic.”
According to the researchers, areas of the ocean with much plastic may trick turtles and other animals into thinking that there are plenty of food sources, when the opposite is true. “Once these plastics are in the ocean, we don’t have a good way to remove them or prevent them from smelling like food,” said Lohmann. “The best thing we can do is to keep plastic from getting into the ocean at all.”
1. Why is plastic pollution posing a threat to ocean animals?A.It may mislead them as food. | B.It may eat up all jellyfish. |
C.It may kill them with its smell. | D.It may trap 700 species of sea animals. |
A.Sea water. | B.Clean water. |
C.Glean plastic. | D.Ocean-soaked plastic. |
A.Turtles seem to eat plastic because it looks like food. |
B.Turtles have died out due to their taking in plastic. |
C.Turtles eat plastic because it gives off the smell of food. |
D.Turtles with their stomachs full of plastic were studied. |
A.Keep away from the polluted ocean. | B.Maintain a plastic-free ocean. |
C.Remove plastic from the ocean. | D.Stop people feeding turtles plastic. |
【推荐3】There are some differences between American English and British English. Some differences are quite interesting.
When my friend Lily from London used the word “larder”, I didn’t know what it meant. Realizing I didn’t follow her, she used another word. I finally knew she wanted to find something to keep some food. The next word came up when we were planning a lunch date. She jotted down the date and time in her diary, while I marked my calendar. If she called me on the phone, she would ring me up. But if the line was busy, she would say the line was engaged. Most times, I can know what Lily means. Last week, she regretted sending her boys to watch an early morning tennis game without their fleeces. I thought that she meant without their jackets or something like that. Other times, we have to ask each other. She recently told me a funny tale about a pissed woman. I wondered what had made the lady angry. It turns out that pissed means drunk.
Here is one more example. My British friend Jane was filling out a ticket at the grocery store recently. She asked the young man to help her if he had a rubber. When she noticed he didn’t follow her, she quickly asked for an eraser, which, in England, is often called a rubber. In order to communicate well with British people, we Americans should learn some words that the British use differently. And I think people who learn English as a second language should also realize that there are differences between American English and British English.
1. According to the passage, in British English ________.A.the word “pissed” means angry | B.the word “jacket” is often used |
C.the word “engaged” means tired | D.the word “rubber” means eraser |
A.Wrote down. | B.Cared about. | C.Looked for. | D.Settled down. |
A.The British way of using words. |
B.Some new words the writer’s British friends taught her. |
C.The reasons why Americans can’t followed the British at times. |
D.Some words used differently in British English and American English. |
A.Indifferent. | B.Negative. | C.Positive. | D.Mutual. |
【推荐1】Researchers are using an underwater drone (无人机) to measure CO2 levels in the ocean. It is believed to be the first time such a vehicle has been used specifically to test CO2 levels. The vehicle, which the team also calls a glider (滑翔机), is designed to dive down to 1,000 meters in deep ocean areas and can operate for weeks at a time.
The goal of the research is to provide scientists with data about how climate change is affecting the ocean’s chemistry. The self-swimming drone was deployed in the Gulf of Alaska this spring.
The team says the project could be a major step forward in measuring the environmental health of oceans. Scientists are most interested in levels of ocean acidification (酸化). This happens when CO2 emissions in the atmosphere make their way into the ocean. Ocean acidification can harm or kill some kinds of sea life.
In a way, oceans have done humans a big favor by taking in (吸收) some of CO2. If this were not the case, there would be much more CO2 in the atmosphere. This would trap more of the sun’s heat and further warm the Earth.
“But the problem is now that the ocean is changing its chemistry because of this uptake,” said team member Claudine Hauri.
One of the best ways to measure ocean acidification is to collect CO2 measurements. Until now, these collections were mostly done from ships or with floating devices at the ocean surface or equipment on the ocean floor.
McDonnell said his goal is to have a large number of similar robotic gliders operating in oceans across the world one day. “Such efforts will be important in helping scientists understand much more about what’s going on in the ocean than we have before,” he said.
1. What is the purpose of scientists carrying out the project?A.To fully use drones. |
B.To keep the ocean clean. |
C.To study in the deep ocean. |
D.To monitor ocean’s chemistry. |
A.Sea life would die out. |
B.The Earth will be warmer. |
C.There would be more CO2 in the sea. |
D.Ocean acidification would occur regularly. |
A.Optimistic. | B.Critical. | C.Doubtful. | D.Negative. |
【推荐2】Take a period of limited rainfall. Add heat. And you have what scientists call a ‘hot drought’ — dry conditions made more intense by the evaporative power of hotter temperatures.
A new study, published in the journal Science Advances, Wednesday, finds that hot droughts have become more common and severe across the western U.S. as a result of human-caused climate change. “The frequency of compound warm and dry summers particularly in the last 20 years is unprecedented,” said Karen King, lead author of the study and an assistant professor at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville.
For much of the last 20 years, western North America has been under the control of a huge drought that has strained crop producers, city planners and water managers. Scientists believe it to be the driest period in the region in at least 1,200 years. They reached that determination, in part, by studying the rings of trees collected from thousands of sites across the Western U.S..
Cross-sections or cores of trees, both living and dead, can offer scientists windows into climate conditions of the past. Dark scars can show where fires have burned. Pale rings can indicate insect outbreaks. “Narrow rings mean less water,” said King, a dendrochronologist, who specialized in tree ring dating. “Fatter rings, more water.” Scientists have looked at tree ring widths to understand how much water was in the soil at a given time. King and fellow researchers did something different. They wanted to investigate the density (密度) of individual rings to get a picture of historical temperatures. In hotter years, trees build thick walls to protect their water.
By combining that temperature data with another tree-ring-sourced dataset looking at soil moisture (湿度), the researchers showed that today’s hotter temperatures have made the current western huge drought different from its past ones.
It also suggests that future droughts will be worsened by higher temperatures, particularly in the Great Plains, home to one of the world’s largest aquifers, and the Colorado River Basin, the source of water for some 40 million people.
1. What led to hot droughts?A.Abundant rainfall. | B.Climate change. |
C.Appropriate temperatures. | D.Dry summers. |
A.Protected. | B.Surprised. | C.Stressed. | D.Helped. |
A.They will not happen in the future. | B.They are affected by those tree rings. |
C.They are similar in intensity to past droughts. | D.They have become more frequent and severe. |
A.To entertain readers with a fictional story. | B.To persuade readers to protect environment. |
C.To inform readers of severity of hot droughts. | D.To share personal experiences and reflections. |
【推荐3】Worried about the climate?
•Count the birds and the bees
Get closer to nature by becoming a citizen scientist. You could be counting birds in your garden, butterflies, insects and flowers, or even reptiles and hedgehogs.
•
Media headlines can be alarming when it comes to the climate and nature crisis or ignoring the issues completely. Hosting a local discussion can allow space for reflection, debate, ideas and collaboration (合作) to take action on global issues at a local level.
•Set up a library of things
Internet shopping has made it too easy to buy new stuff at the click of a button.
•Start a climate emergency centre
A.Cooperate with your locals |
B.But where is it all going to end up |
C.Host a climate and nature discussion |
D.But how have we consumed the things |
E.The climate and nature crisis isn’t going away |
F.There are lots of citizen science projects to take part in |
G.Small local actions with neighbors, local businesses and politicians can make a difference |