组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 人与动植物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:111 题号:22431959

Crossing paths with a wild boar (野猪) can pose fear and joy in equal measure. Despite 700 years of extinction in Britain, the species’ own tenacity and illegal releases from the 1980s have now led to several populations emerging. However, with impacts on both people and the countryside, their right to exist in Britain is heavily debated.

However, the boar’s habitat-regenerating actions that benefit other wildlife, even if they are unloved by many. The few boar in England are threatened again by poaching and culling. Why is more not being done to prevent their re-extinction?

Naturalist, writer and science communicator Chantal Lyons addresses all these complex issues and explains what it might take for us to coexist with wild boar in her new book, Groundbreakers: The Return of Britain’s Wild Boar. In this extract, she explains the history of the wild boar in Britain.

Most of the last millennium was not kind to the wild boar of Europe. But they endured when so many other large animals did not, and their star is ascendant once more. Their population status is rated as “Least Concern” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which reports that the species now has one of the vastest geographical distributions of all land animals, partly thanks to humans.

And so, with hindsight, the return of wild boar to Britain was inevitable. If not intentional. There’d been mutterings among environmentalists for decades that the species should be reintroduced. The market got a taste for them.

More farms sprung up, buying in animals from the Continent, where they had never been extinct and the farming of them was already long established. By the early 1990s there were 40 registered breeders in the UK.

Despite thousands of years of trying, one of the qualities that has proven most challenging to breed out of the farmed pig is escapology. Life, as a certain fictional mathematician once said, finds a way. Our woodlands had been waiting for nearly 700 years. Answering whatever call was sounding in their brains, wild boar began to escape from the farms. Or, in some cases, seem to have been variously helped out by storm damage, animal rights activists, hard-up owners and shooters. Each freed individual was a spark. Something new, something hot and bright with potential. Not all those sparks took. But enough did.

1. What were the circumstances that led to the return of wild boars to Britain?
A.The role of the farmed pigs in the ecosystem.
B.Introduction al reintroduction efforts by environmentalists.
C.Capitalistic influence and the market demand for boar meat.
D.Strict enforcement of the Dangerous Wild Animals Act of 1976.
2. How did various factors contribute to the release of boars into the woodlands?
A.Escapology challenge in farmed pigs and the impact on the market.
B.Animal rights activists’ efforts in facilitating boar release.
C.The influence of the farmed pigs on the behavior of wild boars.
D.Storm damage and its role in releasing boars.
3. How did Chantal Lyons explain the historical context of wild boars in Britain?
A.The negative impact of capitalism on wild boar habitats.
B.The role of the farmed pigs in the resurgence of wild boars.
C.The need for stricter enforcement of wildlife protection laws.
D.The inevitability of wild boar reintroduction through human influence.
4. What does the author imply about the freed individuals among the wild boars?
A.They were all successful in establishing new habitats.
B.Each of them contributed to the decline of the wild boar population.
C.The sparks symbolize the challenges faced by the wild boars in the woodlands.
D.Some of them adapted to their new environment, causing the resurgence of the boars.
【知识点】 人与动植物 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-六选四(约430词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
【推荐1】Directions: Read the following passages. Fill in each blank with a proper sentence given in the box. Each sentence can be used only once. Note that there are two more sentences than you need.

Everyone , including members of Congress and Native American tribes (美国印第安土著部落), wants fewer wild horses on Western lands and tribal reservations.(土著保留地).    1    

The wild horses come from horses that were brought to America from Spain in the 16th century. By 1971, the number of wild horses had dropped sharply. So Congress passed a law to save them. Since then, the number of wild horses has increased three times in size.

Experts predict there will be 115,000 wild horses by 2020.An average adult wild horse eats more than two-and-a-half kilograms of grass and drinks 75 liters of water a day.    2    

The horses’ actions have also caused soil erosion (土壤侵蚀)around water sources, threatening water quality. Gillian Lyons is a wildlife expert at The Humane Society of the United States.

She said, “Originally, when the 1971 act passed, it allowed the Bureau of Land Management(国土管理局) to destroy healthy horses…if populations grew too large. “Since 1994, except for one year, the BLM has been prevented from destroying wild horses. The agency now captures and places them in holding facilities(收容所). A few horses are adopted, but not many. It costs about $50 million a year to care for the captured animals.     3    .If Congress approves the plan, the BLM would have to find other ways to manage horse populations. “They’re going to do that in a couple of ways,” said Lyons. “One is by reducing any use of fertility control(节育措施), which they use barely any of now. And the other way is by getting rid of horses in holding facilities.” Recently, a House committee(众议院监管委员会) voted to permit the BLM to kill the horses. But a Senate committee voted against another bill that would lift the ban(禁令) on horse killing. Native American tribes have struggled with the problem for years. Some support capturing the animals. But others, including leaders of the tribes, say the animals should be treated well and not killed.

The Northwest Tribal Horse Coalition(西北部落马联盟) is made up of five small groups and tribes in Idaho, Oregon and Washington. It says in the short term controlling the number of wild horse births will not stop overgrazing(草场的过度放牧). It supports the slaughter of horses at “humane(人造的) facilities.” An estimated 48,000 wild horses live on the Navajo Nation’s 7,000 square kilometers in Arizona, Utah and New Mexico. Duane “Chili” Yazzie is the president of the Nation in Shiprock. Yazzie has started a horse capture program he considers more humane.     4    He is also looking to train them as farm animals.

A.The wild horse is a vital component to ecological balance on the range lands.
B.President Donald Trump wants to cut the BLM budget by $ 10 million in 2018.
C.Only in this manner will wild horse numbers be in balance with all other forms of wildlife and predators of the wild horses.
D.But there is little agreement on how the number should be reduced.
E.The program would euthanize sick and old wild horses and sterilize healthy ones before returning them to the wild.
F.As a result, non-native plants begin growing in the affected areas.
2019-11-13更新 | 84次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约430词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:这是一篇议论文,文章主要围绕“动物是否也像人类一样是有文化的生物”而展开论述。

【推荐2】Many people would answer the question of what makes us human by insisting that we are cultural beings. There is no doubt that we are. But one definition of culture is the totality of traditions acquired in a community by social learning from other individuals, and many animal species have traditions. Can we then say that some animals are cultural beings too?

One approach to study culture in animals is the so-called Method of Exclusion (排除), in which scientists investigate behavioral variations across populations of one species. In a famous study, scientists learned that chimpanzee (黑猩猩) behaviors were socially passed on as they were present at some sites but not at others, despite having same ecological settings. For example, chimpanzees in Tai National Park in Ivory Coast are well-known for their nut-cracking skills. Chimpanzees in Gombe national part in Tanzania, on the other hand, do not crack nuts, although nuts exist in their environment too.

However, when applying the Method of Exclusion, one has to be very careful. There are other factors that could also explain the pattern of behavioral evaluation. For example, some of the chimpanzee techniques scientists evaluated occur in only one of the three subspecies. So it’s quite possible that these behaviors also have an innate component. This would mean that one chimpanzee subspecies uses a new technique not out of cultural tradition, but because the behavior is fixed to specific genes. Another factor that has to be excluded is of course the environment Chimpanzees in Mahale do not fish algae (水藻), simply because algae does not exist there.

But when we exclude all the variations that can be explained by genes or environment, we still find that animals do show cultural variations. Does that mean there is no real difference between them and us after all? Not exactly: There is a fundamental difference between human and animal culture. Only humans can build culturally on what generations before us have learned. This is called “cumulative culture”. We don’t have to keep reinventing the wheel. This is called the “ratchet (棘轮) effect”. Like a ratchet that can be turned forward but not back, people’s cultural techniques evolve.

It is likely that behaviors we see today in chimpanzee cultures could be invented over and over again by individual animals themselves. In contrast, a child born today would not be able to invent a computer without the knowledge of many past generations.

1. Why does the author mention the example of the chimpanzees in two parks in Paragraph 2?
A.To prove that culture does exist in animals.
B.To justify the uniqueness of the research method.
C.To compare how chimpanzees behave in different parks.
D.To stress the importance of environment in studying culture.
2. What does the underlined word “innate” in Paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Advanced.B.Inborn.C.Adaptive.D.Intelligent.
3. What can we learn from the passage?
A.Cumulative culture is what sets humans apart from animals.
B.Culure in animals is as worthy to be valued as human culture.
C.Animals don’t have the ability to invent behaviors in a community.
D.The “ratchet effect” decides if humans can build on past experiences.
2023-03-23更新 | 454次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐3】Since Abbi Hickman was just a little girl, she has been surrounded by animals. Chickens, cats, dogs, rabbits, and sometimes goats are just some of the animals she cares for. At the age of 9, Abbi went to the Tracy Animal Shelter,in her hometown of Tracy,California,to adopt Sheldon,her favorite cat. There,she saw the poor conditions that the animals were kept in. Abbi knew that it was her duty to take action.

Pins for Pets is Abbi’s solution. For the last three years, she has organized a bowling tournament to raise funds for the Tracy Animal Shelter. She has raised more than $30,000, resulting in a better home for the animals. “Now the shelter is nicer and cleaner and animals have more space. It is far better, a hundred percent better,” Abbi says.

To praise Abbi for her outstanding efforts, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) named her the 2015 ASPCA Tommy P. Monahan Kid of the Year. This award is given to kids who make a substantial (大量的) effort to help animals. Abbi responded to the news of her win with shock. “I was pretty excited. I’ m really honored to receive it,” she says.

Sacrificing time and effort to assist animals can sometimes be difficult, but Abbi hopes to do more. “I want to spread my free services to more shelters. I really just hope people are kinder to animals and respect them more,” says Abbi, sharing her goals for her organization.

At the age of 12, Abbi has already accomplished so much. The advice she has for kids like her, who want to accomplish their goals, is, “Nothing is impossible. You can do anything you put your mind to. Even if it is something small, it can make a huge difference.” Abbi’s work has improved the lives of animals, and she plans to keep coming up with new ways to help them.

1. When she was very little, Abbi went to the Tracy Animal Shelter and       .
A.adopted a dog called Sheldon she liked best
B.raised kids’ awareness of protecting animals
C.found the poor conditions the animals lived in
D.learned some knowledge about some animals
2. How has Abbi raised money during the last three years?
A.By begging from door to door.
B.By organizing a bowling match.
C.By helping others look after some animals.
D.By turning to the Tracy Animal Shelter for help.
3. Which of the following can best describe Abbi?
A.Cautious and loyal.
B.Determined and imaginative.
C.Changeable but optimistic.
D.Responsible and Caring.
4. What can be inferred from the last two paragraphs?
A.Abbi’s organization is non-profit.
B.Abbi thinks she has done enough.
C.Helping animals is a piece of cake.
D.People are friendly enough to animals.
2017-08-26更新 | 94次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般