组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:157 题号:22439422

Evan Selinger, professor in RIT’s Department of Philosophy, has taken an interest in the ethics (伦理标准) of Al and the policy gaps that need to be filled in. Through a humanities viewpoint, Selinger asks the questions, “How can AI cause harm, and what can governments and companies creating Al programs do to address and manage it?” Answering them, he explained, requires an interdisciplinary approach.

“AI ethics go beyond technical fixes. Philosophers and other humanities experts are uniquely skilled to address the nuanced (微妙的) principles, value conflicts, and power dynamics. These skills aren’t just crucial for addressing current issues. We desperately need them to promote anticipatory (先行的) governance, ” said Selinger.

One example that illustrates how philosophy and humanities experts can help guide these new, rapidly growing technologies is Selinger’s work collaborating with a special AI project. “One of the skills I bring to the table is identifying core ethical issues in emerging technologies that haven’t been built or used by the public. We can take preventative steps to limit risk, including changing how the technology is designed, ”said Selinger.

Taking these preventative steps and regularly reassessing what risks need addressing is part of the ongoing journey in pursuit of creating responsible AI. Selinger explains that there isn’t a step-by-step approach for good governance. “AI ethics have core values and principles, but there’s endless disagreement about interpreting and applying them and creating meaningful accountability mechanisms, ” said Selinger. “Some people are rightly worried that AI can become integrated into ‘ethics washing’-weak checklists, flowery mission statements, and empty rhetoric that covers over abuses of power. Fortunately, I’ve had great conversations about this issue, including with some experts, on why it is important to consider a range of positions. ”

Some of Selinger’s recent research has focused on the back-end issues with developing AI, such as the human impact that comes with testing AI chatbots before they’re released to the public. Other issues focus on policy, such as what to do about the dangers posed by facial recognition and other automated surveillance(监视) approaches.

Selinger is making sure his students are informed about the ongoing industry conversations on AI ethics and responsible AI. “Students are going to be future tech leaders. Now is the time to help them think about what goals their companies should have and the costs of minimizing ethical concerns. Beyond social costs, downplaying ethics can negatively impact corporate culture and hiring, ” said Selinger. “To attract top talent, you need to consider whether your company matches their interests and hopes for the future. ”

1. Selinger advocates an interdisciplinary approach because ________.
A.humanities experts possess skills essential for AI ethics
B.it demonstrates the power of anticipatory governance
C.AI ethics heavily depends on technological solutions
D.it can avoid social conflicts and pressing issues
2. To promote responsible AI, Selinger believes we should ________.
A.adopt a systematic approachB.apply innovative technologies
C.anticipate ethical risks beforehandD.establish accountability mechanisms
3. What can be inferred from the last two paragraphs?
A.More companies will use AI to attract top talent.
B.Understanding AI ethics will help students in the future.
C.Selinger favors companies that match his students’ values.
D.Selinger is likely to focus on back-end issues such as policy.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇记叙文。文章讲述了作者到欧洲旅游时见到的欧洲烟民,特别是英国和法国烟民对吸烟的态度,他们无视禁烟标识,不顾他人感受,这让作者对美国烟民有了积极的评价。

【推荐1】Earlier this year I took a trip to England and France to go see some friends. It was a wonderful trip; I really loved it. But one thing that struck me was how different these cultures are from our own. I guess this would strike any traveler because that is the first thing you notice and it is what makes travel so exciting. Of course, these cultures are also similar to ours in many respects, but it’s the differences that really stand out.

One of the things that struck me in particular was the different attitudes towards smoking. As you know, there’s a growing anti-smoking sentiment in Europe. However, when I went to England and France, I got a new perspective on this issue. People seem to smoke anywhere and everywhere, even though anti-smoking signs are all over public places. On the radio, I heard about a member of the World Cup soccer team who smoked. And people were actually saying, “Well, he should not be on the team because he’s a bad example for our children.” I think, if they want to look at bad examples for their children, they should just go out on the street, or go into the subways, or look in the mirror, even, because so many of them are smoking in very inappropriate places. I visited a restaurant buffet in London and saw an English woman scooping up the food with a lit cigarette in her hand. Smoke rising into the air. Actually, when I talked to English people later, they were pretty shocked too, and they said that smoking in a restaurant is rude even by British standards.

This did not give me a bad impression of English people. It gave me, on the contrary, a positive feeling toward American smokers. There are a lot of American smokers who will proclaim their right to smoke whenever they want, but they will follow the rules, generally, because they have consideration for nonsmokers. So this experience in Europe gave me more of a respect for this kind of smoker.

1. What surprised the writer during his trip to England and France?
A.The wonderful trip to England and France.
B.Cultural differences that he noticed during his trip.
C.Similarity between cultures stands out more than differences.
D.Growing anti-smoking views in Europe.
2. What did the speaker find in England and France about the smoking issue?
A.People discuss the smoking issue on the radio.
B.Smokers are allowed to smoke anywhere and anytime.
C.People are encouraged to smoke in inappropriate places.
D.Many smokers pay no attention to the “No Smoking” signs.
3. The word “sentiment” in the second paragraph means ______.
A.feelingB.movementC.offenseD.regulation
4. What kind of smokers does the speaker respect?
A.Those who are from America and Europe.B.Those who respect others’ feelings.
C.Those who defend the right to smoke.D.Those who set rules of smoking in public places.
2023-09-18更新 | 189次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是议论文。丑陋的建筑值得保护吗?作者认为,我们保护建筑不是因为它们的外表,而是因为它们的历史价值。

【推荐2】Time and time again, I hear someone ask why anyone would want to keep an “ugly” building or a building that is dirty and clearly in need of work. I think you could say we preservationists look at buildings through a different angle — an angle that can see the swan (天鹅) in the ugly duck, the story in the simple lines, the book behind the cover.

Take the Queen Emma Building for example. While people may remember that building being named as one of the ugliest buildings in town, the angle from which a preservationist will view the building is that it is uniquely constructed with an artistical brise-soleil to block the sun. The designer used standard concrete bricks to form a decorative wall. Unfortunately, the brise-soleil was removed in 2011, making the building look like many of the contemporary buildings in town.

Sometimes people remember a beautiful site that was replaced by a “horrid” piece of architecture and can’t get over their anger, even when that building becomes an important part of our story. This is particularly true in San Francisco where many preservationists themselves dislike anything newer than the Victorian era. Yes, it was a tragedy that many failed to appreciate the Victorian buildings and let many get torn down several decades ago, but those losses also tell another important story. It tells the story of the 1950s and 1960s when there was hope for a more equal society with inexpensive housing for the working class. Should that history be wiped from our memories?

Preservation is not just about keeping pretty, well-kept buildings, but about conveying parts of our history-not just the history of huge events, but the story of how everyone used to go to a certain corner market. Our history cannot be told only in buildings that meet someone’s criteria of beauty; sometimes our history is painful, but no less important.

1. How do preservationists see buildings?
A.They are devoted to repairing famous buildings.
B.They focus on their value rather than appearance.
C.They prefer ugly buildings to beautiful ones.
D.They pay great attention to ancient buildings.
2. What does the author think of removing the brise-soleil of the Queen Emma Building?
A.It’s regrettable.B.It’s confusing.
C.It’s pleasing.D.It’s unbelievable.
3. Why were many Victorian buildings in San Francisco torn down?
A.To wipe the history of the Victorian era.
B.To restore the architecture before the Victorian era.
C.To work off the deep anger of the working class.
D.To make land available for cheap housing.
4. What might be the best title for the text?
A.What kind of buildings are of historical value?
B.Why do architects make ugly buildings?
C.Are ugly buildings worth preserving?
D.Are preservationists’ work meaningless?
2024-03-19更新 | 77次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】We all need to eat, and when we go to buy food at the supermarket, we’re offered many choice. But we often buy food that’s been produced in huge amounts and that’s traveled many miles before it ends up on our plate. So for some, growing their own food is a better choice – and it tastes good too!

From growing vegetables in little pots on your balcony to taking care of a small plot of land, there are many ways to produce home-grown food. It can be backbreaking work digging, weeding and watering the soil, but the result is fresh, home-grown fruits and vegetables, helping us keep a ‘five-a-day’ diet.

The recent Covid-19 pandemic lock-down means demand for homegrown food has seen a comeback in the UK. Miriam Dobson from the University of Sheffield, told the BBC that some people have been spending a lot of their time on their plots, growing plenty of fresh fruit and vegetables – which, at times, have been challenging to buy in supermarkets. She says “Coronavirus has reminded people of the weakness within our global food system. In such a difficult time, interest in self-support rises.”

But for those with limited space, a solution to grow your own vegetables lies closer to home – using pots. Sheila Brand lives in a third-floor flat in Rotterdam. She has managed to grow tomatoes and eggplants and is already harvesting raspberries. She told the BBC watching the plants grow “is very exciting: 'Oh it's got a new leaf!' ”

As well as the benefits of saving money and enjoying tasty food, growing your own from a balcony or window ledge not only improves your well-being and immediate environment, you can actually grow a lot of vegetables. So, maybe it’s time for us all to get planting and develop our green fingers!

1. A “five-a-day” diet (Para. 2) probably refers to a diet that include__________ every day.
A.Five mealsB.Enough fruits and vegetables
C.Five kinds of riceD.Plenty of water
2. According to Para 3, home-grown food is getting popular again in the UK recently because _____.
A.It’s more interesting, cheap and delicious.
B.our global food system is doing harm to us.
C.It saves the time and money on transportation.
D.it can be hard to buy fresh food during the pandemic.
3. According to the writer, where can you grow your own food if you live in a small flat?
A.In a pot.B.On a plate.C.In a garden.D.On the roof.
4. What does the writer imply in the last sentence?
A.Growing your own food can do good to your health.
B.Growing your own food can make your fingers green.
C.Growing your own food can improve your gardening skills.
D.Growing your own food can bring your family more happiness.
2020-11-23更新 | 397次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般