组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 动物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:38 题号:22726137

In a new study, researchers found that invasive insects in the United States could kill approximately 1.4 million urban trees by 2050, which would cost over $900 million to replace, reports Vishwam Sankaran for the Independent.

Hot spots predicted to have the most urban tree mortality (死亡率) were Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Chicago, Illinois; and New York, New York. The study, published in the Journal of Applied Ecology, is the first nationwide forecast of street tree mortality from invasive insects.

The emerald ash borer is an invasive beetle native to Asia. It was first detected in 2002 in southeastern Michigan, and experts suspect it was brought into the United States on wood packing material carried on cargo ships or airplanes traveling from Asia. Since then, the bug has been damaging ash trees. In the last two decades since the insect was first detected, numerous trees have been killed in North America.

Data collected from 30,000 communities across the country was used to estimate tree mortality in the next 30 years. The researchers combined this data with a model that predicted the spread of 57 different invasive insect species. Their results show emerald ash borers alone could cause 90% of the estimated 1.4 million tree deaths. Ash borers are already predicted to “kill virtually all ash trees” in over 6,000 urban areas, according to Newsweek.

Less than 25% of 30,000 urban areas in the U.S. are expected to experience 95% of all street-tree mortality, reports Adam Barnes for the Hill. The areas that will experience the most tree loss include cities in the Midwest and East Coast. These locations are expected to have the most tree loss because large numbers of ash trees occupy the streets and parks in these areas, reported the Independent.

When it comes to how to save urban areas from becoming treeless, study author Emma Hudgins, a biologist at McGill University, says, “These results can hopefully provide a cautionary tale against planting a single species of tree throughout entire cities, as has been done with ash trees in North America. Planting various trees provides resilience against pest infestations (侵扰).”

1. What can we know about the emerald ash borer?
A.It is an invasive beetle in Asia.
B.It was first found by the Michigan people.
C.It has killed numerous trees in America.
D.They definitely enter the U.S. by cargo ships or airplanes.
2. What is the fourth paragraph intended to describe?
A.The purpose of the research.B.The conclusion of the research.
C.The significance of the research.D.The process and result of the research.
3. What can be inferred from the fifth paragraph?
A.Pest infestations are taking place across the country.
B.The insect’s invasion won’t spread equally in America.
C.Tree loss is the main cause of environmental problems.
D.Ash trees are being removed from many areas in the U.S.
4. What suggestion does Emma Hudgins provide?
A.Getting different types of trees planted.
B.Replacing foreign trees with local ones.
C.Getting more trees planted in more areas.
D.Planting trees resistant to pest infestations.
【知识点】 动物 说明文 植物

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了海豚之间的互相传递教授脱壳技巧的故事。

【推荐1】In Shark Bay, Australia, bottlenose dolphins that aren’t related have been observed teaching each other a new way to use a tool, a behavior that until now scientists have found only in humans and other great apes. It’s also the first known example of dolphins transmitting such knowledge within the same generation, rather than between generations.

In a practice called shelling, dolphins will chase fish into abandoned giant snail shells on the seafloor, then bring the shells to the surface, and shake them with their noses, removing the water and catching the fish that fall out.

“The fact that shelling is socially transmitted among dolphin peers rather than between mother and child sets an important milestone, senior study author Michael Krutzen said.

In 2007, Krutzen launched a study of Shark Bay’s dolphins, identifying more than a thousand individual dolphins over 11 years. During this time, scientists observed shelling 42 times among 19 dolphins. Half of these events occurred after a marine heatwave in 2011, which may have caused a die-off among giant sea snails, leading to more shells on the seafloor.

Because of the length of their study, scientists had very detailed knowledge of the individual dolphins’ family histories, ages, sexes and behavior, making it easier for them to study the 19 dolphins that practiced shelling. For instance, they observed that the dolphins that practised shelling hung out with other shellers, so it’s likely that they copied from those they spent time with, says study lead author Sonja Wild.

The team knew that environmental factors-specifically, whether shelling dolphins did so simply because they lived in a shell-rich area — could explain this peer-to-peer transmission. A genetic characteristic among a family group was another possible reason.

So the researchers combined their data on the dolphin sightings, as well as genetic and environmental data, into a computer model that proposed various ways shelling could be transmitted between dolphins. The model that supported horizontal (横向的) transmission was the strongest outcome, according to the study.

1. What is the function of the first paragraph?
A.To make a comment on the main topic of the passage.
B.To draw readers’ attention to the main topic of the passage.
C.To give a brief introduction to the main topic of the passage.
D.To present the background of the main topic of the passage.
2. What is the second paragraph mainly about?
A.What shelling is.B.Why dolphins do shelling.
C.What happened to the fish.D.How dolphins deal with abandoned snail shells.
3. According to the scientists, shelling dolphins          .
A.usually hunt aloneB.live around areas rich in shells
C.conduct shelling about four times a yearD.acquire shelling skills from other shellers
4. The computer model is to          .
A.further confirm how shelling actually spreads
B.explain why shelling only spreads between peers
C.look for new possible ways for dolphins to spread shelling
D.find out how environmental and genetic factors affect shelling transmission
2024-03-19更新 | 139次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。讲述了英国人为什么喜欢遛狗,文章引用了几位专家的观点对英国人热爱遛狗的原因进行解释。

【推荐2】“When I think of England, I think of the queen taking her dogs for a walk in the countryside,” says Carsten Haferkamp, a dog-owning German architect working in London. There may be something in the stereotype. Data from Tractive, a firm that provides GPS tracking for pets, show that Britons walk their dogs more than their European neighbours do.

The British love for dog-walking may have more to do with the walking than the dogs. Britons are big walkers—they came fifth in the world in a study in 2017, the highest in Europe. Dogs provide walkers with company and a purpose, so it may be that walking encourages dog-ownership, rather than vice versa.

But Julien Dugnoille, an expert at Exeter University, suspects dog-walking has a deeper significance. Dogs, he suggests, are a useful aid to a socially awkward nation. “Britons tend to see dog-walking as a rare opportunity to socialise with strangers, to have a chat with strangers and exchange a few jokes and comments about the weather without putting themselves in danger (ie, without being too committed in their interaction).”

A tradition among the British aristocracy (贵族) of owning and training dogs also leads Dr Dugnoile to suspect that dog-walking retains some of its ancient kudos. When people in the park say “Max is very well-behaved,” says Dr Dugnoille, “that is a way to demonstrate mastery in the art of taming(驯养), an advantage over those dog owners who are ‘not in control of their own dog’.”

But it’s not just about showing off, in his view. He believes walking with one’s best friend creates a time and space where dogs and humans meet as species and connect as individuals.

Still, Britons should not congratulate themselves too much on their behavior towards their dog companions, for they are guilty of a universal hypocrisy (虚伪). According to Dr Carri Westgarth of Liverpool University, “People say that a dog needs a walk every day, but they will find reasons why their dog doesn’t need a walk. They’ll say: he’s got company indoors, he’s nervous or he doesn’t like the rain.”

1. What is the purpose of mentioning the queen in paragraph 1?
A.To inform us of a foreigner’s impression of England
B.To show the British devotion to walking dogs
C.To tell us the importance of dog-walking for Europeans
D.To demonstrate the queen’s love for walking with her companion
2. What does Dr Dugnoille most probably agree with?
A.Britons see dogs as protectors from danger.
B.Dog-walking is related to the British culture.
C.Britons prefer to walk rather than walk the dog.
D.Dog-walking is a close link between the British and nature.
3. What does the underlined word “kudos” in paragraph 4 mean?
A.Practice.B.Belief.C.Honor.D.Manner.
4. What would be the best title for the text?
A.Love Your Dog, Walk Your DogB.How Do Britons Walk Their Dogs?
C.Dog-walking, the New FashionD.Why Do Britons Love to Walk Dogs?
2023-07-23更新 | 96次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍通过一个科学实验论证,水母可以通过神经细胞进行学习,从而改变行为方式。

【推荐3】For Caribbean box jellyfish (水母), learning is literally a no-brainer.

In a new experiment, these animals learned to spot and avoid obstacles (障碍物) despite having no central brain, researchers report in Current Biology. This is the first evidence that jellyfish can make mental connections between events and change their behavior accordingly. “Maybe learning doesn’t need a very complex nervous system, but rather, learning is an essential part of nerve cells,” says Jan Bielecki, a neuroethologist at Kiel University in Germany. If so, the new finding could help trace how learning evolved in animals.

Bielecki and his colleagues wondered if Caribbean box jellyfish could learn that low-contrast objects, which might at first seem distant, were actually close by. The team put 12 jellyfish into a round tank surrounded by low-contrast, gray and white stripes. A camera filmed the animals’ behavior for about seven minutes.

At first, the jellyfish seemed to interpret the gray stripes as distant roots and swam into the tank wall. But those collisions (碰撞) seemed to lead the jellyfish to treat the gray stripes more like close roots in dirty water, and the animals started avoiding them. The jellies’ average distance from the tank wall increased from about 2.5 centimeters in the first couple of minutes to about 3.6 centimeters in the final couple of minutes. Their average collisions into the wall dropped from 1.8 per minute to 0.78 per minute.

“I found that really amazing,” says Nagayasu Nakanishi, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville, who has studied jellyfish nervous systems but was not involved in the new work. “I never thought jellyfish could really learn.”

Neurobiologist Björn Brembs views the results more cautiously, noting the small number of jellyfish tested and the variability in their performance. “I want this to be true, as it would be very cool,” says Brembs. Experiments with more jellyfish could convince him that the animals really do learn.

1. What can we know about the jellyfish in paragraph 2?
A.They can avoid obstacles with a central brain.
B.They can change their behaviour after evolution.
C.They may have learning abilities with nerve cells.
D.They may develop a very complex nervous system.
2. What change in behavior did the jellyfish show in the experiment?
A.They completely ignored the gray stripes.
B.They gradually started avoiding the gray stripes.
C.They could avoid collisions if given enough time.
D.They increased their collisions with the tank wall.
3. What conclusion can be drawn from the experiment?
A.Jellyfish preferred the gray stripes over other things.
B.Jellyfish were unable to learn from their environment.
C.Jellyfish relied on the distant objects to change their behavior.
D.Jellyfish showed a learning process and adjusted their behavior.
4. What does Brembs imply in the last paragraph?
A.He believes more testing is needed to confirm the results.
B.He is excited by the potential implications of the findings.
C.He dismisses the findings as irrelevant to jellyfish behavior.
D.He is doubtful due to the consistent performance of the jellyfish.
2024-03-21更新 | 70次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般