Recently a report was made public by NatureServe, a Virginia-based environmental group, which said 40 percent of animals and 34 percent of plants in the United States are at risk of disappearing.
The group examined data from over 1,000 scientists in the United States and Canada, using 50 years of information on the health of animals, plants and ecosystems. The report provided pictures and maps of areas that are unprotected and where animals and plants are most threatened.
Sean O’Brien, president of NatureServe, said what the report showed was dreadful. For example, among the species (物种) at risk of extinction is the Venus flytrap, a plant that “eats” insects. The report said it is only found in the wild in a few places in the states of North and South Carolina. The report also said 200 species of trees might die out and that America’s large northern grasslands are among the ecosystems most threatened. The main threats to plants, animals and ecosystems include environmental destruction (破坏), land-use change, river pollution, and climate change, according to the report.
California, Texas and the southeastern United States are where the highest percentages of plants, animals and ecosystems are at risk. Those areas have many different forms of life. Wesley Knapp, head plant scientist at NatureServe, said those parts of America haven’t seen much population growth in recent years. Knapp said lawmakers usually do not provide as much money for protecting plants as they do for animals. He hoped the data could guide state and area officials in creating effective State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) to protect endangered species.
Now $50 million nationwide is shared among all states to carry out their SWAP. If the Recovering America’s Wildlife Act was passed, it would increase that amount to $ 1.4 billion. Knapp said the bill would have better served the protection of plants and animals.
1. What can we infer about the environmental group?A.It has been running for 50 years. | B.It has saved 40 kinds of animals. |
C.It put much effort into the report. | D.It just protects threatened plants. |
A.Pleasant. | B.Similar. | C.Common. | D.Terrible. |
A.It could play an active role. | B.It may cover all the species. |
C.It might help reduce the cost. | D.It will take the place of SWAP. |
A.The Protection by Law Making Sense | B.Many US Animals and Plants at Risk |
C.State Wildlife Action Plan on the Way | D.NatureServe Working for a Green World |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】The Amazon rainforest is as pristine (处于原始状态的) a place as most people can imagine, but even there, the effects of a changing climate are playing out. Previous research found that some birds in the Amazon are experiencing drops that may be related to climate change. Now, new research suggests that as the Amazon's dry season has gotten hotter, some species are starting to evolve (进化).
For the new study, researchers studied 77 non-migratory species over a 40-year period. They reported in the journal Science Advances that 36 species have lost weight, as much as 2 percent of their body weight every ten years since 1980. Meanwhile, all the species became smaller in body size, while a third grew longer wings.
The researchers themselves are unsure what advantage the wing length changes give the birds, but smaller birds may have an easier time keeping cool. In general, smaller animals have a larger ratio (比例) of surface area to body size, so they dissipate more heat faster than a bigger animal. Less available food, such as fruit or insects, in dryer weather might lead to smaller body size.
“Think about a fighter plane. It has short wings and is heavy. It has to go really fast to stay high in the air, so it uses up plenty of energy,”says ecologist Vtek Jirinec, “who led the new study, while a glider (滑翔机) almost uses no power to stay high in the air, because it’s got these long wings, and it’s light.”
For those who wonder why a small body change in a small homebody bird should matter, Jirinec points to how our actions have effects we don’t always see - such as changing the size and shape of animals half a world away.
“We think of Amazonia as a pristine place, full of life, untouched by people, away from deforestation,” Jirinec says. “But it looks like no, not necessarily.”
1. What does the new study find out about some bird species in the Amazon rainforest?A.They have changed physically. | B.They are dying out due to hotter weather. |
C.They have a smaller population than before. | D.They have migrated as a result of less rainfall. |
A.Feel. | B.Need. | C.Give out. | D.Make use of. |
A.To study how birds speed up in the air. |
B.To show the advantage of birds’ longer wings. |
C.To describe how birds' wings move when flying. |
D.To introduce the difficulty birds can meet when flying. |
A.It isn't as attractive as it was. |
B.It is making a quick recovery. |
C.It is being influenced by human activities. |
D.It isn't suitable for some bird species any longer. |
【推荐2】Deep sea fishing, sometimes called sport or big game fishing, is a form of fishing. This type of fishing can be a real challenge and is also meant to be enjoyable.
Once the boat arrives on site, a number of techniques can be used to fish. Some people like to use nets, while others prefer to spread bait in the water to attract fish, and to hook them individually. Spear fishing is also possible with some species.
If a fish is landed, there are a number of options for dealing with the fish. Some people take the fish home to eat. Others think that the catch is the fun part.
Going on a fishing charter (租船 )can be an enjoyable experience for people who like fishing and being out on the water.
A.Deep sea fishing is adventurous |
B.Besides, it provides a source of food |
C.So they make the most of time on charters |
D.Fishermen have to be strong and quick on their feet |
E.Many charters provide all of the equipment people will need |
F.The goal with deep sea fishing is to reach deeper parts of the ocean |
G.They set the fish free afterwards so that it can live to fight another day |
【推荐3】Devon—A three-year-old labradoodle named Digby has been praised after he saved a woman who was thinking of taking her own life on a bridge.
Digby is an Australian labradoodle, a type of dog, whose hypoallergenic (低致敏性的) coat is less likely to start allergic reactions in those he communicates with. He was hired by the fire service in 2018 not for his ability to remove bombs but to relieve stress and anxiety among firefighters who had attended unpleasant call-outs. He also works with vulnerable (脆弱的) people in the community as part of a “pets for therapy” programme.
So when the emergency services were called to a vulnerable woman on a motorway bridge, a firefighter had the bright idea to take Digby along.
“We were at the incident as part of a multi-agency response. Police negotiators were speaking with the woman but the situation was becoming increasingly worrying. When Digby arrived, the young woman immediately swung her head round to look, and smiled,” said a spokesman for Devon and Somerset fire service. “This got a conversation started. The woman was asked if she would like to come and meet Digby if she came back over the railings (金属栏杆), which we are pleased to say she did. It was Digby who eventually got her out of harm’s way.”
“The use of therapy dogs has been scientifically proven to help people who are exposed to challenging situations in their lives such as ill health or learning disability,” the spokesman added.
Digby has also been trained to go into schools and hospitals for Pets As Therapy charity. Other services have also started adopting therapy dogs to assist in various situations.
1. Why is Digby chosen as a therapy dog?A.He can remove bombs. |
B.He can bring relief to people. |
C.He can deal with emergencies. |
D.He can communicate with people. |
A.Digby was finally adopted by the woman. |
B.Therapy dogs can cure people of illnesses. |
C.Therapy dogs are now popular in various services. |
D.The use of therapy dogs was started by a firefighter. |
A.A news report. |
B.A science magazine. |
C.A guidebook. |
D.A government document. |
【推荐1】The latest bad but unsurprising news on education is that reading and writing scores on the SAT have once again declined. The language competence of our high schoolers fell steeply in the 1970s and has never recovered. This is very worrisome, because the best single measure of the overall quality of our primary and secondary schools is the average verbal(语言的) score of 17-year-olds. This score correlates with the ability to learn new things readily, to communicate with others and to secure a job. It also predicts future income.
The most credible analyses have shown that the chief causes are vast curricular changes, especially in the critical early grades. In the decades before the Great Verbal Decline, a content-rich elementary school experience evolved into a content-light, skills-based, test-centered approach. Cognitive psychologists agree that early childhood language learning (ages 2 to 10) is critical to later verbal competence, not just because of the remarkable linguistic plasticity of young minds, but also because of the so-called Matthew Effect.
The name comes from a passage in the Bible: “For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.” Those who are language-poor in early childhood get relatively poorer, and fall further behind, while the verbally rich get richer.
The origin of this cruel truth lies in the nature of word learning. The more words you already know, the faster you acquire new words. This sounds like an invitation to vocabulary study for babies, but that’s been tried and it’s not effective. Most of the word meanings we know are acquired indirectly, by intuitively(凭直觉的) guessing new meanings as we understand the main idea of what we are hearing or reading. The Matthew Effect in language can be restated this way: “To those who understand the main idea shall be given new word meanings, but to those who do not there shall follow boredom and frustration.”
Clearly the key is to make sure that from kindergarten on, every student, from the start, understands the main idea of what is heard or read. If preschoolers and kindergartners are offered substantial and coherent lessons concerning the human and natural worlds, then the results show up five years or so later in significantly improved verbal scores. By staying on a subject long enough to make all young children familiar with it (say, two weeks or so), the main idea becomes understood by all and word learning speeds up. This is especially important for low-income children, who come to school with smaller vocabularies and rely on school to pass on the knowledge base children from rich families take for granted.
Current reform strategies focus on testing, improving teacher quality, and other changes. Attention to these structural issues has led to improvements in the best public schools. But it is not enough.
1. The drop in verbal scores on the SAT is worrisome because ________.A.it will lead to a short supply of talents in the labor market |
B.it reveals young people’s negative attitude towards verbal study |
C.it shows the schools’ inability to meet the national requirements |
D.students’ reading and writing ability affects their future development |
A.Children’s lack of language learning ability. |
B.Fewer courses on reading and writing in school. |
C.The shift of curricular focus from content to skills. |
D.Heavy pressure that numerous tests have resulted in. |
A.children should be trained to understand the content |
B.teachers should focus on one topic in language teaching |
C.children’s family background determines their verbal ability |
D.teachers should make everything understandable for students |
A.Mathew Effect in Language Learning |
B.How to Stop the Drop in Verbal Scores |
C.Try to Understand the Main Idea |
D.Don’t Overestimate Your Verbal Scores |
【推荐2】Many employees must be tempted to query on a daily basis when they see their bosses headed down the wrong track. But caution, for fear of appearing insubordinate or foolish and thus possibly at risk of losing their jobs, often leads workers to keep silent.
A culture of silence can be dangerous, argues a new book, “The Fearless Organization”, by Amy Edmondson, a professor at Harvard Business School. Some of her examples are from the airline industry. One was its deadliest accident: a crash between Boeing 747s in the Canary Islands in 1977 when a co-pilot felt unable to query his captain’s decision to take off based on a misunderstanding of instructions from air-traffic control.
The risks may be lower than life or death in most organizations, but companies also suffer when people keep silent, Ms Edmondson believes. Volkswagen was caught up in a scandal(丑闻) over diesel(柴油)emissions from 2015. The engines of its diesel models did not meet American emissions standards and engineers devised a system to fool the regulators. Ms Edmondson says the company’s culture had been one based on threaten and fear; Ferdinand Piëch, its longtime boss, boasted of telling engineers they had six weeks to improve the bodywork fitting on pain of dismissal. In the circumstances, engineers were understandably unwilling to mention the bad news on emissions standards and instead worked around the problem. In a corporate culture based on fear and intimidation, it may appear that targets are being achieved in the short term. But in the long run the effect is likely to be counterproductive. Studies show that fear inhibits learning. And when confronted with a problem, scared workers find ways of covering it up or getting around it with inefficient practices.
The answer is to create an atmosphere of “psychological safety” whereby workers can speak their minds. In a sense, this is the equivalent of Toyota’s “lean manufacturing” process, which allows any worker who spots a problem to stop the production line. This does not mean that workers, or their ideas, are immune from criticism, or that they should complain incessantly.
As mundane(平凡的)tasks are automated, and workers rely on computers for data analysis, the added value of humans will stem from their creativity. But as Ms Edmondson’s book amply demonstrates, it is hard to be either constructive or creative if you are not confident about speaking out.
1. The underlined word “insubordinate” means .A.being inferior | B.disobeying a superior |
C.getting aggressive | D.being ignorant |
A.Volkswagen’s engineers designed a system to meet American emissions standards |
B.when facing problems, scared workers resolve them directly |
C.Volkswagen’s engineers were at risk of losing jobs |
D.the culture of fear and intimidation must be counterproductive in the long term. |
A.A culture of being silent can be life-threatening. |
B.The risk of keeping silent is not necessarily associated with life and death. |
C.Volkswagen’s culture is on the basis of fear. |
D.The value of humans lies in originality in today’s highly-automated world. |
A.An introduction to Amy Edmondson’s new book. |
B.The disadvantages of fear and intimidation culture. |
C.Companies will perform better if employees are not threatened into silence. |
D.People need to be confident when they are speaking out. |
【推荐3】Large gatherings such as weddings and conferences can be socially overwhelming. Pressure to learn people’s names only adds to the stress. A new facial-recognition app could come to the rescue, but privacy experts recommend proceeding with caution.
The app, called SocialRecall, connects names with faces via smartphone cameras and facial recognition, potentially avoiding the need for formal introductions. “It breaks down these social barriers we have when meeting somebody,” says Barry Sandrew, who created the app.
After receiving an invitation to download SocialRecall from an event organizer, the user is asked to take two selfies and sign in via social media. At the event, the app is active within a previously defined geographical area. When a user points his or her phone camera at an attendee’s face, the app identifies the individual, displays the person’s name, and links to his or her social media profile. To protect privacy, it recognizes only those who have agreed to participate and automatically deletes users’ data after an event.
Ann Cavoukian, a privacy expert who runs the Privacy by Design Center of Excellence praises the app’s creators for these protective measures. She cautions, however, that when people choose to share their personal information with the app, they should know that “there may be unintended consequences down the road with that information being used in another context that might come back to bite you.”
The start-up has also developed a version of the app for individuals who suffer from prosopagnosia, or “face blindness,” a condition that prevents people from recognizing individuals they have met. To use this app, a person first acquires an image of someone’s face, from either the smartphone’s camera or a photograph, and then tags it with a name. When the camera spots that same face in real life, the previously entered information is displayed. The collected data are stored only on a user’s phone, according to the team behind the app.
1. Why was SocialRecall developed?A.To identify people. | B.To meet friends. | C.To organize events. | D.To take photos. |
A.How the app was created. | B.What makes the app popular. |
C.How the app functions. | D.What people can do with the app. |
A.By giving names to the photos kept in their smartphones. |
B.By collecting information previously entered in the phone. |
C.By providing the information of a person when they first meet. |
D.By showing the person’s information when it spots a stored face. |
A.It may put people’s privacy at risk. | B.It has caused unintended consequences. |
C.It can prevent some communication disorders. | D.It’s praised by users for its protective measures. |