Xing suggested the government give out 1,000 Yuan to each Chinese since the government income has increased rapidly in recent years. He said his suggestion would allow everyone to directly enjoy the fruits of the country’s economic success, help the lower-income groups deal with rising prices and increase consumption (消费) around the country.
Recent years have seen the government carry out a series of pro-poor (扶贫) and pro-rural (惠农) policies, including increasing spending on public healthcare and calling off the agricultural tax. But the lower-income group still needs more help while being hit hard by an 11-year high in prices and recent snowstorms.
Xing said while making the draft, he has borrowed many ideas from practices in countries like the United States and Singapore. Earlier this year, the governments of the two nations offered cash handouts (救济) to their citizens as the result of a surplus in government income. As for in China, “We can even encourage the rich to donate their 1,000 Yuan red packet to the poor,” said Xing.
Although Xing’s suggestion has gained wide support among ordinary Chinese on the Internet, many other economists criticized it as unpractical. Even Xing himself admitted he made the suggestion without any careful calculation. But they agreed with Xing's point that the growing economic pie should be shared among the people.
“To better use the increase of money, handing out money is not a solution that holds good for all time. It could be better to improve the public service or cut the price of energy use in daily life,” said Qiao Xinsheng, an economic professor.
1. Xing Pu suggested that the government give out 1,000 Yuan to each Chinese because ____.
A.the poor should get help from the rich |
B.the government should help the rich |
C.the growing economic pie should be shared among the people |
D.the government doesn’t know how to use the money |
A.Spending less on public health care. |
B.Increasing the agricultural tax. |
C.Handing out money to every Chinese. |
D.Carrying out pro-poor policies. |
A.Supplying food to everyone every day. |
B.Cutting the price of energy use in daily life. |
C.Controlling the rising of prices. |
D.Increasing the government income. |
A.children receiving red packets from their families |
B.the US and Singapore governments offering cash handouts to their citizens |
C.the government’s increasing spending on public health care |
D.the rising prices in the country |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】What Really Drives You Crazy About Waiting in Line
Have you ever noticed the two main lines you encounter in daily life? Some businesses have many parallel lines that consumers have to choose from. Others have one long, serpentine line that everyone waits in, and when you reach the front of the line you are served by the next available register.
The systems each have advantages and disadvantages. The biggest obstacle to adopting the serpentine line is that you need floor space where the line can form, meaning it doesn’t work in all store designs. Often, the lines will snake around the entire store, blocking customers’ access to the shelves. Special line manager or automatic system is required for organization.
What about the time each line takes? According to Larson, the wait time is about the same. However, the variance is larger for the parallel line system than for the single serpentine line.
In practice, the system of many parallel lines also gives rise to inefficiencies — like when customers don’t notice that one checkout counter is open — which slows down service. “So, the many-line system can never have a mean queue time less than that of a single-line system,” Larson says.
Researchers argue that the serpentine line has more advantages. Namely, it seems socially fairer, because customers who arrive first are always served first. Because people waiting in line often value fairness more than efficiency, studies have shown that serpentine lines make customers happier than parallel lines, regardless of the wait time.
That guarantee of fairness eliminates a lot of stress and anxiety. You might not think about it much, but a system of many parallel lines, like at a grocery store checkout or toll booths, can be very anxiety provoking. There’s the stress of choosing the shortest line, and then there’s the possibility that, for unforeseen reasons, your line will grind to a halt. You can analyze the contents of people’s carts all you want, but the person in front of you may still pull out an envelope stuffed with coupons or a giant bag of pennies.
These lines are what Larson calls “slips and skips”, where people who enter the line first watch those who arrived later overtake them. He says these generate anxiety and uncertainty, and “the victim experiences more psychological loss than the perpetrator (犯罪者) enjoys benefit.”
When people later were given a choice of which line to repeat, a significant majority chose the latter one. Even though it lasted for a longer duration and clearly included more pain overall than the first one, people preferred it because it had a relatively better ending. So we can conclude that the duration of the experience doesn’t matter that much to people — what matters is the discomfort at the worst and final moments.
1. What does the underlined sentence in Paragraph 3 mean?A.Customers could be served very quickly, or have a very long delay. |
B.Customers may meet with many unavoidable accidents. |
C.There are a lot of variants contributing to the wait time. |
D.There are no difference between the two types of lines. |
A.Happy people will choose single-line systems rather than many-line ones. |
B.Regardless of the wait time, people will choose serpentine lines. |
C.Even choosing the shortest line, people may encounter unforeseen factors. |
D.Parallel lines eliminate the actual existence of fairness. |
A.People switch to waiting in serpentine lines. | B.People want to use up all their coupons. |
C.People start to analyze the items in carts. | D.People arrive later but checks out earlier. |
A.People’s feeling of queuing is a matter of perspective. |
B.The merits and shortcomings of waiting in line. |
C.People should avoid the bad habits of queuing. |
D.There are possible solutions to the craze of queuing. |
【推荐2】Nothing is “new and improved” anymore. It's all about the plus.
“Something exciting is happening in March,” flowed out an email from CBS All Access, alerting subscribers that the streaming service is being renamed Paramount + . The company seeks to keep pace with Apple TV+, ESPN +, Disney +, BET +, AMC + and others.
Video services didn't start this. The Apple II + came out in 1979 and Crest + toothpaste in 2002, But TV streaming companies now apparently must be branded plus, for fear that consumers perceive their offerings as a minus. Much of this has to do with justifying a monthly charge for television-which used to be free. A more complete name would be “Paramount + a Bill.”
Hulu used to have a "plus" service, which was a misnomer since what customers got with it was the absence of ads. "We've had fun with our old friend Plus, the company explained in a 2015 email, “but it's time to move on. We just wanted to let you know that we are retiring the Hulu Plus name. From now on, we will just be known as Hulu. No Plus.
Yet other streaming services have been drawn to the plus, thanks in large part to the success of Disney+, which added 86 million subscribers during its first year. Disney also operates ESPN + and , outside the U. S. ,Star + .
A funny thing about marketing: A plus is always a plus but a minus is never a minus—even though more products are notable for what they cut down. Budweiser wouldn't call its lower- calorie beer Bud-. There are fat-free potato chips and cookies, but Pringles- or Oreos- is abandoned.
Americans have a fondness for plus-size portions, plus-size clothing and media that have plus signs in their names. Mercifully, the plus thing hasn't yet reached more important aspects of our lives.
1. What does the underlined word "this" in paragraph 3 refer to?A.Apple service. | B.Video service. | C.Plus service. | D.Streaming service. |
A.Hulu has no ads put in. | B.Hulu no longer follows suit. |
C.Hulu suffered a great loss. | D.Hulu cheated its subscribers. |
A.To avoid misunderstandings | B.To improve the beer's quality. |
C.To keep pace with other companies. | D.To protect the consumers' interests. |
A.Objective. | B.Critical. | C.Tolerant. | D.Skeptical. |
【推荐3】In modern society there is a great deal of argument about competition. Some value it highly, believing that it is responsible for social progress and prosperity. Others say that competition is bad; that it sets one person against another; that it leads to unfriendly relationship between people.
I have taught many children who held the belief that their self-worth relied on how well they performed at tennis and other skills. For them, playing well and winning are often life-and-death affairs. In their single-minded pursuit of success, the development of many other human qualities is sadly forgotten.
However, while some seem to be lost in the desire to succeed, others take an opposite attitude. In a culture which values only the winner and pays no attention to the ordinary players, they strongly blame competition. Among the most vocal are youngsters who have suffered under competitive pressure from their parents or society. Teaching these young people, I often observe in them a desire to fail. They seem to seek failure by not trying to win or achieve success. By not trying, they always have an excuse: “I may have lost, but it doesn’t matter, because I didn’t try.” What is not usually admitted by themselves is the belief that if they had really tried and lost, that would mean a lot. Such a loss would be a measure of their worth. Clearly, this belief is the same as that of the true competitors who try to prove themselves. Both are based on the mistaken belief that one’s self-respect relies on how well one performs in comparison with others. Both are afraid of not being valued. Only as this basic and often troublesome fear begins to dissolve can we discover a new meaning in competition.
1. What does this passage mainly talk about?A.Competition helps to set up self-respect. |
B.Competition is harmful to personal quality development. |
C.Failures are necessary experiences in competition. |
D.Opinions about competition are different among people. |
A.Those who are against competition most strongly. |
B.Those who try their best to win. |
C.Those who value competition most highly. |
D.Those who rely on others most for success. |
A.One’s success in competition needs great efforts. |
B.One’s worth lies in his performance compared with others’. |
C.One’s success is based on how hard he has tried. |
D.One’s achievement is determined by his particular skills. |
A.Every effort should be paid back. |
B.Winning should be a life-and-death matter. |
C.Fear of failure should be removed in competition. |
D.Competition should be encouraged. |
【推荐1】On October 24, 1929 — “Black Thursday” — a wave of panic selling of stocks (股票) swept the New York Stock Exchange. The Great Depression began. By 1932, thousands of banks and businesses had failed. Industrial production was cut in half, farm income had fallen by more than half, wages had decreased 60 percent, new investment was down 90 percent and one out of every four workers was unemployed.
The Republican president, Herbert Hoover was unable to take measures to deal with the economic collapse. So in the 1932 election, he was defeated by Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt, who promised “a New Deal for the American people”.
Within the “Hundred Days”, Roosevelt rushed through Congress a number of laws to aid the recovery of the economy. The Civilian Conservation Corps put young men to work in reforestation (重新造林) and flood.
The Federal Emergency Relief Administration aided state and local relief funds. The Agricultural Adjustment Administration paid farmers to reduce production, thus raising crop prices. The Tennessee Valley Authority built a network of dams in the Tennessee River area to generate electricity and control floods. The National Recovery Administration regulated fair competition among businesses and minimum wages for workers.
The Work Progress Administration (WPA) was one of the most effective of the New Deal measures. Financed by taxes collected by the federal government, the WPA created millions of jobs by undertaking the construction of roads, bridges, airports and other public buildings. It kept workers in the job, thus preserving their skills and their self-respect. The New Deal programs did not end the Depression. But the economy improved as a result of this program of government intervention (介入).
1. According to the passage, “Black Thursday” refers to the day when _______.A.the New York Stock Exchange was shut | B.industrial production decreased |
C.the New Deal was issued | D.the Great Depression began |
A.to deal with economic problems |
B.to help state and local relief funds |
C.to aid the workers to finish their stock selling |
D.to make young people plant trees and build dams |
A.it provided workers jobs of building roads and airports |
B.it preserved workers’ skill and self-respect |
C.it provided financial aids to workers |
D.it ensured workers’ minimum wages |
A.The Agricultural Adjustment Administration paid farmers to reduce crop prices. |
B.The Work Progress Administration is the most effective Administration in the US. |
C.The Depression was not ended just by the New Deal programs. |
D.President Herbert Hoover failed in carrying out the New Deal for the American people. |
【推荐2】One of the executives gathered at the Aspen Institute for a day-long leadership workshop using the works of Shakespeare was discussing the role of Brutus in the death of Julius Caesar. “Brutus was not an honorable man,” he said. “He was a traitor(叛徒). And he murdered someone in cold blood.” The agreement was that Brutus had acted with cruelty when other options were available to him. He made a bad decision, they said—at least as it was presented by Shakespeare—to take the lead in murdering Julius Caesar. And though one of the executives acknowledged that Brutus had the good of the republic in mind, Caesar was nevertheless his superior. “You have to endeavor,” the executives said, “our policy is to obey the chain of command.”
During the last few years, business executives and book writers looking for a new way to advise corporate America have been exploiting Shakespeare’s wisdom for profitable ends. None more so than husband and wife team Kenneth and Carol Adelman, well-known advisers to the White House, who started up a training company called “Movers and Shakespeares”. They are amateur Shakespeare scholars and Shakespeare lovers, and they have combined their passion and their high level contacts into a management training business. They conduct between 30 and 40 workshops annually, focusing on half a dozen different plays, mostly for corporations, but also for government agencies.
The workshops all take the same form, focusing on a single play as a kind of case study, and using individual scenes as specific lessons. In Julius Caesar , sly provocation(狡诈的挑唆) of Brutus to take up arms against the what was a basis for a discussion of methods of team building and grass roots organism.
Although neither of the Adelmans is academically trained in literature, the programmes, contain plenty of Shakespeare tradition and background. Their workshop on Henry V, for example, includes a helpful explanation of Henry’s winning strategy at the Battle of Agincourt. But they do come to the text with a few biases (偏向): their reading of Henry V minimizes his misuse of power. Instead, they emphasize the story of the youth who seizes opportunity and becomes a masterful leader. And at the workshop on Caesar, Mr. Adelmans had little good to say about Brutus, saying “the noblest Roman of them all” couldn’t make his mind up about things.
Many of the participants pointed to very specific elements in the play that they felt related Caesar’s pride, which led to his murder, and Brutus’s mistakes in leading the after the murder, they said, raise vital questions for anyone serving as a business when and ho w do you resist the boss?
1. According to paragraph 1, what did all the executives think of Brutus?A.Cruel. | B.Superior. |
C.Honorable. | D.Bade |
A.help executives to understand Shakespeare’s plays better |
B.give advice on leadership by analyzing Shakespeare’s plays |
C.provide case studies of Shakespeare’s plays in literature workshops |
D.guide government agencies to follow the characters in Shakespeare’s plays. |
A.To highlight the importance of catching opportunities. |
B.To encourage masterful leaders to plan strategies to win. |
C.To illustrate the harm of prejudices in management. |
D.To warn executives against power misuse. |
A.the Adelmans’ programme proves biased as the roles of characters are maximized. |
B.executives feel bored with too many specific elements of Shakespeare’s plays. |
C.the Adelmans will make more profits if they are professional scholars. |
D.Shakespeare has played an important role in the management field. |
A.Shakespeare’s plays: Executives reconsider corporate culture |
B.Shakespeare’s plays: An essential key to business success |
C.Shakespeare’s plays: a lesson for business motivation |
D.Shakespeare’s plays: Dramatic training brings dramatic results |
【推荐3】BEIJING Oct.16 (Friday) (Xinhua)—The Chinese government will enact (将……制成法律) more support policies to lift the country’s 70 million poor people above the poverty line by 2020, President Xi Jinping pledged (保证) on Friday ahead of the 23rd International Day for the Eradication (根除) of Poverty.
Addressing the Global Poverty Reduction and Development Forum (论坛) in Beijing, Xi said China will work to fight the hard battle against poverty. In his speech, Xi drew on his personal experience in the 1960s working as a farmer in a small village in northwestern Shaanxi Province, where he was struck by the poor living conditions in rural China. But over the past several decades, China has made remarkable progress in poverty relief.
China has lifted more than 600 million people out of poverty in the past 30 years, accounting for about 70 percent of those brought out of poverty worldwide. It was the first developing country to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) target of reducing the population living in poverty by half ahead of the 2015 deadline. “Despite the achievements, China remains the world’s biggest developing country, and narrowing the urban-rural gap remains a big challenge for us,” Xi said.
As of the end of 2014, China still had 70.17 million people in the countryside living below the country’s poverty line of 2,300 yuan (376 U. S. dollars) in annual income by 2010 price standards. The president said poverty alleviation will be a major part of China’s post-2015 agenda. While striving to reduce poverty at home, China has also actively supported the cause in other developing countries. Over the past 60 years, China has provided 166 countries and international organizations with nearly 400 billion yuan in assistance.
China has also announced seven times it would exempt (免除), without any conditions, the matured inter-governmental interest free loans owned by heavily-indebted poor countries and least developed countries. At a United Nations summit last month the goal of eliminating poverty in 15 years was laid out and China pledged an initial 2 billion U.S. dollars to establish an assistance fund to help developing nations fight poverty.
In a video message for Friday’s Forum, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon (潘基文) praised China’s remarkable achievements in poverty alleviation, saying the UN welcomes those significant and generous proposals from President Xi and looks forward to further progress with an indispensable partnership with China.
Saturday also marks China’s second National Poverty Relief Day.
1. Which of the following statements is NOT true according to the passage?A.President Xi once worked as a farmer in a small village. |
B.China has made great contributions to poverty relief in the past decades. |
C.China has announced to exempt loans owned by heavily-indebted poor countries and developed countries. |
D.The UN thinks highly of China’s extraordinary achievements in poverty relief. |
A.relief | B.line |
C.reform | D.rise |
A.a magazine | B.a newspaper |
C.a research paper | D.a brochure |
【推荐1】A couple, Jake Williams and Charlotte Sinclair, were absolutely done with the long isolation (隔离), following a few years of COVID-19, and then they decided to launch (发起) a community plan. They started Talk the Walk and managed to make people get together, explore London on foot, and get to know each other.
The number one mission was to have fun — even if only a few people showed up for the free events. That’s what they expected when they started on Meetup.com. Suddenly they were getting hundreds of people responding with excitement.
200-300 people of various ages now regularly attend each event, which opens with the playing of icebreaker games. The couple designed the games to be easy for shy people, too, with “fun questions” breaking the nervousness. They picked interesting places to visit. Attendees were even surprised with an offer of chocolate.
“I’ve done some crazy things in my time working from home to stop loneliness, like dog sitting for people and joining gyms just so I can have more conversations with people,” Jake said.
“I think that it’s hugely impactful for people who have been affected by COVID-19, by being forced to work from home and having that isolation,” he continued.
They’ve seen older people talking with younger people, and people becoming friends — so much so that the strangers are now meeting on their own after becoming familiar.
Talk the Walk organised their last event last year, but said they’ll be back once it starts to warm up again.
Nearly 2,000 members in their Meetup community and followers on their Facebook Page are waiting for that day, but at the same time, this young couple might serve as your very own inspiration to connect people in your own communities.
1. What is the couple’s purpose in starting Talk the Walk?A.To reduce the effect brought by COVID-19. |
B.To encourage people to do physical exercise. |
C.To find interesting activities in and around London. |
D.To end loneliness and bring communities back together. |
A.By giving attendees amazing presents. |
B.By arranging easy games and activities. |
C.By making the organised events enjoyable. |
D.By choosing famous destinations to explore. |
A.Talk the Walk is really needed. |
B.New events will take place in no time. |
C.Talk the Walk is popular with young people. |
D.The couple moved people in the community. |
A.Be active to get in touch with people |
B.Take part in events after the long isolation |
C.Couple answers loneliness with organised walks |
D.Thousands of people show up for interesting events |
【推荐2】Russia's first and only police corgi(柯基犬) has announced his retirement from the force, ending his career of one of Russia's smallest officers. Officer Ryzhiy ("Ginger" in English), 9, worked with the Nizhny Novgorod transport police for seven and a half years, sniffing out illegal drugs, weapons and substances that are able or likely to cause an explosion.
Recently, the short-legged corgi made its name and became a local star after his trainers created a social media account for him last summer. He now has more than 15,000 followers. His resignation was submitted to the local Interior Ministry over the last weekend. "Now, my friends, I am a real pensioner!" reads a post announcing his retirement. The account will now update Ryzhiy's followers on "the everyday life of a retired police dog" as well as the work of his former dog colleagues. "I plan to play sports as often as I did before. And maybe I will even try to learn new things, for example, dancing," the dog's account wrote. Ryzhiy's partner, a Belgian Sheepdog named Ziger, will soon be joined by a new four-legged companion.
Ryzhiy initially joined the police force by accident. His owner, also a police officer, brought him to work one day when the traffic police didn't have enough dogs on hand. He quickly adapted to the task and earned a full-time job as a result.
Corgis are well suited to working as police sniffing dogs but are too expensive for most police budgets, said a Russian corgi trainer. As a result, it remains unlikely that Russia will see any other corgi officers joining the ranks of its police.
1. How did Ryzhiy help the police?A.By searching for the criminals. | B.By discovering prohibited things. |
C.By helping keep traffic orderly. | D.By protecting them from danger. |
A.Ryzhiy. | B.Ziger. |
C.The trainers. | D.The police. |
A.He was probably once a pet dog. |
B.He devoted his whole life to his job. |
C.He had no companions while working. |
D.He was highly adaptable to emergencies. |
A.Police Corgis Are Rare in Russia |
B.Corgis Are Considered the Best Police Dogs |
C.A Russian Corgi Makes His Name Online |
D.Russia's First Police Corgi Goes into Retirement |
【推荐3】Want to help fight global warming? Take off your tie, says the Italian health ministry. It has urged employers to let their staff dress casually at work in the summer so that the air conditioning can be turned down.
“Taking your tie off immediately lowers the body temperature by 2 or 3 degrees centigrade,” the ministry said in a statement. “Allowing a more sensible use of air conditioning brings about electricity savings and protects the environment.”
It called on all public and private offices to let employees wear no tie during heatwaves like the one that has brought Africa-like temperatures to many parts of Italy this week.
The move reacts to a similar action from Italy’s biggest oil group, ENI, which told its staff earlier this month they need not wear a tie at work. The tie makers, however, were left hot under the collar.
“Italy confirms (证实) that it is a strange country,” Flavio Cima said angrily in a letter to financial daily IL Sole~24ORE under the headline: “I, tie maker, am responsible for global warming.”
“We can now happily continue with our lifestyle, using cars, consuming fuel, heating and cooling our homes at leisure. On one condition: we should not wear a tie while we do so,” he wrote.
“I should have listened to my friends and become an oil producer instead.”
Italy is one of the European Union’s worst performers on the pollution front and is among the EU countries expected to exceed (超出) their greenhouse gas emission (排放) targets.
1. What’s the purpose of the move of taking off ties?A.To dress casually. | B.To fight global warming. |
C.To keep the body temperature. | D.To improve working conditions. |
A.ENI. | B.Flavio Cima. |
C.A financial daily. | D.The Italian health ministry. |
A.Angry. | B.Speechless. |
C.Delighted. | D.Puzzled. |
A.He stands by the oil group. | B.He agrees with the ministry. |
C.He admits his responsibility. | D.He argues against taking off ties. |