组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.94 引用次数:875 题号:289903

Influenced by their families and society, many youths are infatuated with expensive famous brands. But not every youth is as rich as a millionaire and people are getting worried about this.

According to a recent survey, one out of five pupils wears clothes of well-known brands, including a belt worth 560 Yuan, more than an ordinary worker’s salary. Among the 100 middle school students surveyed, as many as 70 own famous-brand clothes, 60 have famous-brand watches and 45 possess famous-brand bicycles. Two of them even wear over 1500 Yuan worth of suits.

Most young people who come from ordinary families will try to steal money to have better food and clothing if their parents don’t satisfy their needs. A boy named Chen even killed another boy simply for 500 Yuan and was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment.

People wonder how these teenagers can be independent in the future, while parents are calling for help from schools, governments and the society.

1. Which of the following is not true according to the passage?
A.More than 50 percent of the students surveyed possess things of famous brands.
B.An ordinary worker owns less than 560 Yuan each month.
C.Suits may cost as much as 1500 Yuan.
D.Young people now are as rich as millionaires.
2. What does “be infatuated with” mean according to the context?
A.be anxious about
B.be filled with a strong unreasonable feeling of love for
C.have a strange and unusual way of
D.be low in spirits; sad for
3. As a result, the boy mentioned in the passage will____.
A.steal money for better food and clothing
B.kill another boy for 500 Yuan
C.stay in prison for nine years
D.ask his parents to satisfy his needs
4. The best title for the passage would be____.
A.Youths Run After Famous Brands.
B.Youths Should Own More Money
C.Youths As Rich As Millionaires
D.Youths Must Be Taken Good Care of
9-10高二下·辽宁铁岭·阶段练习 查看更多[1]

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 容易 (0.94)

【推荐1】A single cigarette sold on a street corner may not cost a lot; however, the whole costs of smoking are huge.

First, consider the cost of human life. The World Health Organization says about 10 people die of a tobacco-related disease every minute. That speed adds up to almost six million people dying of such diseases every year.

Most of these preventable(可预防的)deaths happen in low-income and middle-income countries. The World Bank says each of these countries has a total national income(收入)of less than $12,746.

The World Health Organization says tobacco kills 6 million people yearly — a number that is expected to rise to 8 million by 2030 unless immediate action is taken.

For most people, stopping smoking is hard. Many began smoking as teenagers. They are used to it. Also, tobacco contains the powerful drug nicotine.

Studies show people who want to stop smoking can do so with different treatments. Some get help from electronic cigarettes, medicine or nicotine patches that reduce their desire for the drug.

But smoking costs more than the life of a person. It can affect the health of the whole country. The World Health Organization says low-income countries depend heavily on taxes from cigarettes. They use the money, in part, to pay the costs of health care for tobacco-related diseases.

But the illegal trade in tobacco products is further testing the economies of low-income countries. WHO officials say the illegal trade earns about $31 billion every year.

Douglas Bettcher is the director of the WHO’s Department for the Prevention of Non-communicable Diseases. He calls the illegal trade a monster with many heads. He says the trade enables young people to buy cigarettes at low prices, become addicted to tobacco and suffer from serious health problems. It also increases crime and reduces taxes.

The World Health Organization is strongly suggesting that the United Nations member states sign an agreement to end the illegal trade in tobacco products. Eight countries have agreed to the agreement. But the agreement of 32 other countries is still needed for it to become an international law.

1. According to the passage, people dying of a tobacco-related disease are mostly from ______.
A.developed countriesB.high-income countries
C.less developed countriesD.the United Nations
2. Which of the following about the whole costs of smoking is NOT mentioned in the passage?
A.Destroying the environment.B.Being bad to human life.
C.Affecting the whole country’s economy.D.Causing the illegal trade.
3. What’s the main idea of the last but one paragraph?
A.Some action has been taken by the WHO.
B.The harm of the illegal trade in tobacco products.
C.Young people who are addicted to smoking may commit a crime.
D.An agreement to end the illegal trade in tobacco products is being signed.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the passage?
A.Smoking Costs More than You Think
B.Different Ways to Stop Smoking
C.The Illegal Trade in Tobacco Products
D.Immediate Action to Stop Smoking
2019-12-30更新 | 118次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 容易 (0.94)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇议论文。主要探讨财富与幸福相关的话题。富裕国家更幸福的观点似乎是显而易见的,然而,在1974年,经济学家理查德·伊斯特林研究发现情况并非如此,生活满意度的确会随着人均收入的增加而提高,但这只是在短期内。2013年,社会学家Ruut Veenhoven的分析表明,经济增长与幸福之间存在正相关关系。同时根据心理学家Selin Kesebir的说法,幸福还取决于您的收入与周围人的比较。他们认为,只有财富平均分配,一个国家的经济增长才能使其公民更加幸福。作者认为我们应该少关注我们有多少钱,多关注我们如何使用它。

【推荐2】The idea that richer countries are happier may seem obvious. However, in 1974, research by economist Richard Easterlin found otherwise. He discovered that while individuals with higher incomes were more likely to be happy, this did not hold at a national level. In the United States, for example, average income per person rose steadily between 1946 and 1970, but reported happiness levels showed no positive long-term trend; in fact, they declined between 1060 and 1970. These differences between nation-level and individual results gave rise to the term “Easterlin paradox”: the idea that a higher rate of economic growth does not result in higher long-term happiness.

Recent research has challenged the Easternlin paradox, however. In 2013, sociologists Ruut Veenhoven conducted a study using statistics from the World Database of Happiness. Their analysis revealed a positive correlation between economic growth and happiness. Another study found that there is no maximum wealth threshold at which more money ceases to bring you happiness: “If there is a satiation point, we are yet to reach it.” The study’s findings suggested that every extra dollar you earn makes you happier.

According to psychologists Selin Kesebir, happiness also depends on how your income compares to the people around you. They argue that a country’s economic growth only makes its citizens happier if wealth is evenly distributed. In emerging countries with high income inequality—where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer—average happiness tends to drop because only relatively few people benefit from the economic prosperity. This suggests that governments should consider implementing policies to ensure equal distribution of wealth. The happier people are, the more productive they are likely to become, thus leading to improved economic outcomes at the individual and national levels.

There is continuing debate about the link between wealth and happiness, with arguments both for and against the notion that richer countries are happier. However, it is clear that wealth alone isn’t enough to make us happy. The effect of income inequality on happiness shows that happiness is a social responsibility. We need to remember the positive effects of generosity and building social connections. Perhaps our focus should be less on how much money we have, and more on how we use it.

1. According to the passage, Easterlin Paradox refers to ________.
A.The fact that the more money people have, the happier they will feel
B.The suggestion that money should be given the top priority
C.The question how economic outcomes are distributed nationwide
D.The opinion that higher income doesn’t necessarily bring happiness
2. The word “satiation” in paragraph 2 is closest in meaning to “________”.
A.satisfactionB.controversialC.centralD.sensitive
3. What is the major reason for people’s unhappiness related to money?
A.Money not enough.B.Money not fairly distributed.
C.Money not legally earned.D.Money not properly used.
4. Which of the following might be the best title of this passage?
A.What brings happinessB.Easternlin paradox
C.Wealth and HappinessD.Rising income, rising happiness
2023-11-09更新 | 52次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约420词) | 容易 (0.94)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇议论文。文章主要讲述了新冠过后,学生旷课率大幅度上升,并分析了原因。

【推荐3】The COVID-19 pandemic began in late 2019 and for the best part of two years, children were forced to learn at home, staring at computers. As they start the 2023-24 school year, a terrifying proportion still seem barely to be back.

According to a study published in early August, in the 2021-22 academic year 28% of schoolchildren missed at least three and a half weeks of school. The study, conducted by Thomas Dee, an education professor at Stanford University, found that “chronic (长期的) absenteeism”, defined as when a pupil misses 10% of the school year, almost doubled overall between 2018-19 and 2021-22. In Alaska, nearly half of all pupils missed enough school to be counted.

Explaining this is tricky. Students skip school for many reasons: lack of transport, poverty, the weather. But these are unlikely to have worsened recently. A more reasonable explanation for the lasting rise is that, having experienced remote learning, some students — and perhaps their parents — no longer think it necessary or even worthwhile to sit in a classroom. “It’s the same thing as in the workplace,” says a teacher in New Orleans. “Once you’ve gone down to only being there two or three days a week, coming back all five is hard.”

Attending school in person is important. Studies show that children who skip more school get significantly worse grades. One published by the Institute of Labour Economics by three American academics found that missing ten maths classes reduced the chance of a high school student graduating on time by 8%. Schools also connect pupils to important services. In Baltimore, schoolchildren can get free meals or be fitted for glasses through school, and their parents can be hooked up with social services. Educators can also spot if a child is being ill-treated or neglected. Pupils develop social skills in school, take part in after-school programmes and learn sports.

There are few easy fixes, though some look for them. Chicago Collegiate is encouraging attendance by giving pupils individual rewards and by holding class pizza parties. In Baltimore, Mayor Brandon Scott plans to award the school with the most improved attendance rate. Most teachers, however, are simply trying to adapt. “Our youngsters, the competition for their attention has never been more difficult,” sighs a teacher in a New York City middle school. The challenge, he says, is to “attract kids to school”.

1. What’s the real reason for the rise in chronic absenteeism after the pandemic?
A.Economic challenges.B.Worsening transportation.
C.Online learning experience.D.Irresponsible school teachers.
2. Which of the following is NOT the benefit of attending school in person?
A.It lowers the risk of falling ill.
B.It improves academic performance.
C.It offers access to important services.
D.It promotes the development of social skills.
3. What does the underlined word “fixes” in Paragraph 5 mean?
A.Effects.B.Origins.C.Responses.D.Solutions.
4. What is the main idea of the passage?
A.Various measures have been taken to improve school attendance.
B.In-person attendance at school is beneficial to students’ development.
C.Chronic absenteeism in schools saw a significant rise after the pandemic.
D.Online learning is gaining in popularity among students and parents.
2023-11-17更新 | 89次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般