组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 自然 > 人与动植物
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:140 题号:3348648
“Aw, isn't it cute?”
That, right there, is the officially accepted response to any animal contact(接触) the world over. Animals are cute. They're there to be photographed, loved, and occasionally fed. But you know what? Not all animals are cute, or lovely, or even nice. Some of them are a real pain in the neck.
When you travel, you come into contact with all sorts of animals you’ve never heard of before. Some of them are amazing creatures that you'll talk about for the rest of your life. Some of them are just annoying. So, at the risk of causing anger among animal lovers around the world, here are some of the world's most annoying animals.
Vervet monkeys, South Africa
You'll immediately notice two things about Vervet monkeys: they have a bright blue bottom; and they'll steal any food that's not locked in a bank safe. I recently spent some time in South Africa, and watched as monkey after monkey dived in from the trees and stole everyone's food. Get your own food, Vervets! My sandwich was expensive!!
Kea parrots, New Zealand
I have never seen one of these birds before but from what I've been told they are more annoying than a spoilt kid. From biting the paint off your car doors to stealing people's passports, Keas are probably the most curious, and therefore annoying, animals in the world. And they're New Zealanders. That makes sense!
Kangaroos, Australia
Another well-known food-stealer, kangaroos are loved by tourists, eaten by Australians, and generally enjoy making trouble for others. Go on a camping trip anywhere in Australia, and watch how long your bags of food last. Turn your back for 15 minutes and the camp will look like thieves have turned the place upside down.
Grizzly bears, USA
They look pretty cute, grizzly bears. You almost want to go up and give them a hug. Unfortunately, it wouldn't end well. In fact, one of the world's most huggable creatures is also the one most likely to kill you just because it can. Oh, and it'll steal your picnic basket, too.
1. The author uses the underlined expression “pain in the neck” to suggest .
A.these animals may bite you on the neck
B.these animals can cause people a lot of trouble
C.people should be fearful of these animals
D.these animals may cause some serious illness
2. Which of the animals is the most dangerous according to the writer?
A.Vervet monkeys.B.Grizzly Bears.
C.Kangaroos.D.Kea Parrots.
3. Which of the following is not correct according to the passage?
A.When people see the cute animals they might take photographs of them.
B.Sometimes people will feed the cute animals.
C.Australians eat kangaroos.
D.Spoilt kids are not annoying at all.
【知识点】 人与动植物 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】Squirrels aren’t natural city dwellers(居民). In 1986 the sight of one in a tree near New York’s city hall so surprised passers-by that a newspaper published a report about the “unusual visitor”.

Around that time, the tree-dwelling animals were being set free in America’s urban areas to “create pockets of peace and calm like the countryside,” says University of Pennsylvania historian Etienne Benson, who studied our relationship to squirrels over the course of five years.

First, they were introduced to Philadelphia, then to New Haven, Boston, and New York City. Park visitors were encouraged to feed them, and security guards ensured their safety. In the 1910s a leader of the Boy Scouts of America(an organization teaching boys practical skills) said that teaching children to feed squirrels could show the rewards of treating a weaker creature with sympathy, says Benson.

By the early 20th century, though, America began to regret the friendliness it had shown squirrels. Cities had once been filled with animals—from horses pulling goods to dairy cows. By the 1950s those working animals had been moved to the countryside. Pets and wild animals such as birds and squirrels were all that remained of the urban animal kingdom.

Before long, people’s enthusiasm for squirrels wore off, and they started to see them as annoyances. By the 1970s many parks banned feeding the creatures. Today, it is rare to find kids with their parents offering food to squirrels under a tree. And, unfortunately, with more and more buildings being constructed in the city, fewer inhabitable(适宜栖息的) areas are left for the little tree-dwelling animals.

What would be lost if the last of these city dwellers were forced to leave? “I think there’s something constructive to have other living creatures in the city that are not humans and not pets but share the land with us,” says Benson. “It’s a good thing to live in a landscape where you see other creatures going around making lunch. It’s good for the soul.”

1. What’s the purpose of introducing squirrels to Philadelphia?
A.To entertain park visitors.B.To keep the natural balance.
C.To encourage kids to protect animals.D.To make the urban life more peaceful.
2. What was the Boy Scouts leader’s attitude towards feeding squirrels?
A.Disagreeable.B.Doubtful.
C.Supportive.D.Uncaring.
3. What might have happened to squirrels in cities around the 1960s?
A.They might have inhabited more homes.
B.They might have begun to go out of favor.
C.They might have been introduced to more cities.
D.They might have been moved to the countryside.
4. What does Benson suggest in the last paragraph?
A.Squirrels living in cities are annoying.
B.Feeding squirrels should be discouraged.
C.Squirrels should be allowed to live in cities.
D.It is possible for people to keep squirrels as pets.
2019-06-01更新 | 297次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约270词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇记叙文。主要介绍了Douglas Thron通过使用无人机来定位灾难中被困动物,从而实施救助的故事。

【推荐2】Animal rescuer and cinematographer Douglas Thron’s passion for animals began when he was a little kid and he started rescuing orphaned baby animals. When he grew up, he worked as a cinematographer for shows like Discovery Channel’s “Shark Wee”. But Thron said a fire in California “pushed” him to rescue animals, using his cinematography skills well.

At the time, Thron was working as a cinematographer filming a man who was rescuing cats after the fire using an infrared (使用红外线的) handheld camera. The camera uses heat to detect the animals at night. Thron and the man talked about how incredible it would be to put one on a drone (无人机) to detect animals easily. “The animals’ body temperature will flash on the screen and you can pick them out among the rubble (瓦砾),” explains Thron.

The first animal Thron ever rescued was a dog in the Bahamas after a category 5 hurricane hit there. Thron tested out putting an infrared scope on a drone and found the dog exactly in the middle of the huge rubble pile where hundreds of houses had been destroyed. “I flew the drone over and I found him. I was able to rescue him,” he says.

“My dream is to one day have a large animal rescue farm where I can train others on flying drones and make infrared drones as popular for rescuing animals as helicopters are for rescuing people after a disaster,” he says.

1. Which of the following best describes little Thron?
A.Lonely.B.Optimistic.C.Sympathetic.D.Generous.
2. What does the underlined word “one” in paragraph 2 refer to?
A.A heater.B.An infrared camera.
C.A flashlight.D.A temperature detector.
3. What can be inferred from the third paragraph?
A.The dog was reunited with its family.B.Douglas was injured during the rescue.
C.The Bahamas was hit by the strongest flood.D.Douglas’ infrared drone test was a success.
4. What can be inferred from the last paragraph?
A.Infrared drones in animal rescue will be popular.
B.More and more people are willing to fly drones.
C.Helicopters will be widely used in rescuing animals.
D.Infrared drones will replace helicopters in disaster relief.
2024-04-30更新 | 34次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。熊摩擦树木有多种原因:交流、清除毛发或搔痒。最新研究发现一个额外好处:熊在树皮上摩擦时,树干释放出焦油,它是有效的蜱虫驱逐剂。

【推荐3】There are many reasons bears rub (摩擦) against trees. Sometimes they use smells to leave messages on trees for other bears, at other times they remove hair and rub that hard-to-reach part. A new study uncovers an additional benefit: keeping ticks (蜱虫) at bay.

When bears rub against bark, the trunks of the trees they move back and forth against leak out tars (焦油), a kind of thick sticky liquid. The substances, which are extremely unpleasant for ticks, stick to skin, and are water-resistant, making them really suitable to be an effective natural medicine that can drive away ticks.

Biologists have observed that brown and black bears have affection for certain types of trees, such as beech trees. The appeal of the tar is so strong that scientists use its strong smells to attract bears for studies. To test the guessing that the tar is a tick-warding medicine, Biologist Agnieszka Sergiel found herself staring at long containers which the widespread ticks she caught were placed into. She watched to see if they would run away from the tar on one side and toward safe, plain water at the other end of the container. And run they did!

The study provided clear evidence that ticks were avoiding the tar, said Hannah Tiffin, a scientist specializing in ticks. “I think it’s an interesting route to go and could make sense,” she said. “Using natural medicines to war d insects off has been seen in the wild. Monkeys rub their skin with orange trees and dolphins may treat their skin with an undersea material. Your cat may even use some plant to keep insects away.”

Expanding the limited database of ticks found on bears will be one of the most important steps to improve this work, Sergiel noted. There’s still a lot to be learned about tar functioning as a medicine to war d off ticks. Collecting skin samples from different bears and testing ticks’ responses could also be useful, she added.

1. What is paragraph 2 mainly about?
A.Which trees produce sticky liquids.B.What substances from trees attract ticks.
C.Why bears coat their body with sticky liquid.D.How tree rubbing drives away ticks for bears.
2. What did Sergiel do in her experiment?
A.She attracted bears to a kind of trees.B.She studied the way ticks reached bears.
C.She observed ticks’ reaction to a special liquid.D.She compared effects of water and tar on ticks.
3. How does Hannah Tiffin prove the reliability of Sergiel’s findings?
A.By concluding the root cause.B.By citing other animals’ behaviors.
C.By referring to some other studies.D.By summarizing her previous findings.
4. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A.Responses of tested ticks vary.B.Collecting plentiful data is hard.
C.Further deep research is needed.D.More work is required to study bears.
2024-05-22更新 | 14次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般