However, parents often try to choose their children’s friends for them.Some parents may even stop their children from meeting their good friends.The question of “choice” is an interesting one.Have you ever thought of the following questions?
Who choose your friends?
Do you choose your friends or your friends choose you?
Have you got a good friend your parent don’t like?
1. Many teenagers think their _______ know them better than their parents do.
A.friends |
B.teachers |
C.brothers and sisters |
D.classmates |
A.go to their friends |
B.talk with their parents |
C.talk with their friends on the phone |
D.have a discussion with their family |
A.Some parents may want their children to stop to meet their good friends. |
B.Some parents may even ask their children to stay away from their good friends. |
C.Some parents may even not let their children meet their good friends. |
D.Some parents may even not allow their children to meet their good friends. |
A.Parents should like everything their children enjoy. |
B.In all families, children can choose everything they like. |
C.Parents should try their best to understand their children better. |
D.Teenagers can only go to their friends for help. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】A new study suggests a simple getting-to-know-you exercise might improve classroom relationships. The teacher-student relationship affects every aspect of the educational experience. When students don’t feel safe and respected by their teacher, they are less likely to devote themselves to their education. And when teachers feel distanced from their students, it is nearly impossible to walk into the classroom each day actively, let alone encourage motivation or investment in students.
Hunter Gehlbach, a professor, explained that his research is primarily concerned with social perspective-taking (换位思考), or the ability to understand what drives the people around us. As he explained, “My focus is classrooms and social perspective-taking-figuring out the thoughts and feelings of others seems important. We want teachers to be able to engage in this process and figure out the thought process of students as much as possible, in order to understand where and why they are making mistakes.”
Gehlbach and his colleagues gave 315 students and 25 teachers a “getting-to-know -you” survey of 30 items at the beginning of a school year. The researchers matched similarities between the teacher and the student, and then showed those similarities to the teachers and students. Five weeks later, the researchers returned to start a more in-depth survey of both students and teachers, and to measure their opinions of their relationships and the classroom experience as a whole. The second survey showed that when teachers and students know they have five things in common, relationships and educational outcomes both improve.
Gehlbach explained that the similarities he and his colleagues established were not based on personal information, but on shared preferences. Gehlbach explained: one of the biggest surprises in reading the similarity research was how little some of the similarities were that caused positive feelings towards others.
Though Gehlbach’s study has limitations, he is encouraged by the results and eager to explore the phenomenon further.
1. It seems that Gehlbach ___________.A.can’t find enough teachers for the survey | B.is good at social perspective taking |
C.mainly did the research by himself | D.pay more attention to teachers’ understanding of students |
A.The Teachers. | B.The students. | C.The researchers. | D.His colleagues. |
A.to prove if the result of the first one, is correct |
B.to survey some other students and teachers |
C.to show the improvement of students and teachers |
D.to find more similarities between students and teachers |
【推荐2】What kind of relationship do you think will provide you with more life satisfaction, better health and overall well-being? A romantic relationship? A familial (家庭的) one? Surprisingly, the answer is friendship.
However, it’s not possible to have true friends without first making regular friends. Have you ever thought about how long it takes to turn an acquaintance (认识的人) into a true friend?
Well, a study published in the April issue of the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships might have the answer to that question. According to lead study author Jeffrey Hall, a communications professor at the University of Kansas in the US, we need to spend at least 80 hours with another person to create a true friendship with them.
Hall surveyed two groups as they began new chapters in their lives. One group consisted of 429 adults who had recently relocated (搬家), while the other was made up of 112 freshmen from the University of Kansas.
The results showed that the more time each person spent together, the faster friendship formed in both groups. But it seemed that Hall wasn’t satisfied. He wanted to find out exactly how many hours it takes to form a friendship.
According to the survey, “casual” friends are generally formed after spending about 30 hours together. And people will go from casual friends to regular friends after another 50 hours.
However, it takes a lot longer to get really close to someone: A “close” friendship takes about 140 hours to create and “best friends” need about 300 hours.
But spending time together isn’t the only factor (元素) when it comes to making friends. “It’s not enough to just be in the company of someone… it matters how you spend the time,” Hall told the Daily Mail.
For one thing, as Hall noted, the way we communicate matters. “Catching up, joking around and having meaningful conversation promote intimacy (亲密) and closeness, while small talk actually decreases closeness in the relationship,” he said.
And since time is precious, Hall suggested taking advantage of our school years by making as many friends as we can.
Hall’s relationship tips:
·Watch a TV series together
·Share jokes and laughter
·Have long, meaningful conversations
·Watch a movie together
·Engage (参与) in friendly competition by playing video games
1. What is the article mainly about?A.Factors that influence the forming of a friendship. |
B.How people’s personality influences the time it takes to make friends. |
C.The role that friendship plays in our life. |
D.The necessity to make true friends in modern society. |
A.They are of the same age. |
B.They are good at making friends. |
C.They study at the same university. |
D.They just moved to a new environment. |
A.About 30 hours. | B.About 50 hours. |
C.About 80 hours. | D.About 140 hours. |
A.Joking around with their friend. |
B.Having more small talk. |
C.Spending more time together in silence. |
D.Discussing serious topics. |
【推荐3】When I was a child, my grandmother often said interpersonal communication mattered. She backed that up with her own behavior, and she invested her time and energy in interacting with people. When she walked down the street, she spoke to everyone, whether an elderly or a child, speaking whether English or Spanish.
However, as she aged, she noticed that most people wouldn’t have time for communication that’s longer than a 160-character text message, much less time to develop genuine friendships that last decades. In fact, people are barely speaking to one another nowadays. As much as I hate to admit it, I have noticed it too.
My grandmother opened my mind to having a pen pal on the other side of the world. It all started in 2013 when I was at University of Southern California. I met with Kerstin Zilm, a German radio personality who wanted to interview me about being a student struggling financially. I didn’t know much about German culture or the German audience who would listen to the show, but I agreed to do so. I had internalized(使内在化)my grandmother’s concept and I felt this was another way of communication and that speaking about my story was better than keeping it to myself. You never knew who could learn from your life experiences.
After the story aired, a woman named Renate reached out to Kerstin, inquiring how she could find me and help me financially with college. I was grateful, but my pride didn’t allow me to accept the money.
However, I didn’t let the opening halt. Encouraged by Kerstin, I emailed Renate back, thanking her for her kindness. This was the beginning of a beautiful intercontinental friend-ship. From then on, Renate and I often emailed each other. And whenever I was in trouble, she was always there. She sent me virtual hugs at the moments when I needed them most. Though I have never met her in person, she is one of the most important people in my life.
1. What do we know about the author’s grandmother?A.She made lots of foreign friends. |
B.She valued family relationships. |
C.She liked to wander on the streets. |
D.She kept bonding with other people. |
A.They show little respect to the elderly. |
B.They look forward to having a pen pal. |
C.They have limited communication with others. |
D.They like chatting through long text messages. |
A.Her grandmother’s wisdom. |
B.Her pen pal’s encouragement. |
C.Her poverty-stricken situation. |
D.Her curiosity about German culture. |
A.Continue. | B.Appear. | C.Extend. | D.Stop. |
【推荐1】Babies as young as 4 months old who are born into a bilingual (双语的) environment show distinct and potentially advantageous brain patterns for speech processing. Our early-life experiences can have lifelong effects on our behavior. The brain is most sensitive to its environment during the first year of life, which is thought to be a critical period for language development.
Previous studies have looked into the brain mechanisms that underlie (构成……的基础) speech processing in babies who hear just one language. To better understand this in bilingual-exposed infants, Borja Blanco at the University of Cambridge and his colleagues compared how 31 babies who only heard Spanish and 26 babies who heard Spanish and Basque, all aged 4 months, responded to Spanish recordings of The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupery.
The team used an imaging technique called functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure changes in brain activities. In the Spanish-only babies, the recordings caused activation in areas which play a role in speech processing. In the bilingual-exposed babies, the recordings similarly evoked these responses, but they were larger and wider. These infants also had activation in equivalent areas of their brains’ right hemispheres ( 脑半球 ). When the recordings were then played backwards as a control arm of the experiment, the infants exposed to just Spanish had larger responses to the backwards speech, while those to Spanish and Basque had similar brain patterns as before. This may be because the bilingual infants take longer to register their primary language, in this case Spanish, as hearing both this and Basque reduces their overall exposure to either language.
If this is the case, it could help them be sensitive to linguistic differences and enable them to learn to distinguish between languages at a younger age. The researchers note that a bilingual environment stimulates changes in the brain mechanisms underlying speech processing in young infants, adding weight to the idea that the neural basis of learning two or more languages is established very early in life.
1. Why was the study conducted?A.To reveal the impact of bilingual exposure. | B.To confirm the pattern of brain mechanism. |
C.To conclude the factors for speech processing | D.To explore the potentials for language development. |
A.Theory basis. | B.Study methods. |
C.Research findings | D.Technical assistance, |
A.Bilingual-exposed babies are more sensitive. |
B.Bilingual-exposed babies are more linguistically critical. |
C.Bilingual-exposure reduces babies’ linguistic competence. |
D.Bilingual-exposure reduces babies’ overall language exposure. |
A.Immigrants speak better languages. |
B.Mixed race families own more linguistic potential. |
C.Exchange students show greater learning capability. |
D.Overseas workers have higher language proficiency. |
【推荐2】It’s a common belief that the roles actors play might somehow reflect their true personalities. It’s usually not true, but British actress Phoebe Waller-Bridge, 34, is an exception.
In September,2019 Waller-Bridge took home three Emmy awards for her work on Fleabag–--- best writing in a comedy series, best lead actress, and best comedy series.
Her success is partly because of her family. Descended(遗传) from British nobility, Waller-Bridge was brought up in a free environment. Her mother always told her, “You can be whatever you want if you imagine it.” So Waller-Bridge broke all the rules about what a “good” girl should do. “Our laws and moral codes don’t apply – she lives ... without fear of consequence,” The Sun noted.
That fearlessness extends to being authentic(真实的) in her writing and acting. Unlike the can-do heroines and strong, successful women in many TV dramas, Waller-Bridge shows an imperfect but real character. Just like the character Fleabag, who always found a way to say or do the wrong thing, Waller-Bridge feels her life is a mess. “It resonated(共鸣) with the lives of stressed-out women everywhere in reality – doing their best to find balance in their lives,” a viewer wrote on US movie website IMDb. Variety magazine even calls her an “all-around icon”.
Villanelle in Killing Eve, another hit TV series developed by Waller-Bridge, was a little bit violent but showed no interest for the rules others created, which made many people see themselves in her.
“People have been scared to write characters like these. But I think, now, women are so relieved to have this new template(样板,人设). And, aren’t we all a bit of everything?”Waller-Bridge said in an interview with Indian Express.
With such courage and sincerity, Waller-Bridge is, without a doubt, a “golden girl” in Hollywood, Australian news website The New Daily commented.
1. What is Waller-Bridge good at ?A.performing | B.writing reports |
C.directing films | D.designing |
A.Waller-Bridge family results in her achievements. |
B.Waller-Bridge’s mother gave her encouragement. |
C.Waller-Bridge grew up in a rich home. |
D.Waller-Bridge is a bad girl in nature. |
A.The Sun | B.Variety magazine |
C.Indian Express | D.The New Daily |
A.Being brave | B.Being talented |
C.Being hardworking | D.Staying true |
【推荐3】Most people will experience at least one wrong medical diagnosis in their lifetime, resulting in health problems, psychological suffering and financial cost, according to a new report. Because diagnostic errors are generally discovered in retrospect(回顾), researchers said more work needs to be done to improve medical teams and find ways to avoid errors that can change people’s life in the distant future.
“Diagnosis is a collective effort that often involves a team of health care professionals---from primary care physicians to nurses.” said John Ball, chair of the committee which wrote the report. “The type of a single physician observing a patient case and deciding a diagnosis is not always accurate, and a diagnostic errors, we have to look more broadly at the entire process of how a diagnosis is made.”
The researcher, said there are not enough data on diagnostic errors, and efforts to improve diagnosis and reduce errors have not been frequent. The medical culture discourages transparency and makes it more difficult to correct them. The blame lies in cooperation and communication between members of medical teams treating patients, patients themselves, and their families. Besides this, researchers found the healthcare system is not designed for the collaboration needed in the diagnostic process and that diagnosis will continue to worsen if new ideas are not put forward.
The committee recommended more information, from electronic health records to test results, be made more easily available to families and caregivers, to help them better learn and understand what is going on with their health. Creating an environment for patients to question a diagnosis or add information about their condition could also help better influence diagnosis.
Most significantly, the researchers said methods need to be established to make communication between doctors and patients easier. Doctors are not encouraged or paid to communicate with patients as much as they should be.
1. It can be inferred from the new report that .A.diagnostic errors have a great influence on people |
B.new ways are found to avoid diagnostic errors |
C.nobody can avoid those diagnostic errors |
D.diagnostic errors are difficult to be found |
A.For lack of advanced technological equipment |
B.For lack of strict rules of managing the medial environment |
C.For lack of enough professional knowledge about medicinal treatment |
D.For lack of cooperation and communication between physicians, patients and their families |
A.Researches on the diagnostic process |
B.New ways to better protect patients |
C.Advice on reducing diagnostic errors |
D.Communication between patients and doctors |
A.Because of the different belief |
B.Because of the medical situation |
C.Because of being short of money |
D.Because of the current rules |
A.a hospital advertisement | B.a science book |
C.a medical magazine | D.a research report |