King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted “kings don’t give up the throne(王位), they die in their sleep.” But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy(君主制) is seeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyles?
The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarized, as it was following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above mere politics and symbolize a spirit of national unity.
It is this apparent transcendence(超越) of politics that explains monarchs continuing popularity as heads of state. And so, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch- filled region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican City and Andorra). Most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure.
Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history and sometimes the way they behave today symbolizes outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is strange that wealthy noble families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic(民主的)states.
The most successful monarchies try their best to abandon or hide their old noble ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses (or helicopters). Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international 1%, and media interference makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image.
1. According to the first two paragraphs, King Juan Carlos of SpainA.used to enjoy high public support |
B.was unpopular among European royals |
C.eased his relationship with his rivals |
D.gave up his throne in embarrassment |
A.owing to their undoubted and respectable status |
B.to achieve a balance between tradition and reality |
C.to give voters more public figures to look up to |
D.due to their everlasting political symbolizing |
A.The noble families’ excessive dependence on inherited wealth |
B.The role of the nobility in modern democracies |
C.The simple lifestyle of the noble families |
D.The nobility’s sticking to their privileges |
A.Carlos, a good example of All European Monarchs |
B.Europe, the most monarch-filled region in the world |
C.Carlos, a Lesson for All European Monarchs |
D.Europe, symbolic heart of modern democracy. |
相似题推荐
Japan claimed sovereignty(主权) during the Sino-Japanese War of 1895, seizing the islands by illegal means.
The Cairo Declaration issued after World War II stipulated(规定) that all territory taken by Japan illegally, including China’s northeast, Taiwan and Penghu islets, must be returned to China.
In August 1945, Japan announced its unconditional surrender under the terms of the Potsdam Declaration. The declaration laid out that Japan must return Taiwan, the Diaoyu Islands and surrounding islets to China.
But the islands came under US control after 1945. In 1951, Japan and the US signed an illegal treaty in San Francisco without inviting China. The islands were then "entrusted" to Japan according to the treaty.
On September 18th, 1951, then Chinese Premier and Foreign Minister Zhou Enlai made a solemn(庄严的) statement on behalf of the Chinese government that the Treaty of Peace with Japan signed in San Francisco was illegal , and would not be recognized without the participation and signing of the People’s Republic of China.
In June 1971, Japan and the United States signed an agreement to hand over Okinawa to Japan. The Diaoyu Islands were mapped into the handover area.
China’s Foreign Ministry announced on December 30th 1971 that such a move was "totally illegal" and reiterated(重申) that the Diaoyu Islands and surrounding islets were "an integral part of the Chinese territory".
1. The underlined word"maritime"in Paragraph 1 probably means _____.
A.referring to sea | B.referring to many time |
C.referring to marriage | D.referring to hard life |
A.The order of importance |
B.The order of time |
C.The order of place or direction |
D.The order of advantages and disadvantages |
A.China's sovereignty to Diaoyu Island dates back to the Ming Dynasty. |
B.The Potsdam Declaration issued that Japan must return Diaoyu Island and surrrounding islets to China. |
C.In August 1945, Japan announced its unconditional surrender under the terms of the Cairo Declaration. |
D.So far as new China's government is concerned, the treaty between Japan and USA about Diaoyu Island and surrounding islets is considered illegal. |
【推荐2】Apple on Wednesday launched a self-service repair program that would allow its customers to purchase Apple made components to replace worn-out or broken parts. The service will be first available in the US early next year for the iPhone 12 and iPhone 13 ranges, enabling customers to repair their screens, batteries and cameras at home. The service will be extended to other markets throughout 2022 and cover Mac computers with MI chips.
The U-turn is abrupt. As recently as last month, Apple was fighting a shareholder proposal in support of right to repair. The iPhone maker said its own experts were best placed to service its products. The latest move, though, comes after an executive order from the Biden administration in July, directing the FTC (联邦贸易委员会) to address “unfair anti-competitive restrictions on third-party repair or self-repair of items”.
Apple has long been criticized by consumer protection bodies for fiercely guarding its monopoly on the repair process, which has become so strict that iPhones fail to function properly even if two identical models have their parts swapped. Consumers have been forced to pay for “official” repairs at Apple stores whose costs can be so high that many consumers would rather buy a new device altogether.
Right-to-repair advocates say that when a consumer replaces a broken model, it serves Apple’s bottom line but taxes the environment, so this step is likely to be widely welcomed. “Still, there is a risk that Apple is trying to increase the cost of spare parts by freezing out third-party manufacturer,” said Vallauri, a right-to-repair advocate. “Regulation needs to force manufacturers to make products that are easier to repair at an affordable price so devices can be in use for a longer time, limiting the environmental impact.”
1. What can be inferred from paragraph 2?A.Apple adopted the proposal made by its shareholder after careful consideration. |
B.Apple is pressured into easing restrictions on independent repair shops. |
C.Apple has always been a firm supporter of customers’ right to repair. |
D.Apple has its growth restricted deliberately due to its enormous profits. |
A.complete control | B.huge interests |
C.massive influence | D.tight security |
A.The cost of fixing iPhones and iMacs will rise. |
B.Their products will lose favor with environmentalists. |
C.The life cycle of consumer electronics will be extended. |
D.The competition in iPhone parts market will be less intense. |
A.Favorable. | B.Enthusiastic. | C.Skeptical. | D.Cautious. |
【推荐3】“What kind of rubbish are you?” This question might normally provoke anger, but in Shanghai it has elicited weary groans over the past week. On July 1st the city introduced stringent trash-sorting regulations that are expected to be used as a model for the country.
Residents must divide their waste into four separate categories and toss it into specific public bins. They must do so at scheduled times, when monitors are present to ensure compliance (and to inquire into the nature of one’s rubbish.) Violators(违反者)face the prospect of fines and worse.
Shanghai authorities are responding to an obvious environmental problem. It generates 9m tonnes of garbage a year, more than London’s annual output and rising quickly. But like other cities in China, it lacks a recycling system. Instead, it has relied on trash pickers to sift through the waste, plucking out whatever can be reused. This has limits. As people get wealthier, fewer of them want to do such dirty work. The waste, meanwhile, just keeps piling up. China churns out 80bn pairs of disposable chopsticks a year.
The threat of punishment is integral to Shanghai’s drive. On the first day of enforcement, the government sent 3,600 city-management officers, a quasi-police force, to 4,216 rubbish-collection points. They began by making an example of wealthy foreigners: the first warning was issued to Swissôtel Grand, a five-star hotel, for improper sorting. Individuals who fail to recycle could be hit with fines of up to 200 yuan ($29). For repeat violators, the city can add black marks to their credit records, making it harder for them to obtain bank loans or even buy train tickets.
Some object to this. Peng Feng of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences warns that the use of the credit system is overkill, raising a risk that officials will abuse their power. But others say a tough campaign is necessary. “Slowly people will get used to it,” says Li Changjun of Fudan University. Many residents appear to support the idea of recycling in general but are frustrated by the details. Rubbish must be divided according to whether it is food, recyclable, dry orhazardous, the distinctions among which can be perplexing, though there are apps to help work it out.
Some have complained about the rules surrounding food waste. They must put it straight in the requisite public bin, forcing them to tear open plastic bags and toss it by hand. Most vexing are the short windows for dumping trash, typically a couple of hours, morning and evening. Along with the monitors at the bins, this means that people go at around the same time and can keep an eye on what is being thrown out; no one wants to look bad.
But it is inconvenient. “People have to get to work. We don’t have the time for this,” said Mr Wu as he threw out rubbish outside his apartment building. To your correspondent’s untrained eye, his sorting looked impeccable.
1. According to the passage, which of the following statement is NOT true?A.Trash-sorting regulations in Shanghai will be a model for the whole country. |
B.Residents in Shanghai must take out of trash at scheduled time. |
C.Shanghai lacks a recycling system, like other cities in the world. |
D.Fewer people want to do the work as trash pickers. |
A.They will be warned for the first time. |
B.They will be fined 200 yuan. |
C.They will be added black marks to their credit records. |
D.They will face the prospect of fines and more. |
A.Some people object to the trash-sorting regulations. |
B.People in Shanghai have got used to sorting the trash. |
C.Many residents are disappointed with the details of the regulations. |
D.All residents support the idea of recycling generally. |
A.A magazine. | B.A news comment. |
C.A journal. | D.A novel. |
Perhaps you have been told about some habits(习惯) which stop a person reading fast and have been strongly asked to break those habits which you might have.
Do you still have any of these bad habits7 Check yourself by answering "yes" or "no" to these questions:
1. Do you move your lips(嘴唇) when reading silently?
2. Do you point to words with your finger as you read?
3. Do you move your head from side to side as you read?
4. Do you read one word at a time?
If you answer "yes" to any of these questions, start at once to break the habit.
If you move your lips, hold your fingers over them, or hold a piece of paper between your lips while you are reading. Then if your lips move, you will know it and can stop them.
If you point to words, hold the two sides of your book, one side with your left hand, the other side with your right hand. Then you will not have a free finger to use in pointing while reading. If you move your head, place your chin(下巴)in one hand, and hold your head still(不动地).
If you read no more than one or two or three words at a time, you need to work very hard in learning to take in more words at each glance(看一眼) as your eyes travel across the lines of words.
1. You may hold your fingers over your lips while reading
A.to hold a piece of paper between them | B.to feel whether y our lips move or not |
C.to tell others to be silent | D.to stop yourself talking to others |
A.you need to read the words out | B.you need to look at every word carefully |
C.you need to remember every word | D.you need to read several words at a time |
A.don’t use your finger to point to words | B.don’t hold your books with your hands |
C.don’t hold your head still | D.don’t do any of the things mentioned(提到)above. |
A.the importance of fast reading | B.the bad habits in reading |
C.the way to read fast | D.both A and B |
【推荐2】Our screens give out all kinds of light, especially blue light. Blue light, the argument goes, can affect your eye health, your sleeping patterns, and your health. Blue light glasses—technically they should be called “blue light blocking glasses”— filter out (过滤) blue light, letting in the other wavelengths of light, thus theoretically reducing the danger that blue light presents. Blue light glasses are designed to reduce what’s known as digital eye strain (疲劳), or DES. There are many symptoms associated with DES, including headaches, dry eyes, and unclear vision.
How effective are blue light glasses? We’ll start with the bad news: there is no evidence that blue light glasses have any effect on eye strain from digital screens. In fact, one British glasses dealer was fined for indicating that blue light glasses can protect against DES, given that there’s no scientific evidence of this. What’s more likely is that DES is caused by overuse, or misuse of eyes. After all, the sun is a substantially more powerful provider of blue light than our screens, and it has been decidedly proved that DES isn’t associated with the sun at all. The general agreement is that DES is caused by spending too long, staring too hard, and sitting too close to our screens. Health experts generally recommend taking breaks to prevent DES, rather than relying on blue light glasses.
But there is one thing that blue light glasses might help with. Some studies have indicated that blue light can be bad for our circadian rhythms (生理节奏). In other words, exposure to blue light could make it harder to fall asleep. There haven’t been enough studies to tell if blue light glasses, worn for a few hours before bed, could help you sleep better, but it’s not out of the question.
That said, there are interesting reports of people loving their blue light glasses. Even if it’s just the placebo (安慰剂) effect, that can be incredibly powerful, and if it works on you, keep doing it.
1. What can we know from Paragraphs 1 and 2?A.Blue light is beneficial to health. | B.It’s advisable to take breaks to prevent DES. |
C.Blue light glasses can protect against DES. | D.Blue light mainly comes from the screens. |
A.Poor-quality sunglasses. | B.Improper use of eyes. |
C.The blinding sunlight. | D.The small size of screens. |
A.They reduce eye strain. | B.They affect circadian rhythms. |
C.They may be helpful for sleep. | D.They help to see things more clearly. |
A.Objective. | B.Opposed. | C.Indifferent. | D.Unclear. |
【推荐3】Researchers from University of Southern California (USC) may have found the biggest influencer in the spread of fake news: social platforms’ structure of rewarding users for habitually sharing information. The study involved 2,476 active Facebook users ranging in age from 18 to 89. They were asked to complete a decision-making survey about seven minutes long.
Surprisingly, the researchers found that users’ social media habits are closely related to the amount of fake news they shared. Frequent and habitual users spread six times more fake news than occasional or new users. Just 15% of the most habitual news sharers in the research were responsible for spreading about 30% to 40% of the fake news. Users’ habits were more influential in sharing fake news than other factors, including lack of critical reasoning.
The research team wondered: What motivates these users? As it turns out, much like any video game, social media has a reward system that encourages users to stay on their accounts and keep posting and sharing.
Users who post and share frequently, especially eye-catching information, are likely to attract attention. Due to the reward system of social media, users form habits of sharing information that gets recognition from others automatically, without considering consequences such as spreading misinformation.
Then, the team tested whether social media reward structures could be designed to promote sharing of true over false information. They found that incentives (鼓励) for accuracy rather than popularity doubled the amount of accurate news that users share on social platforms.
“We know from previous research that some people don’t process information critically, which influences their ability to recognize false stories online,” said Gizem Ceylan, who led the team. “However, our new study shows that the reward structure of social media platforms plays a bigger role when it comes to misinformation spread.”
1. What does the USC research mainly focus on concerning social media?A.Its reward system. | B.The users’ age group. |
C.Its attraction to users. | D.The reason fake news spreads on it. |
A.A new user. | B.A heavy user. |
C.An occasional user. | D.An uneducated user. |
A.The popularity of their posts. |
B.The easy access to information. |
C.The encouragement from other users. |
D.The immediate money reward from the platform. |
A.Sharing of misinformation is unavoidable. |
B.People shouldn’t use social media frequently. |
C.Lack of critical reasoning is a common problem. |
D.Social media reward structures should be improved. |