组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.64 引用次数:149 题号:4625148
If you have ever been left wondering why your emails are riddled(充斥着) with grammatical errors, or why you can never quite find the right phrase, it may be because you are typing with both hands.
Our vocabulary becomes richer and our writing style becomes more fluent when we type using just one hand, scientists have found. "Typing can be too fluent or too fast, and it can actually weaken the writing process," said Srdan Medimorec, the lead author of the study conducted at the department of psychology at the University of Waterloo, Canada. "It seems that what we write is a product of the interaction(互动) between our thoughts and the tools we use to express them."
Using text-analysis software, researchers asked 103 university students to write essays under different conditions, using one hand to type and using both hands to type. The software was used to analyze(分析) elements of the essays, such as range of vocabulary, sentence complexity and the cohesion(衔接) of the writing.
Researchers found that participants' vocabulary became more advanced when they typed with one hand rather than two. The research team said that by slowing our writing down, typing one-handed allows more time for an internal (内在的) word search, resulting in a larger variety of words.
In contrast, fast typists might just write the first word that comes to mind. However, it is important not to slow typing down too much. Those who typed essays one-handed in the current study slowed down to about the speed of handwriting.
This is the first study to show that changing people’s typing can make their writing get better. The researchers suggested that the speed of writing could affect writing quality regardless of the tools used, whether they are computers, or pen and paper, although further research would be required to prove that idea.
1. The underlined “it” in the second paragraph refers to______.
A.the writing style
B.typing too fast or fluently
C.the vocabulary
D.which hand to use for typing
2. Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
A.The study was carried out in 103 universities.
B.The researchers drew the conclusion by interviewing students about their feelings in the writing process.
C.The typing speed should be as slow as possible.
D.There is no previous study related to the topic before.
3. What is the author’s attitude to the research according to the passage?
A.objectiveB.doubtful
C.criticalD.supportive
4. Which is the best title of the passage?
A.How to become a good writer?
B.Typing with both hands could make you a worse writer.
C.Slower typing, fewer mistakes.
D.Elements weakening the writing process
【知识点】 科普与现代技术

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要介绍了儿童时期的成长环境影响着人的导航能力。

【推荐1】People who grow up outside of cities are better at finding their way around than urbanites, a large study on navigation suggests. The results, described online on March 30 in Nature, hint that learning to handle environmental complexity as a child strengthens mental muscles for spatial skills.

Nearly 400,000 people from 38 countries around the world played a video game called Sea Hero Quest, designed by scientists and game developers as a fun way to collect data about people’s brains. Players piloted a boat in search of various targets.

On average, people who said they had grown up outside of cities, where they would have probably encountered lots of complicated paths, were better at finding the targets than people who were raised in cities.

What’s more, the difference between city residents and outsiders was most obvious in countries where cities tend to have simple layouts (布局), such as Chicago with its streets laid out at 90-degree angles. The simpler the cities, the bigger the advantage for people from more rural areas, cognitive scientist Antoine Coutrot of CNRS and his colleagues report.

Still, from these video game data, scientists can’t definitively say that the childhood environment is behind the differences in navigation. But it’s possible. “As a kid, if you are exposed to a complex environment, you learn to find your way, and you develop the right cognitive processes to do so,” Coutrot says.

Other factors have been linked to navigational performance, including age, gender, education and even a superior sense of smell. Figuring out these details will give doctors a more precise baseline (基准) of a person’s navigational abilities. That, in turn, might help reveal when these skills weaken, as they do in early Alzheimer’s disease, for instance.

1. What does the underlined word “urbanites” in Paragraph 1 refer to?
A.Those who live close to urban areas.
B.Those who are from rural areas.
C.Those who are raised in cities.
D.Those who long for urban life.
2. How did the researchers carry out the study?
A.By playing a game called Sea Hero Quest.
B.By gathering data from the video game.
C.By recording electrical activities in brains.
D.By comparing various targets of the game.
3. What can we learn from Paragraph 3 and 4?
A.City outsiders performed no better than city residents in the study.
B.Cities’ simple layouts gave city residents an advantage in the game.
C.There was no significant difference between city residents and outsiders.
D.The players’ performance had something to do with their earlier experience.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the passage?
A.How environment impacts early childhood development
B.Why is early childhood education important for our future
C.When is the best time to obtain your navigational skills
D.Where you grew up may shape your navigational skills
2022-12-16更新 | 116次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】Next time you find yourself tending to your flower garden, you may want to stay quiet. The flowers are listening.

According to Israeli scientists, the plants could hear bees approaching and attempt to attract them with sweeter nectar(花蜜). In several experiments, they found that playing audio recordings of buzzing bees around certain flowers would cause the sugar concentration in the nectar to rise by about 20% in less than five minutes. Such a rapid reaction by plants to sound had never previously been reported. Just to compare, the researchers also tried a higher frequency noise-like that made by a mosquito or a bat-and the flowers did not respond.

This is not the first time that they' ve reacted to what they 're hearing around them. In a 2009 study. Britain’s Royal Horticultural Society found that women's voices helped make plants grow faster. In that experiment, tomato plants were found to grow up to two inches taller when they were tended to by a female gardener. More recently, an Australian study found that some flowers were able to sense noises, such as the flow of water through a pipe.

The ability of inanimate(无生命的) objects to hear what' s around them may seem like something out of a science fiction novel, but it's real. What if we told you that a potato chip bag left on the floor of a break room could listen in an office gossip? You'd think we were crazy. right?Think again. Researchers found that as people were talking around the potato chip bag. they were sending teeny-tiny sound vibrations(振动) into the air. Those vibrations then hit inanimate objects around the room. So next time you're at the gardens or in a grocery. be careful with what you say.Something might be listening.

1. What did Israeli scientists discover in their research?
A.What plants do to sense their environment.
B.How plants respond to certain sounds.
C.How plants make their nectar sweeter.
D.What plants do to protect themselves.
2. Why are the two studies mentioned in Paragraph 3?
A.To indicate that plants can actually hear what's around them.
B.To stress the environment is important to plants' survival.
C.To tell us many scientists are interested in plant research.
D.To show that Israeli scientists are not the most experienced.
3. What does the underlined word"something"in the last paragraph refer to?
A.Some plants.B.Sound vibrations.
C.Inanimate objects.D.Potato chip bags.
4. What's the best title of the text?
A.Flowers can actually hear your voices
B.Wildlife has amazing survival skills.
C.Bees can talk with garden flowers.
D.Chip bags can uncover your secrets.
2021-01-25更新 | 109次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,一项新的研究表明,用实验室培育的农产品取代构成典型欧洲饮食的肉类和奶制品,可以减少80%以上与食物相关的温室气体,以及水和土地的使用。

【推荐3】Replacing the meat and dairy products that make up a typical European diet with laboratory-grown produce could cut food-related greenhouse gases, as well as water and land use, by over 80 percent, a new study suggests. Food production has huge environmental impacts, creating more than a third of all greenhouse gas emissions (排放).

To assess ways to reduce this impact, Rachel Mazac at the University of Helsinkiin Finland and her colleagues have studied the potential effects of switching to “novel and future foods”. “What we are looking at are foods that are novel in their production technology, like cultured meat or cultured milk,” says Mazac. Her team used the analyses to calculate the potential benefits of switching to these foods assuming people are willing to do so, compared with foods that are typically consumed in Europe.

The results suggest that an “optimised diet” of novel foods could cut greenhouse emissions by 83 percent, water use by 84 percent and land use by 87 percent. “We are seeing some pretty significant reductions in impacts,” says Mazac. The team also found that switching to a vegan (素食的) diet had the similar effect. But switching to lab-grown meat, rather than a vegan diet, could allow many people to eat foods that are more like their current diet. “It would be a way for someone to consume their fast-food burger, but save on land use and water use and global warming potential,” says Mazac.

Speaking of the results, Tim Lang at City, University of London, says: “It’s almost too good to be true.” If the findings are correct, the research has important policy implications (启示), he says. But Lang thinks the environmental benefits won’t come about through consumers making voluntary changes to their diet. They will only play out if governments and companies essentially force these foods on people, he says.

1. How does the author introduce the topic in paragraph 1?
A.By comparing facts.B.By voicing opinions.
C.By releasing figures.D.By reporting findings.
2. What can be inferred from the research led by Mazac?
A.People tend to welcome novel foods enthusiastically.
B.A new way is used to assess the benefits of novel foods.
C.Novel foods are not likely to affect people’s eating habits.
D.Water and land use is on the rise in novel food production.
3. What is Lang’s attitude towards the future of novel foods?
A.Doubtful.B.Critical.C.Optimistic.D.Responsible.
4. What can be a suitable title for the text?
A.Less Meat, Fewer ProblemsB.Novel Foods, Greener Planet
C.Lab-grown Meat: Best Choice FoodD.Future Foods: Healthy Diet
2022-06-26更新 | 65次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般