The question of what children learn, and how they should learn it, is continually being debated and redebated. Nobody dares any longer to defend the old system, the parrot-fashion (way of learning by repeating what others say) of learning lessons, the grammar-with-a-whip(鞭子) system, which was good enough for our grandparents. The theories of modern psychology have stepped in to argue that we must understand the needs of our children. Children are not just small adults; they are children who must be respected as such.
Well, you may say, this is as it should be, and a good idea. But think further. What happens? “Education” becomes the responsibility not of teachers, but of psychologists. What happens then? Teachers worry too much about the psychological implications (暗示) of their lessons, and forget about the subjects themselves. If a child dislikes a lesson, the teacher feels that it is his fault, not the child’s. So teachers worry whether history is “relevant” to modern young children. And do they dare to recount stories about violent battles? Or will this make the children themselves violent? Can they tell their classes about children of different races, or will this encourage racial hatred? Why teach children to write grammatical sentences? Oral expression is better. Sums? Arithmetic? No; real-life mathematical situations are more understandable.
You see, you can go too far. Influenced by educational theorists, who have nothing better to do than write books about their ideas, teachers leave their teaching-training colleges filled with grand, psychological ideas about children and their needs. They make complicated preparations and try out their “modern methods” on the long-suffering children. Since one “modern method” rapidly replaces another, the poor kids will have well been fed up by the time they leave school. Frequently the modern methods are so complicated that they fail to be understood by the teachers, let alone the children; even more often, the relaxed discipline so necessary for the “informal” feeling the class must have, prevents all but a handful of children from learning anything.
1. Under the old system, children were .A.made to learn passively |
B.spoiled by their parents |
C.treated as adults |
D.were forced to become parrots |
A.children must be understood and respected |
B.children are small adults and they know what they need |
C.children are better off without learning lessons |
D.education of children is the responsibility of psychologists |
A.They find that children dislike the lessons. |
B.They tend to blame students for their failure in teaching. |
C.They don’t pay enough attention to students’ actual lessons. |
D.They no longer want to teach children history. |
A.Children will learn well in a relaxed classroom atmosphere. |
B.Only a few children will actually learn when there is no discipline. |
C.Relaxed discipline is necessary for children to develop. |
D.No children will learn anything without strict discipline. |
A.Uninterested. | B.Tolerant. |
C.Satisfied. | D.Critical. |
相似题推荐
A charge made against fairy tales is that they harm the child by frightening him or making him sad thinking. To prove the latter, one would have to show in a controlled experiment that children who have read fairy stories were more often sorry for cruelty than those who had not. As to fears, there are, I think, some cases of children being dangerously terrified by some fairy story. Often, however, this arises from the child having heard the story once. Familiarity with the story by repetition turns the pain of fear into the pleasure of a fear faced and mastered.
There are also people who object to fairy stories on the grounds that they are not objectively true, that giants, witches, two-headed dragons, magic carpets, etc. do not exist; and that, instead of being fond of the strange side in fairy tales, the child should be taught to learn the reality by studying history. I find such people, I must say so peculiar that I do not know how to argue with them. If their case were sound, the world should be full of mad men attempting to fly from New York to Philadelphia on a stick or covering a telephone with kisses in the belief that it was their beloved girlfriend.
No fairy story ever declared to be a description of the real world and no clever child has ever believed that it was.
1. The author considers that a fairy story is more effective when it is ________.
A.repeated without any change | B.treated as a joke |
C.made some changes by the parent | D.set in the present |
A.in a realistic setting | B.heard for the first time |
C.repeated too often | D.told in a different way |
A.makes them less fearful |
B.develops their power of memory |
C.makes them believe there is nothing to be afraid of |
D.encourages them not to have strange beliefs |
A.fairy stories are still being made up |
B.there is some misunderstanding about fairy tales |
C.people try to modernize old fairy stories |
D.there is more concern for children's fears nowadays |
A.they are full of imagination |
B.they just make up the stories which are far from the truth |
C.they are not interesting |
D.they make teachers of history difficult to teach |
【推荐2】Man’s Existential Dilemma
We always knew that there was something peculiar about man, something deep down that characterized him and set him apart from the other animals.
We might call this existential paradox the condition of individuality within finitude (有限性). Man has a symbolic identity that brings him sharply out of nature. He is a symbolic self, a creature with a name, a life history.
The lower animals are, of course, spared this painful contradiction, as they lack a symbolic identity and the self-consciousness that goes with it. They merely act and move reflexively as they are driven by their instincts. They live in a world without time, pulsating, as it were, in a state of dumb beings. This is what has made it so simple to shoot down whole herds of buffalo or elephants. The animals don’t know that death is happening and continue gazing while others drop alongside them. The knowledge of death is reflective and conceptual, and animals are spared it. They live and they disappear with the same thoughtlessness: a few minutes of fear, a few seconds of anguish, and it is over.
Quoted from Ernest Becker’s The Denial of Death
A.But to live a life with the fate of death haunting one’s dreams makes a huge difference. |
B.He is a creator with a mind that soars out the speculate about atoms and infinity. |
C.Man’s body was a curse of fate and culture was built upon repression not because he was a seeker of pleasure, but because he was primarily an avoider of death. |
D.Yet at the same time, man is a worm and food for worms. |
E.Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains. |
F.It was something that had to go right to his core, something that made him suffer his peculiar fate, that made it impossible to escape. |
【推荐3】The need of plus-size consumers has long been the elephant in the room of the fashion industry until body positivity and fat acceptance movements promoted that large-bodied people are not those who are left behind. This trend has become so popular that it is influencing mainstream culture. As a result, fashion brands have finally decided to expand their size ranges. In 2022, the plus-size market grew twice as fast as the standard size market in both North America and the UK.
Yet, many consumers say fashion brands broadening their ranges are not truly inclusive (包容的). “Inclusive sizing means that all bodies are included in fashion, not just the ones who fit in standard sizes,” says Marie North, a UK-based journalist who covers body-image issues. “However, what many designers do right now is pick a number that they think is big enough to include plus sizes and stop. This is even more disrespectful.”
Researchers also criticize (批评) that some brands are just taking advantage of the trend. “Brands that used to promote so-called perfect bodies in their advertisements are now trying to get in on the trend by adding a few sizes. It doesn’t feel like they really care about plus-size people,” says Michael Burgess, analyst in fashion industry. “If brands cared about large-bodied consumers, then it wouldn’t have taken until now to acknowledge that they exist,” he says. “It gives the impression that companies are just trying to gain a share of the market without a real devotion to the community.”
The fashion industry must go beyond merely producing clothing in a range of sizes if they hope to succeed with a body-diverse world. The whole industry has to connect on a personal level with consumers. That involves showing shoppers that they are seen, understood and important to brands. “Consumers care about values, and so they want to buy from brands that reflect the values they believe in. Everyone should enjoy the same range of fashion choices,” says Ludovica Ospina, professor of marketing at the College of Business.
1. What do the underlined words “the elephant in the room” in paragraph 1 mean?A.Hardly satisfied. | B.Socially accepted. |
C.Widely promoted. | D.Obvious but ignored. |
A.Unclear. | B.Negative. | C.Puzzled. | D.Cautious. |
A.Their motivation. | B.Their promotion. |
C.Their devotion. | D.Their advertisement. |
A.Provide more fashion choices. |
B.Show respect to the consumers. |
C.Produce clothes in various sizes. |
D.Build private relationships with customers. |
【推荐1】Psychological science is full of interesting topics, many of which tell a coherent picture of human nature, but some of which create seemingly contradictory stories. A case in point is the tricky and misunderstood overlap between strength-based science and the research on narcissism (自恋).
There is now convincing evidence to show that narcissism is on the rise, especially in our youth. Some researchers say that about 25% of young people showing symptoms of narcissism. The inflated ego of Generation Me is reflected in reality TV, celebrity worship, and out-of-control consumerism.
We are correct to be concerned about this phenomenon, but our fear that all kids are potential narcissists has caused an unhelpful counter-reaction to approaches that seek to make our children and teens feel good about themselves.
In my own research on strength-based parenting, it is common for people to wrongly think this approach to be the cause of narcissism. Their argument seems to be that a child who knows their strengths will automatically view themselves as better than everyone else. It is argued that the self-assurance that comes with identifying and using their positive qualities will make a child selfish and uncaring. Genuine confidence about one’s strengths is categorized as over-confidence; desirable self-knowledge is branded as excessive self-admiration.
Why does this occur? It’s partly because more is known about narcissism than strengths. While strengths psychology has largely stayed within the limit of academic journals, research on narcissism has made its way into the mass media and our daily life. The New York Times noted that narcissism is a favored topic and that people everywhere are diagnosing others with it.
The fear that a strength-based approach will cause narcissism also occurs because of our binary (非此即彼) thinking. We mistakenly believe that one cannot be both confident and humble. We focus on Donald Trump and Kim Kardashian rather than Mahatma Gandhi and Mother Teresa. Without confidence in their strengths, Gandhi and Mother Teresa couldn’t have achieved so much, and yet modesty and selflessness are their qualities.
When we assume that strength-focus is the same as a self-focus, we fail to make the idea clear that people who know their strengths are, actually, more likely to be pro-social and ready to help others.
It’s easy to conclude that every young person is at risk of becoming a narcissist but I’d like to stand up for the thousands of young kids I have worked with who are caring, thoughtful and humble — even when they use their strengths.
1. Which of the following opinions may the writer agree with?A.Strength-based parenting leads to narcissism. |
B.It’s unhelpful for us to make our children feel good about themselves. |
C.To say all kids are potential narcissists is overstating the case. |
D.Children who know their strengths tend to be more selfish and uncaring. |
A.There is a lack of narcissism in our common sense. |
B.Academic journals report more on narcissism. |
C.Many people are diagnosed with narcissism by doctors. |
D.The general public has less access to strengths psychology. |
A.Skeptical. | B.Favorable. | C.Neutral. | D.Doubtful. |
A.Teens’ Confidence Misunderstood | B.Teens’ Narcissism Diagnosis |
C.Teens’ Strength-based Approach | D.Teens’ Psychology Research |
【推荐2】The thing that sets children apart from adults is not their ignorance,nor their lack of skills.Rather,it's their enormous capability for joy.A friend told me a story.One day,when she went to get his 6-year-old son from soccer practice,her kid greeted her with a sad face.The teacher had criticized him for not focusing on his soccer drills.The little boy walked out of the school with his head and shoulders hanging down.He seemed wrapped in sadness.But before reaching the car door,he suddenly stopped,crouching(蹲伏)down to look at something on the sidewalk.“Mom,come here! This is the strangest bug I’ve ever seen.It has ,1ike, a million legs.It’s amazing!”The little face was overflowing with indescribable excitement.
Nowadays,however,when we walk into a classroom,especially in a high school,we’ll be choked by towering books and papers,and hiding behind them are a group of motionless creatures,pens in hand,minds dry,just as the hollow men portrayed by T.S.Eliot.Their pursuit of joy has given way to their hunger for grades.Laughter and happiness are a distant memory for them.
Although joy is an unaffordable luxury in today’s increasingly fierce competition,administrators and teachers need a mindset shift from crushing students with assignments to getting them to take pleasure in productive activities which develop their important qualities,like perseverance and obligation.The assumption that pleasure is the enemy of competence and responsibility makes no sense educationally.
Adults tend to talk about learning as if it were medicine:unpleasant,but necessary and good for you.Why not think of learning as if it were food—something so valuable to humans that they want to experience it as a pleasure?
1. How is Paragraph 1 mainly developed?A.By describing a procedure. | B.By analyzing the process. |
C.By giving an example. | D.By collecting data. |
A.Summarize the previous paragraph. | B.Provide some advice for the readers. |
C.Introduce the main topic for discussion. | D.Clarify some puzzling questions. |
A.Stop giving students homework. |
B.Involve students in meaningful activities. |
C.Supply students with luxuries. |
D.Arouse students’fond memories. |
A.Joy is the spokesperson for learning. | B.Pleasure is the enemy of progress. |
C.Education is the paradise for parents. | D.Exams are a never-ending war. |
【推荐3】A baby born today will be thirty-something in 2050. If all goes well, that baby will still be around in 2100, and might even be an active citizen of the 22nd century. What should we teach that baby to help them survive and flourish in the world of 2050 and beyond? What kind of skills will they need in order to get a job, understand what is happening around them, and navigate their tough life?
At present, too many schools across the world focus on providing pupils with a set of predetermined skills, such as writing computer code in C++ and conversing in Chinese. Yet since we have no idea how the world and the job market will look in 2050, we don’t really know what particular skills people will need. We might invest a lot of effort in teaching kids how to write in C++ or to speak Chinese, only to discover sooner or later that AI will have been able to code software far better than humans, and that a new translation app will have enabled you to conduct a conversation in almost flawless Mandarin, Cantonese or Hakka, even though you only know how to say ni hao.
So what should we be teaching? Many experts argue that schools should downplay technical skills and emphasize general-purpose life skills: the ability to deal with change, to learn new things, and to preserve your mental balance in unfamiliar situations. In order to keep up with the world of 2050, you will above all need to reinvent yourself again and again.
To succeed in such a demanding task, you will need to work very hard on getting to know your operating system better—to know what you are and what you want from life. This is, of course, the oldest advice in the book: know thyself. This advice was never more urgent than in the mid-21st century, because unlike in the days of Laozi or Socrates, now you have serious competition. Coca-Cola, Amazon and Facebook are all racing to hack you.
Right now, the algorithms (算法) are watching where you go, what you buy, and who you meet. Soon they will monitor all your steps, breaths and heartbeats. They are relying on big data and machine learning to get to know you better and better. And once these algorithms know you better than you know yourself, they could control and manipulate (操纵) you. In the end, authority will shift to them.
Of course, you might be perfectly happy giving up all authority to the algorithms and trusting them to make decisions for you and for the rest of the world. If, however, you want to maintain some control over your personal existence and over the future of life in general, you have to run faster than the algorithms. To run fast, don’t take much luggage with you. Leave all your illusions (幻想) behind. They are very heavy.
1. What does the underlined word “downplay” in paragraph 3 most probably mean?A.Give too much emphasis on something. |
B.Make people think that something is less important. |
C.Offer your reasons why something is right or wrong. |
D.Decide something in advance so that it does not happen. |
A.imagination | B.adaptability | C.self-discipline | D.a good sense of balance |
A.if we don’t, algorithms will hack all our devices. |
B.it is an essential skill for us to succeed in the world of 2050. |
C.we need to learn how algorithms work and make full use of them. |
D.we need to outrun algorithms to keep some control over our personal life. |
A.the importance of knowing yourself |
B.the threats and dangers of technology |
C.what kind of skills we might need in the future |
D.some potential benefits algorithms would bring to humankind |